Forum Widgets
Latest Discussions
Purview Destruction of Records Not Working
Hi everyone, I work for a Microsoft Partner Organization, we are experiencing issues with our Purview Implementations as the records are not being destroyed from SharePoint as expected event though the audit log registered all successful approvals for destructions including details on the stages, the comments and the label. We have waited 15 days as per the Purview's documentation and the content is still in the source library. Is anyone else experiencing a similar issue? The instability of the platform is forcing us to stop offering Purview as a solution to our customers and we are leaning more toward developing our own records management solution. We have created a ticket, but Microsoft has not responded, there is no priority to resolve this issue and unfortunately our customers can't wait. If anyone has a solution, please share it with the community. If there are any Purview experts from Microsoft that can offer any ideas, I would appreciate it. Note: Auditing is on for the organization and the email enabled security group and the Disposition Reviewers are in the correct roles: Disposition Reviewer, Records Management, Compliance Admin, List View Explorer and Content Explorer. Also, my configuration is set correctly, I have proof as the audit log indicates content has been approved for destruction weeks ago. Thank you!
Logs not available for PDF applied with sensitivity label
We created sensitivity labels for files and can apply them to files (docx, xlsx, pdf). However, we found that there were no activity logs for PDF in activity explorer nor in audit search. Activity logs were available for MS office documents (docx, xlsx). Is there any way we can enable logging for PDF documents with labelled content? Thanks
No logs for PDF applied with sensitivity label
We created sensitivity labels for files. It works well for MS Office documents (docx and xlsx) and PDF and we can apply them to files via Office application/online (docx and xlsx) or Adobe Acrobat (pdf). However, there was no activity log in Activity explorer for PDF with labelled contents. We searched it in Audit and there is no log as well for PDF. It did have logs for Office documents in Activity explorer and Audit, and I can see who applied label and read Office document in Activity explorer/Audit. Is there any additional setup need to enable log collection for PDF with sensitivity label? ThanksUrgent Issue - Purview Labels ready for review are not showing in the Disposition Review Panel
Our Records Management Solution was working properly, but all of the sudden the labels used are not showing in the disposition review panel. As you can see the Overview is able to identify our latest labels, 1 Day Review Del and 1 Day Review D. There records should be retained for one day only, it has been many weeks and the records still do not display in the disposition review panel. My account is noted as the disposition reviewer and I am in the e-mail enabled security group as well. As I mentioned, in previous months I was getting notified of the review and I was able to access and review the records, but not any more. Below is what the disposition review panel looks like, the count for all labels in inaccurate, the label Policy of one day is not listed. Microsoft recommended to turn on auditing in the tenant, we followed the steps and the issue is still not resolved. Does anyone have any idea of what else needs to be enabled in the tenant for Purview to work properly? Thank you
Same Assets two different Qualified Names.
I scanned assets in Microsoft Purview using two methods: 1. Importing assets directly from an on-prem SQL Server 2. Importing lineage from Azure Data Factory However, Purview is tagging the fully qualified names differently for each method, which is causing it to treat the same dataset as two separate assets. The Onprem one has a prefix of "MSSQLSERVER"Infront of the DB name. I've attached screenshots for more context. Is this the default behavior? If yes, how do I override it? Or is there any other solution for this one.Fabric Warehouse is not extracting metadata like tables and its columns in Purview
Hello Team, Good Evening..! We noticed that the metadata in Datawarehouse is not extracting Schema(Tab) which contains Tables and its columns We scanned Lakehouse using Service prinicple where metadata extraction is done as expected but it is not the same in Data Warehouse after the scan completes. Are there any other options to get that metadata extracted under warehouse ? Please guide us the best possible methods to handle this situation. Regards, Naresh InagantiSharing: PDF readers that support Purview labels
As I was researching on Adobe Acrobat reader and Sensitivity labels, I decided to check if the common alternative PDF readers out there are able to support Purview MIP Sensitivity labels. There is already a published documentation on this for SharePoint-Compatible PDF readers that supports Microsoft IRM: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/sp-compatible-pdf-readers-for-irm (last updated Nov-2023) but I wanted to see if these same PDF readers supports the ability for end-users to use/ select labels similar to that of Adobe Acrobat As of 11-June-2025; atleast one of them clearly do: Nitro PDF: Yes. Documentation shows that users can see and use the sensitivity labels. PDF -X.change Editor: Yes. Documentation show that users can see and use the sensitivity labels. (check the official website, I can't hyperlink it because the site is blocked. FOX PDF editor: No. Documentation only states RMS and not clear if it show Purview labels. This is for F.O.X.I.T editor (spelled without the ".") but for some reason there is a community ban on that word and it won't allow me to post the full name PDFescape: No. Sumatra PDF: No Okular: No If there are other PDF readers that I've missed, I encourage you list it down in the comment below. Would love to grow this list.
Was muss im MS Purview einstellen damit ich auch diese Vertraulichkeitsbezeichnung
Was muss im MS Purview einstellen damit ich auch diese Vertraulichkeitsbezeichnung Alex Reviewit - Confidential: This content is proprietary information intended for internal users only. This content can be modified but cannot be copied and printed. Vertraulichkeitsbezeichnung Confidential View Only: This content is proprietary information intended for internal users only. This content cannot be modified. Erhalte
Microsoft Purview Encryption on Third Party Apps
Hello Community, I’m working with a desktop-based correspondence management system (CMS) application and would like to apply encryption to the documents that are being created, handled, or stored by this application. Specifically, I’m looking to use Microsoft Purview Information Protection to classify and encrypt these documents. Could someone please guide me on: The steps or best practices to integrate Microsoft Purview labels (with encryption) into a third-party or in-house desktop application? Whether Microsoft Purview SDK or API can be used in such scenarios, and if so, what the implementation flow looks like? Any prerequisites or limitations I should be aware of (e.g., licensing, file formats, offline handling)? How to ensure persistent encryption when files are exported from the application (e.g., to network drives or shared folders)?
