Forum Widgets
Latest Discussions
Why UserId and sender ID of the email are different when operation is sensitivitylabelapplied
We are investigating an incident response by reviewing O365 audit logs and have noticed that, for some emails, the User-ID and Sender ID are different when the operation "Sensitivity Label Applied" is recorded.However, there is another specific channel for your mentioned concern where you will get some possible information for certain specific resources and platform from our related community members.SolvedShiv_BFeb 09, 2025Copper Contributor38Views1like3CommentsApproval for Sensitive Label change
Hello everybody! I have some sensitivity labels available to users, each with its definite priority. In DLP, there is a policy that limits the external shipping of an email according to the chosen label. It happens that this way, the user can exchange to any label just by justifying. We need to create an approval of the manager or another specific person, or even another way to prevent the user from choosing a label that allows him from sending the document or email externally. Would that be possible? Or any other way to meet this? Best regards, Breno PadovanSolvedbrenoacpFeb 06, 2025Copper Contributor56Views0likes2CommentsConfiguring Alerts for Sensitivity Label Modifications in Microsoft Purview
Hello everyone, I am currently working with Microsoft Purview and I would like to configure alerts that notify me via email whenever a sensitivity label is modified by a user, whether authorized or not. Iām looking for a native configuration option for this or any alternative solutions using Power Automate, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (MDCA), or any other tool that might be suitable. If anyone has already implemented such a mechanism or can provide guidance or documentation, I would greatly appreciate your help! Thanks in advance for your responses.SolvedArmelFotsoFeb 04, 2025Copper Contributor43Views0likes1CommentOnboarding Devices: "No authenticated user found"
Hi, I am looking to onboard a device in Purview for the purpose of testing some Endpoint DLP policies. I have ran the onboarding script locally and the device successfully appears on the 'Devices' screen. 'Real time protection/RTP' and 'Behavior monitoring/BM' both show as 'enabled' with a green tick, however under 'Valid User' it has a red cross and states: "Invalid: No authenticated user found. Without proper authentication, data classification is impeded. To ensure precise validation, we recommend re-onboarding to Active Directory". The device is in active directory. I have signed into the device with an account that is also in Active Directory. Is there anything additional that I need to do? Any help would be really appreciated - thank you!!!Solvedsp1984Jan 19, 2025Copper Contributor174Views2likes4CommentsGroup writeback doesn't sync back to Entra..
an't find documentation on this if this should actually work or not. I enabled group writeback, which63~06ā643ā414 works fine. Now if I add a user to one of those groups in local Active Directory and sync the user to Entra, the user isn't a member of the group here. Might be just normal behavior, but would be nice if it did sync.SolvedKurban25Nov 18, 2024Copper Contributor26Views0likes3CommentsCan't assign confidential sensitivity label - The label selected is unavailable in office on the web
Hello All, I've been experiencing following issue, whenever I try to assign a confidential sensitivity label (which is the highest label in my case) to a doc in MS 365 or sharepoint I'm getting following error ( details of error, key config settings of the label and policy are listed below): Note: I'm able to assign other lower level sensitivity labels on the web, but not confidential label Appreciate any help in resolving this issue. Error when assigning confidential label to a doc: Error Confidential Label key settings: Following is the main config Policy label key settings: Confidential label has been correctly published to a policy as show below I'm one of the user with the ability to create and assign labels.SolvedSunrise2924Nov 01, 2024Copper Contributor231Views0likes2CommentsInbound Sensitive Information
Hello All, We currently have some DLP policies to restrict Financial Data, HIPPA, and PII data from leaving our org. However, is there a way to restrict this type of sensitive data from being sent into the org? For example, an external address sends some sensitive data to a specific mailbox. Can a DLP policy be created to block that data from reaching a specific mailbox and reply back the email was blocked due to the content? Thanks for any info!SolvedIanG562Nov 01, 2024Brass Contributor202Views0likes3CommentsLegal Hold Communication Acknowledgment links broken by Welcome pop-up
The acknowledgment link generated by Microsoft in a legal hold communication typically takes users to a Purview page with the message "Thank you! Your acknowledgment has been recorded." But now, the ever-present "Welcome to the new Microsoft Purview portal!" pop-up displays, regardless of the user's permissions, and there's no way to close it or bypass it to reach that "Thank you" page. The "Thank you" page loads in the background, but it's partially obscured by the "Welcome" message. Can we please do something to either get rid of this welcome message or disassociate it from these legal hold acknowledgment links?Solvedtgraham-legalopsOct 30, 2024Brass Contributor135Views0likes2Comments
Resources
Tags
- purview58 Topics
- microsoft purview37 Topics
- dlp23 Topics
- Azure Purview10 Topics
- endpoint dlp8 Topics
- Retention Labels8 Topics
- Retention Policy8 Topics
- Sensitivity Labels7 Topics
- sharepoint7 Topics
- eDiscovery6 Topics