Recent Discussions
Using Github Copilot from Azure Subscription
Hello, I have a question on how GitHub Copilot can be accessed and managed through an Azure subscription. If I am getting a Github Copilot license, how is my azure subscription getting linked to the billing and licensing? Specifically, I would like clarification on how the Azure subscription is linked to GitHub Copilot billing and licensing.32Views0likes1CommentSign in to Azure DevOps
The https://dev.azure.com URL redirects to the landing page for the Azure DevOps product. I used to promote this as an URL to use to login to the product. Since this year the page is missing the "Already have an account? Sing in to Azure DevOps" link. As far as I can see there is no way to login to Azure DevOps trough this interface now. There is the usual "sing in" in the top right, which will redirect you to the azure portal (or at least for me it does). How are we supposed to login to Azure DevOps? Old login:Solved454KViews5likes16CommentsMFA required for Global Admin without Conditional Access or PIM enforcement
Hi, I'm analyzing a break-glass account scenario in Microsoft Entra ID and would like to validate a behavior I'm observing. The account: Has Global Administrator role (permanent assignment) Is excluded from all Conditional Access policies (fully validated) Is excluded from Authentication Methods policies and MFA Registration Campaign (fully validated) Has no per-user MFA enabled (disabled) PIM is not enforcing MFA (role is permanently active, no activation required) Security Defaults are disabled SSPR is not enforcing MFA All configurable sources that could require MFA have been reviewed and fully ruled out. However, when signing into Microsoft Admin Portals (Entra/Azure), MFA is still required and cannot be skipped. In Sign-in logs: Conditional Access → Not Applied Authentication Details show: "MFA required in Azure AD" "App requires multifactor authentication" Additionally, there is a Microsoft-managed policy: "Multifactor authentication for admins accessing Microsoft Admin Portals" but it is in Report-only mode. Question: Is Microsoft Entra ID enforcing MFA automatically for privileged roles (like Global Administrator) in admin portals, even when no Conditional Access or PIM policy requires it? And if so, is there any supported way to fully exclude a break-glass account from this behavior? Thanks in advance.15Views0likes0CommentsAzure Artifact Signing: SignTool "Access is denied" with active Public Trust profile
I’m blocked on Azure Artifact Signing for Windows EXE signing. What is already confirmed: - Account endpoint: https://wus2.codesigning.azure.net/ - Code signing account: notarios - Certificate profile: notarios-public-trust (Public Trust, Active) - Identity validation: Completed - User object id: 9aa27294-c04d-4aab-a7b2-3a8b10be96f9 - RBAC includes: - Artifact Signing Identity Verifier - Artifact Signing Certificate Profile Signer (also assigned at certificate profile scope) Signing command (signtool 10.0.26100.0 x64 + dlib): ... sign /v /debug /fd SHA256 /tr http://timestamp.acs.microsoft.com /td SHA256 /dlib "<...>\\Azure.CodeSigning.Dlib.dll" /dmdf "C:\temp\metadata-corr.json" "C:\temp\notarial-app-test.exe" Error every time: - SignTool Error: Access is denied. - Number of files successfully Signed: 0 I also tested Azure CLI auth and explicit AccessToken in metadata; same result. CorrelationId for troubleshooting: - notarios-20260425-1859 If anyone from Microsoft can check backend logs for that CorrelationId, I’d appreciate the exact reason and remediation.15Views0likes1CommentLegacy SSRS reports after upgrading Azure DevOps Server 2020 to 2022 or 25H2
We are currently planning an upgrade from Azure DevOps Server 2020 to Azure DevOps Server 2022 or 25H2, and one of our biggest concerns is reporting. We understand that Microsoft’s recommended direction is to move to Power BI based on Analytics / OData. However, for on-prem environments with a large number of existing SSRS reports, rebuilding everything from scratch would require significant time and effort. Since Warehouse and Analysis Services are no longer available in newer versions, we would like to understand how other on-prem teams are handling legacy SSRS reporting during and after the upgrade. Have you rebuilt your reports in Power BI, moved to another reporting approach, or found a practical way to keep existing SSRS reports available during the transition? Any real-world experience, lessons learned, or recommended approaches would be greatly appreciated.40Views0likes1CommentAzure RBAC Custom Role Best Practices or Common Build Patterns
As a platform admin, I want to grant application admins Contributor access while removing their ability to write or delete most Microsoft.Network resource types, with a few exceptions such as Private Endpoints, Network Interfaces, and Application Gateways. Based on the effective control plane permissions logic, we designed two custom roles. The first role is a duplicate of the Contributor role, but with Microsoft.Network//Write and Microsoft.Network//Delete added to notActions. The second role adds back specific Microsoft.Network operations using wildcarded resource types, such as Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/*. Application Admin Effective Permissions = Role 1 (Contributor - Microsoft.Network) + Role 2 (for example, Microsoft.Network/networkInterfaces/, Microsoft.Network/networkSecurityGroups/, Microsoft.Network/applicationGateways/write, etc.) I understand that Microsoft RBAC best practices recommend avoiding wildcard (*) operations. However, my team has found that building roles with individual operations is extremely tedious and time-consuming, especially when trying to understand the impact of each operation. Does anyone have suggestions for a simpler or more maintainable pattern for implementing this type of custom RBAC design?83Views1like2CommentsVPN Gateway - BGP AS PATH - Steer which VPN tunnel traffic will flow form Azure to OnPrem
Can anyone confirm whether in the topology that Microsoft calls "Active-active VPN gateways" we can steer which VPN tunnel is utilized using AS PATH? Or is it by definition active/active, meaning we can't avoid utilizing both tunnels simultaneously and probably we have to deal with asymetric routing? MS article about different topologies: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/vpn-gateway/vpn-gateway-highlyavailable#activeactiveonprem My findings: Because the Azure gateway instances are in active-active configuration, the traffic from your Azure virtual network to your on-premises network will be routed through both tunnels simultaneously, even if your on-premises VPN device might favor one tunnel over the other. However, according to the Microsoft FAQ about BGP: Yes, Azure VPN gateway honors AS Path prepending to help make routing decisions when BGP is enabled. A shorter AS Path is preferred in BGP path selection.1.3KViews1like2CommentsCommon Security & Governance Blind Spots in Azure Integration
"Hello everyone, I'm starting a discussion to gather insights on a critical topic: security and governance for Azure Integration Services (AIS). As environments grow with dozens of Logic Apps, Functions, APIM instances, etc., it becomes harder to maintain a strong security posture. I’d like to hear from your experience: What are the most common security and governance blind spots people miss when building out their integration platforms on Azure? To get us started, here are a few areas I'm thinking about: Secret Management: Beyond just "use Key Vault," what are the subtle mistakes or challenges teams face? Network Security: How critical is VNet integration and the use of Private Endpoints for services like Service Bus and Storage Accounts in your opinion? When is it overkill? Monitoring & Observability: What are the best ways to get a single, unified view of a business transaction that flows through multiple Azure services for security auditing? Looking forward to a great discussion and learning from the community's collective experience!"84Views0likes1CommentDynamic hostpool sessions not updating
We have created a dynamic host pool in a test environment. We see that new hosts are being created based on the scaling plan. However, these are no longer being deleted. When we look at the status, we see that there are no active sessions, but when we zoom in on the session hosts, it shows that there is a session on two of the three hosts. The latter is incorrect, but it is likely the reason why scaling down is not taking place. Does anyone recognize this? Is there possibly a solution for this? Small addition: If I log in with a user and then log out properly, the current sessions in the host pool overview are updated quickly. However, if I then go to Manage, Session Hosts, the total sessions on that host remain at 1. When I now put the host in drinamode, only then are the actual sessions updated.41Views0likes1CommentAzure ExpressRoute - Cisco Meraki MX or directly into LAN?
We are in the process of deploying Azure ExpressRoute across multiple sites via a provider Layer 2 VPLS circuit and are evaluating our CPE options. Our provider is delivering a Layer 2 handoff to each site, meaning we are responsible for all Layer 3 BGP configuration on the customer edge. We currently run a full Cisco Meraki environment — Meraki MX appliances as our edge firewalls and Meraki MS switches on the LAN side — and are wondering if anyone has successfully terminated an ExpressRoute BGP session directly on a Meraki MX, or alternatively terminated it directly into the LAN without a dedicated edge router in between. Terminating ExpressRoute BGP directly on a Meraki MX appliance — is this even possible given Meraki's limited BGP support? Connecting the Layer 2 provider handoff (dot1Q or QinQ) directly into a Meraki MS LAN switch and routing from there — has anyone made this work, and what were the caveats? Running a dedicated CPE router in front of the Meraki MX — and if so, how did you handle the integration between the CPE router and the Meraki SD-WAN fabric, particularly around route advertisement and traffic steering? Our provider model uses QinQ VLAN tagging with a provider-assigned S-tag and customer-defined C-tags for private and Microsoft peering. Since the provider is only delivering Layer 2, all BGP session establishment, prefix advertisement, and routing policy must be handled entirely on our CPE. Our understanding is that Meraki MX does not support QinQ subinterfaces or the level of BGP policy control needed for ExpressRoute, but we wanted to see if anyone has found a creative workaround before we commit to dedicated CPE hardware at each site. Device recommendations welcome: If a dedicated CPE router is the only viable path, we'd also love to hear what devices others have used successfully for this use case. Our circuit is 1Gbps, so we need something that can handle that throughput comfortably with BGP active — but we're a mid-size enterprise and are looking for cost-effective options rather than carrier-grade platforms. What has worked well for you without breaking the budget? Any real-world experience, gotchas, or recommended architectures would be greatly appreciated, especially from anyone running a Meraki-only environment who has tackled this!30Views0likes1CommentProblems with FSLogix 3.26 - W11 MU - 10 users per Vm
Scenario Overview We are documenting a recurring intermittent Denial of Service (DoS) regarding user profiles in an AVD multi-session environment using Azure Files Premium (SMB). The issue consistently surfaces after updating to the FSLogix 3.26 branch (v3.26.126.19110). Root Cause Analysis (Failure Logs) Through deep log analysis, we identified a "driver poisoning" pattern unique to version 3.26: SMB/Kerberos Handshake Sensitivity: Under varying storage response times (latency spikes of ~350ms vs. the usual ~40ms), version 3.26 triggers an intermittent 1326 error (Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password). Driver Execution Flow Corruption: Unlike previous versions, after this initial network/authentication glitch, the 3.26 driver fails to release execution threads or volume handles properly. Catastrophic Failure (Error 267): The system attempts to access the SecuredProfileRegData path within the mounted VHDX, but the driver returns Event ID 26: "0x10b - The directory name is invalid". Unrecoverable "Zombie" State: Once Error 267 occurs, the VM becomes "poisoned." It blocks all subsequent login attempts and even prevents a clean uninstallation of the agent (MSI Error 0x80070643 due to files being "in use"), necessitating a full VM reboot or redeployment. Has anyone else been through this? My first step was to go back to Agent Version 2506 (2210 Hotfix 4) Evidence of Success with Version 2506 (2210 Hotfix 4) After performing a clean deployment and reverting to version 3.25.626.21064, metrics from April 24, 2026, show absolute stability on the same infrastructure: Consistent Logon Times: Average profile load time of 1.6 seconds across multiple concurrent users Storage Efficiency: FindFile response times remained stable between 39ms and 45ms, with the agent successfully retrying any momentary delays. Error Resilience: Unlike v3.26, if this version encounters an authentication glitch (e.g., on a local service account), it bypasses the error and remains functional, allowing domain users to log in without collateral blockages. Concurrency Support: Seamlessly managed over 20 simultaneously mounted volumes without pointer collisions or kernel hangs.47Views0likes1CommentCopy an Epic with all child work items
Is it possible to copy an Epic with all child work items - i.e., User stories and tasks in addition to the Features? Reason is that we have several Epics with the same structure of Features with its subitems/child work items > User stories > Tasks. I’m able to utilize “Create copy of work items” at several levels and copy the levels child work items – however I would like to create a template with all levels: Epic > Features > User stories > Tasks. Is that possible, and if so how?18KViews1like6CommentsAKS on AzureLocal: KMSv1 -> KMSv2
Hey, quick question on AKS Arc — we're running moc-kms-plugin:0.2.172-official on an Arc-enabled AKS cluster on Azure Local and currently have KMSv1=true as a feature gate to keep encryption at rest working. KMSv1 is deprecated in 1.28+ and we want to migrate to KMSv2 before it gets removed. Since moc-kms-plugin is a Microsoft-managed component we can't just swap it out ourselves. A few questions: Does version 0.2.172 already support the KMSv2 gRPC API, or is that coming in a later release? Is there a supported migration path for AKS Arc specifically, or does this come automatically through a platform update? Any docs or internal guidance you can point us to? Thanks!33Views0likes1CommentDynamic hostpool scaling not working
We have set up an AVD dynamic host pool for testing. The scaling plan properly ensures that a host is created when needed. However, the host is no longer removed even after the rampdown. We observe that the total sessions counter gets stuck. If I log in with a user and then log out properly, the current sessions in the host pool overview are updated quickly. But, if I then go to Manage, Session Hosts, the total sessions on that host remain at 1. Only when I put the host in drain mode are the actual sessions updated. Still hosts are not removed. Anyone seen this before?41Views0likes1CommentAzure Diagnostic data cannot be processed by Azure Stream Analytics due to InputDeserializerError
Planning to steam Azure resource(frontdoor) diagnostic logs to stream to Azure Stream Analytics. However, having troubles on this one as data specifically from AzureDiagnostics failed to get deserialized as input for Stream Analytics job. Error: Error while deserializing input message Id: Partition: [0], Offset: [3663944], SequenceNumber: [285]. Hit following error: Column name: ErrorInfo is already being used. Please ensure that column names are unique (case insensitive) and do not differ only by whitespaces. It's caused by a duplicating column, errorInfo and ErrorInfo on AzureDiagnostic Table, which I am unsure what distinguishes them apart when observing its values. Have any thoughts or solution in mind on how we could simplify or transform these Diagnostic log to possibly remove this duplicating column prior to getting ingested to the Stream Analytics job? Have initially thought of the following solutions, but they aren't so straight-forward and probably costs more and would like to hear other's thoughts as well. 1. Transformation using DCR. I beleive this is ideal for sending Diagnostic Logs to Log Analytics workspace. but this would mean diagnostic logs have to pass through the workspace and then get exported to Stream Analytics which to achieve, may require to add in more components in between the data pipeline. 2. Logic App. Saw somewhere where a scheduled Logic App(probably run by schedule) is used to export data using a query (KQL) from Log analytics workspace then get sent to a storage. Has to modify the destination to an event hub instead perhaps. yet again, to many layers just to pass on the data to ASA. Any other solution you can suggest to refining the incoming data to ASA while minimizing the utilization of compute resources?763Views0likes1CommentExcluding break-glass account from MFA Registration Campaign – impact on existing users?
Hi everyone, I'm currently reviewing the configuration of a break-glass (emergency access) account in Microsoft Entra ID and I have a question regarding MFA registration enforcement. We currently have an Authentication Methods Registration Campaign enabled for all users for quite some time. We identified that the break-glass account is being required to register MFA due to this configuration. The account is already excluded from all Conditional Access policies that enforce MFA, so the behavior appears to be specifically coming from the registration campaign (Microsoft Authenticator requirement). Our goal is to exclude this break-glass account from the MFA registration requirement, following Microsoft best practices. My question is: If we edit the existing registration campaign and add an exclusion (user or group), could this have any impact on users who are already registered? Specifically, could it re-trigger the registration process or affect existing MFA configurations? We want to avoid any unintended impact, considering this campaign has been in place for a long time. Has anyone implemented a similar exclusion for break-glass accounts within an active registration campaign? Any insights or confirmation would be really helpful. Thanks in advance!Solved92Views0likes2Comments'NO_ROUTE_FOUND' error when using truck or car as travelmode
Error when using https://atlas.microsoft.com/route/directions/json?&subscription-key=xxxxxxx&api-version=1.0&language=nl-BE&maxAlternatives=5&travelMode=truck&query=50.70012%2c3.26978:51.043181141774%2c4.0974215693209945 with mode 'bicycle' it works fine.710Views0likes1CommentAVD Environment- FSLogix Profile Login Failure – Write Protected Error
Hi, We are currently facing an issue with FSLogix user profiles in our environment and would appreciate your assistance in identifying and resolving the problem. Issue Description: Users are unable to log in successfully, and we are encountering the following error message: "No Create access → The media is write protected." Environment Details: Session Hosts: Microsoft Entra joined Users: Hybrid identities Profile Storage: Azure File Share Authentication Method: Identity-based access using Microsoft Entra Kerberos Configuration Details: We have assigned the FSLogix user group the role "Storage File Data SMB Share Contributor" on the Azure file share. Registry entry for Kerberose Ticket is also created. NTFS permissions have been configured via Azure Portal (Manage Access), granting Modify permissions to the FSLogix profile users on the file share folder. We can see that user profiles and corresponding VHDX files are being created successfully during login attempts. Problem Statement: Despite the successful creation of profiles and VHDX files, users are still unable to log in, and the error mentioned above persists. We would like your guidance on: Possible causes for the "write protected" error despite correct role and NTFS permissions. Any additional configurations or validations required for FSLogix with Entra Kerberos authentication. Recommended troubleshooting steps or logs we should review to isolate the issue. Please let us know if you need any additional logs, screenshots, or configuration details from our end. Looking forward to your support. Best regards, Ravi Yadav26Views0likes0Comments
Events
Tune in for updates, insights, and live Q&A to help you buy from the Microsoft Marketplace. Follow this page for updates on the topics that will be covered during this month's session. Note: Offic...
Wednesday, May 27, 2026, 08:30 AM PDTOnline
0likes
5Attendees
0Comments
Recent Blogs
- What's a Plugin? A plugin bundles two things: Skills — Operational knowledge (triage runbooks, policy rules, known issues) the agent reads at runtime to guide its reasoning MCP Connectors — L...Apr 29, 202632Views0likes0Comments
- Azure AI Foundry is Microsoft’s enterprise platform for building, deploying, and operating AI applications and intelligent agents as first‑class Azure workloads. From an infrastructure perspective, F...Apr 29, 202640Views0likes0Comments