Pinned Posts
Forum Widgets
Latest Discussions
Classification on DataBricks
Hello everyone, I would like to request an updated confirmation regarding the correct functioning of custom classification for Databricks Unity Catalog data sources. Here is my current setup: The data source is active. Source scanning is working correctly. I created the custom classification in “Annotation management / Classifications”. I created and successfully tested the regular expression under “Annotation management / Classification Rules”. I generated the Custom Scan Rule Set in “Source management / Scan Rule Sets”, associated to Databricks and selecting the custom rule. However, when running the scan on Databricks: I do not find any option to select my Scan Rule Set (for another source like Teradata, this option is visible). No classification findings are generated based on my custom rule. Other tests do produce findings (system-generated). Does anyone have insights on what I should verify? Or is this custom classification functionality not supported for Databricks?
Automatic sensitivity label on existing labeled documents and emails
If I enable today automatic sensitivity labeling for label "Confidential" on behalf on sensitive information type "Credit Card" and 1000 documents are labeled with the label "Confidential". What happend if I remove the sensitive information type "Credit Card" from the label "Confidential", and put it on the Automatic sensitivity label "Highly Confidential". What happend to the 1000 documents which already have the label "Confidential"? Will it be modified to "Highly Confidential" or not?
M365 Compliance connector error in Power Automate flow with retention label action
Hi everyone, I've been troubleshooting this issue for some time now but haven't found a solution yet. I'm configuring retention labels in Purview that trigger a 'Run a Power Automate Flow' action at the end of the retention period. This functionality is outlined in this Microsoft Learn article: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/retention-label-flow The issue arises on the Power Automate side. To set up the flow that integrates with the retention label, the Compliance 365 Connector must be used. This connector requires a Power Automate Premium license, which I have on my account. The flows are also set up in the Default Power Automate environment, as required. Despite following all the necessary steps, the flows won't launch. I keep encountering the same error each time. I've even tried creating multiple retention labels and corresponding flows, each using the compliance connector, but the result is always the same. I've attached documentation with screenshots for reference: First error in flow checker: When opening the flow I see ‘Forbidden Error’ and ‘The response is not in JSON format’ These are the inputs: These are the outputs: For test purposes I created multiple retention labels with each time configured to start the flow 1-5 days after the label is applied. Each time getting the same errors. I know it can sometimes take some time for a labels action to be run, but has been a few months now. Please help
Email to external(trusted user) not require verify user Identity(with Google or One-time passcode)
Dear Expert and Community, I am starting with MS Purview - Data Loss Prevention. I have one point to clarify and seek your advise / comment / contribute or sharing good practice regarding with below: - Firstly, we can send email to externally user contain sensitive information, it is encryption or blocked (result: worked as expected). If remail encrypt, the external receiver require verify the Identity via sign in with google acc / with a one time password. - Second: we plan sending email to external user (only trusted user / domain). Is it possible, do not require these scope user reverify their Identity again and again? If yes, how to do it? If not - why? Well appreciated for update and supporting. Thanks,
Purview Data Map scanning Microsoft Fabric and no classifications applied or scan rule sets
Microsoft Purview cannot currently apply built-in or custom classifications (including sensitive information types) to metadata discovered from Microsoft Fabric workspace scans. While Purview can register Fabric workspaces and extract structural metadata (workspaces, Lakehouses, Warehouses, tables, columns, and limited lineage), classification rules are not executed against Fabric assets in the same way they are for supported sources such as Azure SQL, ADLS Gen2, or on-prem databases. This results in classification gaps across a core enterprise analytics platform. Why This Is a Significant Service Omission 1. Breaks the Core Value Proposition of Purview 2. Undermines Regulatory and Risk Management Controls 3. Creates an Inconsistent Governance Experience 4. Blocks Downstream Purview Capabilities 5. Forces Anti-Patterns and Workarounds The lack of automated classification support for Microsoft Fabric workspace data represents a material service omission in Microsoft Purview, significantly limiting its effectiveness as a unified data governance platform and introducing avoidable compliance, operational, and assurance risks—particularly in regulated environments. Are there plans to improve this and if so what are the timescales?Issue Using Built in Trainable Classifiers in Auto Labelling Policies - Purview
Over the last few days, I have run into issue while configuring Auto labelling policies in Purview specifically when using built in classifiers for eg: Budget, Agreements These classifiers are parr of ready to use. They have been working well for us until recently but now saving an auto labelling rule that includes any of Trainable classifiers getting client side error: 'Could not find rule pack associated with sensitive information type' this is unexpected because: same classifiers eg: Budget worked perfectly just few weeks ago. No changes have made to roll, permissions on our side. Still not sure why showing issue now. Kindly request you, help me with root cause of the cause. Please feel free to post it comments if someone faced same issue in using trainable classifiers in auto labelling policies. Thanks in advance. Regards, BanuMuraliFuture - Purview vs Fabric for governance
I was wondering if anyone else was struggling to determine where exactly the future of Purview is regarding Data Governance? I see Microsoft pushing a ton of Data Governance functions into Fabric along with promoting the Catalog and Governance capabilities are in Fabric, but this doesn't cover the Enterprise. We are working to build a more robust Enterprise Data Governance solution, but I'm struggling to find reasons to build out Purview with all of the direction in expanding Fabric more than I hear news around Purview. Purview doesn't even ingest metadata on tables and columns from Fabric Lakehouse and Warehouse? Hoping gather other's experience and view points.
Onboard devices in Purview is grayed out
I’m getting started with Microsoft Purview and running into issues onboarding devices. In the Purview portal, no devices appear, and the “Onboard devices” option is grayed out. I have EMS E5 licenses assigned to all users, and I’m signed in as a Global Admin with Purview Administrator and Security Administrator roles. All devices are managed by Intune and run Windows 11 Enterprise with the latest updates. They are Microsoft Entra joined (AAD joined), show up correctly in Defender, and their Defender onboarding status is active and onboarded. What piece am I missing that would prevent these devices from showing in Purview and keep the onboarding option disabled? Any guidance would be appreciated.Snowflake and vnet
Hi Folks, I'm really keen to use Purview with snowflake and am finding the drip feed of features a bit frustrating. After waiting for data quality in snowflake, it turns out that it doesn't (yet) work with vNet's. This is necessary for my setup unless a fixed IP address for Purview is possible without a vNet / IR? As a user allowing administrators to configure / reuse the same connection(s) defined in data map (which do work with a vNet and snowflake) in the unified catalogue would be a better user experience. Is this on the roadmap? if so, when is it likely to drop? JamesCan´t Sign confidential documents
Hello, I have a problem. I want to send confidential contracts to customers for signing with Adobe DocuSign. This contracts have a label "confidential" from purview and are encrypted. But now the customer cant sign the contract with DocuSign because of the encryption. Is there a way that they can sign the document? We must encrypt the documents because compliance reasons and ISMS. Thank you.
