Recent Discussions
Announcing Windows Server vNext Preview Build 29621
Hello Windows Server Insiders! Today we are pleased to release a new build of the next Windows Server Long-Term Servicing Channel (LTSC) Preview that contains both the Desktop Experience and Server Core installation options for Datacenter and Standard editions and Azure Edition (for VM evaluation only). Branding remains Windows Server 2025 in this preview - when reporting issues please refer to Windows Server vNext preview. Build 29531 established a new Server preview baseline build. Please perform a clean install of Build 29531 (or later) using the installation media linked below. Please note: Upgrades from Windows Server vNext preview builds older than 29531 are not supported. We encourage all Windows Server vNext preview users to perform a clean install using 29531 or later to successfully upgrade to future Windows Server vNext preview builds. While upgrades from earlier Windows Server previews (Build 26525 and older) are not technically blocked by setup.exe, a number of known issues have been identified related to upgrades necessitating the establishment of a new baseline build for our Server vNext Preview Program. The new baseline build (29531) will not be Flighted due to upgrade issues. Flighting support resumed with preview build 29550 or later. What's New [NEW] We're excited to announce Trusted Launch for virtual machines (TVMs) on Windows Server—a security feature you can enable when creating Generation 2 VMs. This initial preview supports TVMs with Secure Boot, vTPM, and vTPM state protection (at rest), managed via PowerShell. ⚠ Not supported in this release: Moving TVMs to another server TVMs in failover clusters or Hyper-V Replica Boot integrity verification TVMs in Windows Admin Center (WAC) Instructions 1. Install the latest ServerInsider preview build. 2. Enable Hyper-V (restarts the server): Install-WindowsFeature -Name Hyper-V -IncludeManagementTools -Restart 3. Set the registry keys: New-Item -Path "HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\AszIgvmAgent" -Force New-ItemProperty -Path "HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\AszIgvmAgent" -Name "TvmWinServer" -Value 1 -PropertyType DWord -Force 4. Enable Trusted Launch: Enable-WindowsOptionalFeature -Online -FeatureName "IsolatedGuestVm" -NoRestart 5. Verify IGVmAgent is running (should show Running): Get-Service -Name "IGVmAgent" If it isn't running, report the issue with the IGVmAgent and IGVmSystem Operational logs (Event Viewer → Applications and Services Logs → Microsoft → Windows). 6. Create an external virtual switch (if needed): (Get-VMSwitch | Where-Object { $_.SwitchType -eq "External" }).Name 7. Create the TVM. With an existing Gen 2 VHDX: New-VM -Name <VMName> -Generation 2 -GuestStateIsolationType TrustedLaunch -SwitchName <switch> -VHDPath <path to vhdx> -Path <config path> Or with a new VHD, then attach a Gen 2–compatible guest OS ISO: New-VM -Name <VMName> -SwitchName <switch> -NewVHDPath <new VHD path> -NewVHDSizeBytes 40GB -Generation 2 -GuestStateIsolationType TrustedLaunch -Path <config path> Add-VMDvdDrive -VMName <VMName> -Path <Guest OS ISO path> Ensure the DVD drive is first in the firmware boot order so the VM boots from it. 8. Verify isolation type (should return TrustedLaunch): (Get-VM -Name <VMName>).GuestStateIsolationType 9. Verify guest state protection: Stop the IGVmAgent service and restart the VM—without IGVmAgent running, a Trusted launch VM with guest state protection won't start. Quick Machine Recovery available in Windows Server vNext Insider Previews. Quick machine recovery (QMR) is now available for Server vNext Insiders to test. This feature enables the recovery of Windows Server devices when they encounter boot critical errors that prevent them from booting. QMR can automatically search for cloud‑based remediations to recover from widespread boot failures significantly reducing the burden on IT administrators when multiple devices are impacted. This supports the goals of the Windows Resiliency Initiative by enabling applicable fixes to be delivered through trusted Windows Update to restore affected devices, helping reduce downtime and minimize manual recovery efforts across enterprise environments. This feature is currently enabled in the latest Server vNext Insider builds for customers to experience test mode. A Group Policy option to enable or disable the feature will be introduced in upcoming builds to provide additional administrative control. To simulate the quick machine recovery experience, use the following commands from an elevated command prompt: Enable test mode: reagentc.exe /SetRecoveryTestmode Configure Windows to boot to Windows Recovery Environment on the next boot: reagentc.exe /BootToRe Reboot your device. The system goes through autoremediation of a simulated crash safely and reboots back to Windows Server. For more information, please review Quick machine recovery (QMR) and Windows Resiliency Initiative. When providing feedback using Feedback hub, please select QMR from the Recovery and Uninstall category in the app. NVMe-over-Fabrics (NVMe-oF) extends the NVMe protocol—originally designed for local PCIe-attached SSDs—across a network fabric. Instead of using legacy SCSI-based protocols such as iSCSI or Fibre Channel, NVMe-oF allows a host to communicate directly with remote NVMe controllers using the same NVMe command set used for local devices. In this Insider build, Windows Server supports: NVMe-oF over TCP (NVMe/TCP), allowing NVMe-oF to run over standard Ethernet networks without specialized hardware. NVMe-oF over RDMA (NVMe/RDMA), enabling low-latency, high-throughput NVMe access over RDMA-capable networks (for example, RoCE or iWARP) using supported RDMA NICs. For more information, please visit: Introducing the Windows NVMe-oF Initiator Preview in Windows Server Insiders Builds | Microsoft Community Hub ReFS Boot is enabled for Windows Server vNext preview builds. Known Limitations ReFS Boot systems create a minimum 2GB WinRE partition. When WinRE cannot be updated due to space constraints, the system may disable WinRE. Disabling WinRE does not remove the partition. If the WinRE partition is deleted and the boot volume is extended over it, this operation is unrecoverable without a clean install. For more information, please visit: Resilient File System (ReFS) overview | Microsoft Learn Feedback Hub app is available for Server Desktop users! The app should automatically update with the latest version, but if it does not, simply Check for updates in the app’s settings tab. Known Issues A race condition in the TLS hybrid key exchange implementation may cause the LSASS service to crash when hybrid groups are negotiated by a TLS server. To avoid this issue until the fix is released, please disable hybrid groups (X25519_MLKEM768, SecP256r1_MLKEM768, SecP384r1_MLKEM1024) using TLS cmdlets or Group Policy, as outlined here. Server Core Upgrades and AppCompat FOD: Enabling AppCompat FOD after reinstall may fail due to legacy 3rd-party license compatibility issues on Server Core devices. Server Core users may be unable to install the latest AppCompat FOD after upgrading to build 29574. This appears to be limited to Server Core installations with 3rd-party application licenses that fail compatibility checks after upgrade. This will be addressed in a future build. Upgrading from older builds of Windows Server vNext previews (26525 or older) are not supported. Please perform a clean install of build 29531 or later. Users may experience failures when attempting to upgrade from earlier previews (build 26525 and older). VMs may fail to upgrade or start after upgrade from older preview builds impacting live migration and failover cluster scenarios. Download Windows Server Insider Preview (microsoft.com) Flighting: The label for this flight may incorrectly reference Windows 11. However, when selected, the package installed is the Windows Server vNext update. Please ignore the label and proceed with installing your flight. This issue will be addressed in a future release. Available Downloads Downloads to certain countries may not be available. See Microsoft suspends new sales in Russia - Microsoft On the Issues. Windows Server Long-Term Servicing Channel Preview in ISO format in 18 languages, and in VHDX format in English only. Windows Server Datacenter Azure Edition Preview in ISO and VHDX format, English only. Microsoft Server Languages and Optional Features Preview Keys: Keys are valid for preview builds only Server Standard: MFY9F-XBN2F-TYFMP-CCV49-RMYVH Datacenter: 2KNJJ-33Y9H-2GXGX-KMQWH-G6H67 Azure Edition does not accept a key. Symbols: Available on the public symbol server – see Using the Microsoft Symbol Server. Expiration: This Windows Server Preview will expire September 15, 2026. How to Download Registered Insiders may navigate directly to the Windows Server Insider Preview download page. If you have not yet registered as an Insider, see GETTING STARTED WITH SERVER on the Windows Insiders for Business portal. We value your feedback! The most important part of the release cycle is to hear what's working and what needs to be improved, so your feedback is extremely valued. Please use the new Feedback Hub app for Windows Server if you are running a Desktop version of Server. If you are using a Core edition, or if you are unable to use the Feedback Hub app, you can use your registered Windows 10 or Windows 11 Insider device and use the Feedback Hub application. In the app, choose the Windows Server category and then the appropriate subcategory for your feedback. In the title of the Feedback, please indicate the build number you are providing feedback on as shown below to ensure that your issue is attributed to the right version: [Server #####] Title of my feedback See Give Feedback on Windows Server via Feedback Hub for specifics. The Windows Server Insiders space on the Microsoft Tech Communities supports preview builds of the next version of Windows Server. Use the forum to collaborate, share and learn from experts. For versions that have been released to general availability in market, try the Windows Server for IT Pro forum or contact Support for Business. Diagnostic and Usage Information Microsoft collects this information over the internet to help keep Windows secure and up to date, troubleshoot problems, and make product improvements. Microsoft server operating systems can be configured to turn diagnostic data off, send Required diagnostic data, or send Optional diagnostic data. During previews, Microsoft asks that you change the default setting to Optional to provide the best automatic feedback and help us improve the final product. Administrators can change the level of information collection through Settings. For details, see http://aka.ms/winserverdata. Also see the Microsoft Privacy Statement. Terms of Use This is pre-release software - it is provided for use "as-is" and is not supported in production environments. Users are responsible for installing any updates that may be made available from Windows Update. All pre-release software made available to you via the Windows Server Insider program is governed by the Insider Terms of Use.PowerShell DSC Pullserver stops working with SQL database
After updating Windows Server 2025, our DSC Pull Server stopped communicating with its SQL backend database. The issue was not present before the update, and reverting to the previous version of Microsoft.PowerShell.DesiredStateConfiguration.Service.dll immediately restored normal functionality. With the newer DLL version, the service starts successfully and the endpoint remains available, but no connection is established to the SQL Server database. As a result, database initialization does not occur, required tables are not created or updated, and node registration fails. No database sessions are observed on the SQL Server during registration attempts, indicating that the service does not reach the SQL connection phase. We compared the previous working DLL version with the updated version and confirmed that the regression is introduced by the newer DLL. Replacing the updated DLL with the earlier version consistently restores SQL database connectivity and normal Pull Server Operation.47Views0likes2CommentsUnable to Build Switchless Storage using Network ATC
3-Node HV/S2D Cluster using Switchless Storage and Network ATC getting Network HUD Error I have a Dell 3-node server cluster being used to host Hyper-V with S2D. Each node is identical and certified to pass S2D requirements. The networking consists of 2 onboard 1 Gbps and 2 quad-port PCI(e) NICs at 10/25 Gbps. The 2 onboard ports are being used for the management intent, 2 ports from each of those NICs are being connected to 2 top-of-rack switches for the compute intent at a total of 12 10 Gbps connections, and the other 2 ports from each of those NICs are being connected directly to the other nodes in a dual mesh method for the storage intent at a total of 6 25 Gbps connections. Very similar to the Microsoft diagram for a three-node storage switchless, dual TOR, dual link deployment network reference pattern for Azure Local, but I am using Windows Server 2025 Datacenter, not Azure Local. The problem I am encountering is when I attempt to create the switchless storage intent, I get an error (shown below) that reads "Failed to fetch physical NIC mapping from the Network HUD service. Please diagnose..." If I leave off the switchless option, it builds without issue. The error only occurs when I attempt to use the switchless option. I tried without configuring the NIC IP addresses first, as well as trying configuring the NIC IP addresses beforehand. I tried without having a cluster built first, as well as building a failover cluster without storage before running the network intent command. The error I posted below shows my last attempt after having the NICs configured with IP addresses and having a failover cluster established before running the command. The error has remained the same throughout the process. Has anyone else run into an issue like this with switchless storage? It seems like everything that I am trying to do is within scope and should be a supported solution. My fallback plan is to use my existing switches, but that drops my connection speeds down from 25 Gbps to 10 Gbps due to hardware limitations.114Views0likes3Commentsntoskrnl.exe and build version not getting updated after applying KB5078740 on server 2025
I have installed the latest March patch kb5078740 on server 2025 which was upgraded from server 2022. the patch is showing installed but the ntoskrnl.exe and build version is still showing 10.0.26100.4652. Qualys is detecting it as patch not installed based on file version which should be 10.0.21600.32522. Please let me know how to fix this issue.576Views1like1CommentVirtual printer in windows server 2019 standard is not shown after configuration
Hello, I am, trying to configure a virtual printer in a Windows server 2019 standard edition that is deployed in OCI cloud. This instance has windows server license included in the pricing. The problem comes when after ending the process of configuration this virtual printer is not displayed in "Devices and printers" any idea why is this happening? Regards, Ana41Views0likes1CommentProblem in Windows Server 2022
Hello, I need help with the following: I had the video application installed and working on a VPS with Windows Server 2022, and suddenly it stopped working. It won't start, and it doesn't show any errors or events that I can analyze in the viewer. Does anyone have any idea what might be happening? I've already tried many AI recommendations, from uninstalling and reinstalling an older version of the application to uninstalling the latest server update, among other things. I also tried installing it on another VPS, and it shows the same problem.55Views0likes1CommentCertificate Error Connecting to only to some of the Cluster's resources
Latest version of WAC, winrm configured to connect over HTTPS. No issues connecting to the servers that are members of the cluster, or clients and other servers in our AD. No issues connecting to the cluster Dashboard (I can see health, CPU usage, etc.) and some of the resources (such as Drives, Volumes, Servers). Configuration -> Settings or Security works fine. It's only when I go to some resources, such as virtual switches, GPU's or a handful of others that I get errors connecting to member servers; Specifically, the error will state that for each server: Connecting to remote server servername.local failed with the following error message : The server certificate on the destination computer (servername.local:5986) has the following errors: The SSL certificate contains a common name (CN) that does not match the hostname. The one oddity I see is that .local is being added to the end of the server name. Also, servername will not contain the domain extension, just the name. Here's what I've checked so far: DNS is correct for the member servers and the cluster, both with Host (A) and PTR entries, can be pinged and resolved. As far as I can tell the certificates are setup correctly, no issues connecting to the member servers individually, or the cluster at first. The AD entry for the cluster is in place with the correct permissions for the cluster's service account I've read that .local is appended if the server/cluster is not part of AD, but that's not the case. We have two additional clusters and this issue does not appear on them. I also have not been able to identify any obvious differences between the setup of the two fully functioning clusters and this one. In the Event Viewer on the WAC server, under Applications and Service Logs _> WindowsAdminCenter, I can see Error Entries ID 304 for each member server with a similar message as above: Unable to create PowerShell session on node, status: 400, error code:PSRemotingTransportException, error message:Connecting to remote server server.local failed with the following error message : The server certificate on the destination computer (server.local:5986) has the following errors: The SSL certificate contains a common name (CN) that does not match the hostname. For more information, see the about_Remote_Troubleshooting Help topic.. As a side note, opening a remote Powershell session to each member server via WAC works fine and by contrast, in the WAC Event viewer there will be corresponding Information entries list the server's FQDN. Here's an example Category: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Hosting.Diagnostics EventId: 2 SpanId: 50d2635d1f6eb737 TraceId: b8c8e1de80ac2f84f1230c5ec3305b38 ParentId: 3e0619ce2c5decca ConnectionId: 0HNMB39BE0AS7 RequestId: 0HNMB39BE0AS7:0000009F RequestPath: /api/PowerShell/nodes/serverFQDN/invokeCommand Request finished HTTP/2 POST https://WACserverFQDN:6601/api/PowerShell/nodes/serverFQDN/invokeCommand - 200 - application/json;+charset=utf-8 230.3283ms It seems that when it comes to accessing only some of the cluster's resources WAC no longer has the member servers FQDNs, and I'm not sure where to look for changing that. Anyway, any guidance would be appreciated.38Views0likes1CommentWAC vMode fails validating SMB
Hi Reviewing vMode and try add a Hyper-V 2025 (non hyperconverged) cluster with a FC SAN. Fails on Validating "SMB port accessibility". Have gone through firewall settings and opened all neccesary ports that i can find mentioned. Even tried without FW turned off without any success so hit the wall now. WAC vMode is installed on a vm running Win2025std and in same domain as the cluster (and hosts) i try to add. Probably some obvious thing i have missed so any suggestions?33Views0likes1CommentRDS Connection Broker High Availability
We're starting to plan for a fully available Windows Server 2025 RDS farm. We already have a SQL Server cluster on Linux Ubuntu in the environment. I couldn't find any Microsoft documentation stating whether a SQL Server cluster on Linux can be used. Does anyone have any official references on this topic? Current SQL Server cluster environment: 2 SQL Server Standard 2022 Linux Ubuntu 22.04, Linux cluster (Pacemaker + Corosync) Thank you.167Views1like1CommentWindows Server 2022 File Server Cluster | Network Teaming
Hello Microsoft Community, I have a Windows Server 2022 File Server Cluster (all physical nodes) running with SMB shares. At present, it is not configured with NIC teaming. We are planning to setup NIC teaming. I am going to add an additional network adapter to achieve this. Since this is a production file server server. It tried to perform NIC teaming in a test environment. Upon setting up network teaming, File server clustered roles do not come online and fail. It registers an Event ID 1049 about duplicate IPs despite the fact that I have deleted old network adapter via device manager (show hidden devices). New network adapter comes online without any previous knowledge of IPs. When setting up old IP scheme on a new individual network adapter, File server clustered roles come online successfully. However, setting up the old IP scheme on teamed network adapter, it registers Event ID 1049 about duplicate IPs and roles shows a status of Failed instead of Stopped. Duplicate IPs are only registered for clustered file server roles. They are not registered for node IPs and cluster management IPs. What would be a best way to achieve network teaming on an existing file server cluster without setting up the cluster from scratch?56Views1like1CommentMultiple Namespace Detection in Windows NVMe Over TCP Initiator
We are evaluating the Windows NVMe Initiator and have observed an issue with namespace handling. Our NVMe subsystem contains multiple namespaces. When we connect to the subsystem over TCP and establish connections to all namespaces, they are all shown as connected under the controller. However, only one namespace (shared block device) is exposed and accessible within Windows. Based on our testing, it appears that the initiator may be mapping only the first namespace associated with a given Friendly Name. We were able to connect another subsystem, whose friendly name was different. Questions: Is support for multiple namespaces within a single subsystem currently available in the Windows NVMe Initiator? If so, are there any configuration requirements or known limitations related to namespace discovery and mapping? Is the initiator expected to expose all connected namespaces as separate disks within Windows? We would appreciate any guidance or clarification on the expected behavior.61Views0likes2CommentsWindows Server 2025 - Cannot Pin Tools and Apps on Start Menu
I am evaluating Windows Server 2025, Version 24H2 (OS Build 26100.32690) I am unable to pin Admin Tools or any other app on Start Menu. Taskbar pinning works well but not the Start Menu. Anyone experiencing the same ?137Views0likes1CommentEnforcing LDAP Signing breaks ADDS Replication (repadmin.exe)
Hi All, After months of auditing Event ID 2889 and remediating application simple binds (clear text usernames/passwords over the wire), I was left with only SASL binds (that do not use signing). I proceeded to set LDAP signing to 'negotiate' as per the GPOs below, and several dozen Microsoft KBs and from the community e.g.. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-server/active-directory/enable-ldap-signing-in-windows-server Default Domain Controllers Policy Domain controller: LDAP server signing requirements: None: Data signing is not required in order to bind with the server. If the client requests data signing, the server supports it Default Domain Policy Network security: LDAP client signing requirements: Negotiate signing: If Transport Layer Security/Secure Sockets Layer (TLS\SSL) has not been started, the LDAP BIND request is initiated with the LDAP data signing option set in addition to the options specified by the caller. If TLS\SSL has been started, the LDAP BIND request is initiated with the options that are specified by the caller. I still noted 1,000s of Event ID 2889s (0 – SASL Bind that does not use signing), primarily from DCs, and ::1 addresses I proceeded with enforcing LDAP signing ("Require Signing" for both GPO settings above) and noted: LDAP authentication was occurring via Kerberos (SASL/SPNEGO) with simple binds blocked as per tracing (and ldp.exe) confirmations: Error <8>: ldap_simple_bind_s() failed: Strong Authentication Required Error 0x2028 A more secure authentication method is required for this server. However, I came to work the next day and performed a manual replication: Repadmin /Syncall /APeD LDAP error 8 (Strong Authentication Required) Win32 Err 5. So I had to revert back to Negotiate. How can customers enforce LDAP signing if common Microsoft ADDS executables like repadmin.exe still use Simple Binds? Any ideas appreciated, thank you in advance. Steve156Views1like1CommentWindows Server 2025 DC — LSASS handle leak identified via WinDbg — authz!AuthzpDeQueueThreadWorker
Hello All!! Im having a problem, LSASS crashes on a Windows Server 2025 Domain Controller, I identified what appears to be the root cause using WinDbg memory dump analysis. Sharing this hoping someone else has seen it or Microsoft can confirm. The Problem LSASS handle count grows continuously over time and eventually crashes with a 0xC0000005 access violation (Event ID 1015). After a reboot the cycle repeats. The growth rate correlates with authentication load and faster during peak hours, slower overnight. WinDbg Dump Analysis Captured LSASS dump at high handle count and ran !handle 0 f: Token handles: overwhelmingly dominant Everything else: negligible Every leaked token shows: GrantedAccess: 0x8 (TOKEN_QUERY only) PointerCount: overflowed to negative integer Running !findstack authz 2 shows multiple worker threads all sitting in: authz!AuthzpDeQueueThreadWorker What Was Tested And Eliminated Stopped or disabled each individually and measured handle growth rate — zero meaningful difference from any: - Antivirus (all components) - Backup software - Application services - VSS snapshots - Hardware management agents etc.. Environment OS: Windows Server 2025, fully patched with the latest updates including April LSASS update. Role: Domain Controller DNS PAM: Not active. Conclusion Token handles are opened with TOKEN_QUERY access inside authz!AuthzpDeQueueThreadWorker and never released. Reference counter overflows to negative integer. Growth rate scales directly with authentication load. Current workaround: reboots during off hours. Has anyone else seen this pattern on Windows Server 2025? Is there a known fix or Microsoft acknowledgment for this specific authz token handle leak?383Views2likes4CommentsCreating parent reverse lookup zone when child zones already exist — what happens?
We have an AD-integrated DNS environment that has accumulated a large number of reverse lookup zones over time, created without any parent zone — essentially DNS sprawl from years of admins creating individual subnet zones rather than working from a parent. We currently have approximately 80+ reverse lookup zones including: Dozens of x.10.in-addr.arpa zones covering various 10.x.x.x subnets Multiple x.172.in-addr.arpa zones A handful of others including 100.192.10.in-addr.arpa, 168.192.in-addr.arpa, 204.167.in-addr.arpa, 215.204.167.in-addr.arpa, 135.7.in-addr.arpa None of these were ever delegated from a parent zone — they were just created independently. The 10.in-addr.arpa zone does not exist. Domain controllers are a mix of Windows Server 2019 Standard (majority) and Windows Server 2025 Standard. Our goal is to create 10.in-addr.arpa as the consolidation point going forward — new registrations go there, and we migrate existing child zones into it one at a time, deleting old ones as we go at a pace we're comfortable with. Before touching anything, we need to understand what creating 10.in-addr.arpa will actually do to the existing child zones. Specifically: Will existing records in the child zones be deleted? We've seen the TechNet article documenting records vanishing when creating a child zone under an existing parent — does the same destructive behaviour occur in the reverse direction? Will auto-delegations be created in the new parent zone pointing to the existing child zones, and if so how quickly? Will the child zones continue to function normally for queries while the parent exists alongside them? Will dynamic registration start hitting the parent zone for subnets not covered by an existing child zone, or will something unexpected happen? We can't test this in a lab as we don't have a replica environment available, and can't risk touching production without understanding the behaviour first. Pointers to any documentation covering this specific scenario would also be appreciated — we've been unable to find anything that addresses creating the parent after the children already exist independently.58Views0likes1CommentWindows server 2025 Application Crashing Events
I have installed a Windows Server 2025 and after starting it in about 30 minutes the following error appears in the Windows application log . ======================================= Log Name: Application Source: Application Error Date: 4/6/2026 1:51:06 μμ Event ID: 1000 Task Category: Application Crashing Events Level: Error Keywords: User: SERVER\Administrator Computer: SERVER.efarmacy.internal Description: Faulting application name: backgroundTaskHost.exe, version: 10.0.26100.1, time stamp: 0x5bc61463 Faulting module name: biwinrt.dll, version: 10.0.26100.32230, time stamp: 0xb950595a Exception code: 0xc000027b Fault offset: 0x0000000000012713 Faulting process id: 0x1964 Faulting application start time: 0x1DCF4100B5B371A Faulting application path: C:\WINDOWS\system32\backgroundTaskHost.exe Faulting module path: C:\Windows\System32\biwinrt.dll Report Id: a0fa5d15-b026-4d12-a047-d965195ac338 Faulting package full name: MicrosoftWindows.Client.CBS_1000.26100.275.0_x64__cw5n1h2txyewy Faulting package-relative application ID: Global.Accounts Event Xml: <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event"> <System> <Provider Name="Application Error" Guid="{a0e9b465-b939-57d7-b27d-95d8e925ff57}" /> <EventID>1000</EventID> <Version>0</Version> <Level>2</Level> <Task>100</Task> <Opcode>0</Opcode> <Keywords>0x8000000000000000</Keywords> <TimeCreated SystemTime="2026-06-04T10:51:06.2935992Z" /> <EventRecordID>7473</EventRecordID> <Correlation /> <Execution ProcessID="1984" ThreadID="6560" /> <Channel>Application</Channel> <Computer>SERVER.efarmacy.internal</Computer> <Security UserID="S-1-5-21-4001248846-3127524418-1814302027-500" /> </System> <EventData> <Data Name="AppName">backgroundTaskHost.exe</Data> <Data Name="AppVersion">10.0.26100.1</Data> <Data Name="AppTimeStamp">5bc61463</Data> <Data Name="ModuleName">biwinrt.dll</Data> <Data Name="ModuleVersion">10.0.26100.32230</Data> <Data Name="ModuleTimeStamp">b950595a</Data> <Data Name="ExceptionCode">c000027b</Data> <Data Name="FaultingOffset">0000000000012713</Data> <Data Name="ProcessId">0x1964</Data> <Data Name="ProcessCreationTime">0x1dcf4100b5b371a</Data> <Data Name="AppPath">C:\WINDOWS\system32\backgroundTaskHost.exe</Data> <Data Name="ModulePath">C:\Windows\System32\biwinrt.dll</Data> <Data Name="IntegratorReportId">a0fa5d15-b026-4d12-a047-d965195ac338</Data> <Data Name="PackageFullName">MicrosoftWindows.Client.CBS_1000.26100.275.0_x64__cw5n1h2txyewy</Data> <Data Name="PackageRelativeAppId">Global.Accounts</Data> </EventData> </Event> =========================================== I have already done the actions to check the files. The check does not find any problems but the problem continues to appear. "DISM.exe /Online /Cleanup-image /Restorehealth" "sfc /scannow". I would like to know if anyone else has faced this problem and if there is a solution for it. Thanks in advance .131Views1like2CommentsRDP Client - incorrect keyboard shortcut action in German localization
In the above dialog, when any of the checkbox controls has the focus, ALT+V toggles the state of the checkbox. ALT+V obviously should trigger "Verbinden" (Connect) instead. But not when the dialog first appears, i.e. none of the controls has the focus. Then ALT+V does nothing. As long as any chekbox control has the focus, ALT-V toggles its state. If the command button "Abbrechen" has the focus, ALT-V does nothing, i.e. ALT-V never triggers "Verbinden" except the command button "Verbinden" itself has the focus. Steps to reproduce: Start RDP client to connect to a remote machine Press ALT-Z -> "Zwischenablage" will be checked as expected Press ALT-Z again -> "Zwischenablage" will be unchecked as expected After any of the two steps above, press ALT-V -> "Zwischenablage" will be toggled instead of triggering "Verbinden" Same goes for "WebAuthn". Depending on the devices on the local machine an the RDP settings for sharing those, their might be more options with checkbox. I suspect those to behave similarly wrong when pressing ALT-V. The OS doesn't seem to make a difference. I see the same behavior on both Windows 11 and Windows Server 2022. RDP client version:60Views0likes1Comment
Events
Recent Blogs
- 5 MIN READFor decades, applying a security fix to core OS components meant swapping files on disk and restarting so the loader could map the new image into memory. Rebooting to patch is a workaround for a limi...Jul 13, 2026182Views0likes1Comment
- July 9th, 2026: The Windows Admin Center installer has been updated to build number 2.7.4. This build includes multiple security improvements such as correcting elevation of privilege and remote code...Jun 25, 20261.5KViews13likes9Comments