missing co-pilot conversation history after update:
I have updated Co-pilot this morning. when co-pilot restarted my chat history/ conversations were uploaded... except for one. the affected conversation started in January 2026 and is significantly larger than your other chats (a project based sparring exchange). I refreshed, but that did not work out: error message ("Unable to load"/white screen. other smaller conversation did up-load correct. I use Copilot app version macOS Tahoe 26.6.2 version. support could not help me and send me to this platform....Incorrect Microsoft 365 Entitlement showing in Copilot
When using Copilot at https://copilot.microsoft.com I am seeing a page that comes up and shows me as logged in with a Microsoft 365 Family entitlement, but then after about 1 second, it redirects to some other page, seemingly a login/authentication page, and then redirects back to the Copilot chat, but my entitlement now shows "Personal" instead of "Microsoft 365 Family". All my chat history appears to still be there, but some preview features that I had been using such as Copilot Health are no longer available. I contacted Microsoft Support who redirected me to this forum identifying that there is likely an issue with my subscription entitlement. My account is the subscription owner. The issue started a week or so ago and I also see "Personal" in the Copilot app on Android. indicating that it is not an issue with a particular client side experience.
Chats desaparecido tras actualización de Copilot
Después de la actualización de Copilot, la nueva interfaz no muestra ninguna de mis conversaciones. Utilizo la misma cuenta de Microsoft en PC y móvil. Antes de que la actualización se completara, podía ver y abrir todos mis chats desde la interfaz antigua, por lo que las conversaciones seguían existiendo. Ahora la nueva experiencia muestra el historial vacío. ¿Se trata de un problema conocido de migración o sincronización del historial?Copilot Capabilities
What's one Copilot Capability you use almost every day that you think more people should know about? For me, this will be Copilot in PowerPoint. As someone who creates PowerPoint decks a lot, I find it very helpful. Copilot knows how to align with the brand goals, brand colors, and brand information. I'd love to hear from you, what aspect of Copilot makes life easier for you.CoPilot account issue
Bot WC said: Based on the troubleshooting performed so far, the issue appears to be specific to your Microsoft account, as: Copilot is failing on multiple platforms (MacBook, iPhone, and web browser). The issue occurs in both normal and Incognito/InPrivate sessions. Your Microsoft 365 Personal subscription is active. Your Copilot credits are available. Another Microsoft account works normally on the same devices. At this point, I recommend reaching out to the Microsoft Copilot Technical Community, where account-specific Copilot issues can be reviewed by Microsoft moderators and specialists who can investigate service-side restrictions, account anomalies, or backend-related issues. Where can a specialist sort this for me?Microsoft 365 Copilot
Microsoft 365 Copilot – Persistent Source Access, Retrieval and Corpus Analysis Failures I am posting this because I have been experiencing persistent problems with Microsoft 365 Copilot when working with academic source material, and after multiple troubleshooting attempts, support contacts, and Level 2 escalation, I still do not have a meaningful explanation or solution. My use case is academic research. I work with a corpus of approximately 17–20 academic textbooks, handbooks, dictionaries, and reference works in linguistics and sociolinguistics. My goal is deliberately to test the maximum practical capacity of the subscription plan I am paying for, especially regarding multi-source analysis, retrieval, source grounding, session continuity, comparison, and synthesis. The subject matter itself is completely clear to me. I know what is contained in these sources, I am familiar with the terminology and relevant concepts, and I can independently verify whether Copilot has actually accessed the relevant material, omitted major sources, misunderstood terminology, or produced a synthesis that does not reflect the corpus. This is therefore not a case of an unclear prompt or of a user being unable to evaluate the answer. What I have already tested I have tried multiple ways of providing the source material. I have: used files stored within the Microsoft ecosystem; used OneDrive; tested Microsoft 365 Copilot; tested Copilot workflows involving Word; tested Notebook-style source workflows; rewritten and simplified prompts; created detailed protocols instructing Copilot to analyse all available sources; explicitly required source attribution; explicitly required comparison between authors; instructed Copilot not to stop at automatically generated summaries or partial retrieval output; converted the material into different file formats. The file-format testing produced one particularly strange result. Ironically, the most satisfactory results were obtained only after taking an original, fully functional academic PDF textbook — with intact indexing, tables, structured text, and no access restrictions — converting it first into an image-only PDF with no OCR, and then into an image-based PDF with OCR. These degraded versions are clearly less suitable for serious academic analysis than the original structured PDF. Nevertheless, they were among the versions for which Copilot was at least able to confirm that it had access to the document content. This is difficult to explain from a user perspective and suggests that the document retrieval or ingestion behaviour may not be functioning consistently. Main problems observed 1. Incomplete corpus analysis In one test, Copilot produced an academic-looking synthesis based on only three sources from a corpus of approximately 17–20 files. Only after being challenged did it acknowledge that it had not systematically reviewed the remaining files. For academic work, this is a serious problem. If the task is to analyse a corpus, using only a small subset without clearly stating that limitation makes the result unreliable. 2. Unreliable source access Copilot sometimes appears to know that the file exists but is unable to continue analysing it. Depending on the session, it may indicate that: it cannot access additional source content; only previously extracted content is available; it cannot continue beyond the currently retrieved material; the source is no longer usable in the ongoing task. This makes long-form source-based research unreliable. 3. Session continuity problems I have also observed behaviour suggesting that source or analysis sessions can become inactive or unusable. This is particularly problematic in multi-document work, because a corpus analysis requires continuity across multiple steps and multiple sources. 4. Summary versus source-content confusion At several points, Copilot treated a summary or summarised retrieval result as though it were effectively the available document content. The underlying files are not summaries. They are full academic textbooks and reference works. An automatically generated summary should not become the endpoint of the analysis if the full document is available. I repeatedly instructed Copilot to continue retrieving and analysing the underlying source text rather than stopping at the summary layer. Copilot itself eventually acknowledged that this would be the correct approach, but was still unable to continue consistently. 5. Weak source traceability For academic synthesis, I need to know which source supports each major conclusion. This remains inconsistent. A polished paragraph is not sufficient if I cannot reliably determine: which source was actually accessed; which authors were compared; which statement came from which file; which parts are synthesis and which parts are generic model knowledge. Source traceability is essential for academic work. 6. Task drift In some cases, after being repeatedly reminded of the original task, Copilot began suggesting unrelated outputs such as: a full course; a dictionary; exam preparation; a 30–50 page outline; other academic products. These were not requested. The original task was still to perform corpus-based analysis of a specific linguistic topic. 7. Word editing failures I have also encountered cases in Word where Copilot responded that it was unable to start editing the selected text and that nothing in the document had been changed. This adds to the impression that the issue is not limited to one specific Copilot surface. Example of inconsistent session behaviour I have also seen extremely simple requests behave inconsistently within the same Copilot session. For example, the exact same question: “What is the current time?” first received: “Sorry, I wasn't able to respond to that.” and shortly afterwards received a correct current-time response. This is obviously not an academic research task, but it is useful because it demonstrates that the instability is not always caused by complex source material. Support history I have already contacted multiple Microsoft support agents. I have also interacted with Level 2 technicians. I have submitted reports through Copilot feedback channels and through Microsoft support. I have provided detailed explanations of the behaviour. I have repeatedly tested the issue using different approaches. So far, I have not received a meaningful technical explanation of the root cause, and the behaviour has not materially changed. What I would like Microsoft to clarify I would appreciate technical clarification on the following points: What are the practical limits on the number of sources that Microsoft 365 Copilot can meaningfully analyse in one research workflow? Are there documented limits on retrieval depth within large PDFs? Why can a document be available in the Microsoft environment but still become inaccessible or unusable during the task? What causes source-analysis sessions to become inactive? Why can degraded image-based/OCR versions sometimes appear more accessible than the original structured PDF? How can a user verify which files were actually accessed and analysed? Why does Copilot sometimes operate only on summaries or partial retrieval output? Are there differences in source access and retrieval capability between Microsoft 365 Copilot, Word, Notebooks, and other Copilot surfaces? Is Microsoft aware of a wider issue involving source grounding, file retrieval, or session continuity? Is there a recommended workflow for reliable academic analysis across a corpus of 15–20 large reference works? I am not looking for another generic troubleshooting response. I would genuinely like to understand whether this is a known technical limitation, a retrieval issue, a session-management issue, or something else. I am willing to provide examples, screenshots, test cases, and additional details if that would help reproduce the behaviour. At the same time, I think it is reasonable to say that I cannot justify continuing to pay for a product if the core functionality I am paying for — reliable access to, analysis of, and grounding in the sources I provide — does not work consistently enough to be usable.For account managers running QBRs, is M365 Copilot enough or do you need workflow-specific agents?
Hi Microsoft 365 Copilot community, I’m trying to better understand how account managers and customer-facing teams are using Copilot for recurring business review workflows. Imagine you manage dozens of merchant or customer accounts. Every quarter, you need to prepare business reviews, summarize account performance, identify changes from the prior period, create executive-ready slides, recommend next actions, and send follow-up notes. For those of you doing similar work today: - Is Microsoft 365 Copilot enough for this workflow using prompts across Excel, PowerPoint, Word, Outlook, and Teams? - Where does the process still become manual or hard to repeat? - Do you need batch handling across many accounts, or is one account at a time enough? - How important is quarter-over-quarter history tracking? - Do you want outputs organized automatically in OneDrive or SharePoint so each account has a durable review history? - What would make this kind of workflow trustworthy enough for executive or customer-facing use? I’m especially interested in the business-user perspective: account managers, customer success managers, partner managers, sales operations, merchant services teams, and anyone who prepares recurring customer/account reviews. For context, we recently built a Microsoft 365 Marketplace agent called Merchant QBR AutoPilot that explores this pattern: batch QBR scorecards, PowerPoint outputs, OneDrive organization, and follow-up email drafts. But my main question is broader: what would you actually want Copilot or a workflow-specific agent to do for quarterly account reviews? Curious how others are approaching this.
