JSON Formatting
I created a JSON that counts the days after a certain start date "A" and stops after a date "B" if there is no date in B it keeps counting. Further the days count<90 turn green, 90-120, turn yellow, >120 turn red. The problem I encounter is that it works fine in 0. All items, but no longer in a specific view, although the record gives the correct number (B-A) the visual view keeps counting from A. Did anyone had something similar? The JSON code checked out correct and it was mentioned that the error is to be found in SharePoint backend configuration settings, rather than frontend browser code or indexing times. What could/should be changed in the backend configuration to solve this?
Planner task comments no longer send email notifications – critical regression
This change removed a previously existing core functionality without providing an adequate replacement. With the new Planner experience, task comments no longer trigger automatic email notifications to assigned users. This breaks a critical communication mechanism that many teams relied on for reliable task coordination. As a result, assigned users are no longer consistently informed about updates, introducing a high risk of missed information and operational issues in day-to-day work. There is currently no supported or enforceable alternative to ensure users are notified. Previous behavior: Task comments triggered automatic email notifications Assigned users were reliably informed Communication was traceable and consistent Current behavior: No automatic email notifications No configuration to restore this @mentions required (manual, error-prone, not enforceable) Microsoft Support has confirmed that this is by design and cannot be reverted. From an enterprise perspective, this is not just a design change, but a regression of critical functionality without an equivalent replacement. Request: Please restore automatic email notifications for task discussions or provide a reliable, enforceable alternative for notifying assigned users. Question to the community: How are you handling this change in real-world scenarios? Switching tools? Enforcing @mentions? Moving communication out of Planner? Would appreciate hearing how others are dealing with this.
How are organisations monitoring attendance and participation during live Microsoft Teams meetings?
Hi everyone, I’m interested in how organisations are monitoring and verifying attendance and participation during live Microsoft Teams meetings, particularly where accurate records are important. Teams attendance reports provide useful information about when participants join and leave, but they don’t necessarily provide a complete picture of what happens throughout a session. For example, how are organisations managing: Participants switching their cameras off for extended periods People stepping away while remaining connected Monitoring attendance throughout longer meetings, training sessions or online events Verifying that participants remain present Maintaining reliable attendance records for compliance, accreditation or reporting purposes Are you relying on Teams’ built-in attendance reports, monitoring participants manually, or using additional tools? I’m particularly interested in how organisations are addressing these challenges without creating additional administrative work for those running the sessions. Would be great to hear what approaches or solutions others have found effective.
Teams Chat messages disappears
Problem with Teams Windows client. When you hover the mouse over the chat column, all the contacts disappear. If you click on the Chat icon to the left or press CRTL+2 you get the error message "We ran into a problem getting your chats and channels" I have tried to do both a repair and reset from the advanced app settings. Also tried to remove Teams and do a new installation. Finally I have manually delete the cache files from: %userprofile%\appdata\local\Packages\MSTeams_8wekyb3d8bbwe\LocalCache\Microsoft\MSTeams What's next to get Teams working again?
Microsoft Teams transcription language settings
Hi! With a Microsoft 365 Business Premium license and a Copilot license, I can use transcription during a Teams meeting by setting the spoken language to Auto Detect. However, the transcription is sometimes inaccurate. Is there a way to limit the language detection scope? For example, is it possible that I select only English and Chinese, and Auto Detect is restricted to those two languages instead of also attempting to detect languages such as Spanish or French ?The New Unified Events Experience in Microsoft Teams: Webinars & Town Halls in One Place
Hi everyone 👋 Microsoft has redesigned the Meet app in Teams into a new unified Events app. Webinars, town halls and custom events now share a single workflow for creating, discovering and managing events. I recorded a step-by-step video walkthrough, and I'd like to share the key points here for anyone planning the transition in their organization. 🔍 What's new • Discover tab: attendees, presenters and organizers can find upcoming events, register, and watch past recordings without relying only on calendar invites • Manage tab: a central hub to create, edit and track events across every stage • Templates: schedule webinars, town halls and custom events faster • Create from scratch: custom events follow Town hall policies for broadcast-style events and Webinar policies for collaborative ones • Event landing pages with integrated Q&A and Polls • Scheduling from shared and delegate mailboxes ⚙️ Admin & licensing notes • Existing Webinar and Town hall policies continue to apply, and no admin action is required for the rollout • Since April 1, 2026, several event features that used to require Teams Premium are included in Teams Enterprise • Events with up to 3,000 interactive attendees are supported; larger events (up to 100,000) require an attendee capacity pack • Teams Live Events was retired on June 30, 2026, so town halls are now the way to run large broadcast-style events 💬 I'd love to hear from you: • Have you already moved from Live Events to town halls? • Which do you use more in your organization, webinars or town halls? • Any tips or gotchas from your rollout? Thanks for reading, and feel free to share your experience in the replies! Giuliano De Luca Solutions Architect | Microsoft 365Microsoft Teams/ Lists JSON
Hello, I'm currently using Teams and Lists to track our universities certifications. I found a JSON's that allowed me to make the numbers of the dates red when expired, yellow within 30 days, and green if futher than 30 days. I'm wanting to add another format that will make the cell completely red when there is no date entered to make it stand out that there isn't information there. Below is the current JSON I have entered. { "$schema": "https://developer.microsoft.com/json-schemas/sp/column-formatting.schema.json", "elmType": "div", "txtContent": "@currentField", "style": { "color": "=if(@currentField <= @now, 'red',if(@currentField <= @now + 2592000000 && @currentField > @now,'orange','green'))", "font-weight": "=if(@currentField <= @now, 'bold',if(@currentField <= @now + 2592000000 && @currentField > @now,'semi-bold','normal'))" } } Thanks!
Shared Channels: @Channel mentions fail to trigger activity notifications for team-shared members
Hello everyone, I am facing a persistent issue regarding notification behavior in Microsoft Teams Shared Channels that I hope someone can clarify or help with. Scenario: We have a Shared Channel that is shared with multiple teams (e.g., 17 teams in total). Note: I know that this way of communicating is not the recommended way, but we are not allowed to use any Viva products etc. Users accessing the channel are members of those shared-in teams, but they are not listed as direct individual members in the Shared Channel's own member list. Users have their channel notification settings correctly configured to receive notifications (e.g., "All new posts" or standard banner/activity settings). The Problem: When someone uses a channel mention (e.g., @ChannelName) in this shared channel, the users who have access via the team-sharing mechanism do not receive any activity feed notifications. The workaround/oddity: They only receive the activity notification if we explicitly add each user as a direct individual member to the Shared Channel. The dilemma: Since the channel is shared with 17 teams, adding hundreds of users manually or via scripts as direct members creates massive redundancy and clutters the UI (users see the team and the channel redundantly). Inconsistency: We noticed that in older shared channels created some time ago, channel mentions worked across team shares without needing direct individual memberships. It seems newer shared channels behave differently and strictly require direct membership to trigger activity feed notifications for @Channel mentions. Questions: Is this a known design limitation or a recent backend change in Microsoft Teams for newer Shared Channels regarding how @Channel mentions resolve indirect team members? How are organizations supposed to utilize @Channel mentions effectively in large-scale collaborations involving multiple shared teams without bloating the direct membership list? Any insights or workarounds would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!Architectural Limitation: Move LBR from Gateway to Voice Routes for Shared Trunks
The Problem: Currently, Location-Based Routing (LBR) in Microsoft Teams is hard-locked to the root OnlinePSTNGateway object (e.g., via -GatewaySiteLbrEnabled). This creates two major administrative roadblocks: Derived Trunk Limitations: For organizations utilizing multi-tenant partner architectures and derived trunking models (such as AudioCodes Live Pro/Express), the underlying global gateway configuration is owned and managed by the provider. Because administrators lack root modification rights over these shared gateway objects, they cannot enable or configure LBR. https://imgur.com/a/RzTE4nu Managing gateways via the Teams Admin Center (Voice > Direct Routing > SBCs) results in restricted or failing LBR configurations. Rigid Global Enforcement: Forcing LBR as a strict hardware-level switch creates deployment roadblocks, such as entirely blocking unmapped or remote workers. This is overly restrictive in regions like North America, where strict anti-toll-bypass compliance is not a legal mandate (unlike regions like India). The Proposed Solution: Decouple LBR from the Gateway Object: Shift LBR evaluation away from the root hardware gateway switch toggle and allow it to occur at the Voice Route, PSTN Usage, or Calling Policy layer. Support Derived & Shared Trunks: This decoupling will instantly make LBR compatible with multi-tenant SBC models, allowing enterprises to manage geographic routing via distinct voice routes (which are already peered with gateways), bypassing the need for root gateway property access. Regional Flexibility & Compliant Enforcement: Enable regional flexibility so enterprises can bypass unnecessary toll-bypass blocks in regions where they aren't mandated (like North America) without breaking calls for "Unknown" network sites. Crucially, for heavily regulated regions like India, system-enforced policies should automatically lock LBR on to strictly maintain local country regulations without relying on manual overrides. Business Impact: This enhancement will unlock advanced routing flexibility for thousands of enterprises utilizing modern cloud-hosted and derived trunking architectures. It bridges the gap between legacy PBX design constraints and modern multi-tenant cloud voice management, significantly reducing deployment friction for global organizations.
