Data Retention for Former Employees
How are other organizations configuring the Viva Glint's ‘Retain survey responses and identifiable data for deleted users’ settings? Are you retaining former employees' identifiable information for historical reporting, or deleting their data when they leave? What factors did you consider when making the decision?
Cascading of Results
Hello! I’m not sure if this is the right forum for my question—please let me know if I should post elsewhere. I’m interested in learning how other Viva Glint customers handle sharing survey results within their organizations. Specifically, does anyone provide access to results directly to broader groups, rather than using a cascading process (from C-suite to VPs and then to Managers)? Currently, our process takes 4-6 weeks, as results are cascaded down each management level. I’d love to hear about other approaches—how do you share results? What are the benefits and drawbacks of bypassing the traditional cascading method?
Literature on Validation of Survey
Some of our insurance plans are requesting more technical information related to the glint patient safety pulse survey to demonstrate that it is "a psychometrically sound, scientifically validated instrument.” I am not seeing any references on the website or discussion boards related to any technical report that shows the validation that was done related to the GPS questions. Where may we find this level of information?
Changing the Elements of the Engagement Index
Glint's default Engagement index is a combination of eSat and Recommend items. Is it possible to change this formula? Can we choose different items/questions to be the ingredients in our company's Engagement index? If it is possible to do configure this, how do we make that change, and what would happen with benchmarks for Engagement? Thank you, anyone, for being willing to chime in!
Multiple Language Invitations
We are migrating next month with our first Viva-Glint pulse administration slated for September. One of the questions I haven't been able to solve for so far is the lack of external links or multiple languages being included in survey invites. We are multi-national and survey in 20 languages. In the past we would send out English invitations with a top banner of links to internal translations in the other 19 languages. It is my understanding that these links will no longer be possible. The suggestions we have received are to send out invites in the local languages based on country code, but we have a lot of international movement and don't want to guess at what language people might want. I'm curious to hear how other companies that have already gone through migration are navigating this change. I feel like this is a big obstacle and may impact our response rate. Thanks!