Oct 04 2021 03:05 PM - edited Oct 18 2021 06:30 AM
Hi, I have an i7-7700K. This CPU have TPM 2.0, It's compatible with Secure Boot, it have 4 core up to 4.2 GHz. It also is 64bit.
I don't know why this CPU is not supported by Microsoft to install Windows 11.
Update, 10/18/2021: Yesterday I bought a MacBook Air, I know that the MacBook isn't the best computer and that you are limited within the horizon of Apple. But I don't trust Microsoft and the new Windows 11. What if I bough another computer of 2.000 US dollars and in some years Microsoft decided that I need a new computer? At least, with the new M1 chip of Apple I know that they will support the hardware and the will send me Updates and give Support.
Oct 28 2021 09:01 AM
Oct 28 2021 09:25 AM
Oct 28 2021 12:27 PM
Oct 31 2021 01:06 PM
Oct 31 2021 03:11 PM - edited Oct 31 2021 03:21 PM
@ariveron no, each processor is unique. In order to program a processor you need the instruction sets and other specs from the manufacturer that keeps in mind the registers, cache, instructions, pipelining and so on and so forth for each and every processor. This has not been done for the i7 7700k. Subsequently extensive testing and support is needed. When people use the i7 7700k now they are making the operating system think it is another processor and thus are not getting a best use of resources also certain machine language codes could cause a crash and instability.
You will not get a best use of cpu resources and it is not advisable nor advantageous, plus many features and functions will not be possible at all.
https://youtu.be/piJhu7sI3Iw Watch this video, this will give you an idea of what needs to be done.
Oct 31 2021 08:23 PM - edited Dec 05 2021 02:22 PM
This was already solved by Microsoft (I used this on all my computers, it works perfectly.)
1.) Download Windows 11 ISO Image to "C:\Win11_English_x64v1.iso"
2.) Start Powershell -> Start Menu -> Run -> taskmgr -> File -> Run new Task -> %SystemRoot%\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell.exe -> Select "Create this task with administrative privileges." -> Click OK.
3.) Run the following commands in sequential order (copy/paste the text block)...
Set-ExecutionPolicy -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -Scope LocalMachine -Force
Remove-Item -Path "HKLM:\SYSTEM\Setup\MoSetup" -Force -Recurse;
New-Item -Path "HKLM:\SYSTEM\Setup\MoSetup";
New-ItemProperty -Path "HKLM:\SYSTEM\Setup\MoSetup" -Name "AllowUpgradesWithUnsupportedTPMOrCPU" -PropertyType DWord -Value "00000001";
Mount-DiskImage -ImagePath "C:\Win11_English_x64v1.iso";
4.) Open Windows Explorer and select the drive labeled "CCCOMA_X64FRE_EN-US_DV9"
5.) Run setup.exe (in-place upgrade)
Oct 31 2021 09:08 PM
Oct 31 2021 09:50 PM
@SixpieceIf there are real issues, which are less common, then update your drivers, run this script, etc.
Set-ExecutionPolicy -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -Scope LocalMachine -Force
./sc config EventLog start=auto;./sc config UsoSvc start=auto;./sc config wuauserv start=auto;./net start EventLog;./net start UsoSvc;./net start wuauserv;
DISM /Online /Cleanup-image /Restorehealth;
DISM /Online /Cleanup-Image /StartComponentCleanup /ResetBase;
./SFC /SCANNOW;
Get-AppXPackage -AllUsers | Foreach {Add-AppxPackage -DisableDevelopmentMode -Register "$($_.InstallLocation)\AppXManifest.xml"};
Get-AppxPackage | Reset-AppxPackage;
Nov 01 2021 05:26 AM
Nov 01 2021 05:37 AM
thank you all for sharing… and perhaps while you are at it you may want to dual boot your computer as a Macintosh with the latest OS from Apple Big Sur: follow these instructions in order to do so:
https://www.hackintoshshop.com/2810/hackintosh-big-sur-guide/
Nov 01 2021 05:43 AM
That Verge article is actually just quoting this Microsoft article (if you were wondering where it came from. My script is based on this too.)
"Ways to install Windows 11" -> https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/ways-to-install-windows-11-e0edbbfb-cfc5-4011-868b-2ce77...
Nov 01 2021 05:46 AM
Nov 01 2021 03:48 PM
@Mousefluff I am not lucky, I am still unable to install after creating the registry key :loudly_crying_face::
Nov 01 2021 04:10 PM
you can create a windows 11 environment instance in hyper v and then do not have to go through the trouble of a major upgrade...
Nov 01 2021 08:29 PM
just a snapshot of windows 11 running under hyper v , blow your brains out with windows 11 without taking the hit...
Nov 02 2021 08:07 AM
Nov 02 2021 08:14 AM - edited Nov 02 2021 08:24 AM
Nov 02 2021 08:39 AM - edited Nov 02 2021 08:42 AM
"Otherwise it is the developers who suffer."
Enabling HypervisorPlatform, does not give you VM functionality, it is just an API. Hyper-V is not even remotely the same as HypervisorPlatform. Having the APIs and a fully functional program are entirely different things. Like I said, compare, and then make up your mind about which one you want. You have to work quite a bit to get the same thing (more complexity.) So of course you HAVE to research the costs of using open source software, over another alternative (it may or may not matter.) I use lots of free software, but I also use premium software as well (it depends on what it is.) If you've ever used any of these VMs, you would know right away that they just can't scale like you think they can (the free versions have hard-coded limitations.) Free ESXI has physical limitations, regardless of what you want to do with it (Google Search is your friend in this instance, but I guess that's outlawed in Europe for privacy reasons. Ok so whatever search engine you want to use, would probably be able to find a feature matrix comparison chart, etc, a lot of information to cross-reference with, to help you make an informed decision, etc.) If you improve your soft skills this will all make perfect sense to you.
The drawbacks of using free software are immediately noticeable, even if it's functionally comparable. It's laughable to compare that with the post-paid versions given how terrible the extensions are. Like I said though, that's the only drawback, which the extensions provide driver support. I mainly use that for Linux / Unix on Windows ironically. If I HAVE to use that with Windows, I disable most of the extensions because I don't want to have to generalize the image with sysprep, or go in and remove strange drivers from the driver store (it's still perfectly usable for any operating system.) If VM has amazingly good low-level hardware access in a Bare-Metal VM, most likely it's NOT going to be Hyper-V or the free version of VirtualBox. It's necessary to make effort to do cross-comparisons and research the costs (to see if the time investment is worth it.) I mean MOST VMs you get like Hyper-V and whatnot, are mainly used to provision images. They don't have to be really high performance, and they serve mostly to fill a gap, a functional need (ie. Provisioning 32-bit images with the ADK / AIK on a 64-bit host machine.) I'm sure Hyper-V might be useful for running a 64-core server with a ridiculous amount of containers / virtualized Windows-only images, yet you would only be able to achieve that in a reasonable way on an entirely different SKU anyways (not Windows 10 pro obviously.)
Nov 02 2021 09:47 AM
Hello everyone!
Please read the MTC code - Not relevant posts can be reported to the Moderator!
Nov 02 2021 12:21 PM
I don't understand the rationale of buying a new computer now regardless of whether it's a mac or not. Windows 11 just launched and Windows 10 isn't losing support for another 4 years. And isn't Microsoft trying to expand compatibility as they roll out?