<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Data Governance topics</title>
    <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/bd-p/data-governance</link>
    <description>Data Governance topics</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 22:16:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>data-governance</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-05-30T22:16:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Welcome, Purview Lighting Talks audience!</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/welcome-purview-lighting-talks-audience/m-p/4515998#M155</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please log in and then post any of your Data Governance spillover Purview Lightning Talks questions in the thread below. You can tag them using these hyperlinked handles:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="lia-text-color-15"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Improving Discovery, Trust, and Reuse of Analytics with Purview Data Products&lt;/STRONG&gt; -&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;a href="javascript:void(0)" data-lia-user-mentions="" data-lia-user-uid="3435228" data-lia-user-login="CraigWyndowe" class="lia-mention lia-mention-user"&gt;CraigWyndowe​&lt;/a&gt;&lt;SPAN class="lia-text-color-15"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="lia-text-color-15"&gt;Length: 5 minutes | Topic: Governance&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="lia-text-color-15"&gt;This talk shows how bringing Power BI and Fabric assets into Microsoft Purview Governance Domains and Data Products creates a single, trusted view of enterprise analytics. By connecting reports, semantic models, and underlying data with shared metadata, ownership, and business context, organizations can make existing assets easy to discover and safe to reuse.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Also, you can come here at any time and click "Start a Discussion" to post a topic or question to your Purview Community!&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;img /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 21:54:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/welcome-purview-lighting-talks-audience/m-p/4515998#M155</guid>
      <dc:creator>RenWoods</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-29T21:54:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Purview : comment filtrer les résultats “Data products” par termes du glossaire ?</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/purview-comment-filtrer-les-r%C3%A9sultats-data-products-par-termes/m-p/4514040#M154</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;a { text-decoration: none; color: #464feb; } tr th, tr td { border: 1px solid #e6e6e6; } tr th { background-color: #f5f5f5; }&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bonjour,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Je teste Microsoft Purview (Unified Catalog) avec des &lt;STRONG&gt;produits de données&lt;/STRONG&gt; auxquels j’ai associé des &lt;STRONG&gt;termes de glossaire&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Les termes de glossaire sont &lt;STRONG&gt;publiés&lt;/STRONG&gt; et &lt;STRONG&gt;visibles&lt;/STRONG&gt; dans l’onglet &lt;STRONG&gt;Découverte&lt;/STRONG&gt; → &lt;STRONG&gt;Glossaire d’entreprise&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Les produits de données sont également &lt;STRONG&gt;publiés&lt;/STRONG&gt; et retrouvables via la recherche.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cependant, je ne vois pas d’option (ou elle ne retourne aucun résultat) pour &lt;STRONG&gt;filtrer les résultats de recherche des produits de données par termes de glossaire&lt;/STRONG&gt;, contrairement à d’autres filtres disponibles (ex. &lt;STRONG&gt;Propriétaire&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;STRONG&gt;Type de produit&lt;/STRONG&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Est-ce que le filtrage des &lt;STRONG&gt;produits de données&lt;/STRONG&gt; par &lt;STRONG&gt;termes de glossaire&lt;/STRONG&gt; est supporté dans l’onglet Découverte ?&lt;BR /&gt;Si oui, y a-t-il des &lt;STRONG&gt;pré-requis&lt;/STRONG&gt; ou &lt;STRONG&gt;conditions&lt;/STRONG&gt; particulières (ex. type de glossaire, indexation/délai, association au niveau data product vs assets, etc.) ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 13:39:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/purview-comment-filtrer-les-r%C3%A9sultats-data-products-par-termes/m-p/4514040#M154</guid>
      <dc:creator>Miriane</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-23T13:39:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Filtrer les résultats de la recherche des produits de données  à l'aide des  termes de glossaire</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/filtrer-les-r%C3%A9sultats-de-la-recherche-des-produits-de-donn%C3%A9es-%C3%A0/m-p/4514036#M153</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Bonjour,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Je teste Microsoft Purview (Unified Catalog) avec des &lt;STRONG&gt;produits de données&lt;/STRONG&gt; auxquels j’ai associé des &lt;STRONG&gt;termes de glossaire&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Les termes de glossaire sont &lt;STRONG&gt;publiés&lt;/STRONG&gt; et &lt;STRONG&gt;visibles&lt;/STRONG&gt; dans l’onglet &lt;STRONG&gt;Découverte&lt;/STRONG&gt; → &lt;STRONG&gt;Glossaire d’entreprise&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Les produits de données sont également &lt;STRONG&gt;publiés&lt;/STRONG&gt; et retrouvables via la recherche.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cependant, je ne vois pas d’option (ou elle ne retourne aucun résultat) pour &lt;STRONG&gt;filtrer les résultats de recherche des produits de données par termes de glossaire&lt;/STRONG&gt;, contrairement à d’autres filtres disponibles (ex. &lt;STRONG&gt;Propriétaire&lt;/STRONG&gt;, &lt;STRONG&gt;Type de produit&lt;/STRONG&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Est-ce que le filtrage des &lt;STRONG&gt;produits de données&lt;/STRONG&gt; par &lt;STRONG&gt;termes de glossaire&lt;/STRONG&gt; est supporté dans l’onglet Découverte ?&lt;BR /&gt;Si oui, y a-t-il des &lt;STRONG&gt;pré-requis&lt;/STRONG&gt; ou &lt;STRONG&gt;conditions&lt;/STRONG&gt; particulières (ex. type de glossaire, indexation/délai, association au niveau data product vs assets, etc.) ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 13:34:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/filtrer-les-r%C3%A9sultats-de-la-recherche-des-produits-de-donn%C3%A9es-%C3%A0/m-p/4514036#M153</guid>
      <dc:creator>Miriane</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-23T13:34:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Métadonnées personnalisées sous Purview avec une relation un à plusieurs</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/m%C3%A9tadonn%C3%A9es-personnalis%C3%A9es-sous-purview-avec-une-relation-un-%C3%A0/m-p/4514031#M152</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Bonjour,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Je souhaite créé une métadonnée sous Purview, en l'associant à une métadonnée parent, Comment est-ce possible&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Merci de votre retour,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 13:21:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/m%C3%A9tadonn%C3%A9es-personnalis%C3%A9es-sous-purview-avec-une-relation-un-%C3%A0/m-p/4514031#M152</guid>
      <dc:creator>Miriane</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-23T13:21:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Governing Entra‑Registered AI Apps with Microsoft Purview</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/governing-entra-registered-ai-apps-with-microsoft-purview/m-p/4508061#M150</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As the enterprise adoption of AI agents and intelligent applications continues to accelerate, organizations are rapidly moving beyond simple productivity tools toward autonomous, Entra‑registered AI workloads that can access, reason over, and act on enterprise data. While these capabilities unlock significant business value, they also introduce new governance, security, and compliance risks—particularly around data oversharing, identity trust boundaries, and auditability.&lt;BR /&gt;In this context, it becomes imperative to govern AI interactions at the data layer, not just the identity layer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is where Microsoft Purview, working alongside Microsoft Entra ID, provides a critical foundation for securing AI adoption—ensuring that AI agents can operate safely, compliantly, and transparently without undermining existing data protection controls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Lets look at the role of each solution Entra ID vs Microsoft Purview&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A very common misconception is that Purview “manages AI apps.” In reality, Purview and Entra serve distinct but complementary roles:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Microsoft Entra ID&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Registers the AI app&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Controls authentication and authorization&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Enforces Conditional Access and identity governance&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Microsoft Purview&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Governs data interactions once access is granted&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Applies classification, sensitivity labels, DLP, auditing, and compliance controls&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Monitors and mitigates oversharing risks in AI prompts and responses&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Microsoft formally documents this split in its guidance for Entra‑registered AI apps, where Purview operates as the data governance and compliance layer on top of Entra‑secured identities.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;H5&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Lets look at&amp;nbsp; how purview governs the Entra registered AI apps.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/H5&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below is the high level reference architecture which can be extended to low level details&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;H6&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;1. Visibility and inventory of AI usage&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/H6&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once an AI app is registered in Entra ID and integrated with Microsoft Purview APIs or SDK, Purview can surface AI interaction telemetry through Data Security Posture Management (DSPM).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DSPM for AI provides:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Visibility into which AI apps are being used&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Which users are invoking them&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;What data locations and labels are touched during interactions&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Early indicators of oversharing risk&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;This observability layer becomes increasingly important as organizations adopt Copilot extensions, custom agents and third‑party AI apps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;2. Classification and sensitivity awareness&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Purview does not rely on the AI app to “understand” sensitivity. Instead the Data remains classified and labeled at rest.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;AI interactions inherit that metadata at runtime&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Prompts and responses are evaluated against existing sensitivity labels&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;If an AI app accesses content labeled Confidential or Highly Confidential, that classification travels with the interaction and becomes enforceable through policy. This ensures AI does not silently bypass years of data classification work already in place.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;3. DLP for AI prompts and responses&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of the most powerful but yet misunderstood purview capabilities is the AI‑aware DLP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using DSPM for AI and standard Purview DLP:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Prompts sent to AI apps are inspected&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Responses generated by AI can be validated&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Sensitive data types (PII, PCI, credentials, etc.) can be blocked, warned, or audited&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Policies are enforced consistently across M365 and AI workloads&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Microsoft specifically highlights this capability to prevent sensitive data from leaving trust boundaries via AI interactions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;4. Auditing and investigation&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Every AI interaction governed by Purview can be recorded in the Unified Audit Log, enabling:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Forensic investigation&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Compliance validation&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Insider risk analysis&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;eDiscovery for legal or regulatory needs&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;This becomes critical when AI output influences business decisions and regulatory scrutiny increases. Audit records treat AI interactions as first‑class compliance events, not opaque system actions&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;5. Oversharing risk management&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rather than waiting for a breach, Purview proactively highlights oversharing patterns using DSPM:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;AI repeatedly accessing broadly shared SharePoint sites&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;High volumes of sensitive data referenced in prompts&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Excessive AI access to business‑critical repositories&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;These insights feed remediation workflows, enabling administrators to tighten permissions, re‑scope access, or restrict AI visibility into specific datasets.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In a nutshell, With agentic AI accelerating rapidly, Microsoft has made it clear that organizations must move governance closer to data, not embed it into individual AI apps. Purview provides a scalable way to enforce governance without rewriting every AI workload, while Entra continues to enforce who is allowed to act in the first place. This journey makes every organizations adopt Zero Trust at scale as its no longer limited to users, devices, and applications;&amp;nbsp; It must now extend to AI apps and autonomous agents that act on behalf of the business.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;If you find the article insightful and you appreciate my time, please do not forget to like it 🙂&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 13:52:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/governing-entra-registered-ai-apps-with-microsoft-purview/m-p/4508061#M150</guid>
      <dc:creator>Prashbv</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-02T13:52:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Importación de términos en un glosario (tipo clásico) con metadatos de tipo entero</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/importaci%C3%B3n-de-t%C3%A9rminos-en-un-glosario-tipo-cl%C3%A1sico-con/m-p/4503049#M148</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Buenas tardes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Estamos haciendo una importación de términos mediante archivo CSV en un glosario (tipo clásico).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dicho CSV usa Plantillas personalizadas con metadatos que tenemos definidos como enteros, metadatos como Precisión y Longitud. El problema nos viene cuando importamos dichos metadatos (como son opcionales ) y en el fichero viajan en blanco... Purview nos asigna a dichos metadatos el valor de cero. Es decir que en ausencia de valor, le pone un cero. Lo cual no es lo que buscamos. Tampoco podemos modificar el metadato del término una vez importado ya que a pesar de que lo dejamos en blanco al guardar el término le vuelve a asignar el valor de cero. Alguien mas ha tenido esa problemática?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;He leido que la forma de solucionarlo es definiendo aquellos metadatos que son opcionales de tipo String, que es un tipo de dato que acepta valores nulos.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:35:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/importaci%C3%B3n-de-t%C3%A9rminos-en-un-glosario-tipo-cl%C3%A1sico-con/m-p/4503049#M148</guid>
      <dc:creator>anmarmon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-03-17T16:35:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unified Catalog Self-Serve Analytics - Data products and other elements do not sync</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/unified-catalog-self-serve-analytics-data-products-and-other/m-p/4495361#M137</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dears,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I intend to create a custom interface through a PowerBI report in Fabric to distribute Purview Unified Catalog browser.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I use the feature "Unified Catalog Self-Serve Analytics" to deliver the Unified Data Catalog content in a Fabric Lakehouse. However, from the 44 data products created, only 22 are delivered to the lakehouse, in the data product table I have tried in different lakehouse, same result.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would love some advice to help me configure this properly. Do you face the same issue ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Antoine&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 10:27:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/unified-catalog-self-serve-analytics-data-products-and-other/m-p/4495361#M137</guid>
      <dc:creator>hentone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-17T10:27:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Salesforce to MS Purview Integration</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/salesforce-to-ms-purview-integration/m-p/4493125#M134</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, we are trying to setup Salesforce to MS Purview Integration for Data Mapping.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Registration step is straightforward; however, we have run into issues trying to setup the scan itself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Error: Failed to testConnection: Exception when processing request: Connector Exception: Server returns ResponseCode:'400'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have raised this as an issue for MS Support but not making much progress.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any tips, advice or links to how to guides etc. would be very much appreciated!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 14:49:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/salesforce-to-ms-purview-integration/m-p/4493125#M134</guid>
      <dc:creator>fmcmahon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-06T14:49:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Shutdown impossible, How to cancel a Norton subscription fan running  Update KB5073455</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/shutdown-impossible-how-to-cancel-a-norton-subscription-fan/m-p/4491728#M133</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm running Windows 11 Enterprise, OS Version Dial 87.7.41934 . 68. BIOS version: LENOVO R2SET29W (1.05 ). System model 21S7S0ER00. Intel processor Family 6 Model 181.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After the latest update KB5073455 I'm experiencing inability to shutdown the computer. Also, a very annoying problem since the latest update is that the computer fan is constantly on since startup. Closing the lid of the laptop will not turn the fan off and will continue until the battery runs out. Because of the corporate environment, I am unable to advancedly control the fans, or for example uninstall the latest update until a fixed one is provided. Do you know when can we expect a fix to be released? Thank you already in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards, dhiraj&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 06:53:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/shutdown-impossible-how-to-cancel-a-norton-subscription-fan/m-p/4491728#M133</guid>
      <dc:creator>poiuytre</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-03T06:53:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to cancel a Norton subscription Allow Uniqueness of Glossary Terms across Governance Domains</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/how-to-cancel-a-norton-subscription-allow-uniqueness-of-glossary/m-p/4491725#M132</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When glossary terms are created and published, there is no check for the same term name in another governance domain.&amp;nbsp; Some organizations do want to enforce term uniqueness across all domains.&amp;nbsp; Would it be feasible to provide an optional switch in Unified Catalog settings to turn this on?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 06:48:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/how-to-cancel-a-norton-subscription-allow-uniqueness-of-glossary/m-p/4491725#M132</guid>
      <dc:creator>poiuytre</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-02-03T06:48:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cross workspace lineage for Fabric Lakehouse tables in Purview</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/cross-workspace-lineage-for-fabric-lakehouse-tables-in-purview/m-p/4490423#M124</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I’m currently exploring lineage capture in Microsoft Purview for Fabric Lakehouse tables that are spread across multiple workspaces, following&amp;nbsp;medallion architecture (Bronze, Silver, Gold in separate Fabric workspaces).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While reviewing the documentation, I noticed the stated limitation around cross-workspace lineage for non-power BI assets, as mentioned here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img&gt;snippet from&lt;P&gt;https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/data-map-lineage-fabric&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is there any update or workaround planned to support cross-workspace Fabric lineage in Purview?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is this limitation on the product roadmap or actively being worked on?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Until native support is available, are there any recommended design patterns to handle lineage in this scenario?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 11:39:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/cross-workspace-lineage-for-fabric-lakehouse-tables-in-purview/m-p/4490423#M124</guid>
      <dc:creator>sarav_s</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-29T11:39:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Unassign Assets from Data Products in Microsoft Purview at Once</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/how-to-unassign-assets-from-data-products-in-microsoft-purview/m-p/4469507#M118</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I’ve assigned around 100 assets to a specific data product and would now like to unassign all of them at once, rather than removing them individually.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using the Purview REST API with Python, I was able to retrieve the list of my data products and successfully identify the target data product. However, I haven’t been able to fetch the list of assets currently assigned to it, which prevents me from performing a bulk unassignment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could anyone please advise how to retrieve and unassign all assets from a data product programmatically?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 05:16:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/how-to-unassign-assets-from-data-products-in-microsoft-purview/m-p/4469507#M118</guid>
      <dc:creator>pardis1368</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-13T05:16:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Purview workspace scan: table visible but metadata not ingested</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/purview-workspace-scan-table-visible-but-metadata-not-ingested/m-p/4465835#M115</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm copying gold tables from a dev workspace lakehouse to a user workspace warehouse in Fabric. The copied tables appear correctly in the warehouse, but when I run a Purview scan on the entire user workspace, all metadata is ingested except for one specific table.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All other warehouse objects scan successfully - only this particular copied table is missing from Purview. What could cause this selective scanning issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 03:26:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/purview-workspace-scan-table-visible-but-metadata-not-ingested/m-p/4465835#M115</guid>
      <dc:creator>faizfablillah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-10-31T03:26:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Custom Attributes with 1 to Many relationship</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/custom-attributes-with-1-to-many-relationship/m-p/4454760#M108</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am looking to enhance an asset (report) by adding custom metadata fields, such as subscription details. However, each report can have multiple subscriptions, creating a one-to-many relationship. Since managed attributes do not support this, what is the recommended approach to address this in Purview?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 12:22:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/custom-attributes-with-1-to-many-relationship/m-p/4454760#M108</guid>
      <dc:creator>vlearn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-17T12:22:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Data product search is broken: no results for partial terms</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/data-product-search-is-broken-no-results-for-partial-terms/m-p/4452834#M105</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Searching for data products using partial terms returns zero results, despite the existence of data products with matching names. For example, searching for '&lt;STRONG&gt;risk&lt;/STRONG&gt;' yields no results even though we have three data products that have '&lt;STRONG&gt;risk&lt;/STRONG&gt;scores' in their names.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have created a support ticket, and was told that the PG has stated this behavior was by design. I just can't wrap my head around this statement. Search is the reason why data catalog tools are popular and help democratize data, and this type of searching doesn’t really help to make the data products discoverable.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A feature request was created (3135) but I was also asked to post here for visibility.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's some proof:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2025 08:24:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/data-product-search-is-broken-no-results-for-partial-terms/m-p/4452834#M105</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-09-10T08:24:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cannot see Data Map and Unified Catalog in the free version of Microsoft Purview</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/cannot-see-data-map-and-unified-catalog-in-the-free-version-of/m-p/4448067#M103</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey, I am trying to setup a data connection in the free version of Microsoft Purview. However, I cannot see the Data Map and Unified Catalog features.&amp;nbsp; Is this the intended limitation of the free version?&amp;nbsp; Or do I miss something?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 22:46:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/cannot-see-data-map-and-unified-catalog-in-the-free-version-of/m-p/4448067#M103</guid>
      <dc:creator>JackDong</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-25T22:46:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Feature request: Get rid of "Welcome to new Microsoft Purview portal" screen</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/feature-request-get-rid-of-quot-welcome-to-new-microsoft-purview/m-p/4440989#M94</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Any new user of Purview DGS will be shown this screen:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I strongly believe this should be an admin led tenant-wide decision, and not an 'any new user on it's own decision'.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The screen is confusing and completely unnecessary for new users with "Global Catalog Reader" permissions only. The problem with this screen is that it results in some users landing in the classic portal, while all documentation and training materials that we share are based on the new portal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My suggestions would be to move this option to 'settings'. After all, as Microsoft, you want your users to use the new portal too, right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;P.S. in the meantime, please get rid of the homepage and move all that under a 'getting started' page: &lt;A href="https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/discussions/data-governance/catalog-homepage-improvements-are-urgently-needed/4392980" target="_blank"&gt;Catalog homepage improvements are urgently needed | Microsoft Community Hub&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 08:58:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/feature-request-get-rid-of-quot-welcome-to-new-microsoft-purview/m-p/4440989#M94</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-08-07T08:58:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Building a ChatGPT like app on top of Purview catalog data</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/building-a-chatgpt-like-app-on-top-of-purview-catalog-data/m-p/4432941#M89</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We've started experimenting with the Purview catalog and added some governance domains and data products. This helps us build up a rich source of meta data especially when linked with the glossaries and data assets.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, what we really want to get to is a solution where users can ask a question based on their objective and get told which report to run / website to access etc, like you would do with ChatGPT. The Purview CoPilot seems to be focussed on security as far as I can tell. I've got an idea that this&amp;nbsp; can be achieved by using the Atlas APIs (confirmed by ChatGPT) but was wondering if this is something anyone else has done, if there is a sample app out there anywhere, or just if there's a better way of achieving our objective?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:17:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/building-a-chatgpt-like-app-on-top-of-purview-catalog-data/m-p/4432941#M89</guid>
      <dc:creator>GraemeW</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-14T10:17:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Challenges adding large numbers of assets to a Data Product in Unified Catalog</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/challenges-adding-large-numbers-of-assets-to-a-data-product-in/m-p/4422116#M85</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The client's needs oblige us to add the tables from a SQL database into the data product; they've also got a use case for a massive file share.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are hitting a wall in finding a programmatic solution to bring these data map assets into the Product, and the portal fails when trying to add more than 100 objects at a time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking for a timeline for the release of APIs and tools to address this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 15:55:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/challenges-adding-large-numbers-of-assets-to-a-data-product-in/m-p/4422116#M85</guid>
      <dc:creator>taddaRxC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-09T15:55:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Purview Data Governance: Grant access to business consumers search Unified Catalog "Data products"</title>
      <link>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/purview-data-governance-grant-access-to-business-consumers/m-p/4420276#M81</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am in Microsoft purview as regular users (business Consumer) to search in Unified Catalog for organization data associated to customers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The administrator told me they granted me the following roles:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Data Map collection: Data Reader&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Governance Domain: Local Catalog Reader.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Governance domain Published&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Data product published:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am able to connect to Purview unified catalog &amp;gt; Discovery &amp;gt; Data Asset and see all the data asset in the data map collections.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;P&gt;however, When I try to access Purview Unified Catalog &amp;gt; Discovery &amp;gt; Data Product &amp;gt; search keyword "Customers" which is a published data products, I got error 403.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please see the images for the context.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;the Microsoft documentation is very confusing about how business consumer can access the data products.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img /&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can I grant access to regular users to search corporate data in Purview Unified catalog for data products?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 22:28:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/data-governance/purview-data-governance-grant-access-to-business-consumers/m-p/4420276#M81</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergio_Londono</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-03T22:28:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

