Forum Widgets
Latest Discussions
Trend Micro Vision One Connector Not working
Hi All, Before I get nuked in the comments to raise an issue on the Sentinel Repo. Here me out π Around a month ago, the logs stopped ingesting. A quick snoop around revealed the reason. But I'm not sure if I should raise an issue, or try to fix the issue, risking voiding any future support I can get, since the connector and the app that comes with it are market solutions. Function app was not running due to a dependency issue. Spotted this on the diagnostic logs, under the "exceptions" table. "module named _cffi_backend not found" a python package google tells me, thats used to interact with C code. So logically, I need to find the requirement.txt and make sure the dependency is there. Also make sure the python version on the runtime and Azure matches, The logs were initially flowing as usual . I had completed integrating Trend Micro using Azure Functions based connector around 7 months ago. Worked like a toyota helix until now. So once again, would like to know the community's thoughts on it. Thxxmal_secJul 21, 2025Copper Contributor64Views0likes0CommentsMulti-trigger Playbooks & Renamed Triggers
Hello Sentinel enthusiasts, In some cases, deploying a playbook with multiple triggers is a much easier solution than having 9 playbooks which do the same thing. In the specific example I'm going for I have developed a playbook which requires the user to change their password within a certain amount of time. We want to have the ability to have three triggers for the playbook - incident, entity and http (for external orchestration platforms) - then we also want to have the option for it to be instant, or within a configurable number of days/hours (1day, 7days). In this situation the native way would be to have 9 playbooks in total - seems like a big amount for a simple action. I attempted to initially develop these playbooks with all three triggers in a base template which is deployed using bicep - success. But what do you know, at first, I could only see the playbook in the automation playbook list saying "Sentinel Action" but I couldn't trigger it from an actual incident or entity. Turns out this was because I had given the trigger a different display name than the default. This specific case seems a bit odd to me because the underlying data is the same, nonetheless - not a huge issue, change the display name to the default and voila. My next surprise was when I realised that the Sentinel UI will only pick up the first trigger to run a playbook. i.e. if I define an entity trigger first then an incident trigger, I cannot see it appear to trigger for an incident and vice versa. So, I set on a mission and was able to create a chromium extension which will modify the resource response - to duplicate a playbook once for every trigger it has (only in the azure portal PWA) and what do I know - everything works perfectly as if it was fully supported. It would be great if these UI bugs could be fixed as they seem pretty trivial and don't seem to require a major change, considering it is solely a frontend bug - especially if I can create an extension which resolves the issue. Obviously, this is not an ideal scenario in production. Garnering some support to have this rectified would be great and it would also be cool to hear people's opinions on this ~SebsebagiusJun 27, 2025Copper Contributor47Views0likes0CommentsS1 Data Connector malfunctioning?
I am utilizing the S1 codeless data connector available in the content hub. It would seem that only a few tables are actually populating with data now. Threats and Alerts are no longer being captured. Is anyone else experiencing this? Any work arounds available? Any suggestions would be much appreciated!GarritEmpieJun 05, 2025Copper Contributor39Views0likes0CommentsCCP ProofPoint and Zscaler
Hi, I have ProofPoint and Zscaler Data Connector which appear to show as Deprecated. Logs are still flowing via native Azure Function uninterrupted. Per PP - CCP is suggested approach to replace Zscaler - No replacement method but I assume this will also require CCP Has anyone created CCP for these and successfully deployed these solutions?logger2115Apr 18, 2025Brass Contributor47Views0likes0CommentsRetrieving MailAddress from Entity for Logic App
I'm trying to put together a logic app that will reset a users password and also send them an email notifying them why their password was reset. The logic app triggers off a sentinel incident. The users email address I need to send to is from the Entities properties of the Sentinel incident. How can I extract the users email address? Its in the "MailAddress" property of each Entity. I believe Im going to have to parse it out of the JSON result but need some guidance if that is the case. Appreciate any help.Richard_ScarApr 10, 2025Copper Contributor52Views0likes0CommentsLog Analytics Workspace - ThreatIntelIndicators
Morning! I have been working on migrating some of our tenant analytic rules to use the new TI ThreatIntelIndicators table. However, I noticed the following: When querying against the new table, I get these values in a tenant log workspace When I do the same query in another tenant logs workspace, I get this result back If I expand the query to grab last 7 days, I get results back but they are wildly different from what I see from one tenant to another. I can find big and small discrepancies in the logs I see. I still can't find the connector on the connectors page (When I filter them out by data type). I can see the one that is being used for the soon to be decommissioned table. As far as I understand, the connector is not going to be changed per se, just how we access the logs from any given log analytics workspace. I'm expecting to see the same values across my log workspaces since it comes from the same connector, and provided by MS, or is this ingestion of TI logs tenant scope and each one has different settings? I couldn't find something that tells me this in the docs. Or is this part of the rollout problems we are expecting to see? Thanks!122Views0likes0CommentsUnknown Behaviour Involving GroupsService in OfficeActivity
I have spotted a few hundred events with the following KQL query in my environment. This is the result of one of the entries. It looks like a regular legitimate behaviour by Microsoft but I don't seem to find any documentation about it. Can anyone share the insight of it? Thank you!user32954811Mar 31, 2025Copper Contributor33Views0likes0CommentsAMPLS Restrictions Preventing Outbound API Calls in Logic Apps β Any Workarounds?
Hi everyone, Iβm encountering an issue where Azure Monitor Private Link Scope (AMPLS) restrictions are preventing Azure Logic Apps from making any outbound API calls, even to Microsoft-owned outbound IP addresses. One specific problem is that when running KQL queries inside a Logic App, the Azure Monitor connector fails because it attempts to access Microsoft outbound IPs, which are blocked by AMPLS restrictions. Since this is happening within Logic Apps itself, I donβt have direct control over these outbound calls. Has anyone found a workaround to allow Logic Apps to function correctly while keeping AMPLS in place? Would Private Endpoints, VNET Integration, or any other configuration help resolve this? Any insights or solutions would be greatly appreciated!SergiMar 04, 2025Copper Contributor37Views0likes0CommentsJuniper SRX 340 logs not read by rsyslog
I have configured Juniper SRX 340 Junos logs to be forwarded to a centralized syslog server before reaching Microsoft Sentinel. I can see the Juniper logs on the syslog server while doing a TCPDUMP but, the same logs are not ready by rsyslog. The same syslog server is also receiving the logs from Cisco ASA. The rsyslog is able to read the ASA logs with no issues and further forward them to Sentinel through AMA agent. I don't have any filters applied in rsyslog.conf file and I'm capturing everything (*.*) all syslog facility and severity to a log file but, still the Juniper logs are not recognized by rsyslog. Please help on resolving this issuerahulb25Jan 25, 2025Copper Contributor80Views0likes0CommentsBug in stand-alone MS Sentinel MITRE tactics
I setup a new Analytic rule where I had selected multiple tactics/techniques combinations. When I create an incident from that rule, only one of the tactics/techniques actually show up in the stand-alone MS Sentinel UI as well as in the SecurityIncident table. It isn't even the first one I selected; it is the last one. I did double check the Analytic rule and all the tactics/techniques are selected. If I look at the incident using the MS Sentinel REST API, it does show that all the tactics/techniques are there as well as if I look in the M365 portal (I have my MS Sentinel instance linked). Heck, even the Graph Query will show them all (after expanding the incident to show the alerts as well). Has anyone noticed this recently? Is it a bug or another new "feature"?GaryBusheyJan 12, 2025Bronze Contributor93Views0likes0Comments
Resources
Tags
- siem426 Topics
- KQL294 Topics
- data collection235 Topics
- Log Data213 Topics
- analytics155 Topics
- azure151 Topics
- automation141 Topics
- integration131 Topics
- kusto118 Topics
- playbooks118 Topics