CoPilot's OCR interfering with its functioning
I've asked CoPilot to create a research database in an .xlsx file, by extracting data from .pdf files that I have uploaded. It's working very hard and willingly, but is being frustrated because its OCR mechanism is grabbing and rendering the files before CoPilot can see the raw data. Feature Request: Give Copilot Access to Original Uploaded Files, Not Just OCR/Rendered Representations While building a research-grade numismatic catalogue from PDFs and an Excel workbook, Copilot was able to read OCR text and rendered pages but could not work directly with the underlying XLSX workbook or original PDFs. For research, legal, archival, genealogical, accounting and catalogue-building tasks, Copilot should have access to: Original uploaded file. Rendered page/image representation. OCR/extracted text. The AI should be able to choose the most appropriate representation for the task rather than relying primarily on OCR.
Credits usage for Copilot Studio Workflow with agents
If I add an agent(for research and analyze from the JSON provided) in Copilot studio recurring workflow, whose and which credits will be used whenever it runs? Hi Team, I have a question regarding licensing and credit consumption in Copilot Studio. I have created a Copilot Studio agent that performs research and analysis based on a JSON payload. I am planning to invoke this agent from within a Copilot Studio recurring workflow that runs on a schedule. Could you please clarify the following: When the recurring workflow executes and calls the agent, whose credits are consumed? The user who created the workflow? The owner of the agent? The account under which the workflow runs? The environment's pooled credits? Are there separate credit charges for: Workflow execution Agent invocation Generative AI/research actions performed by the agent Any guidance or documentation links explaining the credit consumption model for this scenario would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!Copilot Studio agent suddenly stopped working in Teams
Hello, I've run into a strange issue with a Copilot Studio agent and I'm trying to understand where to investigate next. The agent is published to the "Teams and Microsoft 365 Copilot" channel and was working normally in Microsoft Teams until recently. The agent still works correctly in Copilot Studio. The agent still works correctly in Microsoft 365 Copilot / Copilot Chat. The issue only occurs in Microsoft Teams. What happens in Teams: Messages can be sent to the agent. No error message is displayed. No response is returned. Most importantly, no session is created in Copilot Studio (Analytics / Observability). Because no session is created, it looks like the message never reaches the agent runtime. What I've already checked: Republished the agent. Reinstalled the Teams app. Verified the Teams and Microsoft 365 Copilot channel configuration. Checked permissions and sharing settings. Checked Teams Admin Center configuration. Tested in both Teams Desktop and Teams Web. Reviewed Microsoft 365 service health. This same tenant has another Copilot Studio agent that works normally in Teams. The affected agent previously worked in Teams for several weeks before the issue appeared. The agent architecture is very simple (single MCP server, no custom connectors, no Power Automate involved in this scenario). At this point, I'm mainly trying to understand why Teams no longer seems to create a conversation/session for this specific agent while the same agent continues to work in Copilot Studio and Microsoft 365 Copilot. Has anyone seen similar behavior or found a way to diagnose why Teams is no longer forwarding requests to a specific agent ? Thank you for helpCopilot Studio + SharePoint: Markdown (.md) Files in Doc Libraries Supported as Knowledge Sources?
Hi all, We’ve been doing some deeper testing with Copilot Studio agents grounded in SharePoint knowledge sources, and I’m hoping to clarify whether what we’re seeing is a known limitation or an undocumented gap. Scenario A Copilot Studio agent uses SharePoint document libraries as a knowledge source The library contains Markdown (.md) files that are intentionally used as canonical design references The same .md files: ✅ Work well when uploaded directly to the agent ❌ Are not retrievable or citable when stored in a SharePoint library and added as a SharePoint knowledge source To help with grounding, we created modern SharePoint index pages that: Explain what the markdown collections are (Patterns, ADRs, Guardrails) Link directly to the canonical folders and files Explicitly state that the .md files are the source of truth The agent can: Discover and summarize the index pages correctly Understand that .md artifacts exist and where they live But it cannot: Read the content of the individual .md files Apply a specific pattern or ADR from those files in a design conversation Cite them as sources, even when permissions and search indexing are confirmed What We’ve Checked Permissions (agent user has access) Folder depth (kept shallow) Search results (markdown files appear in SharePoint search) SharePoint indexing status Work IQ enabled Same content works when attached directly to the agent This behavior also seems consistent with what others have reported here: Markdown works when uploaded directly Markdown retrieval degrades when hosted in SharePoint libraries Questions for the Product Team / Community Are Markdown (.md) files in SharePoint document libraries officially supported as Copilot Studio knowledge sources today? If yes, are there specific constraints (file size, rendering, parsing, indexing) that differ from Word/PDF? If no (or “not yet”), is this a known limitation on the roadmap? Is the recommended pattern to: Convert important markdown files into .aspx pages, or Use thin “index / summary” pages and keep markdown canonical until retrieval improves? We’re happy to adapt our information architecture — just trying to align with the intended platform direction rather than work against it. Thanks in advance for any guidance or clarification. This capability is extremely powerful, and clearer expectations here would help a lot of teams make the right design tradeoffs.
Issue on Copilot studio Credit Consumption
Hello Community, We are currently using a Copilot Studio license (€10/month plan) and have encountered an issue when using our agent. Although our organization still has a significant number of Copilot credits available, the agent displays the following error message: "You are out of credits." To verify the credit status, we checked the Power Platform Admin Center, where Copilot credit consumption is monitored. The current usage details are: Total credits purchased: 1,281,000 Credits consumed: 427,737 Remaining credits: Approximately 853,263 Based on these figures, we still have around 800,000+ credits remaining, yet the agent is unavailable due to the "out of credits" error. We would appreciate any guidance on the following: Why is the agent reporting that we are out of credits when a large credit balance remains? Are there any known limitations, allocation settings, or licensing requirements that could cause this behavior? Are there any troubleshooting steps we can perform to verify whether the credits are correctly assigned and available for use? Has anyone else experienced a similar issue, and if so, how was it resolved? Any guidance or recommendations would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Using Dynamics 365 ERP MCP Server from a Standalone Copilot Studio Environment
We have a Copilot Studio environment that is not connected to Dataverse and is not linked to any Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations environment. We would like to use the Dynamics 365 ERP MCP Server from an agent in this Copilot Studio environment to retrieve data from F&O. Is this configuration supported? If so: What connection and authentication setup is required between Copilot Studio and the Dynamics 365 ERP MCP Server? Does the Copilot Studio environment need to be linked to the target F&O environment or Dataverse environment? Can the ERP MCP Server connect directly to F&O independently of the Copilot Studio environment? How is user authentication handled when the agent invokes MCP tools? Does the MCP connection use the authenticated user's F&O permissions, a service principal, or the connection owner's credentials? Are there any prerequisites, limitations, or recommended architectures for using the ERP MCP Server from a standalone Copilot Studio environment?
Copilot Studio agents problems connecting to Sharepoint knowledge source
Hello, Since last week users in my tenant are experimenting issues regarding the connection between copilot studio agents and Sharepoint. The agents are not able to extract information from Sharepoint sites, printing there is not information in the Sharepoint site regarding the user's question when that information is in Sharepoint. These agents used to work well till last week. Does have been any update in Microsoft 365 services that can be affecting these agents ability to retrieve information from Sharepoint?Adding a shared connected-agent bot to a solution pulls in all parent bots, no way to exclude?
I'm trying to add a single Copilot Studio bot to a solution, and it's pulling in every other bot that references it as a connected agent with no prompt and no way to include just the one bot. Repro: 1. Created a brand-new, empty solution (single publisher, no components added yet). 2. Objects → Add existing → Bot → selected only "agent_1" 3. No "include required components" dialog appeared the add just happened. Expected: the solution contains only the selected bot (at most, plus its own connection references). Actual: the solution jumped to 238 objects, 6 agents, 229 agent components, 3 connection references. It pulled in every other bot in the environment that has a connected-agent action pointing at "agent_1" (5 parent bots), plus their own further connected-agent dependencies. This makes it impossible to build a scoped solution around one client-facing agent when it shares a connected-agent bot with unrelated agents elsewhere in the tenant. Normal Dataverse solution dependencies pull in what a component requires; this also seems to pull in everything that depends on it, in reverse, with no override. Questions: 1. Is this expected/intended behavior for connected-agent solution dependency tracking? 2. Is there any supported way UI, PAC CLI, or Dataverse API to add a shared connected-agent bot to a solution without including every bot that references it?
