Forum Widgets
Latest Discussions
Anyone managing Azure budgets? Would love to hear how you're doing it
Hi everyone - I’m a founder working on a tool to help engineering and infra teams plan and monitor Azure cloud costs more effectively (especially when it comes to budgeting and forecasting). I’m not selling anything - just trying to understand how teams currently handle: Planning Azure spend across teams or projects Staying within budget or tracking drift over time Forecasting costs based on changing usage If you're involved in this (or have strong opinions about what Azure does well/poorly here), I’d love to hear your thoughts. Even a few sentences would be super helpful. You can DM me here or just drop a quick comment. Happy to share what I’ve learned from others too. Thanks!
Azure Support Case Feedback
Hello, Just posting this thing here after couple email exchanges with the Azure Support Team. So basically 2 issues I encountered via Azure Support (on Azure Portal) is like after getting an initial reply from the support team, I couldn't make any follow-up reply (i.e., unable to re-open the ticket). The second issue is the ticket blocks my access. According to the Azure Support Team, they indicated that the issue is transferred internally to another team under Microsoft so it's technically not part of Azure Support anymore and basically a limitation is that if the ticket is transferred to another team, the ticket could cause the issues mentioned above. Hence, I would like to provide this as feedback and potentially seek to submit this as a feature request to lift this limitation. Thanks
Comparision on Azure Cloud Sync and Traditional Entra connect Sync.
Introduction In the evolving landscape of identity management, organizations face a critical decision when integrating their on-premises Active Directory (AD) with Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD). Two primary tools are available for this synchronization: Traditional Entra Connect Sync (formerly Azure AD Connect) Azure Cloud Sync While both serve the same fundamental purpose, bridging on-prem AD with cloud identity, they differ significantly in architecture, capabilities, and ideal use cases. Architecture & Setup Entra Connect Sync is a heavyweight solution. It installs a full synchronization engine on a Windows Server, often backed by SQL Server. This setup gives administrators deep control over sync rules, attribute flows, and filtering. Azure Cloud Sync, on the other hand, is lightweight. It uses a cloud-managed agent installed on-premises, removing the need for SQL Server or complex infrastructure. The agent communicates with Microsoft Entra ID, and most configurations are handled in the cloud portal. For organizations with complex hybrid setups (e.g., Exchange hybrid, device management), is Cloud Sync too limited?Resoure Graph Explorer
I’m looking to retrieve a list of Azure resources that were created within the last 24 hours. However, it appears that Azure does not consistently expose the timeCreated property across all resource types, which makes direct filtering challenging. Request for Clarification/Support: Could you please confirm if there’s a reliable way to filter resources based on their creation time — for example, resources created in the last N days or within the last 6 hours? If timeCreated is not uniformly available, what’s the recommended approach (e.g., using Resource Graph, Activity Logs, or any other reliable method) to achieve this?
Empowering Data Security with Azure Rights Management and Azure Information Protection
In today’s digital world, data is one of the most valuable assets a business can have. Whether it’s customer information, financial records, or internal documents, keeping that data safe is absolutely necessary. As more companies move to cloud-based systems and work in hybrid environments, the need for smart and reliable data protection tools is growing fast. That’s where Azure Rights Management (RMS) and Azure Information Protection (AIP) come in. These tools help businesses organize, label, and secure their data across different platforms, making sure it stays protected no matter where it goes. Understanding Azure Rights Management (RMS) Azure RMS is a cloud-based service designed to safeguard digital information through encryption, identity, and authorization policies. It ensures that data remains protected regardless of where it resides—on a local device, in the cloud, or in transit. Core Protection Workflow The Azure RMS protection process is straightforward yet powerful: Encryption: When a user initiates protection, the content is encrypted using strong cryptographic standards. Policy Attachment: An access policy is embedded within the file, defining what actions are permitted (e.g., read-only, no print, no forward). Authentication: Access is granted only after successful authentication via Azure Active Directory (Azure AD). Decryption and Enforcement: Once authenticated, the file is decrypted and the access policy is enforced in real time. Encryption Standards in Use Azure RMS employs: AES 128-bit and 256-bit encryption for securing documents. RSA 2048-bit encryption for protecting customer-specific root keys. These standards ensure that even if data is intercepted, it remains unreadable and unusable without proper authorization. Azure Information Protection: Beyond Encryption While Azure RMS focuses on securing content, Azure Information Protection (AIP) adds a layer of intelligence through classification and labeling. AIP enables organizations to define and apply sensitivity labels that reflect the value and confidentiality of their data. From Classic to Unified Labeling Microsoft has transitioned from the classic AIP client to the Unified Labeling Client, which integrates directly with Microsoft 365 compliance solutions. This shift simplifies management and enhances compatibility with modern Office applications. Sensitivity Labels in Action Sensitivity labels help organizations manage data access and usage by categorizing content into levels such as: Public: Safe for public distribution. General: Internal use only. Confidential: Restricted to specific internal groups. Highly Confidential: Limited to named individuals with strict usage controls (e.g., no printing or downloading). Labels can be applied manually by users or automatically based on content inspection, context, or metadata. Built-In Labeling in Office Apps Modern Office apps now support built-in labeling, eliminating the need for separate add-ins. This native integration ensures a smoother user experience and reduces the risk of compatibility issues or performance degradation. Licensing Overview To leverage AIP features, organizations must have the appropriate licensing: Office 365 E3 and above: Basic classification and labeling. AIP Plan 1: Included in Microsoft 365 E3 and EMS E3. AIP Plan 2: Included in Microsoft 365 E5 and EMS E5, offering advanced capabilities like automatic labeling and document tracking. Real-World Use Cases Access Control: Limit access to sensitive documents based on user roles or departments. Version Management: Use labels to distinguish between draft and final versions. Automated Workflows: Trigger encryption or archiving when documents reach a certain sensitivity level. Why Azure Information Protection Matters Implementing AIP brings a host of benefits: Persistent Protection: Data remains secure even when shared externally or accessed offline. Granular Control: Define who can access data and what they can do with it. Visibility and Auditing: Monitor access patterns and revoke access if needed. Hybrid Compatibility: Protect data across cloud and on-premises environments using the Rights Management connector. Centralized Management: Streamline policy creation and enforcement across the organization. Conclusion Azure RMS and AIP together form a powerful duo for modern data protection. By combining encryption, identity management, and intelligent labeling, organizations can confidently secure their most valuable asset information while enabling seamless collaboration and compliance.
Activate text entry box not accepting text
I have been experiencing this issue for a few weeks now and assumed it was just me. But I asked several co-workers and they are all experiencing the same issue. When attempting to active a PIM role in Azure, the text entry box for adding the reason you're activating the role will flash and change the outline to blue, indicating it is now ready to accept text entry. However, it will not allow typing in text. If you click inside the box several times, you might be offered the option to auto-fill a previously used entry (but not always). In order to actually type in the reason, I have to first click on "Roles" in the activation window, then click "Activate" again to get back to the text box. It will then accept text entry and allow completion of role assignment. It's not a huge problem, but it adds steps and time to role assignment, which isn't ideal since roles are usually being grabbed to take care of an apparent emergency. (I have a great short video showing exactly what I'm talking about, but the media insertion option would not allow adding it here.)
Create a Release Pipeline Agent in Azure DevOps
Hi, I am trying to install a new agent for my Azure DevOps. I have followed the instructions that Azure DevOps provides when trying to install/create a new agent, but I am constantly running into an issue when installing the agent mentioned in the following URL: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/install/application-not-started?version=(null)&processName=AgentService.exe&platform=0009&osver=6&isServer=0&shimver=4.0.30319.0 I am running .NET Framework 4.6.2 on my system, and I do not know how to create the agent on my local system, I keep running into this error. I have also updated my PAT for both GitHub and Azure DevOps. Regards, Asim Khan
Has anyone here integrated JIRA with Azure DevOps
We are currently using Azure Pipelines for our deployment process and Azure Boards to track issues and tickets. However, our company recently decided to move the ticketing system to JIRA, and I have been tasked with integrating JIRA with Azure DevOps. If you have done something similar, I will appreciate any guidance, best practices, or things to watch out for.Azure Form Recognizer Redaction Issue with Scanned PDFs and Page Size Variations
Hi all, I’m working on a PDF redaction process using Azure Form Recognizer and Azure Functions. The flow works well in most cases — I extract the text and bounding box coordinates and apply redaction based on that. However, I’m facing an issue with scanned PDFs or PDFs with slightly different page sizes. In these cases, the redaction boxes don’t align properly — they either miss the text or appear slightly off (above or below the intended area). It seems like the coordinate mapping doesn't match accurately when the document isn't a standard A4 size or has DPI inconsistencies. Has anyone else encountered this? Any suggestions on: Adjusting for page size or DPI dynamically? Mapping normalized coordinates correctly for scanned PDFs? Appreciate any help or suggestions!Intern project using Azure OpenAI
Hello, I'm an intern on the Python services team. My project revolves around using the Azure OpenAI service. I was wondering if anyone with expertise using this service could meet with me this week to talk more about its capabilities? Or point me in the right direction to get the help I'm looking for. Thanks!
