Forum Discussion
The i7-7700K meet the minimun requierments to run Win11. But its not suported, Why?
- Microsoft is supposed to use the money to pay the developers. Otherwise it is the developers who suffer…
- only take the services that you need for example if you only need hyper v then only use hyper v. Maybe someone wants to play guitar and piano but if you only have money for one pick one and focus on it.
- raise your prices instead of trying to cut corners and sell yourself short charge an ample price to reflect your true costs. If that doesn’t work continue to develop yourself personally to the point that you are able to make something that someone needs no matter what the cost is then charge accordingly. I mean all these computer costs that you tend to spend a great deal of your life behind are very small compared with car appointments a few days in a hotel, etc.. or even using 3rd party services…
"Otherwise it is the developers who suffer."
Enabling HypervisorPlatform, does not give you VM functionality, it is just an API. Hyper-V is not even remotely the same as HypervisorPlatform. Having the APIs and a fully functional program are entirely different things. Like I said, compare, and then make up your mind about which one you want. You have to work quite a bit to get the same thing (more complexity.) So of course you HAVE to research the costs of using open source software, over another alternative (it may or may not matter.) I use lots of free software, but I also use premium software as well (it depends on what it is.) If you've ever used any of these VMs, you would know right away that they just can't scale like you think they can (the free versions have hard-coded limitations.) Free ESXI has physical limitations, regardless of what you want to do with it (Google Search is your friend in this instance, but I guess that's outlawed in Europe for privacy reasons. Ok so whatever search engine you want to use, would probably be able to find a feature matrix comparison chart, etc, a lot of information to cross-reference with, to help you make an informed decision, etc.) If you improve your soft skills this will all make perfect sense to you.
The drawbacks of using free software are immediately noticeable, even if it's functionally comparable. It's laughable to compare that with the post-paid versions given how terrible the extensions are. Like I said though, that's the only drawback, which the extensions provide driver support. I mainly use that for Linux / Unix on Windows ironically. If I HAVE to use that with Windows, I disable most of the extensions because I don't want to have to generalize the image with sysprep, or go in and remove strange drivers from the driver store (it's still perfectly usable for any operating system.) If VM has amazingly good low-level hardware access in a Bare-Metal VM, most likely it's NOT going to be Hyper-V or the free version of VirtualBox. It's necessary to make effort to do cross-comparisons and research the costs (to see if the time investment is worth it.) I mean MOST VMs you get like Hyper-V and whatnot, are mainly used to provision images. They don't have to be really high performance, and they serve mostly to fill a gap, a functional need (ie. Provisioning 32-bit images with the ADK / AIK on a 64-bit host machine.) I'm sure Hyper-V might be useful for running a 64-core server with a ridiculous amount of containers / virtualized Windows-only images, yet you would only be able to achieve that in a reasonable way on an entirely different SKU anyways (not Windows 10 pro obviously.)
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}