User Profile
Maxim_vanL
Copper Contributor
Joined 6 years ago
User Widgets
Recent Discussions
Intel iCSL driver SSL version
Our Defender reports that the Intel iCLS driver uses an outdated and unsafe OpenSSL version. After contacting Intel they told me to update to version 1.72.189.0. I can find (and manually install) this driver at the MS catalog (https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx?q=intel%20icls%20windows%2011%20%201.72.189.0) but I do not whish to roll out a driver this way to 250+ devices. The releasedate is march 7th. There are 5 files from 4 different companies (non of which is the manufacturer of my device (Dell)) My question is why the update is not pushed through Windows Update. I this something Microsoft should do or should I pressure Dell?1.3KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Can we share site content Inside sharepoint to outsider
Are the options greyed out when you try to share a folder/file or in the admin portal? Administrators can set Sharingpolicies. Maybe they set it to not allow sharing: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/turn-external-sharing-on-or-off221Views0likes0CommentsRe: Device Events table
adiii Panos83 Did you find a solution? I run into the same problem. The devices schema is missing. In a demo tenant I just created, the schema is visible and useable. Our users have Microsoft 365 Business Premium licenses The user that executes the query has an Office 365 E3 license (also assigned an MS 365 Business Premium license but that has no effect.) There are 225 devices onboarded in Defender which report installed software, threat detections etc. The devices were onboarded from Intune (MDM Enrolled)2.8KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Safe Links policies for email messages
SeniorBraddah The test I started yesterday (see my other comment) has been completed. I created a new policy with the correct settings and assigned it to a single user. Secure Score now mentions both policies with the correct number of users and states that both policies are configured less securely than recommended. So it seems the detection is incorrect.4KViews0likes5CommentsRe: Safe Links policies for email messages
Same here. Today I created a new policy with the same settings and applied it to one user (Also excluded that user from the original policy). Hopefully that will be scored in which case I will assign all users to the new policy and delete the old one. If it doesn't work, I will at least see if the implementation status is updated (both policies should appear). If the status is updated but the scoring is not, I will change the status manually to "Resolved through alternate mitigation". Once every 3 months, I analyze all the items with status other then "Completed" to see if detection has improved or previously accepted risks are still acceptable.4.1KViews0likes0CommentsRe: Secure Score MS Teams
PatrickZegels Maybe you have solved it by now, but I thought to provide somewhat of an answer nontheless. I have the same issue. Only our score is 1.89. The reason I think is that altough most policies are grayed out and deprecated, they still can be assigned to some users. If such a policy is configured to accept guest users, point are reducted. From PowerShell you can connect to Teams and list the users that have a specific policy assigned. Connect-MicrosoftTeams Get-CsOnlineUser -ResultSize Unlimited | Where {$_.TeamsMeetingPolicy -ne $Null} | fl UserPrincipalName,TeamsMeetingPolicy Assign those users the default TeamsMeetingPolicy in the GUI or in PowerShell and the number should rise. The command for this is: Grant-CsTeamsMeetingPolicy -Identity UserPrincipalName -PolicyName $null In my case, a number of accounts cannot be altered due to "provisioning errors". Still working on that.2.7KViews1like3Comments
Recent Blog Articles
No content to show