Add Site Link to External Users myapplications.microsoft.com
Hi, I'm wanting to add a simple Site Link to the myapplications.microsoft.com landing site for External Users. When an external user accepts an invitation the process ends with them reaching https://myapplications.microsoft.com/ which is just a mostly blank page. Is there a way to pre-populate the page with link to the Site that the external user has access to? Or I'd even settle for changing the landing page the external user ends on. Is that possible and how?
New user unable to search for external contacts
Hi all! We have a weird issue with one of our users in Teams. She is unable to do external lookup of users. Everyone else in my Org is able to do so. User has Microsoft 365 E5 license The Tenant is set to Teams only and we have compaired the user to others that are working without luck. Can anyone help me out?
People Science - resources and researches on a few different topics for exec presentation
Hi, I have a client and a leadership team that is bought-in to engagement, data-driven, and ambitious to do more. Tech industry, gone from start-up to 500 employees so starting to mature. They have been doing their own insights but have now sought after external consultant to provide more external viewpoints for inspiration and additional insights. Here are some topics that came up in the scoping session with HR Engagement trends in general, how are the scores shifting (slightly downwards?) and why? I have the “modern approach to measuring engagement” mentioning the revamp of the people success elements post-COVID so I can use some snippets from that. But does someone have a slide summarising it nicely rather than in text/article? Any other trends in the last year? The client has a focus on being great at hybrid working so would be good to see if anyone has done work with companies and the link between engagement and hybrid The client is still privately owned, small-ish (500 people) and one current challenge is their mixed comms about exit plan - when it could happen as most employees have equity. Interestingly very low employee attrition, although scores are declining (still high scores however). Possibly waiting for payout? If there are some materials on smaller companies who are privately owned where employees have equity and how to deal with comms in that environment Any specific trends on tech companies They use top 10th percentile benchmark, but since scores are declining, there are some gaps that are quite big. If someone has experience of “downgrading” to a lower benchmark, e.g. global mean, and how to position that. They don’t want to look like they’re dodging ambitions. I said a way to do it could maybe to include both – baseline and ambition. Any case studies/best practice on actions that worked on Prospects, Comms, Confidence in Sen. Leadership Much appreciated. PabloHow do I check the delivery reports for external mails from outlook?
I wish to check the delivered time of an email sent from a different company. I note that emails exchanged internally are of no problem when providing the delivery report. If possible, would there be a way for me to check the "delivery report" of mails sent from outside our company? Kind Regards,Teams Chat External Members - Mobile vs Desktop and External Members
Hello We're having ongoing issues connecting to external members of our Teams in chat. Our organization has about half of our team as external contractors from another org so half the team is at a second domain. We have all the members of the 2nd domain as Members. Ie I toggled them from Guests to Members in Azure directory. They all have Teams licenses in their 'home' domain. On Desktop - we can tag any of them no worries. Typing in their name after @ finds them immediately and we can tag them. In Chat however, typing in their name results in not finding anyone. I can type their full email and we can chat with them as an external person but then the chat is in their other domain, not our domain. On Mobile however, this is not an issue. Any of our members can be found in chat, and in fact we can't even add them to chat with externally. On Desktop, I can go into Manage Team, find the member (from external domain), click on them to get their info and then Chat with them and then it opens up their chat no worries. Just can't actually start the chat from the Chat window.. Becoming quite an issue as half our team is struggling to connect to the other half.
Accès sharepoint externe
Bonjour, je souhaite partager un site sharepoint pour des utilisateurs externe à mon organisation. Cependant je souhaiterais qu'ils puissent s'identifier sans forcément avoir à saisir systématiquement un code qui leur est envoyé par microsoft dans leur boite mail. Est-ce possible de définir un mot de passe pour chaque utilisateur ? D'avance merci.Users cannot see [External] tag in OWA and Outlook Conversation View
There are multiple ways to add [External] tag to emails received from outside the organization. O365 users can use the Native [External] tag in Office 365. You can apply [External] tag using transport rule in Exchange and Office 365. You can also set up [External] tag using rules in your third-party gateway. Exchange Team has already covered the first two options in their blog Native external sender callouts on email in Outlook. In this post I just wanted to talk about an intermittent issue where [External] tags behave differently for different emails. For example, You have 2 emails with [External] tag in the subject. When you reply to the first email you see the tag replaced with RE: and when you reply to the second email the tag is appended with RE: [EXTERNAL]. When you enable conversation view in Outlook or OWA you don’t see the [External] tag in the message preview for some emails, while it still shows for some other emails. But when you double click on either of the two emails the tag can be seen in the Subject line. The underlying cause for the issue lies in the MAPI properties of the email and the mechanism used to add the tag. There is one major difference between the Conversation View and Normal View. In normal view, the message preview displays the value in the MAPI property PR_SUBJECT. However, when we see the email in conversation view the message preview displays another MAPI property “PR_CONVERSATION_TOPIC” and that’s why in most cases you will not see the external tag. You can check these properties using MFC MAPI. In OWA, Conversation View is set by default, and you won’t see External tag in the message preview. You can click on Settings and change the view. A message store provider has the option of assuring that “PR_CONVERSATION_TOPIC” property is always set on incoming or outgoing messages. If these properties are already set, they should not be altered. If not, they can be set to PR_NORMALIZED_SUBJECT. So “PR_CONVERSATION_TOPIC” gets the value from “PR_NORMALIZED_SUBJECT” Now let’s find why is the value in “PR_NORMALIZED_SUBJECT” and PR_SUBJECT different? First Scenario: If the PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX is present and is an initial substring of PR_SUBJECT. In that case PR_NORMALIZED_SUBJECT and associated properties are set to the contents of PR_SUBJECT with the prefix removed. For First Scenario it is straight forward, as the PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX property was set explicitly, the string can be of any length and use any alphanumeric characters, but it must match a substring at the beginning of the PR_SUBJECT property. Here “External” will be removed from Subject when setting the value for “PR_NORMALIZED_SUBJECT” PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX is External: PR_SUBJECT is External: This is an Important Email PR_NORMALIZED_SUBJECT is This is an Important Email PR_CONVERSATION_TOPIC is This is an Important Email If this is the case with an email, it will not display External tag in message preview and when you reply to this email it will change the tag from External: to Re: Second Scenario: If the PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX is present, but it is not an initial substring of PR_SUBJECT, PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX is deleted and recalculated from PR_SUBJECT. Third Scenario: If PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX is not present, it is calculated from PR_SUBJECT In Second and Third Scenario, the property PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX is not set or needs to be recalculated. The rule for computing the prefix is that PR_SUBJECT must begin with one, two, or three letters (alphabetic only) followed by a colon and a space. If such a substring is found at the beginning of PR_SUBJECT, it is then added to PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX. Otherwise, PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX property remains unset. By design if store must calculate or recalculate the value of PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX then it will fail to calculate [External] as it is more than 3 alphabets long. This means PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX property will remain unset PR_SUBJECT_PREFIX is PR_SUBJECT is External: This is an Important Email PR_NORMALIZED_SUBJECT is External: This is an Important Email PR_CONVERSATION_TOPIC is External: This is an Important Email If this is the case with an email, it will display External tag in message preview because it is now the subject itself and when you reply to this email it will change the tag from External: to RE: [EXTERNAL]. Now that you understand when and why will you experience this problem you can circle back to tagging rule to fix this. You can check the protocol logs to find why the two emails were processed differently. This can happen either due to conflicting rule or if the tagging rule modifies Thread-Topic and Subject headers differently.
Sharepoint Online External Group
Hi, We currently have a Sharepoint 2013 foundation server that we run our small intranet on. We are a small group of companies (3) and each company has their own AD and Tenet on Azure AD. There are about 200 users in total. I have been trialling the Sharepoint Migration tool to migrate over the current intranet which seems a bit buggy but I think it will be enough with a bit of work to do a like for like. It seems pretty straight forward to add in my current users in the org that the Sharepoint site is hosted in. however, I also need to add in all of the other users from the 2 external organisations so they can see the site. Is there a simpler way to do this other than have to add in 130 users manually? Ideally, I was hoping to be able to just apply a group that was created in each external org to the sharepoint site but that doesnt seem possible. Previously (or currently, I should say) as we have forest trusts in place on premises, its pretty easy to do this but now we are moving to the cloud it doesnt seem like it is possible? thanks, Paul
