Relabeling files won't reflect the Label changes
I am running Microsoft Purview Scanner, where we scanned and applied the Default Label "Internal" to all the documents in the file share for "One Folder". After that has been applied successfully, we realized that some of the Access Controls in the Label called "Internal" need to be updated. So we enabled Access control permissions for this label to include the "Export" option. I thought changes made to a published label would reflect already labeled files. But it doesn't. Even though we opened and closed one file and didn't reflect my changes. Steps we tried: Re-ran scan with the option to re-label existing files (already labeled files) with the same label to see if it reflect new changes. But nothing. We reset the Scan service and restarted the server too. nothing worked. Do anyone know if a Label is applied already to files in file share and we update some of the settings for the same label, with the changes reflect properly? I know it reflects in cloud, but not sure why it can't reflect in file shares
Cannot update Case number in Microsoft Purview eDiscovery
I can no longer update the Case number under case settings in the new eDiscovery UI. I used to be able to update it via the externalId Graph endpoint but that appears to be deprecated. The error simply reads "update failed" - there is no additional information. Is anyone else having this problem?
Some Fabric Lakehouse tables not appearing in Microsoft Purview after scan
Hi everyone, I’m running into an issue where several tables from a Fabric Lakehouse aren’t appearing in Microsoft Purview after a workspace scan. Here’s the situation: I scanned a Fabric workspace that contains multiple Lakehouses. For most Lakehouses, the tables appear correctly in Purview after the scan. However, for one specific Lakehouse, several tables that I know exist aren’t showing up in the scanned assets — even after adding the Lakehouse as an asset to a data product in the Unified Catalog. What I’ve tried: I rescanned the workspace and the specific Lakehouses. I verified that the tables are persistent (not temporary) and appear under the Tables section in Fabric, not only as files. I confirmed permissions for the Purview connection account. Scan results and errors: After the rescan, the tables still didn’t appear. The scan logs show several ingestion errors with messages like: Failed to ingest asset with type fabric_lakehouse and qualified name [qualified name] due to invalid data payload to data map I checked the error entries to see which assets they point to, and none of them are related to the tables in the Lakehouse in question. There were four of these errors in the last run. Additional context: Some older Lakehouses that had been archived months ago in Fabric still appeared as active in Purview before the rescan, so there may be stale metadata being retained. Notes: I’m aware Fabric scanning in Purview currently has sub-item scanning limitations where item-level metadata is prioritised, and individual tables aren’t always picked up. But given that tables from other Lakehouses appear as expected, and given the ingestion errors (even though the errors do not point to the missing tables), it feels like there may be a metadata sync or processing issue rather than a simple coverage limitation. Question: Has anyone encountered this behaviour or the “invalid data payload to data map” error before? Any guidance on further troubleshooting steps would be appreciated. Thanks in advance!Microsoft Compliance Assessment issues - ASD L1
Hi, We are using Microsoft Compliance Assessments in Microsoft Purview In the Microsoft Compliance Manager we have enabled the ASD Essentials Level 1 assessment Under the Microsoft Actions There are 2 actions, one is: Malicious Code Protection - Periodic and Real-Time Scans (SI-0116) The issue that currently the testing status is 'failed low risk' , but the testing status has the date tested as Monday Sep 30 2024, well before we opened the assessment, also with notes that are completely irrelevant to this client and certainly not something we have put in. The information in there is quite long, I can provide a txt file with this information I have checked the documentation and we have implemented the required security configuration With these items set the way they are we have no way to complete the assessment
Duplicate file detection
Hi Community, I need to scan multiple windows file servers using Microsoft Purview and one of the asks is to detect and identify duplicate files on those. Can someone please guide how that can be accomplished. What functionality needs to be used and how to go about duplicate detection? Note that this is primarily duplicate finding assignment for files as in office documents and pdfs. Thanks.
Microsoft Default Credit Card Number is not working effectively.
Hi All, I just observe that Microsoft default SIT for Credit Card is detecting more False Positives, it is detecting the 16 digit transaction numbers, tracking ID's, Receipt numbers and even Microsoft support ticket numbers also detecting as Credit Card Numbers. how can we finetune the Microsoft Default SIT to make sure it should detect only valid Credit Card Numbers.Unable to login to purview once Classic interface retired
Once Microsoft forced the retirement of the Classic portal, I have been unable to login to Purview. I opened a case and it went nowhere, we have not changed anything with our account permissions or roles during this period, but Microsoft obviously changed something drastic. We'd been using Purview classic without any problems, we simply got a message last year that "Microsoft had migrated us" and never worked since. Earlier in the year, we'd encounter an error, now (without changing anything) we get to a screen that reads "Select a Microsoft Purview account" and it lists our Microsoft Entra ID (only one to choose) but the next prompt to select from a drop-down under "Account name" has no options. Is Microsoft documenting common scenarios for what they've broken? Support refused (or were unable) to actually dig into our tenant or configuration to look, they just sent article after article that didn't apply to our situation.Custom SITs fine tunned in MIP
Hello Everyone, Currently working on MS Purview Solutions greenfield deployment project for one of the customer for on-premise data and M365 data. I have created few custom SITs classifiers with regex pattern in the MIP portal almost 3 months ago and it's classifying the data as expected but with some false positives. All of them are fine-tuned to prevent false positives. It's scanning and classifying the newly created M365 data as expected. However it's not reclassifying the previously classified false positive data. How can I forcefully rescan/reclassify the false positive M365 data. I just want to reclassify the data with fine-tuned custom SITs to correctly classify the data before labelling. One more question related to on-prem scanners. I have started the on-prem scanners to scan all the SharePoint sites and Fileshares for any sensitive information. Initially its ran full scan and later it's started as incremental scan. Above scan started before creating the custom SITs and labels. Now I want run a full scan just to classify the data with recommending the labels based on the sensitive data instead of enforcing and applying the label. Can someone throw some light which options need to be select for just recommending the label instead of applying the label. Current configuration as shown below: Any help really appreciated. Regards Anand SunkaSecure your data—Microsoft Purview at Ignite 2025
Security is a core focus at Microsoft Ignite this year, with the Security Forum on November 17, deep dive technical sessions, theater talks, and hands-on labs designed for security leaders and practitioners. Join us in San Francisco, November 17–21, or online, November 18–20, to learn what’s new and what’s next across data security, compliance, and AI. This year’s sessions and labs will help you prevent data exfiltration, manage insider risks, and enable responsible AI adoption across your organization. Featured sessions: BRK250: Preventing data exfiltration with a layered protection strategy Learn how Microsoft Purview enables a layered approach to data protection, including AI and non-AI apps, devices, browsers, and networks. BRK257: Drive secure Microsoft 365 Copilot adoption using Microsoft Purview Discover built-in safeguards to prevent data loss and insider risks as you scale Copilot and agentic AI. LAB548: Prevent data exposure in Copilot and AI apps with DLP Configure DLP policies to protect sensitive data across Microsoft 365 services and AI scenarios. Explore and filter the full security catalog by topic, format, and role: aka.ms/Ignite/SecuritySessions. Why attend: Ignite is your chance to see the latest Purview features, connect with product experts, and get hands-on with new compliance and data protection tools. Microsoft will also preview future enhancements for agentic AI and unified data governance. Security Forum (November 17): Kick off with an immersive, in‑person pre‑day focused on strategic security discussions and real‑world guidance from Microsoft leaders and industry experts. Select Security Forum during registration. Connect with peers and security leaders through these signature security experiences: Security Leaders Dinner—CISOs and VPs connect with Microsoft leaders. CISO Roundtable—Gain practical insights on secure AI adoption. Secure the Night Party—Network in a relaxed, fun setting. Register for Microsoft Ignite >
