%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-399157%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EYour%20email%E2%80%99s%20legal%20disclaimer%20is%20meaningless%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-399157%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%0A%20%26lt%3Bmeta%20http-equiv%3D%22Content-Type%22%20content%3D%22text%2Fhtml%3B%20charset%3DUTF-8%22%20%2F%26gt%3B%3CSTRONG%3EFirst%20published%20on%20TechNet%20on%20Apr%2013%2C%202011%20%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20%3CA%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.economist.com%2Fnode%2F18529895%22%20title%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.economist.com%2Fnode%2F18529895%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3E%20http%3A%2F%2Fwww.economist.com%2Fnode%2F18529895%20%3C%2FA%3E%20%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20And%20before%20you%20disagree%2C%20examine%20all%20%3CEM%3E%20paper%20%3C%2FEM%3E%20mail%20coming%20from%20your%20company%20to%20see%20if%20it%20includes%20the%20same%20disclaimer%E2%80%A6%20%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CP%3E-%20Ned%20%E2%80%9Chostile%20witness%E2%80%9D%20Pyle%3C%2FP%3E%0A%20%0A%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-TEASER%20id%3D%22lingo-teaser-399157%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EFirst%20published%20on%20TechNet%20on%20Apr%2013%2C%202011%20http%3A%2F%2Fwww.%3C%2FLINGO-TEASER%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-399157%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EEmail%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3Ened%20pyle%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3Esilly%20rabbit%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E
Microsoft
First published on TechNet on Apr 13, 2011
http://www.economist.com/node/18529895

And before you disagree, examine all paper mail coming from your company to see if it includes the same disclaimer…

- Ned “hostile witness” Pyle