Looking for the teams default vivid flag background images
Good Day all. I have a situation where two organizations share a conference room, and each org has it's own teams appliance. For reasons too long to get into, I need to watermark the *standard, default* teams background to visually identify which codec is currently on-screen. Specifically, I need high rez copies of vivid_flag. This is for the splash pages, not in-meeting backgrounds. The only image I can find with google images that does NOT have button overlays on it is only 402x224 pixels. Needless to say, shown on an 86" 4K monitor, that looks like crap. calling on anyone who has these images and/or Microsoft to send them along. yes I know that the next time MS changes the default background this goes away. I'll burn that bridge when I come to it. Thank you all in advance, Auslambert This is a demo of what I want to do, using that 400 pixel thumbnail:
file upload option disappearing in teams bot
We have Teams bot (we're the developer). When users first start teams, they have the file upload option available under the + button next to the type a message box. However, shortly afterwards, this option disappears. Not all users, just some. Seems to occur for both Mac and Windows users. Our manifest looks like this: { "$schema": "https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/json-schemas/teams/v1.19/MicrosoftTeams.schema.json", "manifestVersion": "1.19", "version": "1.0.7", "id": "xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx", "developer": { "name": "example", "websiteUrl": "https://www.example.com", "privacyUrl": "https://www.example.com/privacy", "termsOfUseUrl": "https://www.example.com/privacy" }, "icons": { "outline": "example_mono.png", "color": "example_portrait.png" }, "name": { "short": "example", "full": "example, your digital assistant" }, "description": { "short": "example is a digital AI assistant designed to streamline your workflow.", "full": "example is an advanced AI-powered professional assistant developed by example, crafted to enhance productivity and efficiency in the workplace. With a focus on accuracy and a professional demeanor, example assists with information retrieval, scheduling, communication, and various tasks, ensuring that you have more time to focus on what matters most in your business." }, "accentColor": "#fb9745", "bots": [ { "botId": "yyyyyyyy-yyyy-yyyy-yyyy-yyyyyyyyyyyy", "scopes": [ "personal" ], "isNotificationOnly": false, "supportsFiles": true, "commandLists": [ { "scopes": [ "personal", "team" ], "commands": [ { "title": "New", "description": "Starts a new conversation" } ] } ] } ], "permissions": [ "identity", "messageTeamMembers" ], "webApplicationInfo": { "id": "yyyyyyyy-yyyy-yyyy-yyyy-yyyyyyyyyyyy", "resource": "https://RscBasedStoreApp" }, "validDomains": [ "*.ngrok-free.app", "*.ngrok.app", "exampledev.ngrok.app" ] } ``` As far as I can see from the current manifest schema, the bot needs no other scopes. Is this a known bug or are we screwing something up with the config? Any help appreciated!
Distribution list vs file storage
We're having a bit of a disagreement within our company, wanted to get some feedback. On one hand, a higher-up became frustrated when he went looking for a file related to a client, and found 3-4 different Sharepoint sites with the client's name. This was usually the result of different departments creating their own Teams/Sharepoints for the same client. His feeling is every client should only have a single Sharepoint. Also, it should be attached to Teams so that Teams users can easily stay in Teams to access the files. On the other hand, the IT department wants to create Teams (which will inevitably have a Sharepoint) for distribution lists, as it will allow for more modern technology to be used when compared to using traditional distribution lists. But then that causes problems with the above, as it will result in more confusion about where a file might be located. The single email that comes with the Team/Sharepoint isn't really usable because both Creative and Customer Service are storing files there, but Creative doesn't want to get emails intended just for Customer Service and vice-versa. So it would have to be additional Teams/Sharepoints for the client. Nobody thinks we can just procedurally keep people from storing files in the Teams/Sharepoints that were really just intended to be a distribution group, regardless of special naming conventions or whatnot. How do other people handle the distribution list vs file storage issue?Can I restrict certain Team Members to be 'Read Only' for files, whilst being able to access Posts?
Hi, Any advice would be much appreciated on this as I've been going round in circles and I don't know how best to resolve it, or if there's another way around it. Essentially what I am wanting is to be able to add someone within my organisation as a member of a Team (members have edit access by default, as most people require this) but, rather than them being a full member, I just want them to have read only access to the files area. So we would almost like to have - Team Owners (can do everything) Team Members (edit access) Guests (can see posts but read only access to files) When adding someone via Teams we only have the Owner / Member choice, with no way to restrict in in finer detail on a per-person basis. I have tried using Sharepoint permissions to drill into the 'Members' group but - as they were added via Teams - it groups them together as a 365 managed group and doesn't let me amend individual user permissions. Is there a clever way to do this? Or a different way of adding people so that they can both have read-only access to files and also see the posts area? Many thanks in advance!
File attachment issue with custom apps
Hi there, my org is currently on public preview and the latest version is 25017.203.3370.1174. We are running few chatbot apps withing the org and since the updates, we see that the file attachment option in our chatbot app is either disabled for everyone or inconstant for few users. Checked the manifest and mad suer the file operations attribute is set to "true". No idea what's causing this issue!
