Forum Widgets
Latest Discussions
Hybrid Exchange 2019 move to M365
Dear All, I am asked to move/ migrate the existing Hybrid Exchange to M365. All mailboxes are located in M365. MX Record is pointing to the third-party spam filtering company which we are not too sure either stay with them or not. My next concern is the Send and Receive connectors. has any one of you done similar task like this? any help or document/ link would be much appreciated. Regards
Exchange 2016 Decommission
Hi all, I am trying to decom my 2016 environment and cannot disable (Disable-Mailbox) the final 16 mailboxes (out of thousands). Am getting the error Active directory response: 00002098: SecErr: DSID-03150A45, problem 4003 (INSUFF_ACCESS_RIGHTS), data 0. I have been troubleshooting this for HOURS now. It's not enabling inheritance on the user perms (every article suggests that). The perm exchange trusted subsystem isn't there. The users do not have any admin groups. It's nothing that I can find in the first 6 pages of googling. Sadly, of course, there is no support anymore so can't even raise a ticket. Can't uninstall Exchange with mailboxes left :( Any idea's are more than welcome, please. Thank you.
Permission activesync on smartphone
Hi everyone, when you grant the permissions in question to manage company email from a smartphone, do these permissions, in addition to Remote Wipe, Password Enforcement and Device Encryption (I remember these as the main ones), somehow give the Exchange administrator access to my personal data? For example, photos, any documents saved on the SD card or on the smartphone itself? Thanks in advanced!Will these commands fix our phantom meetings issue?
I opened a ticket with Microsoft Support for an issue we are facing where "phantom" meetings are appearing in at least two of our meeting room calendars. The subject of the meeting says "Private appointment" and the lock icon appears at the bottom, and when you click on any of them they disappear from the calendar, only to re-appear when you navigate away and come back. They appear in Classic Outlook, New Outlook and Outlook for the web. The support rep is telling me to run these commands on the room mailbox to "reset the room mailbox availability cache": Set-CalendarProcessing -Identity <roommailboxupn> -RemoveOldMeetingMessages $true Set-CalendarProcessing -Identity <roommailboxupn> -AutomateProcessing AutoAccept But if I run Get-CalendarProcessing, it confirms that these are the existing settings already: Get-CalendarProcessing -Identity <roommailboxupn> | fl RemoveOldMeetingMessages,AutomateProcessing RemoveOldMeetingMessages : True AutomateProcessing : AutoAccept This can't possibly do anything, right? I should ask my CSAM to open a GetHelp on this case, right? Does anyone know how to actually fix this issue?High Volume Email is Generally Available and Ready to Charge
On April 1, Microsoft announced the general availability for the High-Volume Email (HVE) solution together with details of the PAYG charges incurred to send email to internal recipients, which is all that HVE can do. Microsoft will enable HVE charging on June 1, 2026, Before then, you’ll need to create a billing policy and link it to a valid Azure subscription if you want to continue to use HVE. https://office365itpros.com/2026/04/23/hve-ga-charging/Is the Archive mailbox self-help diagnostic working for anyone?
Just curious: is the archive mailbox self-help diagnostic at https://aka.ms/PillarArchiveMailbox working for anyone? When I run it, instead of getting results about the user whose UPN I entered, I get this: The following issues were found with your archive mailbox. No account was found for [The UPN of my admin account]. Make sure you've entered the correct email address or create a new account with that name. For more information, see Add users to Office 365. I tried opening a ticket with Microsoft Support, but they refused to work on it without requiring me to do all the legwork of gathering logs and HAR traces and who knows what else, despite the fact that the support agent was able to replicate the exact same issue in his lab.
User cannot rename categories even when being the owner
Hi guys, I have a user that cannot rename categories in a mailbox whilst being the owner. As you can her permission level is set on owner. And yet the rename is greyed out: User says she was able to rename just some time ago, but when she tried on 17/04/2026 she couldn't. Anyone has any ideas?
Email Showing as Quarantined in a Message Trace, but Not Showing up in MS Defender
A customer of ours was waiting on an email to arrive and to help figure out where the email was or if it was sent yet we ran a message trace. The message trace showed that the email was sent to quarantine. With this information in mind, I went to MS Defender > Email & collaboration > Review > Quarantine but could not find the message. I modified some of the filters and could not get the quarantined message to appear. I triple checked the filters I created and made sure the information was correct. I also removed all filters and looked for the time period the email came in, but could not find it. Not sure if this is related, but this email had a significant delay likely coming from the sender. Any thoughts or ideas? Or anything that I am missing?Administratively retract a user's email
I was recently asked to retract a message that was sent in-error to staff. I ran a discovery/search, and saved it, but when I ran the powershell script after connecting to Exchange, the script could not find the search, something like name not found. I verfied the name was correct, and I am a global admin so permissions should not have been an issue. Does anyone know of any accurate documentation to run a search and retract? I had to use an old YouTube video and could not find anything in Microsoft's documentation.
ARC verification fail (40) on specific Exchange Online frontends - recurring issue
Hello, We are observing recurring arc=fail (40) errors on messages forwarded through Exchange Online, caused by specific frontend servers. The same messages pass ARC verification correctly on other providers (Google, etc.). Affected frontends identified so far: CH2PEPF0000013F.namprd02.prod.outlook.com - build 15.20.9700.17 (March 14, 2026) CH3PEPF0000000B.namprd04.prod.outlook.com - build 15.20.9769.17 (April 6, 2026) Both share the same build suffix .17. The signing implementation on our side has been cryptographically verified as correct and RFC 6376 compliant. The issue has also been reported on the IETF ietf-smtp mailing list with full technical analysis. Cryptographic analysis shows the failing servers append a spurious trailing \r\n to the last header before computing the verification hash, violating RFC 6376 Section 3.7. Is there a pattern with .17 frontend builds and ARC verification? Reagards Vittorio
