User can't see some emails after loading PST
Recently I helped a user migrate from an IMAP mail to Outlook. I downloaded the PST file from the old IMAP account and loaded the file into his new account, all in Classic Outlook as this user refuses to use the new Outlook. However, during the load of old mail he would stop receiving any new mail. To fix this I created a new profile and that did allow new mail to arrive, however, the mail from the backup didn’t show. I then loaded the backup into the new Outlook and it only loaded mail up to 2022. After this, we loaded the PST into Outlook Classic on a different device as to not disrupt workflow, but that also didn’t solve the issue. I loaded the PST file into a testing account, and it did load all the files, from 2020 to the date the file was created.Using a scanner device with HVE
Has anyone had any success in setting up a scanner device with HVE? Everything I've read about the HVE option allows for a scanner to send to HVE, but as I've had no luck in getting my Brother ADS-2800 to communicate with HVE. I've confirmed the settings multiple times, but keep getting the same error when I attempt a test email from the scanner. " Communication over the network using SSL was unsuccessful. The SSL settings may not be configured to match the server settings. Confirm the send e-mail server "Port" and the setting for "SSL/TLS". We'd like to use these scanners for sending into a pre-designated internal mailbox. In theory it should work - in practice however, different story.How to Bulk Transfer Meeting Ownership Between Mailboxes
The Invoke-ChangeMeetingOrganizer cmdlet can transfer meeting ownership from one user to another. In this article, we discuss using a PowerShell script to transfer meetings in bulk between users. The code requires a mixture of Exchange Online and the Microsoft Graph using a registered Entra ID app. It all sounds complicated, but really isn’t – and the code handles scenarios like transferring meetings from someone leaving the organization. https://office365itpros.com/2026/08/10/invoke-changemeetingorganizer-bulk/
Use the Invoke-ChangeMeetingOrganizer Cmdlet to Transfer Meeting Ownership
The Invoke-ChangeMeetingOrganizer cmdlet transfers meetings from one organizer to another and makes sure that all calendar settings are preserved. All of which sounds good, but some limitations exist that you should be aware of. The most important limitation is that although Exchange Online can switch ownership for a meeting event, it does nothing to update any online component, like a Teams meeting join URL. That remains a manual task. https://office365itpros.com/2026/08/06/invoke-changemeetingorganizer/
How to move user from a CSP Exchange Online licence to a Microsoft direct licence in the same tenant
I have an existing Microsoft 365 tenant with a single Exchange Online (Plan 1) licence that was purchased through Bluehost (Endurance International Holding B.V. CSP). Microsoft notified me that Endurance is no longer authorised as a Direct Bill CSP, so I decided to purchase a new Exchange Online (Plan 1) subscription directly from Microsoft My current situation is: Exchange Online (Plan 1) purchased through Bluehost/Endurance Exchange Online (Plan 1) purchased directly from Microsoft Both subscriptions are now active The problem is that Microsoft 365 appears to pool the licences together. Under Users → Active users → Licences and apps I only see Exchange Online (Plan 1) and there is no way to choose which subscription the user is assigned to. The licensing page simply shows: Licences assigned from all subscriptions: 1 / 2 The two subscriptions are only distinguishable by their billing profiles (one is the Bluehost/Endurance CSP subscription and the other is my new Microsoft direct subscription). I want to make sure my mailbox is consuming the Microsoft direct licence. How can I determine which subscription my user is currently licensed from? If the user is still consuming the CSP licence, what is the supported way to move them onto the Microsoft direct subscription? Is the licence automatically reassigned if the CSP subscription is cancelled, or is there a manual process that should be followed? I want to keep the existing tenant, mailbox, domain and email data and only change the billing source for the licence. Any guidance from anyone who has completed this transition would be greatly appreciated.
Outlook.de DKIM and DMARC records broken
Outbound mail from outlook.de carries a DKIM-Signature with d=OUTLOOK.DE; s=selector1, but the corresponding DNS TXT record at selector1._domainkey.outlook.de does not exist. This causes receiving servers to report dkim=permerror (no key for signature). To reproduce: Send a mail from any @outlook.de account Check the DKIM-Signature header — it references selector1 Run: dig TXT selector1._domainkey.outlook.de — no record returned The domain outlook.de also has no DMARC record published (dmarc=none). Some header information: Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:e41c:b0:73b:6833:703f with SMTP id em28csp1732536pxc; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:23:10 -0700 (PDT) [...] ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; mx.google.com; dkim=permerror (no key for signature) header.i=@OUTLOOK.DE header.s=selector1 header.b=mWWTJtqO; arc=pass (i=1); spf=pass (google.com: domain of email address removed for privacy reasons designates 2a01:111:f403:d20f::3 as permitted sender) [...] I leave out DNS this time as the discussion was marked as spam, but you can easily check it yourself: dig TXT selector1._domainkey.outlook.de and dig TXT _dmarc.outlook.de return no entries as all. So obviously the DNS records are not published. This leads to bad email reputation - so emails are either in SPAM folders or get rejected completely. Can someone from MS look into this and fix it. This is at least the case since June 2026 - see also https://borncity.com/blog/2026/07/02/patzt-microsoft-bei-dkim-fuer-outlook-de/ (which is in German unfortunately) - but that is the exact issue.
How can specific users be exempted from a tenant-scoped Microsoft 365 Apps Policy?
Hello, I am looking for guidance regarding Microsoft 365 Apps Cloud Policy Service behavior and policy precedence. Current configuration: In Microsoft 365 Apps Admin Center → Policy Management (config.office.com), we have the following policies: Policy 1 Name: Shorten Meeting Global Scope: Tenant Priority: 0 Configured settings: Shorten appointments and meetings = Enabled Reduce the end time of short appointments and meetings = 5 minutes Reduce the end time of long appointments and meetings = 10 minutes Policy 2 Name: Test Scope: User (Security Group) Priority: 1 Assigned only to a dedicated test group Relevant settings configured as Not Configured Observed client behavior: On corporate-managed devices, affected users receive the following registry values: HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Cloud\Office\16.0\Outlook\Options\Calendar shortenevents = End_Early endearlyshort = 5 endearlylong = 10 The Outlook option: File > Options > Calendar > Shorten appointments and meetings is greyed out. Additional validation: Using the same Microsoft 365 account on an external non-corporate device: The above registry path is not present. The Outlook option is editable. Testing performed: A user-scoped Cloud Policy was created and assigned to a dedicated security group. For the "Shorten appointments and meetings" setting, only the following options are available: Enabled Not Configured There is no Disabled option. but the Tenant policy continued to apply and the Outlook option remained locked. Questions Is there a supported way to exempt specific users from a tenant-scoped Microsoft 365 Apps Cloud Policy when the setting only supports "Enabled" and "Not Configured" and does not provide a "Disabled" option? Does Not Configured in a User-scoped policy allow evaluation to continue to the lower-priority Tenant policy? If policy precedence is changed so that: Test Policy = Priority 0 Tenant Policy = Priority 1 would the User policy potentially suppress the Tenant setting? Is there a supported way in Microsoft 365 Apps Cloud Policy Service to provide exceptions for specific users while keeping the Tenant policy as the organizational default? Has anyone successfully implemented an exclusion or override scenario for the "Shorten appointments and meetings" setting? Any guidance or documentation references would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.
Teams Meeting Add-in Not Appearing in Outlook
The computer was rebuilt from scratch and reinstalled with a clean operating system. After the installation, all required Microsoft applications (Outlook, Teams, etc.) were installed and the user successfully signed in. However, the Teams Meeting add-in is not appearing in Outlook as expected. Within the Outlook Calendar/Appointment window, only the Skype Meeting option is visible, while the Teams Meeting option is completely missing. Checks Performed: New Microsoft Teams is installed and functioning properly. Outlook and Teams are both signed in with the user account. Outlook COM Add-ins have been checked. Disabled Items have been checked. Teams Meeting Add-in for Microsoft Office has been verified. Outlook updates have been checked. Microsoft Teams has been reinstalled. Outlook profile has been verified. Exchange mailbox is active and functioning correctly. Despite all the above checks, the Teams Meeting option is still not displayed in the Outlook Calendar/Appointment window, and only the Skype Meeting integration is available. Expected Behavior: The Teams Meeting button should be available within the Outlook Calendar/Appointment window, allowing users to create Teams meetings and automatically generate Teams meeting invitations. Request: Please why the Teams Meeting Add-in is not being loaded into Outlook and provide assistance in restoring the Teams Meeting functionality within the Outlook Calendar/Appointment interface. Attachments: Screenshot showing the current issue (Teams Meeting button missing) Screenshot showing the expected behavior (Teams Meeting button visible)
