Label Inheritance in outlook.
When an attachment with a higher-priority sensitivity label is added, the email initially inherits that label. However, after the attachment is removed, the email reverts to the default label, and if another attachment with a different (higher priority) label is subsequently added, the email does not automatically inherit the new label. Is this correct behavior and any MS doc related to this?When the default sensitivity label is applied, an asterisk (*) appears next to the label.
When I open a Word document and the default sensitivity label (e.g., INTERNAL) is applied, an asterisk appears next to the label along with a message indicating that the file hasn’t been saved yet. Is there any detail Microsoft documentation that explains this behavior? This only occur for default label if I try to remove default label (without saving word file) and apply any other label then * mark is not there.
How to Unassign Assets from Data Products in Microsoft Purview at Once
Hello, I’ve assigned around 100 assets to a specific data product and would now like to unassign all of them at once, rather than removing them individually. Using the Purview REST API with Python, I was able to retrieve the list of my data products and successfully identify the target data product. However, I haven’t been able to fetch the list of assets currently assigned to it, which prevents me from performing a bulk unassignment. Could anyone please advise how to retrieve and unassign all assets from a data product programmatically?Cannot update Case number in Microsoft Purview eDiscovery
I can no longer update the Case number under case settings in the new eDiscovery UI. I used to be able to update it via the externalId Graph endpoint but that appears to be deprecated. The error simply reads "update failed" - there is no additional information. Is anyone else having this problem?
Some Fabric Lakehouse tables not appearing in Microsoft Purview after scan
Hi everyone, I’m running into an issue where several tables from a Fabric Lakehouse aren’t appearing in Microsoft Purview after a workspace scan. Here’s the situation: I scanned a Fabric workspace that contains multiple Lakehouses. For most Lakehouses, the tables appear correctly in Purview after the scan. However, for one specific Lakehouse, several tables that I know exist aren’t showing up in the scanned assets — even after adding the Lakehouse as an asset to a data product in the Unified Catalog. What I’ve tried: I rescanned the workspace and the specific Lakehouses. I verified that the tables are persistent (not temporary) and appear under the Tables section in Fabric, not only as files. I confirmed permissions for the Purview connection account. Scan results and errors: After the rescan, the tables still didn’t appear. The scan logs show several ingestion errors with messages like: Failed to ingest asset with type fabric_lakehouse and qualified name [qualified name] due to invalid data payload to data map I checked the error entries to see which assets they point to, and none of them are related to the tables in the Lakehouse in question. There were four of these errors in the last run. Additional context: Some older Lakehouses that had been archived months ago in Fabric still appeared as active in Purview before the rescan, so there may be stale metadata being retained. Notes: I’m aware Fabric scanning in Purview currently has sub-item scanning limitations where item-level metadata is prioritised, and individual tables aren’t always picked up. But given that tables from other Lakehouses appear as expected, and given the ingestion errors (even though the errors do not point to the missing tables), it feels like there may be a metadata sync or processing issue rather than a simple coverage limitation. Question: Has anyone encountered this behaviour or the “invalid data payload to data map” error before? Any guidance on further troubleshooting steps would be appreciated. Thanks in advance!Microsoft Compliance Assessment issues - ASD L1
Hi, We are using Microsoft Compliance Assessments in Microsoft Purview In the Microsoft Compliance Manager we have enabled the ASD Essentials Level 1 assessment Under the Microsoft Actions There are 2 actions, one is: Malicious Code Protection - Periodic and Real-Time Scans (SI-0116) The issue that currently the testing status is 'failed low risk' , but the testing status has the date tested as Monday Sep 30 2024, well before we opened the assessment, also with notes that are completely irrelevant to this client and certainly not something we have put in. The information in there is quite long, I can provide a txt file with this information I have checked the documentation and we have implemented the required security configuration With these items set the way they are we have no way to complete the assessmentCompliance Meets AI: Wrapping Up an Incredible Series and Looking Ahead
Over the past six sessions, the Compliance Meets AI webinar series has taken us on a journey through the evolving landscape of compliance, security, and generative AI. From SharePoint advanced management and data security posture for AI to eDiscovery, auditing, and communication compliance, we’ve explored how Microsoft Purview and Copilot can transform governance strategies. Today’s final session, Deep Dive: Insider Risk for Copilot, was a powerful close to the series. Led by Kevin Uy and supported by our team, we unpacked how Insider Risk Management (IRM) helps organizations detect and mitigate risky behaviors—intentional or accidental—before they become costly incidents. Key highlights included: Risky AI Usage Policies: How to monitor prompts and responses for sensitive data exposure across Copilot and third-party AI tools. Policy Templates & Indicators: Leveraging built-in templates for data leaks, health record misuse, and AI-specific risks. Integration with DLP: Understanding how IRM complements real-time blocking by providing investigative context. Adaptive Protection: Moving from passive monitoring to proactive enforcement by linking IRM insights with DLP policies. If you missed today's session: No worries you can watch the recording here https://aka.ms/Compliance-Meets-Ai-Session-Six We also shared practical tips on policy configuration, threshold tuning, and privacy controls, plus a sneak peek at forensic evidence and case escalation workflows. Why This Series Matters Compliance isn’t just about meeting regulatory requirements—it’s about building trust in an era of AI-driven innovation. This series brought together experts and practitioners to demystify complex topics and provide actionable strategies for safeguarding sensitive data while enabling productivity. What’s Next? The conversation doesn’t stop here. We’re thrilled to announce that Compliance Meets AI will return in 2026 with new topics, deeper demos, and fresh insights into governance for emerging technologies. Expect sessions on advanced AI risk scenarios, cross-cloud compliance, and automation strategies that redefine security operations. Stay tuned for registration links early next year—and in the meantime, revisit all six recorded sessions here and follow me on LinkedIn for ongoing updates. Thank you to everyone who joined us for this series. Your engagement and feedback shape what comes next. Here’s to a future where compliance and AI work hand in hand to empower secure innovation.
Duplicate file detection
Hi Community, I need to scan multiple windows file servers using Microsoft Purview and one of the asks is to detect and identify duplicate files on those. Can someone please guide how that can be accomplished. What functionality needs to be used and how to go about duplicate detection? Note that this is primarily duplicate finding assignment for files as in office documents and pdfs. Thanks.
