Forum Widgets
Latest Discussions
MECM OSD TS Application Installations fail randomly to download content.
We are experiencing a persistent and well-documented issue with MECM OSD Task Sequences where Applications randomly fail to install after the MECM client has been installed. This behavior seems to affect many environments and has been an ongoing problem for years, yet a definitive solution remains elusive. In our case, we have over 30 Applications included in the OSD Task Sequence. Despite implementing all commonly recommended mitigations—such as inserting an additional restart after the MECM client installation and including a two-minute delay before the Application install task group begins—we still encounter random failures. The issue is not limited to any specific Application; it can be any one of the 30+ Apps, and the failure to download appears to occur entirely at random. Occasionally, most of the Applications install successfully, and only one will fail, which subsequently causes the entire Task Sequence to fail with the same error. Importantly, all of these Applications install without any issues post-OSD, further confirming that the problem lies not with the Applications themselves but with the process during the Task Sequence. The randomness of which App fails also suggests an underlying process, feature, or timing issue—not an App configuration problem. We have thoroughly validated all related infrastructure settings: Boundaries and boundary groups have been triple-checked. No boundary is assigned to multiple groups. Site system assignments are correct. We are using PKI certificates and HTTPS, and the client authentication certificate is present on the device at the time of failure. The issue has been replicated across both Windows 10 and Windows 11, ruling out any specific cumulative updates or OS version anomalies. No additional language packs are being installed—only language fallback is applied via the "Apply Windows Settings" step. One suspicious observation is the lack of any reference to our local Distribution Point in the LocationServices or CAS logs during failure events. Initially, this pointed to a possible boundary misconfiguration, but after multiple checks, no issues have been identified. Unfortunately, we are unable to use the common workaround of converting Applications to Packages, due to internal policies and deployment requirements. Therefore, we need to resolve this while continuing to use Applications in the Task Sequence. Given the number of years this issue has persisted across customer environments, it's surprising there isn’t more formal guidance or documentation available to help isolate the root cause. If anyone has encountered a similar scenario or has any advanced troubleshooting tips, we would greatly appreciate your insight.TechKngMar 16, 2026Copper Contributor224Views0likes1CommentNew MECM Build, Device Collections not showing devices
I just built a new MECM server and updated it to version 2509. I imported an older Device Collection script to make collections. The Windows Server 2012/2012R2 did find the 4 servers that I have but for 2019, 2022 and 2025, nothing is showing. Here are some queries that I have tried: select SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name,SMS_R_SYSTEM.SMSUniqueIdentifier,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Client from SMS_R_System inner join SMS_G_System_OPERATING_SYSTEM on SMS_G_System_OPERATING_SYSTEM.ResourceID = SMS_R_System.ResourceId where SMS_G_System_OPERATING_SYSTEM.Version = "10.0.20348" select SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name,SMS_R_SYSTEM.SMSUniqueIdentifier,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Client from SMS_R_System inner join SMS_G_System_OPERATING_SYSTEM on SMS_G_System_OPERATING_SYSTEM.ResourceID = SMS_R_System.ResourceId where SMS_R_System.OperatingSystemNameandVersion like "%Server 10%" and SMS_G_System_OPERATING_SYSTEM.BuildNumber = "20348" select SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceID,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceType,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Name,SMS_R_SYSTEM.SMSUniqueIdentifier,SMS_R_SYSTEM.ResourceDomainORWorkgroup,SMS_R_SYSTEM.Client from SMS_R_System inner join SMS_G_System_OPERATING_SYSTEM on SMS_G_System_OPERATING_SYSTEM.ResourceID = SMS_R_System.ResourceId where SMS_G_System_OPERATING_SYSTEM.BuildNumber = "20348" I even tried one using the OS Name. The limiting Collection used is Servers | All which shows 97. I also changed it back to All Systems, but to no avail. All the boundries and boundry groups are set.wfry24Feb 13, 2026Copper Contributor51Views0likes1CommentIssues with OSD in secondary MCM 2509 site
Hi, having upgraded primary and secondary MCM site to version 2509 I cannot perform OSD anymore on secondary site location - errors: Failed to query Management Point locator QueryMPLocator: no valid MP locations are received Boundary Group in secondary site does have assigned MP and that is secondary MCM site server - however I get this as well: <MPLocation SiteCode="" AssignedSiteCode="" MP="" MPCertificatesEx="" x86UnknownMachineGUID="" x64UnknownMachineGUID=""/> Any help would be highly appreciated.BojanZFeb 03, 2026Copper Contributor55Views1like0CommentsSCCM - 23/24H2 to 25H2 Upgrade
Hello SCCM Community! Having an issue with upgrading devices from 23 and 24H2 to 25H2, I am downloading the newest version in SCCM under Windows Servicing and Feature Upgrades and deploying it to the targeted collection, but nothing shows in Software Center. Upon checking the UpdatesDeployment log, it shows Actionable Updates = 0 in one of the lines, but I'm wondering why WUA is determining updates do not apply to the machine. I believed this could be a GPO restriction but I've confirmed that there are no conflicting GPOs or Registry Edits. Any suggestions? Thanks!ctowensJan 28, 2026Copper Contributor553Views1like1CommentApplications deployed on device based collection are missing from devices.
Hey guys, In my SCCM environment we are facing an issue. Its a co-managed environment where apps are deployed via SCCM. All of a sudden the apps deployed on Device based collection are not reaching the end user devices. The policies related to these app are also not reaching the device. The compliance status for these apps also went down even though if it is installed on the device the SCCM reports as Non-Compliant\Error. Has anyone faced this issue or can help me to identify what could be causing the issue.Chetan_SCCMJan 13, 2026Copper Contributor283Views0likes6CommentsExisting required application deployments policy is not sent to devices
I have couple hundred applications in SCCM/MCM that are set to required and whenever there is a new device is built, all these required applications automatically get installed. I am on 2503 and 5 days ago i started seeing this issue. But if modify that deployment with current date and time then the application gets deployed right away if i run Application Deployment evaluation cycle. I also tested by deleting the existing deployment and created a new required deployment and run Application Deployment evaluation cycle then the application installs right away. The problem seems like the Primary server is not sending the policy to the client for existing deployments. The application compliance that we see for every deployment under Monitoring for all the devices moved to Error with Success. Not sure why this is happening. All these changes i noticed in the last one week. A week ago all these Already Compliant and Success status device count is under Success tab. Let me know if you have any suggestions.MCM1Jan 13, 2026Copper Contributor342Views0likes5CommentsSYSTEM CENTER IMPLEMENTATION & LICENSING Guide
Dear Microsoft Community, Our organization is planning to deploy a comprehensive IT management solution using the Microsoft System Center Suite. The goal is to streamline infrastructure operations, enhance backup and recovery, manage both virtual and physical resources, oversee endpoints, and maintain security and compliance. We need guidance regarding the number and type of licenses required, specifically Client Management Licenses (CML), Server Management Licenses (ML), and System Center Suite licenses.narayandas4oneDec 20, 2025Copper Contributor345Views0likes5CommentsSystem Center Configuration Manager : Trojan QGIS software false detection ?
Hi, I’m not sure where to report or ask about this alert, so I’m posting here. I use SCCM to deploy the software QGIS (an open-source GIS application) to users’ computers using .msi installers. Recently, SCCM removed my installer and reported the following alert: System Center Endpoint Protection a détecté un programme malveillant sur un ou plusieurs ordinateurs de votre organisation Nom de la collection : _Tous les serveurs Nom du programme malveillant : Trojan:Win64/ScarletFlash.ASA!MTB Nombre d'infections : 1 Heure de la dernière détection (heure UTC) : 03/12/2025 02:14:24 Voici les infections de ce programme malveillant : Nom de l'ordinateur : xxx.xxxxxxx.xxxx Domaine : xxxx Heure de détection (heure UTC) : 03/12/2025 02:14:24 Chemin d'accès au fichier du programme malveillant : containerfile:_E:\Sources_Packages\QGIS\3.40.10\QGIS-OSGeo4W-3.40.10-1.msi;containerfile:_E:\Sources_Packages\QGIS\3.40.12-1\QGIS-OSGeo4W-3.40.12-1.msi;file:_E:\Sources_Packages\QGIS\3.40.10\QGIS-OSGeo4W-3.40.10-1.msi->application.cab->filD90E2F766C2B1014B0D199BDDDF46963;file:_E:\Sources_Packages\QGIS\3.40.12-1\QGIS-OSGeo4W-3.40.12-1.msi->application.cab->fil338C30DA73AC1014AF5482D1DA910BA5 Action de correction : Aucune action État des actions : Réussi Pour afficher d'autres informations sur l'activité des programmes malveillants dans votre organisation, exécutez le rapport des détails du programme malveillant. I contacted QGIS security team that says it's probably a false detection. How can I report this to Microsoft and request an update to their detection signatures to prevent this installer from being deleted? Sincerly,DoantDec 16, 2025Copper Contributor134Views0likes1CommentIssues with Capturing Windows11 25H2
I have been trying to capture an updated image from vsphere8 and sccm. I had zero issues with 22H2 and 23H2 but now I cannot get sysprep to pass generalizing. This error keeps coming up but I have tried most things the great Google had to offer. Any one else running into this issue?brown_shDec 16, 2025Copper Contributor954Views0likes1Comment
Tags
- cm current branch47 Topics
- Operating System Deployment18 Topics
- software update management14 Topics
- Site Setup and client deployment10 Topics
- App Management8 Topics
- general7 Topics
- SCCM7 Topics
- cloud-attached management6 Topics
- endpoint protection5 Topics
- CM 20124 Topics