copilot
4 TopicsI just want to secure AI. DLP vs Info Protection vs DSPM vs Governance vs...
I'm with an MSP, and I've avoided Purview like the plague, because it seems to be suffering from the same 'made by marketing teams' 'strategy' the 365 documentation is. However, it's my understanding Purview policies are needed for Data control of Copilot. Here's my issue: all of these different 'solutions' sound like the exact same thing, but are pitched as if they are something different. i'm going to post a couple of descriptions for these 'solutions' to illustrate this. 'discover, label, and protect sensitive and business-critical info' 'make sure your organization can identify, monitor, and protect sensitive info across the expanding Microsoft 365 landscape' 'discover and secure all your sensitive data across Microsoft 365 and non-365 data sources' 'Discover, label, and protect sensitive and business-critical info across your multicloud data estate.' I genuinely do not have time to figure out what each of these 'solutions' are, then figure out their policies, then their giant library of settings (below)... It's not even clear to me what's active NOW, considering we never licensed Purview - but somehow have been roped into it. It SEEMS like these are all variations of marketing terms, which all point to 3-4 actual technical implementations in obscure ways. Can someone advise on the ACTUAL technical policies we want to target and enable? Or just give some clarity? I've never felt so overwhelmed or disconnected from Microsoft's environment. We just want to secure our tenant's AI usage.97Views0likes4CommentsMicrosoft 365 Copilot not showing up as location in DLP
Hi, I am working on implementing security measures for Microsoft Copilot in a client environment. I want to create a DLP policy to not process data with certain sensitivity labels but when I go into DLP to create the policy, the location for Microsoft 365 Copilot is not an option. I also noticed that the "Fabric and Power BI workspaces: location is also not available. I have checked other similar client M365 tenants, and both of these locations are available by default. Any insight would be appreciated.694Views0likes5CommentsNew blog post: Is Your Data Ready for Microsoft 365 Copilot?
Is Your Data Ready for Microsoft 365 Copilot? Microsoft 365 Copilot is a game-changer for productivity, but here’s the catch: Copilot surfaces what users already have access to. If your governance isn’t in order, sensitive data could be exposed. In my latest blog, I share: ✅ How to prevent oversharing in Teams & SharePoint ✅ Why sensitivity labels are critical for Copilot ✅ How to monitor usage and avoid shadow AI ✅ Why you don’t need perfect governance to start 📖 Read the full blog: Microsoft 365 Copilot Data Readiness Checklist 👉 What’s your biggest challenge with Copilot readiness? Drop your thoughts below!88Views0likes0CommentsCopilot DLP Policy Licensing
Hi everyone We are currently preparing our tenant for a broader Microsoft 365 Copilot rollout and in preparation to that we were in the progress of hardening our SharePoint files to ensure that sensitive information stays protected. Our original idea was to launch sensitivity labels together with a Purview data loss prevention policy that excludes Copilot from accessing and using files that have confidential sensitivity labels. Some weeks ago when I did an initial setup, everything worked just fine and I was able to create the before mentioned custom DLP policy. However, when I checked the previously created DLP policy a few days back, the action to block Copilot was gone and the button to add a new action in the custom policy is greyed out. I assume that in between the initial setup and me checking the policy, Microsoft must have moved the feature out of our licensing plan (Microsoft 365 E3 & Copilot). Now my question is what the best licensing options would be on top of our existing E3 licences. For cost reasons, a switch to Microsoft 365 E5 is not an option as we have the E3 licences through benefits. Thanks!Solved715Views0likes2Comments