Pinned Posts
Forum Widgets
Latest Discussions
Search for shared pornographic images
I already have an active policy in Communication Compliance that captures shared pornographic images. Now, I'd like to perform an online search for images that were stored before this policy was created. Is this possible?Solvedanderson2510Oct 07, 2025Copper Contributor48Views0likes2CommentsIs it possible to prevent Microsoft Purview from being applied to M365 within the tenant?
Hello. Thank you for viewing my post. I am currently considering trying out Purview to enhance data management within Microsoft Fabric. However, I am facing an issue where I cannot proceed to proof-of-concept testing because the impact on the M365 environment used within the tenant is unknown. I have reviewed Microsoft's official information and understand the following: ・Using Purview features for M365 requires an E5 license ・Using Purview for Fabric requires a pay-as-you-go Purview subscription However, I still haven't confirmed what specific impact it might have on M365. I'm looking for ways to use Purview solely for Fabric, or methods to identify specific operations/settings that could affect M365. I would greatly appreciate any insights you could share.Solvedurua-hrOct 03, 2025Copper Contributor39Views0likes1CommentApply Sensitivity label on SharePoint or Teams site to block offeline sync
Hi All, I was wondering is there any way if we apply a label toa SharePoint or Teams site (backed by SharePoint), we can enforce restrictions such as "Don't allow offline sync". Thanks in advance, DilanSolved120Views2likes2CommentsCopilot DLP Policy Licensing
Hi everyone We are currently preparing our tenant for a broader Microsoft 365 Copilot rollout and in preparation to that we were in the progress of hardening our SharePoint files to ensure that sensitive information stays protected. Our original idea was to launch sensitivity labels together with a Purview data loss prevention policy that excludes Copilot from accessing and using files that have confidential sensitivity labels. Some weeks ago when I did an initial setup, everything worked just fine and I was able to create the before mentioned custom DLP policy. However, when I checked the previously created DLP policy a few days back, the action to block Copilot was gone and the button to add a new action in the custom policy is greyed out. I assume that in between the initial setup and me checking the policy, Microsoft must have moved the feature out of our licensing plan (Microsoft 365 E3 & Copilot). Now my question is what the best licensing options would be on top of our existing E3 licences. For cost reasons, a switch to Microsoft 365 E5 is not an option as we have the E3 licences through benefits. Thanks!SolvedStefan19x9aSep 08, 2025Copper Contributor241Views0likes2CommentsAuto-Labeling based on data in Document Properties doesn't work
I have a customer who is moving away from Titus sensitivity labels to MIP sensitivity labels, and I need to migrate their documents from one label taxonomy to the other. Titus creates two document properties in an Office document, TitusGUID and Classification, with text values representing the label GUID and the name of the Titus label. I have created an auto-labeling policy that searches a test SharePoint site and uses "Document property is", and then added the above DP's. I went into SharePoint and added both of them to the search index of the tenancy, unfortunately i've had no luck in getting the policy to detect my test documents. I then decided to create a SIT containing these keywords and when I tested the SIT against a test document, it successfully detected them. I then created a 2nd rule in my auto-labeling policy that looks for the SIT, but it still didn't detect the test documents when I ran the simulation. I finally created a test document with the keywords and values in the body of the document, ran the simulation and within a few minutes it had detected the document. So clearly there is an issue with the auto-labeling policy identifying sensitive data in the Document Property fields. Could anyone confirm if they have been successful in getting this functionality to work, using either method? Thanks.SolvedCameronStephens2Aug 05, 2025Copper Contributor148Views0likes3CommentsPurview sensitivity label modernization Label grouping Roadmap ID: 386900
Hello team, Purview will implement a new way to organize labels: https://admin.microsoft.com/Adminportal/Home?#/MessageCenter/:/messages/MC1111778 https://www.microsoft.com/en-ca/microsoft-365/roadmap?id=386900 Do you know where can I get information about how this upgrade will impact the current taxonomy for sensitivity labels, I am using label, label parent and sublabels. I reviewed in microsoft learn without any information about this feature.SolvedsergioandreslqAug 03, 2025Copper Contributor211Views0likes1CommentDoes anyone know what the 'CS019-009' error means for eDiscovery premium jobs?
Hello, Once in a while, a job in eDiscovery premium will fail with error "CS019-009". For example when preparing search preview, making an export or adding a collection to a review set. The job will give status "failed". When restarted, the job runs completely fine so we never create a ticket for this. I can't seem to find anywhere what "CS019-009" means. Is this a generic error? Thanks in advance!Solved102Views1like1CommentAuto-Apply Sensitivity Label
I am working on DLP and Information Protection feature of Purview to utilize the Sensitive Info Types. In DLP, I made a policy to send alerts when the SITs are found. In Information Protection, I have sensitivity label and configured to auto apply it once it detects the SIT. I use the same SIT on alert and in sensitivity label. Upon doing tests on several documents, I am receiving alerts via email because the SIT is found. However, the automatic application of SIT on the document does not persist, even it's been 2 weeks since I have created the document. Other information: *Upon publishing other labels, i did not configure any default labels on documents. *Tenant is US *Im working in the Philippines Here is the email i am receiving coming from the DLP policy. Here is my configuration of the sensitivity label.Solved_simon22Jul 25, 2025Copper Contributor247Views0likes5CommentsAccessing Content explorer data via SPN
Hi all, I am trying to get all the data from Content explorer for SITs matched files using https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/exchange/export-contentexplorerdata?view=exchange-ps. I can run the command(Export-ContentExplorerData) when using User-Principle login but having issues while running it on SPN. For SPN Permissions, we followed the steps here https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/exchange/app-only-auth-powershell-v2?view=exchange-ps assigned all the permissions on the page but still having issues when running the script. One of the permission for SPN that seems mandatory is Content Explorer Content viewer. Now in purview portal, we are not able to assign this permissions to SPN as it throws an errror "Adding SPN to purview role groups is not supported" Can we run this command(Export-ContentExplorerData) based on SPN(using application permission)? if yes what are the permission we need to assign to that SPN. Thanks in advanceSolvedmrityunjay6492Jul 24, 2025Copper Contributor198Views0likes3CommentsClient Side Auto Labelling Not Working
Hi All, I have configured some rules for client-side auto labelling, sometimes it works, sometimes it does not. It is supposed to upgrade the documents to Protected B. Is anyone else experiencing this or should i be making changes to the configurations? Please see attached.SolvedAishatJul 14, 2025Copper Contributor151Views0likes2Comments
Resources
Tags
- purview107 Topics
- microsoft purview56 Topics
- Sensitivity Labels16 Topics
- ediscovery14 Topics
- Information Protection13 Topics
- Azure Purview12 Topics
- Retention Policy11 Topics
- Retention Labels8 Topics
- endpoint dlp8 Topics
- api8 Topics