Feb 11 2019 02:03 PM
Hello,
When I enforce values in a column in a library (in a team site), and then when uploading a file, I am not forced to enter metadata, the file simply shows "Required info" in the column.
Is it not possible to enforce that metadata be entered for required fields? Currently I upload files and no enforcement of metadata when I have required fields set.
Thank you
Feb 11 2019 04:26 PM
SolutionFeb 15 2019 01:49 PM
Jun 21 2019 05:46 AM
I believe the only way to force users to add metadata when uploading a document is by using a list to capture the required fields, have the users then upload a document or documents, then use a MS Flow to move that data over to a document library, maybe after some approvals occur or using a delay or timer, etc. Having the ability to require the metadata when someone is uploading a file and not letting them save it until they do complete all the information, such as occurs in a SharePoint list, would be a really GREAT feature! I have been having issues getting all of the metadata over to the library even though it is written in the Flow. @Robert Lien
Jun 21 2019 07:31 AM
I do not believe there is a silver bullet to address the problems associated with adding metadata to content. In addition to the above mentioned methods there are alternatives that may help. For example, use
- tools that require users to select content types (and set properties) during uploading
- tools that automatically extract properties from the uploaded content (e.g. PDF keywords, email subject, GPS coordinate, ...) and capture the values as metadata
- "inheritance" (e.g. documents uploaded to a project folder inherit the folder's metadata that are project specific)
- tools that provide "auto-classification" capabilities
Paul | SLIM Applications
http://www.slimapplications.com
Oct 30 2019 08:50 AM
Hi,
I found a WA for that problem. You can use the the old link /sites/XXXXX/_layouts/15/UploadEx.aspx for the upload ant then you have to fill in the required metadata.
Nov 07 2019 02:41 PM
That sucks hearing this because I like making sure people put in metadata when they upload documents. You really only get once chance to get it from the user and that's the best time to get it...upon uploading.
Also...now I can't run a workflow with the metadata I'm expecting from the user when they upload a document. There's workarounds I use but overall that sucks. I like the old experience which would force the user to add the metadata and basically keep the document checked out.
Nov 07 2019 02:45 PM
@cbankx Agree, we should at least have an option to force, or allow bypass IMO. And what happens if it's forced and skipped (Save file as draft , or remove/don't upload)
Nov 08 2019 09:00 AM
@cbankx good point about workflows. This is not working as a required field. Required means required, not flagged. If I make a column REQUIRED I expect that the item will not be added to the library unless something is entered for that field. I don't want a library with a whole bunch of "Required info" flags.
Nov 08 2019 09:10 AM
Nov 11 2019 02:06 AM - edited Nov 11 2019 02:09 AM
@tpogue - AGREE
What is the use of setting up a version control library with Approval workflow but you do not have to specify the approver name????
Must admit the more I work with cloud and flow the more problems there is and I truly feel that this is a step backward from on-premise with Workflow / Enforced metadata / Designer workflow / reusable workflows etc...
Almost if this was a rushed job to get the functionality out without proper investigation / scoping or testing
(ANGRY EMOJI)
Apr 22 2020 08:17 AM
What is the point of making a metadata field required if it is not required...in this context, it really means, "we'd like this value, but you don't need to include it." Words have meanings.
Sep 17 2020 11:47 AM - edited Sep 17 2020 11:48 AM
@hcvman This is one of the starker examples of Msft's completely amateurish understanding of ux. There's a huge difference between telling users to upload documents and fill in the required fields and telling them to upload a document and THEN REMEMBER TO GO TO THE LIBRARY VIEW AND FILL IN WHAT'S MISSING. Worse still, there's no alert or notification that they need to do this. Msft "recommends" classifying with metadata rather than folders, yet they've removed an absolutely essential compliance component in getting users to do this. So now daily I get complaints from users because documents with missing tags "aren't showing up" in predefined views .... really, really stupid, Msft.
Feb 13 2022 04:55 AM
@matt howellI suggest using M-Files if this is a real pain point for you. It integrates well with SharePoint as well.
Apr 05 2022 03:50 AM
@DushilinoDo you have a link for that tool?
Jun 28 2023 07:45 AM
The only way is to use third party product like Shareflex, they combine a list and a library. A list behaves differently compared with a library. In a list you cannot store the item unless the mandatory fields have content. Shareflex uses the list for the metadata and the SP library for the files.
Jun 29 2023 09:03 AM
@Robert Lien
See Collab365 for a list with best document management apps: link