Forum Widgets
Latest Discussions
Sharing: PDF readers that support Purview labels
As I was researching on Adobe Acrobat reader and Sensitivity labels, I decided to check if the common alternative PDF readers out there are able to support Purview MIP Sensitivity labels. There is already a published documentation on this for SharePoint-Compatible PDF readers that supports Microsoft IRM: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/sp-compatible-pdf-readers-for-irm (last updated Nov-2023) but I wanted to see if these same PDF readers supports the ability for end-users to use/ select labels similar to that of Adobe Acrobat As of 11-June-2025; atleast one of them clearly do: Nitro PDF: Yes. Documentation shows that users can see and use the sensitivity labels. PDF -X.change Editor: Yes. Documentation show that users can see and use the sensitivity labels. (check the official website, I can't hyperlink it because the site is blocked. FOX PDF editor: No. Documentation only states RMS and not clear if it show Purview labels. This is for F.O.X.I.T editor (spelled without the ".") but for some reason there is a community ban on that word and it won't allow me to post the full name PDFescape: No. Sumatra PDF: No Okular: No If there are other PDF readers that I've missed, I encourage you list it down in the comment below. Would love to grow this list.
Was muss im MS Purview einstellen damit ich auch diese Vertraulichkeitsbezeichnung
Was muss im MS Purview einstellen damit ich auch diese Vertraulichkeitsbezeichnung Alex Reviewit - Confidential: This content is proprietary information intended for internal users only. This content can be modified but cannot be copied and printed. Vertraulichkeitsbezeichnung Confidential View Only: This content is proprietary information intended for internal users only. This content cannot be modified. Erhalte
Microsoft Purview Encryption on Third Party Apps
Hello Community, I’m working with a desktop-based correspondence management system (CMS) application and would like to apply encryption to the documents that are being created, handled, or stored by this application. Specifically, I’m looking to use Microsoft Purview Information Protection to classify and encrypt these documents. Could someone please guide me on: The steps or best practices to integrate Microsoft Purview labels (with encryption) into a third-party or in-house desktop application? Whether Microsoft Purview SDK or API can be used in such scenarios, and if so, what the implementation flow looks like? Any prerequisites or limitations I should be aware of (e.g., licensing, file formats, offline handling)? How to ensure persistent encryption when files are exported from the application (e.g., to network drives or shared folders)?
Urgent Issue - Purview Labels ready for review are not showing in the Disposition Review Panel
Our Records Management Solution was working properly, but all of the sudden the labels used are not showing in the disposition review panel. As you can see the Overview is able to identify our latest labels, 1 Day Review Del and 1 Day Review D. There records should be retained for one day only, it has been many weeks and the records still do not display in the disposition review panel. My account is noted as the disposition reviewer and I am in the e-mail enabled security group as well. As I mentioned, in previous months I was getting notified of the review and I was able to access and review the records, but not any more. Below is what the disposition review panel looks like, the count for all labels in inaccurate, the label Policy of one day is not listed. Microsoft recommended to turn on auditing in the tenant, we followed the steps and the issue is still not resolved. Does anyone have any idea of what else needs to be enabled in the tenant for Purview to work properly? Thank you
Making NEW process feel like the OLD one
With most Microsoft products, you can usually make NEW versions feel and work like the OLD ones as you make the transition. But this new Microsoft Purview seems to do away with a lot of the functionality of the "Classic eDiscovery" process. Are there any ways to get things back, such as: Larger PST file size limits? Mine appear to be stuck at 10GB now De-duplication. This appears to be gone. Extract all results into a single folder. This appears to be gone Do allow the search to look for Teams, Sharepoint and OneDrive results even if i opt not to extract them?
Microsoft Purview DLP block all / allow some?
I am configuring Microsoft DLP to protect sensitive information from being uploaded on internet by any medium such as browser, 3rd party apps or exfiltration by malwares. When I configured the policy, under Service domain and browser activities tab, I can see that there is no way of blocking by default. It means that, I first need to define apps in "restricted apps and apps groups" of DLP settings and have to define list of browsers under "Browser and domain restrictions to sensitive data". 1. Is there a way that I block all browsers (without entering them into unallowed list) in policy and allow some? 2. Is there a way that I can block all apps to access my sensitive information and allow only oneDrive lets say? If I add list of apps in restrictions, someone can make a custom app and upload files into it and my policy will be bypassed since that app will not be part of restricted apps list. Please advice on both.Endpoint DLP Not Enforcing Real-Time Blocking
Hello Team, I’m currently testing Microsoft Purview Endpoint DLP and have configured policies to block sensitive data activities (e.g., copying to personal Gmail, uploading to cloud apps, etc.). I’ve enabled enforcement mode and selected “Block” for all activities like copy to clipboard, file uploads, and print. However, despite this configuration: Activities are only being audited, not blocked in real time In Activity Explorer, enforcement mode shows as “Audit” Example: I copied sensitive content into Gmail (saved as draft), and it was not blocked What I’ve already checked: Enforcement mode is set to “Block”, not just “Audit” Device is onboarded and showing healthy in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Logged in with a user in scope of the policy Verified DLP policy is enabled and published Confirmed content matches sensitive info type Why does the activity still show “Audit” even when set to block? Are there any additional settings, delays, or known issues? How can I force real-time enforcement? Is there a way to validate/test if the policy is fully enforced? Attaching screenshot of DLP policy and activity explorer for better understanding error. Looking forward to your suggestions.
Forced to new purview portal nothing works or is too slow
so what we feared has occured; forced to the new portal and nothing works. cannot change roles we have roles as they worked in the old portal but new portal doesn't seem to accept the custom roles. cannot implement content search across SPO anyone else having issues?Snowflake and vnet
Hi Folks, I'm really keen to use Purview with snowflake and am finding the drip feed of features a bit frustrating. After waiting for data quality in snowflake, it turns out that it doesn't (yet) work with vNet's. This is necessary for my setup unless a fixed IP address for Purview is possible without a vNet / IR? As a user allowing administrators to configure / reuse the same connection(s) defined in data map (which do work with a vNet and snowflake) in the unified catalogue would be a better user experience. Is this on the roadmap? if so, when is it likely to drop? James
