Forum Discussion
Auto-apply labels in Security and Compliance Center
This is something you see from time to time fairly commonly.
I will give you my own thoughts on it, please keep in mind I am not affiliated with Microsoft in anyway, but rather just someone who has heavily used O365 for the last 5 years.
I think it is ultimately two factors that lead to this.
1. It was coded that way in development: When the product was being put together/built, the focus is on getting the technology and the features to work and apply correctly. That is where the original effort gets put in. Limitations, specifically licensing ones are not in the original phases of development, but are added in later as the service/feature is built on.
Microsoft has a long history of this. Some other examples: There was no auditing on flow runs forever, even though limiting O365 Group creation was a premium feature you could still create it, Other premium group features were accessible to everyone through Azure AD regardless of your licensing, etc etc.
They develop the technology and get it to work, but dont provide the limitations around it (either in effect, or in your case by disclaimers/limitations to the admin functionality). Luckily they eventually get around to adding stuff like this normally. However I guarantee you will see more of it in the future.
2. They kind of want to show your clients this feature. Lets be honest, this is how allot of the security and compliance center has been since it became the security and compliance center. They show you all the bells and whistles, and what you can do, as they want clients to explore and see the power of them, but they do limit them behind licenses. They are a subscription based service. They want you client to know about labels, and that they can do powerful things like PCI compliance reporting. Now your client has that knowledge they did not before, and it is a business decision on their side if they make it or not.
Think about something like the secure score, that thing is FULL of e5 features and advanced options that are additional licensing.
Kind of annoying as a consultant I know, but I dont necessarily see them changing away from this anytime soon.
Adam
Thanks for the reply Adam. I understand wanting to showcase the bells and whistles and such. I also think that if they are going to display these features regardless of what license is actually in a Tenant, some warning around it wouldn't be amiss. For instance, when an admin clicks on auto-apply, a small pop-up that says "this feature requires an E5 license, do you want to continue" wouldn't be terribly challenging. And it could pop up regardless of the license in the Tenant (so even if you have an E5, you would see the pop-up - then it's less logic around the pop-up). If you're going to showcase the bells and whistles, let users know what they are actually capable of using.
Just my two cents - and it's not worth much more than that.
