Microsoft Information Governance and Records Management AMA

Is there currently any way to change the "Configure record versioning" and "Allow editing of record properties" settings within the Compliance Center to be based on a specific site collection and not for the entire tenant. In most cases we like the ability for end users to have the ability to unlock the record label on documents/folders to be able to edit. But we have cases where those two specific settings listed above would be effective for not allowing end users to edit anything on specific sites.

o365 Mailboxes on Litigation Hold for many years can fill the Recoverable Items folder to the point where normal messages and calendar updates fail to be delivered/sync’d. The fix is to apply archiving and Start-ManagedFolderAssistant on the mailbox. Eventually the Archive will fill. My Question is, is there a better band aid for this situation?

Hi, at the end of a retention period for a document, a disposition review is triggered (we are using retention labels). In the disposition tab, some actions are possible, such as re-labelling or deleting. That is great, however, we also ave some documents that are required to be sent outside of our organisation. We need a way for our archivist to find and select all documents that are expired (rentention period ended), manually review them and then store them somewhere in a library of the SPO site awaiting to be sent over to the outside organisation. Is there any way inside the compliance center where this would be possible?

When will retention labels get all of the capabilities of Exchange retention tags? Is the goal to get this fully moved over to the compliance center?

Help with a Customer Issue, Has anyone seen this problem with Exact Match? Essentially what was happening is that the EDM SIT we were creating would error out if a custom SIT was assigned to detect a searchable field. The error message just returned the name of the custom SIT, and the diagnostic information with it had no details. The customer created the same EDM SIT with the same custom SIT earlier that day in the customer’s dev tenant, and did not encounter the error. We (the consultants) tested assigning a custom SIT to a searchable field in an EDM SIT and did not experience the error in our MSDN tenant. The problem seems specific to the customer’s prod tenant. In the customer’s prod tenant, we were able to create the EDM SIT with out-of-the-box SITs assigned to searchable fields, but when we went back to change the OOTB SITs to custom SITs, we received the error as well. I will note too that we had made a change to the custom SIT we were using 30-45 minutes prior to assigning the SIT. I’m unsure if this may be the cause of the error.

Are there any plans / updates on when we will get information barriers in our dev tenants? This is needed for testing

We are currently unable to approve destruction of more than 600 items pending disposition from the Compliance Center. We receive multiple errors during the process. Some of our labels have move than 100K records due for destruction and as soon as we implement labels in the recently migrated projects records sites, we will have several million records due for destruction. Per MSFT support, the limit for bulk deletion is 500 items and this doesn’t work for us to destroy records at scale. Any thoughts how we work around these limitations?

I am new to this Records & Information Management forum.. there is lot's of definition for "Records" and "Record keeping system" online available What is "Record" and "Record keeping system" definition by Microsoft?

Hi, I'm trying to build an automation in SharePoint that moves documents from a source library to another one when a specific retention label is applied. The problem is that I am not able to use any odata filter query or condition on the retention label column. Any idea how to get this to work?

Welcome to the Microsoft Information Governance and Records Management Ask Microsoft Anything (AMA)! This live hour gives you the opportunity to ask questions directly to the Microsoft team. Please post any questions in a separate, new comment thread on this event. Thanks!