MATCH formula anomaly?
Can anyone explain this? If I simply type 490.44 and then calculate 490.44 as 490.44/40*40 (or even directly B3/40*40) excel recognizes both as equal through a simple A=B calculation yet not with a MATCH calculation. What is more odd is any other number I use does not cause this error...
Excell function problem
I have been using Excel for a good few years, i have a spreadsheet that has been working fine until now. My main problem is that when i copy & paste data everything works fine, i have been able to add cells to make a new total. but when i cut & paste the value of cells i get a REF error. so when i need to move a series of cells higher or lower any cells that contain word they move fine, the cells containing numbers move but the cell with the function just goes to #REF, the function was working okay with my previous versions of Excel but now it will not. if anyone has got any idea what the problem is or any way of fixing it i would be most gratefullsort by column then by numbers in a row
HI all I have a table of results pictured here. Once the results are in, I sort the table by the Total Score Column. When we have a tie (as in line 3 & 4, I need to sort by who has the most highest score... so, who has the most 9 (equal here), then by most 8.5 (line 4 wins the tiebreaker, 4 over 2) Can I do this so it doesn't affect the order of the columns but just the rows involved.
Regarding the filter by condition option in pivot table in the excel
I'm taking Google Data analytics course in the coursera, there they use filter in the pivot table and apply conditions like, less than or greater than, they were using the Google sheets, and I couldn't find that option in the excel, you can select or unselect the value in the filter but there's no option to apply conditions like lesser than or greater than such value. Is there any way you guys know, from which you filter the fields by conditions, please let me know.Excel table not using updated formula in new rows
I have an Excel spreadsheet that keeps giving me the same issue with the formulas in column O. Originally, column O contained the following formula: Original formula: =IF(R4<>"", R4, Q4) + IF(ABS(I5-I4) < 30, 25/1440, IF(ABS(I5-I4) <= 50, 40/1440, IF(ABS(I5-I4) <= 150, 60/1440, IF(ABS(I5-I4) <= 250, 80/1440, IF(ABS(I5-I4) <= 300, 100/1440))))) The formula has since been updated to: Current formula: =IF(R4<>"", R4, Q4) + IF(ABS(I5-I4) < 30, 25/1440, IF(ABS(I5-I4) <= 50, 40/1440, IF(ABS(I5-I4) <= 150, 60/1440, IF(ABS(I5-I4) <= 250, 80/1440, IF(ABS(I5-I4) <= 300, 100/1440))))) + C5/24 However, whenever I insert a new row, Excel automatically fills it with the original formula instead of the updated one, even though I have been using the updated formula for quite some time now. How can I make Excel recognize and use the updated formula when new rows are inserted?
Excel 365: Unexpected Predictive Behaviour Causing Retroactive Cell Changes in Structured Dataset
Hi everyone, I’m posting this to share an unusual and potentially important issue I encountered in Excel 365 this morning. I’ve already submitted a detailed report to Microsoft via the Feedback Hub, but I felt it would be useful to document it here for visibility and to see whether anyone else has experienced something similar. While entering data into a structured table (a parts‑catalogue workbook), Excel began exhibiting behaviour that did not match Flash Fill, AutoFill, or the standard predictive typing feature. Specifically: Grey predictive text appeared beyond the cursor and extended into cells below the active cell Excel began rewriting previously validated cells in the same column Each time I pressed Enter, Excel updated earlier rows based on its latest inferred pattern Attempts to correct earlier rows caused further cascading changes Undo did not revert all changes The behaviour resembled an AI‑style inference engine trying to “learn” my pattern, becoming progressively more confused This was not the normal predictive typing behaviour (which only shows grey text inside the active cell and does not affect other cells). The behaviour stopped only after I clicked the Flash Fill button twice, which suggests an internal state reset. I’m not seeing the issue now, and other workbooks behaved normally, so this appears to have been a transient internal mode rather than a persistent setting. I’m sharing this here because: it caused silent data corruption in a structured dataset it may indicate an experimental feature or feature‑flag activation others working with structured data may want to be aware I’d be interested to know if anyone else has seen similar behaviour If helpful, I can provide the reproduction steps, screenshots, and the engineering‑style report I submitted to Microsoft. Thanks, John
