Entra Conditional Access Issue
Hi Guys, Our Outlook add-in relies on the Graph API to fetch emails. Due to customer-side Conditional Access (CA) Policies, we are seeing critical failures where Continuous Access Evaluation (CAE) demands user interaction (InteractionRequired code) to resolve challenges like LocationConditionEvaluationSatisfied or TokenCreatedWithOutdatedPolicies. Since this authentication occurs backend-to-Entra, we lack a frontend mechanism to prompt the required user interaction. Is there a recommended pattern, method, or architectural change that allows our backend to redirect or challenge the user for interactive sign-in, thereby satisfying these CAE requirements and unblocking customers? Exact error messages: 1. Continuous access evaluation resulted in challenge with result: InteractionRequired and code: LocationConditionEvaluationSatisfied 2. Continuous access evaluation resulted in challenge with result: InteractionRequired and code: TokenCreatedWithOutdatedPolicies
Introducing native Service Bus message publishing from Azure API Management (Preview)
We’re excited to announce a preview capability in Azure API Management (APIM) — you can now send messages directly to Azure Service Bus from your APIs using a built-in policy. This enhancement, currently in public preview, simplifies how you connect your API layer with event-driven and asynchronous systems, helping you build more scalable, resilient, and loosely coupled architectures across your enterprise. Why this matters? Modern applications increasingly rely on asynchronous communication and event-driven designs. With this new integration: Any API hosted in API Management can publish to Service Bus — no SDKs, custom code, or middleware required. Partners, clients, and IoT devices can send data through standard HTTP calls, even if they don’t support AMQP natively. You stay in full control with authentication, throttling, and logging managed centrally in API Management. Your systems scale more smoothly by decoupling front-end requests from backend processing. How it works The new send-service-bus-message policy allows API Management to forward payloads from API calls directly into Service Bus queues or topics. High-level flow A client sends a standard HTTP request to your API endpoint in API Management. The policy executes and sends the payload as a message to Service Bus. Downstream consumers such as Logic Apps, Azure Functions, or microservices process those messages asynchronously. All configurations happen in API Management — no code changes or new infrastructure are required. Getting started You can try it out in minutes: Set up a Service Bus namespace and create a queue or topic. Enable a managed identity (system-assigned or user-assigned) on your API Management instance. Grant the identity the “Service Bus data sender” role in Azure RBAC, scoped to your queue/ topic. Add the policy to your API operation: <send-service-bus-message queue-name="orders"> <payload>@(context.Request.Body.As<string>())</payload> </send-service-bus-message> Once saved, each API call publishes its payload to the Service Bus queue or topic. 📖 Learn more. Common use cases This capability makes it easy to integrate your APIs into event-driven workflows: Order processing – Queue incoming orders for fulfillment or billing. Event notifications – Trigger internal workflows across multiple applications. Telemetry ingestion – Forward IoT or mobile app data to Service Bus for analytics. Partner integrations – Offer REST-based endpoints for external systems while maintaining policy-based control. Each of these scenarios benefits from simplified integration, centralized governance, and improved reliability. Secure and governed by design The integration uses managed identities for secure communication between API Management and Service Bus — no secrets required. You can further apply enterprise-grade controls: Enforce rate limits, quotas, and authorization through APIM policies. Gain API-level logging and tracing for each message sent. Use Service Bus metrics to monitor downstream processing. Together, these tools help you maintain a consistent security posture across your APIs and messaging layer. Build modern, event-driven architectures With this feature, API Management can serve as a bridge to your event-driven backbone. Start small by queuing a single API’s workload, or extend to enterprise-wide event distribution using topics and subscriptions. You’ll reduce architectural complexity while enabling more flexible, scalable, and decoupled application patterns. Learn more: Get the full walkthrough and examples in the documentation 👉 here
403 Error: Application access policy not found, -Global scope not available in tenant
Hi everyone, I'm trying to use Microsoft Graph API to retrieve online meeting details using an application identity. However, I receive a 403 error with the message: "No application access policy found for this app" I followed the documentation here: Configure application access policy, but I encountered a problem: the -Global scope mentioned in the documentation is not available in my tenant. I’ve successfully granted the policy using the following methods: Option A – Grant to Specific User Grant-CsApplicationAccessPolicy -PolicyName "YOUR_POLICY_NAME" -Identity "email address removed for privacy reasons" Option B – Grant to AD Group New-CsGroupPolicyAssignment -GroupId "YOUR_GROUP_ID" -PolicyType ApplicationAccessPolicy -PolicyName "YOUR_POLICY_NAME" These work fine, and the app can access online meetings for users or groups assigned this way. However, I need to allow the app to access meetings across the organization, and the -Global assignment method is not available in my tenant. Questions: Is there an alternative to -Global for tenant-wide access? Is this limitation expected in certain tenant configurations? Any workaround or best practice for enabling organization-wide access to online meetings via Graph API? Thanks in advance!Build. Secure. Launch Your Private MCP Registry with Azure API Center.
We are thrilled to embrace a new era in the world of MCP registries. As organizations increasingly build and consume MCP servers, the need for a secure, governed, robust and easily discoverable tools catalog has become critical. Today, we are excited to show you how to do just that with MCP Center, a live example demonstrating how Azure API Center (APIC) can serve as a private and enterprise-ready MCP registry. The registry puts your MCPs just one click away for developers, ensuring no setup fuss and a direct path to coding brilliance. Why a private registry? 🤔 Public OSS registries have been instrumental in driving growth and innovation across the MCP ecosystem. But as adoption scales, so does the need for tighter security, governance, and control, this is where private MCP registries step in. This is where Azure API Center steps in. Azure API Center offers a powerful and centralized approach to MCP discovery and governance across diverse teams and services within an organization. Let's delve into the key benefits of leveraging a private MCP registry with Azure API Center. Security and Trust: The Foundation of AI Adoption Review and Verification: Public registries, by their open nature, accept submissions from a wide range of developers. This can introduce risks from tools with limited security practices or even malicious intent. A private registry empowers your organization to thoroughly review and verify every MCP server before it becomes accessible to internal developers or AI agents (like Copilot Studio and AI Foundry). This eliminates the risk of introducing random, potentially vulnerable first or third-party tools into your ecosystem. Reduced Attack Surface: By controlling which MCP servers are accessible, organizations significantly shrink their potential attack surface. When your AI agents interact solely with known and secure internal tools, the likelihood of external attackers exploiting vulnerabilities in unvetted solutions is drastically reduced. Enterprise-Grade Authentication and Authorization: Private registries enable the enforcement of your existing robust enterprise authentication and authorization mechanisms (e.g., OAuth 2) across all MCP servers. Public registries, in contrast, may have varying or less stringent authentication requirements. Enforced AI Gateway Control (Azure API Management): Beyond vetting, a private registry enables organizations to route all MCP server traffic through an AI gateway such as Azure API Management. This ensures that every interaction, whether internal or external, adheres to strict security policies, including centralized authentication, authorization, rate limiting, and threat protection, creating a secure front for your AI services. Governance and Control: Navigating the AI Landscape with Confidence Centralized Oversight and "Single Source of Truth": A private registry provides a centralized "single source of truth" for all AI-related tools and data connections within your organization. This empowers comprehensive oversight of AI initiatives, clearly identifying ownership and accountability for each MCP server. Preventing "Shadow AI": Without a formal registry, individual teams might independently develop or integrate AI tools, leading to "shadow AI" – unmanaged and unmonitored AI deployments that can pose significant risks. A private registry encourages a standardized approach, bringing all AI tools under central governance and visibility. Tailored Tool Development: Organizations can develop and host MCP servers specifically tailored to their unique needs and requirements. This means optimized efficiency and utility, providing specialized tools you won't typically find in broader public registries. Simplified Integration and Accelerated Development: A well-managed private registry simplifies the discovery and integration of internal tools for your AI developers. This significantly accelerates the development and deployment of AI-powered applications, fostering innovation. Good news! Azure API Center can be created for free in any Azure subscription. You can find a detailed guide to help you get started: Inventory and Discover MCP Servers in Your API Center - Azure API Center Get involved 💡 Your remote MCP server can be discoverable on API Center’s MCP Discovery page today! Bring your MCP server and reach Azure customers! These Microsoft partners are shaping the future of the MCP ecosystem by making their remote MCP Servers discoverable via API Center’s MCP Discovery page. Early Partners: Atlassian – Connect to Jira and Confluence for issue tracking and documentation Box – Use Box to securely store, manage and share your photos, videos, and documents in the cloud Neon – Manage and query Neon Postgres databases with natural language Pipedream – Add 1000s of APIs with built-in authentication and 10,000+ tools to your AI assistant or agent - coming soon - Stripe – Payment processing and financial infrastructure tools If partners would like their remote MCP servers to be featured in our Discover Panel, reach out to us here: GitHub/mcp-center and comment under the following GitHub issue: MCP Server Onboarding Request Ready to Get Started? 🚀 Modernize your AI strategy and empower your teams with enhanced discovery, security, and governance of agentic tools. Now's the time to explore creating your own private enterprise MCP registry. Check out MCP Center, a public showcase demonstrating how you can build your own enterprise MCP registry - MCP Center - Build Your Own Enterprise MCP Registry - or go ahead and create your Azure API Center today!403 Forbidden when sending mail with app-only token via Microsoft Graph
Hello, I am trying to send emails from my Outlook account using a registered enterprise application in Azure AD. We created an application registration in our tenant, assigned the relevant users, and granted admin consent for these Microsoft Graph application permissions: Mail.Send and Mail.ReadWrite and Mail.Send.Shared. I authenticate with application credentials (client_id, client_secret, tenant_id) and successfully retrieve an app-only access token using MSAL in Python: def get_access_token() -> str: load_dotenv() client_id = os.getenv("CLIENT_ID") client_secret = os.getenv("CLIENT_SECRET") tenant_id = os.getenv("TENANT_ID") authority = f"https://login.microsoftonline.com/{tenant_id}" scopes = ["https://graph.microsoft.com/.default"] # app-only token app = msal.ConfidentialClientApplication( client_id=client_id, client_credential=client_secret, authority=authority ) result = app.acquire_token_for_client(scopes=scopes) if "access_token" not in result: raise RuntimeError(f"Auth failed: {result.get('error_description') or result}") return result["access_token"] The token is retrieved successfully. However, when I try to send an email with: GRAPH_BASE = "https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0" def send_email(access_token: str, from_user: str, to_address: str, subject: str, body_text: str, save_to_sent: bool = True) -> bool: """ Sends a plain-text email via POST /users/{from_user}/sendMail using an app-only token. Returns True on success; raises HTTPError on failure. """ payload = { "message": { "subject": subject, "body": {"contentType": "Text", "content": body_text}, "toRecipients": [{"emailAddress": {"address": to_address}}], }, "saveToSentItems": bool(save_to_sent), } r = requests.post( f"{GRAPH_BASE}/users/{from_user}/sendMail", headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {access_token}"}, json=payload, timeout=20, ) r.raise_for_status() return True …I get this error: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/users/{from_user}/sendMail File "C:\mail\src\mail.py", line 53, in send_email r.raise_for_status() ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^ File "C:\mail\src\mail.py", line 111, in <module> send_email(token, from_user, to, "Hello from Microsoft Graph", "Hello Human") ~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ requests.exceptions.HTTPError: 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/users/{from_user}/sendMail where {from_user} is my actual mailbox address (e.g., email address removed for privacy reasons). Since the app has Mail.Send (Application) permission with admin consent, my understanding is that the app should be able to send mail on behalf of any user in the tenant using /users/{user}/sendMail. Is there another configuration step I am missing (e.g., Application Access Policy or mailbox-level Send As requirement)? Any guidance on why this 403 happens despite having Mail.Send application permissions with admin consent would be very helpful. Thank you!Glossary access issue in portal
I'm new to Purview and need some guidance on how to troubleshoot this. I have created a new glossary over the apis and can list the new glossary after its creation. I cannot however see the new glossary in the portal. I am the purview admin so have all the access rights including Data Curator. The api uses a registered app with client secret to gain access. The apis can confirm access and creation of the glossary, the portal just throws a 403 error message Muddying the waters a little I have a federated user on the tenant where purview is running. I really don't know where to start troubleshooting this, any help appreciatedGranting App ability to change group memberships by making it an owner?
Hello, We'd like an app to be able to control memberships of only certain security groups using app-based authentication. Today it is documented that a GroupMember.ReadWrite.All role is needed to do this on the app registration: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/group-post-members?view=graph-rest-1.0&tabs=http This, however, grants access to the app to make changes to any group. However, we have noticed that API calls to change memberships work on groups owned by the Service Principal. For example, if I make a call to the API below for memberships and the app is assigned as the owner of the group, it works. https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/groups/{{group-id}}/members/ Is this a supported mechanism? I don't see it documented anywhere.
Can I update existing meeting via API so "Record automaticaly" is on?
Hi Currently we using MS Booking so our students register for the exam. We plan to make is "self serve" so time of the instructor is not required. A meeting got the option "Record and transcribe automatically". I would like to turn it on via API. Is that possible? I checked https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/bookingappointment-update?view=graph-rest-1.0 and https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/bookingbusiness-post-appointments?view=graph-rest-1.0&tabs=http to see if there is any property for "recording" but did not find anything.
