Forum Discussion
How are organisations monitoring attendance and participation during live Microsoft Teams meetings?
Hi everyone,
I’m interested in how organisations are monitoring and verifying attendance and participation during live Microsoft Teams meetings, particularly where accurate records are important.
Teams attendance reports provide useful information about when participants join and leave, but they don’t necessarily provide a complete picture of what happens throughout a session.
For example, how are organisations managing:
- Participants switching their cameras off for extended periods
- People stepping away while remaining connected
- Monitoring attendance throughout longer meetings, training sessions or online events
- Verifying that participants remain present
- Maintaining reliable attendance records for compliance, accreditation or reporting purposes
Are you relying on Teams’ built-in attendance reports, monitoring participants manually, or using additional tools?
I’m particularly interested in how organisations are addressing these challenges without creating additional administrative work for those running the sessions.
Would be great to hear what approaches or solutions others have found effective.
1 Reply
- Emily2002Brass Contributor
The useful distinction is being connected versus participating. Teams attendance reports can document connection times, but neither a connected account nor an enabled camera proves someone is paying attention. Camera-off time isn’t reliable evidence of absence either.
For training, a practical approach is to combine the attendance report with a few short polls or check-ins spread through the session, followed by a brief knowledge check. Use named responses where individual records are required, and tell participants in advance how attendance will be assessed.
To keep the admin work down, Microsoft Forms can collect the checks, and Power Automate can record responses in a Microsoft List. Reconcile those with the Teams attendance report rather than treating either source as complete proof on its own.
For accreditation, agree on the required evidence with the accrediting body first. A tool that tracks cameras, reactions, or speaking time may provide extra signals, but it can’t reliably certify continuous presence. Allow an alternative for people with connection problems or accessibility needs.