Assign IP Address for Windows Server 2025 VM on Hyper-V
I have built my first Windows Server 2025 VM on HyperV and trying to assign an IP address. I want the VM's to be like an actual server so I Created an external vswitch. The HyperV server IP is 172.16.1.41 with a physical gateway of 172.16.1.5. I have tried to assign the new VM with 172.16.1.42/255.255.255.0 and the Gateway is 172.16.1.5 also. However, I cannot get a positive ping. Do I need another VSWITCH configured or what am I missing?
Hyper-v Ubuntu 26.04LTS Multiple DHCP entries
Good evening, am running windows server 2022 datacenter edition, which is running multiple hyper-v machines. I have been installing a new instance of ubuntu 26.04.1LTS but have noticed something weird. Maybe you could assist. Issue: When fresh install Ubuntu 26.04.1 into a VM using hyper-v, I notice 2 IP addresses appear in windows DHCP (192.168.40.20, 192.168.40.21). When I shut down the instance only one disappears (192.168.40.21). If I delete 192.168.40.20 and restart the VM instance both Ip addresses reappear in DHCP. Points to note: Image was downloaded direct off the website with no changes (have redownloaded to make sure image is not broken) Have tried using a different name for the server Have noticed the ubuntu instance only picks up one address (192.168.40.21) for the adaptor. Am unable to ping 192.168.40.20 or connect to that address via ssh. Would anyone have any idea, where the second IP address would be coming from in DHCP?
Central pki
Has anyone implemented a centralised PKI where the Root CA is stored in Azure Key Vault and workloads can automatically obtain the Root CA when they are deployed, as well as receive updated versions when the Root CA needs to be rotated or renewed? I’m looking to implement a centralised PKI for an Azure hub-and-spoke architecture, where workloads across the spokes can automatically obtain and trust the Root CA. The workloads could include VMs, AKS, containers, App Services and Azure Functions. I’m aware that Azure Machine Configuration can be used to deploy certificates to VMs, but this is specific to VMs. What is the recommended approach for distributing the Root CA to the other Azure workload types using a consistent and automated mechanism? Ideally, I’d like the solution to be fully automated, so that new workloads receive the current Root CA during deployment and existing workloads automatically receive updated versions whenever the Root CA is rotated or renewed. I will be deploying the root ca in a key vault via terraform a project for the root ca only to update whenever is needed and then each resources to be able to get the latest root ca. Has anyone implemented something similar, or could you provide guidance on the recommended architecture and distribution mechanism?
Zero Trust DNS is Here: Elevating Enterprise Security on Windows 11
When attackers target an enterprise today, they rarely begin with a blunt smash-through-the-front-door intrusion. They begin quietly by resolving a domain. In most cases, modern malware, phishing kits, and human-operated ransomware operators rely on DNS as the entry point to discover infrastructure, beacon command-and-control, and exfiltrate data. Thus, it is becoming even more important to secure DNS to help protect against increasingly frequent, complex, and expensive cyberattacks. Enterprises have invested heavily in Protective DNS services with cutting-edge threat intelligence to identify and block malicious domains in real time but if an endpoint device can simply bypass them, the entire Zero Trust posture is weakened. Today, Microsoft is closing that gap. Introducing Zero Trust DNS (ZTDNS) We are excited to announce that Zero Trust DNS (ZTDNS) is now generally available on Windows 11 Enterprise and Windows 11 Education editions. ZTDNS is a new enterprise security feature in Windows that helps ensure DNS policy configured on the enterprise DNS server is enforced on the device. This is an important advancement for organizations working to enable that outbound connectivity on managed Windows devices aligns with enterprise authorization and policy. ZTDNS provides device-level enforcement of an enterprise’s DNS policy, in-box on Windows 11 helping ensure devices only communicate with destinations the organization intends. It doesn’t require installing and managing additional agents or maintaining a “best effort” block list on each endpoint device. With ZTDNS, the enterprise DNS resolver becomes the policy source of truth and Windows becomes the enforcement point. For more information, check out our documentation. This can be particularly useful for organizations in highly regulated industries, or where compliance with NIST standards is of paramount importance. Without ZTDNS, the system DNS client could be pointed to a network-provided malicious DNS server, which can resolve unapproved domains and return incorrect resolutions to redirect the system to attacker’s endpoint. If the malicious DNS server uses encrypted DNS, IT administrators won’t be able to analyze the DNS traffic to prevent or mitigate potential attacks. Applications can use their own DNS client to completely bypass system policies. Also, system remains vulnerable to in-network attackers. ZTDNS protects against these attack vectors by mandating the use of Windows DNS client and only sending encrypted DNS queries to the trusted DNS servers. Since ZTDNS blocks all outbound connections and local name resolution by default, the system is protected against in-network threats. Why is ZTDNS needed? In enterprise scenarios, DNS is no longer just a lookup mechanism but a policy decision point. However, without device-level enforcement, attackers can hijack device DNS to: Redirect DNS queries from the device to a malicious or compromised DNS server Use their own encrypted DNS client and bypass system DNS client Bypass DNS completely with direct IP connections In such cases, organizations lose the ability to control which network destinations the endpoint is allowed to reach even if a Protective DNS service is used. ZTDNS addresses this by only allowing outbound connections to IP addresses that were resolved by the trusted DNS server for a query issued by the Windows DNS client. More importantly, it achieves this without terminating end-to-end encryption. How does ZTDNS work? ZTDNS integrates the Windows DNS client with the Windows Filtering Platform to help enforce domain-name-based network lockdown using encrypted DNS. ZTDNS is off by default and can be configured on a Windows 11 device with an enterprise-approved DNS over HTTPS (DoH) or DNS over TLS (DoT) server. When enabled, ZTDNS blocks all outbound IP-based connections by default and only allows outbound connections to IP addresses resolved by the trusted DNS server or those added to the manual exception list by the IT administrator. It mandates the use of encrypted DNS (DoH or DoT) and only trusts the DNS resolutions initiated by the Windows DNS client and answered by the trusted DNS server to create outbound allow exceptions. This helps provide a strong, enforceable control that aligns with Zero Trust principles: all destinations are untrusted by default unless specifically permitted. In a nutshell, when configured and enabled, ZTDNS will have the following effects on your Windows 11 device: Encrypted DNS enforcement (DoH or DoT) Default deny for outbound IPv4 and IPv6 traffic Dynamic allow listing of IP addresses returned by trusted DNS servers Static allow listing of IP addresses approved by the IT administrator via manual exceptions Centralized logging of permitted and blocked connections Deploying ZTDNS ZTDNS is available in the latest builds of Windows 11 Enterprise and Windows 11 Education. To deploy ZTDNS, enterprises can configure and enable it via: netsh commands JSON configuration We are also actively developing a Microsoft Intune experience for ZTDNS and we will share more information when the details are available. For detailed deployment guidance, check out our official documentation. Connect with us For customers attending Microsoft Ignite 2025, please join us at session BRK258: Inside Windows Security, from client to cloud to learn more about ZTDNS. Alternatively, you can also visit the Windows Resiliency Initiative & Windows Security booth to discuss ZTDNS in depth. For customers who are unable to attend Microsoft Ignite 2025, we would still welcome the opportunity to connect. If you have questions about Zero Trust DNS, deployment considerations, or would like to share feedback from your evaluation, please contact us at ztdnsteam@microsoft.com. Securing the Present, Innovating for the Future Security is a shared responsibility. Through collaboration across hardware and software ecosystems, we can build more resilient systems secure by design and by default, from Windows to the cloud, enabling trust at every layer of the digital experience. The updated Windows Security book is available to help you understand how to stay secure with Windows. Learn more about Windows 11 and Copilot+ PCs. To learn more about Microsoft Security solutions, visit our website. Bookmark the Security blog to keep up with our expert coverage on security matters. Also, follow us on LinkedIn (Microsoft Security) and X (@MSFTSecurity) for the latest news and updates on cybersecurity.Hyper-V Cluster Failover Event viewer log showing SMB traffic connect to quorum disk network share
Hi, To tweak my SIEM, I need to correlate smb network traffic between Hyper-V servers and witness disk stored on a network share on another server. I'm searching a log who tell me the Hyper-V is connecting to the witness disk (on network shared drive) for doing something ... probably I will be able to correlate and put exception when this happens and the SMB traffic between Hyper-V and the other server to stop always receive this alert. Any cues would be appreciated! ThanksNPS network policy with multiple Client ip4 addesses
I have a wireless policy on my NPS server with the primary wireless controller added using a Client IPv4 address entry in the policy. I want to add the backup controller as well but it seems it is adding it as a and condition. I need it to be added as an or condition when the primary controller is unreachable. How can I add multiple Client ip4 addessess in a Network policy with an or condition? An and condition would require both to be reachable. thanks.Azure VM Agent Status not ready
I have created a red hat openshift private cluster but the VMS are stuck in the state of "agent status not ready." I have followed these troubleshooting steps: Linux Virtual Machine Agent Status "Not Ready" - Microsoft Community Hub However, all of them seem to point to trying to check and see what is on the VM itself. I am unable to do this because I can't SSH into the machine. Has anyone else ran into this issue and been able to resolve it? I am deploying it via CLI as I was not able to do it via GUI for some reason. This is my script: #az login az account set --name "accountnamehidden" #az provider register -n Microsoft.RedHatOpenShift --wait #az provider register -n Microsoft.Compute --wait #az provider register -n Microsoft.Storage --wait #az provider register -n Microsoft.Authorization --wait $LOCATION= "eastus" # the location of your cluster $RESOURCEGROUP= "sample-rg" # the name of the resource group where you want to create your cluster $CLUSTER= "K8sDev1test" # the name of your cluster $arovnet= "sample-vnet" $mastersubnet = "k8sDev1-master-ue-snet" $workersubnet = "k8sDev1-worker-ue-snet" az aro create --resource-group "samplerg" --vnet-resource-group "sample-vnet-rg" --name $CLUSTER --vnet $arovnet --master-subnet "k8sDev1-master-ue-snet" --worker-subnet "k8sDev1-worker-ue-snet" --apiserver-visibility Private --ingress-visibility Private --fips true --outbound-type UserDefinedRouting --client-id hidden --client-secret hiddenAzure Networking: Request for Granular Control of “Allow Azure Services and Resources”
I would like to get the Azure community’s thoughts on a networking/security improvement that I believe could help organizations implement a stronger least-privilege model. Several Azure resources provide an option similar to: “Allow Azure services and resources to access this resource.” This is useful when an Azure service needs to access another Azure resource, but the current option can be quite broad. Example: Power BI → Azure SQL For example, suppose Power BI Service needs to access an Azure SQL Server. The actual requirement might be: Power BI → Specific Azure SQL Server = Allow However, the available option may require enabling: “Allow Azure services and resources to access this server” This effectively creates a much broader trusted-service exception than the actual requirement. Ideally, I would like to see something like: Azure SQL Server │ ├── Power BI Service → Allow ├── Azure Data Factory → Deny ├── Azure Functions → Deny ├── Azure App Service → Deny └── Other Azure Services → Deny Proposed improvement Could Microsoft provide an additional option such as: “Allow selected Azure services and resources” where customers can explicitly select which Azure service/resource is allowed to bypass the network restriction? Depending on the Azure service, the selection could potentially be based on: Specific Azure service Specific Azure resource Resource ID Subscription Resource group Tenant Managed identity / Entra identity Specific service instance For example: Trusted Azure Services / Resources Power BI → Production Analytics → Allow All other Azure services → Deny Why I think this would be useful This would give customers a middle ground between: Disabling public access and implementing Private Endpoint/private connectivity, or Allowing all Azure services/resources through the broad trusted-service exception. A granular trusted-service model would allow: Only the Azure service/resource that actually requires access is trusted. This would better support least privilege, Zero Trust, security, and compliance requirements. Broader Azure applicability My suggestion is not specifically for Azure SQL. The Power BI → Azure SQL scenario is just an example. I think this could be a common Azure networking capability for all Azure resources that currently support a trusted Azure services / “Allow Azure services and resources” type of bypass. I would be interested to hear from the Azure community and Microsoft: Is there already a way to achieve this level of granularity? Are there architectural/security reasons why this cannot currently be implemented? Is Microsoft considering a more granular trusted-service model? Would a feature like “Allow selected Azure services/resources” be technically feasible? I would appreciate any feedback or guidance from the Azure networking/service teams.
Office 365 Application Splash Screen / Start Screen
All office applications are opening with an alternate splash screen (the white one) I believe this is because the is a problem with my user's profile. I get the alternate screen when loading all office 365 applications. I have several odd things happening on the user's computer. Can anyone tell me what the alternate screen is telling me?
