Recent Discussions
Partner Center Dashboard Access Issue
Hi all, I'm getting some reports that some of you who previously had access to Partner Center and the TSP Dashboard suddenly lost access in the last couple week. If this is you, can you please send me a direct message with a screen shot of what you're seeing, as well as the email address you're using to log into the site and your Microsoft Partner ID number. Please do not post that information as a reply to this thread. Please send directly to me DanDonohue. Thank you.2026 FabCon + SQLCon Europe Fabric in the Wild: Photo Scavenger Hunt
📸 Fabric in the Wild: Photo Scavenger Hunt at FabCon + SQLCon Europe Heading to FabCon + SQLCon Europe in Barcelona? Get ready to explore, connect, and have some fun with the Fabric community! We're excited to launch the Fabric in the Wild: Photo Scavenger Hunt, an exclusive experience for Microsoft partners attending the event. Whether you're networking at Partner Day, taking in the keynotes, meeting fellow partners, or discovering Barcelona, you'll have the opportunity to capture your adventure and win some exclusive Fabric swag. 🏆 Win Fabric Kicks Complete the challenge by sharing photos from any five scavenger hunt moments and you'll be entered for a chance to win 1 of 3 pairs of Fabric Kicks. 📷 How It Works ✅ Complete any 5 photo challenges from the hunt ✅ Share all 5 photos in a single LinkedIn post or carousel ✅ Include: #FabConEurope #MicrosoftPartner #FabricInTheWildSweepstakes ✅ Tag @Stephanie Chimeziri That's it. You're in! The scavenger hunt is all about celebrating the people, experiences, and energy that make the Microsoft Fabric partner community special. From Partner Day and keynotes to new connections and iconic Barcelona landmarks, we can't wait to see Fabric in the wild through your lens. Drop your photos, showcase your creativity, and share your FabCon story with the community! 🌍 See you in Barcelona. For more information about FabCon + SQLCon Europe, visit aka.ms/fabconeu #MicrosoftFabric #FabConEurope #SQLConEurope #MicrosoftPartner #FabricCommunity #DataAnalytics #FabricInTheWildSweepstakes #PartnerDay #MicrosoftPartnersHow channel partners participate in multiparty private offers
Multiparty private offers in Microsoft Marketplace enable software companies and channel partners to work together to create customized offers for customers with negotiated pricing, terms, and billing options. Watch this short video to learn the role of channel partners in the multiparty private offer process, including providing required Marketplace and customer information, reviewing pending partner actions in Partner Center, applying eligible pricing adjustments, adding custom terms or supporting documents, and submitting the offer for customer review. Whether you're new to multiparty private offers or looking to better support joint sales opportunities, this walkthrough provides an overview of the key steps channel partners complete before an offer can be shared with a customer.
Choosing the right offer type for your cloud and AI solutions
Whether you're bringing a new AI solution to market or evaluating how to scale an existing application, understanding Marketplace offer types can help you choose the right path to monetization and customer adoption. Check out this short video that compares the capabilities of SaaS offers, Container offers, and Azure managed applications to understand which model best aligns with your architecture, deployment requirements, and customer needs.
new partner tenant - price sheet API calls don't work
I work for a CSP direct partner with multiple tenants. We're currently setting up a Netherlands tenant, and I can't manage to make calls to retrieve price sheets. I think the underlying issue is that this tenant is missing the enterprise app for "Microsoft Partner" (ID 4990cffe-04e8-4e8b-808a-1175604b879f), so I can't add a permission for it to my app registration. Any clue how I can add it? Do I have to open a support ticket or can I do it myself? It's present in our other tenants (US, Ireland, etc.). Price sheet API docs: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/partner-center/developer/get-a-price-sheetSeller verification Rejected at Employment step — no email received, no appeal (ID 94611890)
Our Partner (MAICPP) verification completed successfully on 31 Aug 2026 — contact, identity (Verified ID) and business all Verified (Partner ID 7113511, DIGITAL QAZAQSTAN LTD, UK company no. 17178943). The Developer/seller verification for the same legal entity (Seller ID 94611890) is closed as "Rejected — no appeals available", stuck at "Employment Verification — Pending Partner Action" with an estimated date of 06.09.2026 still showing. No verification email or action request was ever received at the primary contact (monitored, junk folder included), and the closed page shows no Fix now / appeal / upload control. Root cause we identified: the seller profile contained an outdated registered address. It has been corrected and now matches Companies House exactly (Office 393, Unit 5, 399-405 Oxford Street, Mayfair, London W1C 2BU). Business verification documents show "Provided". A fully prepared transactable professional service offer is blocked from publication only by this verification. Could a Community Manager please escalate this to the Partner Vetting team to reopen or reinitiate the seller verification?Learn how leading partners drive co-sell success with Microsoft Marketplace
Want to create more Marketplace opportunities and strengthen your co-sell motion? Join Reis Barrie, CEO of Carve Partners, for a practical discussion on how leading software companies use Microsoft Marketplace to accelerate growth, engage Microsoft sellers, and create repeatable paths to revenue. You'll learn the fastest path toward transactable offers and Azure IP co-sell eligibility, explore the seller habits that consistently generate Marketplace opportunities, and discover strategies for identifying high-potential accounts and shortening sales cycles. The session will also cover Marketplace signals, funding opportunities, and proven engagement approaches that help partners build momentum sooner. Whether you're responsible for sales, alliances, Marketplace strategy, or go-to-market execution, this session offers actionable insights you can apply immediately. Stay for the live Q&A and bring your questions. Add to your calendar: How leading partners drive co-sell success with MarketplaceMarketplace Publishing - Email with the Certification Team
Greetings partners, fellows, and friends, Standards Core is a 2nd year ISV - we currently have 1 SaaS and 2 Office add-in listings, now working on our first Apps and agents for Microsoft 365 and Copilot ... we have submitted our first publish, can currently working to address certification details. Why am I posting this? Well, after the 1st submission, in addition to the certification report on Marketplace, we also received an email - thereafter questions/iterations were immediately interactive with very quick and clearly attentive responses. So I wanted to mention that we really appreciate that!! Previous submissions that I have experienced were through the submissions portal only - the personalized email interaction was a pleasant surprise, and made the process feel much warmer than the previous "formal" portal-only interaction. Thank you [certification team], and looking forward to re-submit shortly. Thanks again, Leon, CTO/Standards Core LLCLearn how to move co-sell opportunities from ready to closed-won with greater consistency
What separates co-sell ready opportunities from closed-won success? The answer often comes down to stakeholder alignment, commercial readiness, and a clear strategy for engaging Microsoft and partner resources at the right time. Join Kevin Flitcroft, Head of Sales for SaaSify at Spektra Systems, as he shares practical guidance for helping partners improve deal execution and revenue outcomes. Learn how to align opportunities to Microsoft priorities, determine when to engage Microsoft sellers, position Microsoft Marketplace early in the sales cycle, and support customer purchasing goals through effective commercial motions. You'll also explore the Audit/Activate/Run framework and discover how successful organizations create repeatable co-sell practices that help increase win rates, strengthen pipeline development, and drive more consistent business growth. Discover how leading partners turn co-sell opportunities into consistent business growth. Attend this live session to gain practical strategies you can apply to your next opportunity. Add to your calendar: Microsoft co-sell playbook: From co-sell ready to closed-wonThe AI Trust Gap: We're Auditing Outputs, But Nobody's Watching the Input
Hi all, Manjish here, founder of Pryvasee.AI. I want to open a conversation rather than make a pitch, because I think this is a problem bigger than any one company can solve, and I'd like to hear how others in this community are approaching it. Over the past year, watching enterprises adopt LLMs like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, etc one pattern kept showing up. Almost every governance conversation started after the prompt was sent. Teams were building dashboards to review AI outputs, running periodic audits, writing acceptable use policies. All useful, but all reactive. Nobody I spoke to had a clear answer to a much simpler question: what actually happens to the sensitive data in that prompt in the moments before it leaves your organisation's control? That gap is why we built Pryvasee.AI differently. Instead of sitting after the model and reviewing what came back, we sit before it. Pryvasee Guard screens prompts, documents, and images for PII, PHI, and PCI and other such sensitive data before anything reaches a model. Pryvasee Thread lets you run the same request across OpenAI, Gemini, Grok, and DeepSeek from one interface, so you're never trusting a single model's answer by default. And the Trust Engine scores every response that comes back for groundedness and hallucination risk, so there's a number behind "does this look right" instead of a gut feeling. We built it natively on Azure (AKS, Azure SQL, Azure SQL Ledger for a tamper evident audit trail) because we think the next wave of AI governance problems won't just be about data leakage. They will be about proving, after the fact, exactly what happened, for a regulator, an auditor, or your own board. Most organisations can't do that today for a single AI interaction, let alone thousands a day across four different model providers. We're early. MVP/Beta since July 2026, live on the Microsoft Commercial Marketplace since late August, and currently working through a handful of enterprise pilots rather than claiming a long customer list. I would rather be upfront about that than oversell it. What I'm genuinely curious about: for those of you building or advising on enterprise AI adoption, is anyone handling the "before the model" problem today, whether with tooling, policy, or something else? And do you think this becomes a bigger issue as more employees start using multiple AI tools side by side, or does it resolve itself as the big model providers add more guardrails natively? Would love to hear how others are thinking about this.
Can Marketplace Become the Trusted Delivery Ecosystem for Specialized Microsoft Services?
Over the past several years, Azure Marketplace has become an increasingly important mechanism for connecting customers, partners, publishers, and Microsoft. As Marketplace adoption grows, I have been reflecting on one aspect of ecosystem collaboration. Many customer initiatives involve multiple organizations, each with different responsibilities, commercial models, onboarding requirements, and procurement processes. This raises an interesting question for the community: Can Azure Marketplace play a larger role in reducing operational friction between Marketplace participants who are already transacting through the platform? Potential outcomes could include: Faster customer project execution. Simpler cross-organizational collaboration. Greater adoption of Marketplace-transactable solutions. Reduced administrative overhead. Increased Marketplace transaction activity. From a Marketplace ecosystem perspective, reducing friction between participants may create value for customers, partners, publishers, and Microsoft alike. I would be interested in learning: Whether others have encountered similar challenges. Whether existing Marketplace capabilities already address this area. Which future improvements would have the greatest impact. Looking forward to hearing the community's perspective.Discover how Dragon Copilot solutions can reach clinicians through Microsoft Marketplace
As healthcare organizations adopt AI to streamline care delivery, partners have a new opportunity to bring innovation directly into clinical workflows. Microsoft Marketplace now supports Dragon Copilot Physician Apps and Agents, helping partners deliver intelligent solutions that support documentation, clinical insights, and workflow efficiency at the point of care. Learn how Microsoft Marketplace helps partners publish, monetize, and scale Dragon Copilot solutions through flexible commercial models, trusted purchasing experiences, and targeted healthcare discovery experiences. Read the article to explore the new Dragon Copilot offer type and how to bring your healthcare innovation to market through Microsoft Marketplace. 👉 Read the full article: Accelerate healthcare innovation with Dragon Copilot apps and agents in Microsoft Marketplace
Microsoft Templates for Azure Application upload
Hi All, Are there ready to use templates for the documentation that Microsoft is requesting to upload for this offer type - such as Solution and Deployment Architecture, Customer Installation Guide, Customer Onboarding and Configuration Guide, Data Integration Guide. If yes, could someone share the links or the templates. Thank you!Verification docs resubmitted as requested — 9 business days, zero response — 2608140040001875
MPN Account ID: 7136847 Tracking ID: 2608140040001875 Timeline: Initial rejection on Aug 8. Case reopened, Vetting Operations requested additional business registration documents (address change filing + updated GST registration reflecting our current registered address). We submitted these on Aug 14, the same day they were requested. Your team's message committed to a follow-up within 2-3 business days — it's now been over a week with no acknowledgment of receipt or status update on the ticket. Could someone from Vetting Operations confirm receipt of the documents and the current review status? Happy to share any additional verification details by DM if that helps move this along. Thanks in advance. AshishVetting rejected 4 times, identical canned replies, no Fix Now, Program Not Found
We are stuck in a loop that Microsoft support is not fixing, and each closure comes with the exact same copy-paste line, no diagnostic detail, no path forward. Legal Info shows Vetting Status: Rejected, no Fix Now button anywhere on the page (screenshot 1). Verification Summary returns "Program Not Found — No current profile found for this program" (screenshot 2). Tax and Program pages are inaccessible from the same account. This is an existing account with two live Azure Marketplace offers already published, not a fresh signup. We have submitted four separate appeals. All four were closed with the same templated response, word for word: Ticket 2608130040002080: "We've reviewed your appeal for verification. Based on the information you have provided to date, we have determined that your organization does not currently meet the requirements to pass verification. We have closed your application. If you decide to reapply, please review the information at https://aka.ms/CSPVerification and http://aka.ms/PartnerVerification to ensure you meet the latest requirements." Ticket 2608140040001403: "We've reviewed your appeal for verification. Based on the information you have provided to date, we have determined that your organization does not currently meet the requirements to pass verification. We have closed your application." Ticket 2608190040002484: "We've reviewed your appeal for verification. Based on the information you have provided to date, we have determined that your organization does not currently meet the requirements to pass verification. We have closed your application. If you decide to reapply, please review the information at https://aka.ms/CSPVerification and http://aka.ms/PartnerVerification to ensure you meet the latest requirements." Not one of these responses names a single missing document, a single mismatched field, or a single requirement we have failed to meet. "The information you have provided" is never specified. There is no Fix Now button to submit anything against, and Verification Summary does not even acknowledge the program exists. We are being asked to "reapply" against a process that gives no indication of what to change. Four appeals, four identical form letters, zero actionable detail. This is not a verification process, it is a wall. We need someone from Vetting Operations to state plainly what specifically is failing on this legal entity, or to escalate this out of the templated-response queue entirely. Happy to provide Seller ID, tenant ID, and all four ticket numbers again by DM if that speeds this up.How to get your cloud and AI solutions co-sell eligible on Marketplace
A transactable Microsoft Marketplace offer can play an important role in supporting your broader go-to-market strategy with Microsoft. This video walks through the essentials of Marketplace co-sell qualification. You'll also gain insight into how approved offers may participate in Microsoft customer-focused selling motions and help customers transact using committed Microsoft cloud spend.
Legal entity vetting rejected: BusinessDpl, no Fix Now button, Verification Summary error
Our legal entity vetting in Partner Center is Rejected, Sub-Status dplVerification, Reason BusinessDpl. There is no Fix Now option for this sub-status. The Verification Summary page returns "Program Not Found." The Tax and Program pages are both inaccessible. Our Microsoft AI Cloud Partner Program registration also shows as deactivated. We have raised four support tickets with no resolution: 2607220040001822, 2607210040001506, 2608130040002080, 2608140040001403. Could a moderator confirm whether BusinessDpl requires review by the internal compliance team, and if so escalate this case to them? Happy to share our One Vet ID, Seller ID, and entity details by DM rather than posting them here. Thank you.Make confident buying decisions with Microsoft Marketplace
Help customers make confident technology decisions with a buying experience built around choice, flexibility, and business needs. Join this live Microsoft Marketplace session on September 2, 2026, to learn how intelligent discovery, free trials, private offer requests, and flexible contract durations can support evaluation and purchasing conversations. Partners will gain practical guidance for working with business, technology, procurement, and IT stakeholders throughout the buying process. Use the session to sharpen co-sell conversations, connect solution value to customer priorities, and discuss commercial arrangements that fit each organization. Registration is not required. Add the event to your calendar, sign in to the Tech Community, select Attend for reminders, and post questions before or during the live broadcast. Explore the event and prepare your next customer conversation today. 👉 Attend the session live: Evaluate and buy solutions with Microsoft Marketplace
Recent Blogs
- 1 MIN READAccess the latest Instructor-Led Training (ILT) updates anytime at http://aka.ms/Courseware_Title_PlanAug 28, 2026
- 2 MIN READWant to dive into the details of negotiated deals and how to create them? Head to App Advisor: https://aka.ms/GrowMySales Not all customers buy apps in the same way. Some need negotiated pricing. O...Aug 28, 2026
