Forum Discussion
ISV Success FAQ: ISV Success benefits vs MAPS
Note: this FAQ is relevant to participants in ISV Success. Learn more about ISV Success here.
5 Replies
- RsdraigCopper Contributor
Hi, the link is useful, but your answer (and the info in the link) doesn't answer the question. justinroyal
- sid6mathurBrass ContributorHaha,it's just that the Action Packs are *paid* products that bundle "convenient things" typically required by ISVs or others from MSFT - no gatekeeping on who can buy it and when.
ISV Success is a complimentary (aka free) set of benefits available for limited time, and limited contexts.- RsdraigCopper Contributor
sid6mathur, well ISV Success isn't free, there's an annual charge, at least from the 2nd year.
We're in the ISV success programme, its really good and we'll be continuing. However, I had a question about whether we still need to renew MAPS each year now that we're part of ISV success, i.e. does ISV success give us sufficient benefits to make MAPS redundant.
Its not very clear (very little is from MS!), I didn't find a clear answer, and I raised a support request with MS, which just confused things further.
However, I worked out that we do need MAPS.... in particular (for us), ISV Success provides Office 365 licenses, but these are 'Development' licenses, i.e. they can only be used for development purposes, not for business use. So, we need MAPS for that - I think the D365 licenses might be similar.
Also, we use the £75 a month ($100?) Azure credits from MAPS to cover a lot of our Azure costs for dev/demo sites. So, overall the cost of MAPS is very much worth it as ISV Success doesn't cover the same stuff.
My original comment applies though - the original question is to 'compare the benefits', which the answer doesn't do at all, it just gives a brief outline of what ISV Success is...
On my journey (of confusion), I also found out about 'Partner Success', which is different to ISV Success and seems to overlap with MAPS.
I understand the need for multiple partner programmes to suit different needs and different levels of engagement, and this is fantastic. But, (as with much of MS info), all the guidance is written from the perspective of an 'expert' (i.e. someone who already knows how it works, the buzz words and acronyms) and there is very little explanatory guidance.