Workflows - Posting a Card
I'm in the process of migrating our Jira integration with teams from using the soon to be deprecated Connectors, to Workflows. I have two problems that I can't see to overcome. 1. All the messages are posted as '[My Name] via Workflows posted a new message'. Is there any way the message can come from another user or no user? 2. The preview for the messages (in the notification popup and Activity screen) is 'Card', instead of anything useful. Together this makes the notifications not very useful. What I have done: The workflow is set up And what is being posted to the webhook is (for example). { "type": "message", "attachments": [{ "contentType": "application/vnd.microsoft.card.adaptive", "contentUrl": null, "content": { "type": "AdaptiveCard", "$schema": "http://adaptivecards.io/schemas/adaptive-card.json", "version": "1.4", "body": [{ "type": "ColumnSet", "columns": [{ "type": "Column", "width": "auto", "items": [{ "type": "Image", "url": "https://i.imgur.com/FrVumxY.png", "size": "Medium" } ] }, { "type": "Column", "width": "stretch", "verticalContentAlignment": "Center", "items": [{ "type": "TextBlock", "size": "Medium", "weight": "Bolder", "text": "Component Missing [ADP-xxx]" } ] } ] }, { "type": "TextBlock", "text": "Initiator: ", "wrap": true }, { "type": "TextBlock", "text": "ADP-xxx: Fixing reset password validation", "wrap": true, "weight": "Bolder", "color": "Accent", }, { "type": "TextBlock", "text": "Status: QA Ready", "wrap": true }, { "type": "TextBlock", "text": "Type: Bug", "wrap": true }, { "type": "TextBlock", "text": "Assignee: ", "wrap": true } ], "actions": [{ "type": "Action.OpenUrl", "title": "Open in Jira", "url": "https://xxx.atlassian.net/browse/ADP-xxx" } ], "$schema": "http://adaptivecards.io/schemas/adaptive-card.json", "version": "1.4" } } ] } I have tried posting various different combinations of summary attributes with no effect. Is there a whole better way of doing this, or is there a few tweaks I can make?
App Validation failing for no clear reason
We're trying to get our (very simple) Teams App listed on the app store, but during the App Validation we keep getting the same error: "Unable to upload the manifest.zip file in MS Teams." as seen below: Downloading the report doesn't give any more information, it only lists the only successful validation step ("BotID should be registered") and the error doesn't appear there. I've validated the manifest.json file against the schema, tried reuploading the same manifest to a different org (creating a new app and bot) - validation fails there too. Does anyone have any pointers? Here is my (anonymized) manifest file: { "$schema": "https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/json-schemas/teams/v1.19/MicrosoftTeams.schema.json", "manifestVersion": "1.19", "version": "1.1.1", "id": "[redacted]", "developer": { "name": "[redacted]", "websiteUrl": "https://www.[redacted].com", "privacyUrl": "[redacted]", "termsOfUseUrl": "[redacted]" }, "icons": { "color": "color.png", "outline": "outline.png" }, "name": { "short": "[redacted]", "full": "[redacted]" }, "description": { "short": "[redacted]", "full": "[redacted]" }, "accentColor": "#4A3AFF", "bots": [ { "botId": "[redacted]", "scopes": ["personal"], "supportsFiles": false, "isNotificationOnly": false, "commandLists": [ { "scopes": ["personal"], "commands": [ { "title": "help", "description": "Show what this bot does and how to connect your account" }, { "title": "connect", "description": "Get a fresh link to (re-)connect your account" } ] } ] } ], "staticTabs": [ { "entityId": "conversations", "scopes": ["personal"] }, { "entityId": "about", "scopes": ["personal"] } ], "permissions": ["identity", "messageTeamMembers"], "validDomains": ["app.[redacted].com", "auth.[redacted].com"] }
CS agent OK in M365 Copilot; Teams chat silent / no Studio session
We are troubleshooting a Copilot Studio agent that works correctly in Microsoft 365 Copilot and in the Copilot Studio test surface, but does not receive inbound activities from Microsoft Teams personal chat. Environment and evidence: - Agent: Copilot Studio agent (custom business assistant) - Copilot Studio agent ID: 88901b10-… (truncated) - Teams/Entra app ID: 7e4a53cc-… (truncated) - Manifest version: 1.0.8 - Channel configuration: Microsoft 365 Copilot + Microsoft Teams - Publish: Succeeded / Channel state: Synchronized - Agent Registry: Available - Authentication: Integrated / Tool credentials: Maker-provided - MCP/custom connector runtime: working (Studio tool test HTTP 200) - Microsoft 365 Copilot routing: working Failure specific to Teams: - Messages in Teams web and desktop appear delivered in the agent personal chat - Agent never replies - Studio monitor has M365 Copilot sessions, but no Teams session for those timestamps - Teams Admin Center Manage apps returns 0 results by name or exact app ID despite Agent Registry Available - Intentionally not republishing / reconnecting OAuth / rewiring connectors because M365 Copilot path proves the same agent+connection works Classification: FAIL — Teams inbound activity is not reaching the Copilot Studio agent. Questions focused on Teams delivery: 1. Why would Teams personal 1:1 messages never create a Studio conversation while M365 Copilot does? 2. Is a missing TAC Manage apps row expected under Unified App Management when Registry shows Available? 3. Known gaps: Agent Registry Available + channel Synchronized, but Teams client chat bound to a non-runtime endpoint? 4. Best diagnostic if Monitor shows 0 Teams sessions after a confirmed client send? Looking for production experience / documented workaround. Redacted evidence available; no tokens/secrets.
Migrating Teams Calling Bot (EchoBot) from VMSS to Windows Containers / ACI?
Hi everyone, I have built a Microsoft Teams Calling Bot using Application-Hosted Media based on the official C# EchoBot sample: https://github.com/microsoftgraph/microsoft-graph-comms-samples/tree/master/Samples/PublicSamples/EchoBot Currently, our signaling logic is fully serverless and runs efficiently on Azure Functions. However, the actual media processing (using the C# Calling SDK which relies on native Windows media binaries) is deployed on VMSS with Windows Server, just like the repository's default deployment guide suggests. Running these Windows VMs continuously is becoming extremely expensive, and we are looking for a cheaper, modern, or "on-demand" alternative to handle the media pipeline. Since raw audio processing strictly requires these native Windows-based Media binaries, I would like to ask the community: 1. Windows Containers (ACI / AKS): Has anyone successfully run this C# EchoBot/Media SDK inside Windows Containers (such as Azure Container Instances or AKS)? If so, how do you handle the public IP and port-binding requirements for the media sockets (since the platform needs direct public connectivity for UDP/TCP traffic)? 2. On-Demand Provisioning: Are there any known architectures or best practices for spinning up the media processor only when a call starts (e.g., triggering an ACI instance via the Azure Function signaling bot) and tearing it down afterwards to keep costs near zero when idle? 3. Alternative Approaches: If you have solved this high-infrastructure cost problem for a real-time raw audio bot in production, what architecture did you end up using? Any documentation, GitHub references, or architectural advice would be highly appreciated! Thanks!
What if post adaptive card and wait for a response timeout
Hi Team, Scenario: Post the adaptive card to the team chat. If the user doesn't respond after 2 hours, the adaptive card should be updated as "Expired"with a new design on the same conversation. In an attempt to comply with this, I used a "Post adaptive card in char and wait for response." Challenges: What would happen if I posted an adaptable card and waited for a response timeout? I wouldn't get a response. An error is being thrown. Expectations include waiting for a response after receiving an adapted card. In any case, your card has already produced a message ID and posted. This action should to return a Message Id in the event that a timeout occurs. Would you kindly respond if you have discovered a solution?Regarding Teams Meeting Media Transport Behavior in VDI Optimization Scenario
Hello Microsoft Teams Engineering Team, I am currently working on a Browser Content Redirection / media offload implementation for a VDI environment, where WebRTC media transport is handled through a local native component while the Teams application continues running inside the virtual desktop session. While testing, I observed that: 1:1 calls successfully receive audio and video media But in meetings auido / video RTP is never forwarded despite successful ICE, DTLS, and SRTP establishment DTLS ApplicationData traffic is present during meetings, suggesting DataChannel/SCTP activity Based on transport-level observations, it appears that Teams meetings may rely on SCTP/DataChannel communication for SFU video subscription management, while 1:1 calls do not require the same subscription flow. I wanted to ask whether: Teams meeting video forwarding depends on active bidirectional SCTP/DataChannel connectivity Meeting video subscriptions are expected to be coordinated over the WebRTC data channel/control plane Split ownership of media transport and control-plane transport could affect expected Teams meeting behavior in VDI optimization scenarios Thank you for your time and guidance. Best regards,Rajdev
