Pinned Posts
Forum Widgets
Latest Discussions
Approving new Glossary Terms
Thanks for reviewing my question: In the classic glossary, one can set up a workflow that requests for Data Owners to approve new glossary terms before they are published. Im using the new enterprise glossary. It appears that workflows still point to the classic glossary. Does anyone know how to set up this approval. Also is there a way that users can notify data owners/stewards if they have comments or question on a glossary terms,. Thanks.Custom SITs fine tunned in MIP
Hello Everyone, Currently working on MS Purview Solutions greenfield deployment project for one of the customer for on-premise data and M365 data. I have created few custom SITs classifiers with regex pattern in the MIP portal almost 3 months ago and it's classifying the data as expected but with some false positives. All of them are fine-tuned to prevent false positives. It's scanning and classifying the newly created M365 data as expected. However it's not reclassifying the previously classified false positive data. How can I forcefully rescan/reclassify the false positive M365 data. I just want to reclassify the data with fine-tuned custom SITs to correctly classify the data before labelling. One more question related to on-prem scanners. I have started the on-prem scanners to scan all the SharePoint sites and Fileshares for any sensitive information. Initially its ran full scan and later it's started as incremental scan. Above scan started before creating the custom SITs and labels. Now I want run a full scan just to classify the data with recommending the labels based on the sensitive data instead of enforcing and applying the label. Can someone throw some light which options need to be select for just recommending the label instead of applying the label. Current configuration as shown below: Any help really appreciated. Regards Anand Sunka
9M365PurvieweDiscoveryInfra touching files in office activity logs
Hi, We use Office Activity Logs through Log Analytics Workspace to report on specific files. We noticed that in our most recent report, many files were accessed by 'ExportWorker' with 'ClientAppName' M365PurvieweDiscoveryInfra. This seems to have happened on specific days a couple of weeks ago where the activity 'file accessed' whenever an ediscovery was run on a location that stored the particular file was registered. This was not the case before if I remember correctly. Does anyone know why this activity was registered as such in the logs and/or has also experienced the exportworker of M365PurvieweDiscoveryInfra touch their files when running an ediscovery? Is this a change with the new eDiscovery? It is also undesirable that users can track incident response employees touching their files in case of an investigation.
eDiscovery case (Premium) and on-premise file share content
We have E5 license and Purview eDiscovery premium. We have a need to create eDiscovery case with on-premise file share data source. As part of this configuration, we have done the following: Installed a graph connector agent on the on-premise file share with azure app registration with the appropriate permissions. In Microsoft 365 admin center, configured file share data source linking to file share graph connector above. The files on the file server were successfully indexed. No issues. However, in the next step, while creating an eDiscovery case (Premium), we don't see "Add Graph Connector as a data source within a case" to add the above graph connector. What are we missing? The user has Global Administrator permissions.
