Forum Widgets
Latest Discussions
Catalog homepage improvements are urgently needed
Hi Microsoft, Since this page for Purview DGS has opened, I though I'd start a discussion and provide some user feedback on the UX. Let's be honest: it is confusing for end users, and annoying for admins: Users navigate to the catalog to find data, but end up on a homepage that tells them how to set up a catalog. Trust me on this: they don't care, and neither do I after having set up the catalog already. Users do however see a search bar, which they will use. The 'search' bar on the homepage does not search for data assets or data products, but for Microsoft documentation. Users get stuck here, without ever finding data. The current set up of the homepage makes it totally feel like some preview/demo environment. This lint search bar persists throughout the application, leading to more confusion on data product or data assets search (as there are now two search bars), or within the page of a data product itself (where the search bar persists in the lint, but follow-up search actions using this search bar result in nothing helpful). I'd suggest removing this lint search option entirely, and bringing the 'discovery' search options to the homepage. Bonus points if the homepage becomes customizable (e.g. like a SharePoint page) so we can point our users to company specific documentation to help them get started. I thought this feature was promised in the previous roadmap, but unfortunately it seems to be deleted in the most recent publication. A better homepage will greatly aid user adoption.
How to connect SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition in Data Map?
Hi all, One of our customers is using SAP S/4 HANA Cloud Public Edition. They want it to be brought under Purview Data Catalog. I was trying to look up some documentation on it but can only find it for S/4 HANA. Is there any different connection method for the Public Cloud edition or it is the same process as S/4 HANA? Can someone please help me out with this?
Data Product Owner and Contacts should be separate fields
Currently, the 'contacts' field under a data product has a 1 on 1 relationship with the 'data product owner' field. It is not possible to add 'contacts' seperately. I believe this does not make sense for most organizations. For example, our data products have one owner, and multiple contacts (e.g. data stewards, data experts). That's how our governance works. We are not going to add people to the 'data product owner' field that are no data owners, just to show them in contacts. Also, why would you have two fields that basically do the same? Clicking on 'data product owner' already gives me the information for 'contacts'. Please let us add contacts here, that are not the data product owner.Request access form should be customizable
Most customers have existing data access policies and access request forms. Customers should be able to adapt the request access form, so it reflects their existing form for data access. Besides the point that the access request form should be customizable, the current form has some shortcomings that are not too sharp: When a data product is created, data product owners are asked to fill in a maximum access duration. On the request access form it is not possible for a requester to provide a requested duration as an input. Why is the "business justification" entry only one row? Why can we not turn the "Purpose" part off? Why are there three options that are always there? What if a data owner does not want to provide access for "assessing fit"? We expect the user to describe their intentions with the data in detail. We do not expect to data owner to think out all possible purposes beforehand. I have seen As a data product owner, I can set up customizable workflows for data product access and use Power Automate connector to connect with other applications. On the roadmap. Please make customizing the request access form part of this feature.
