Intune On-Demand Proactive Remediation API Reliability for Large-Scale Usage
Hi Team, We are testing the Intune On-Demand Proactive Remediation API: POST /deviceManagement/managedDevices/{managedDeviceId}/initiateOnDemandProactiveRemediation In our environment, the remediation package works correctly, and the API generally triggers the remediation as expected. However, during repeated testing, we noticed that a small percentage of requests do not seem to reach the endpoint. For example: 20 remediation requests sent 18-19 execute successfully 1-2 never trigger on the target device Devices are online and managed by Intune Added a 30-second delay between requests, but the behavior still occurs intermittently Before adopting this in production for a large client base, we'd like to understand: Has anyone observed similar behavior? Is this API reliable for triggering remediation across multiple devices in parallel? Are there any known limitations, queueing mechanisms, throttling considerations, or best practices? Is there a recommended way to verify that a remediation request was actually delivered to the device? Since this API is still in the beta/preview stage, is there any information on its roadmap or GA timeline? Note: For additional context, detailed test results, observations, and environment information, a PDF containing the complete analysis has been attached. Any guidance or real-world experience would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. https://learn-attachment.microsoft.com/api/attachments/1ad5bea4-9038-4b25-9a2a-a9e66a870f6a?platform=QnA https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/intune-devices-manageddevice-initiateondemandproactiveremediation?view=graph-rest-beta
Duplicate subscriptions for a specific resource
Hello, Previously, we were not allowed to create duplicate subscriptions for the same resource. But now we can create duplicate subscriptions for a specific resource. Could you please confirm whether this functionality has been newly enabled or supported? Why duplicate subscriptions are now allowed for the same resource like (/users, /groups & communications/callRecords). Whether this is a change or a bug. We would appreciate clarification on the expected behavior and the supported use cases.
Intune App inventory Graph
Hi All, I've enabled the configuration profile to receive app inventory data in Intune. In the GUI the data I can view the data just fine, but I would like to use Graph to automate this data and create custom reports. When I use the following https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/deviceManagement/managedDevices/[device-id]/deviceInventories('ApplicationProperties') I get an error: "Forbidden - 403 - 199 ms Either the signed-in user does not have sufficient privileges, or you need to consent to one of the permissions on the Modify permissions tab" even though the docs I can find about permissions are OK.
What is the Microsoft Graph API replacement for deprecated Recent, SharedWithMe, and Insights APIs?
Hi Microsoft Graph community, I'm currently working on a Microsoft Graph integration that needs to retrieve: Files recently accessed/used by the current user Files shared with the current user Files from OneDrive and SharePoint I'm currently using the following APIs: GET /me/drive/recent GET /me/drive/sharedWithMe GET /me/insights/used However, these APIs are deprecated, and some of them will stop returning data after November 2026. (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/drive-sharedwithme?view=graph-rest-1.0&utm_source=chatgpt.com) I'm stuck in development because I haven't been able to identify a Microsoft-supported replacement that provides the same functionality. Could someone please clarify: What is the official replacement for /me/drive/recent? What is the official replacement for /me/drive/sharedWithMe? What is the official replacement for /me/insights/used? Is there a single recommended Microsoft Graph API that can provide recently used and shared files across both OneDrive and SharePoint? I'm specifically looking for the officially supported API/recommended approach, rather than a workaround that may also become deprecated. Any guidance from Microsoft Graph experts or Microsoft employees would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Graph /users query with mailboxSettings filters/expands excludes unlicensed users
Hello Microsoft Graph team, I would like to report what appears to be a bug in Microsoft Graph user queries involving mailboxSettings. Issue summary: When mailboxSettings is used in a filter or expand clause on /users, unlicensed users are not returned, even when they should match the filter. Example scenario: Filter used: mailboxSettings/userPurpose ne 'room' Observed behavior: Users without Exchange license/mailbox are excluded from results (or result set appears truncated to mailbox-enabled users). Expected behavior: All users should be considered in /users query evaluation. If a user has no mailbox settings, behavior should be consistent and documented (for example null handling), but those users should not be silently dropped from /users results unless explicitly filtered out by query semantics. Reproduction steps: In a tenant with mixed users: Licensed mailbox users Unlicensed users without mailbox Run a /users query that includes mailboxSettings in filter and/or expand. Compare returned users with a baseline /users query without mailboxSettings conditions. Notice unlicensed users disappear when mailboxSettings is involved. Sample request patterns: GET https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/users?$filter=mailboxSettings/userPurpose ne 'room' GET https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/users?$expand=mailboxSettings&$filter=mailboxSettings/userPurpose ne 'room'
Virtual Event Legal Terms
Hello all - I'm currently in the process of attempting to integrate Team webinar registration into my Drupal site, but we discovered an issue where if this Legal Terms field is added to the Event > Registration > Configuration: It doesn't show up when we GET predefined questions, but we can't create a registration without somehow returning a response for this field. We get this error: But we can't find anything in the graph API documentation about how to structure a POST to include an agreement to the terms of use. In the graph api metadata I do see an unknownFutureValue enum which is in the same place in the list as where Legal Terms is in the Teams UI. Is there any current way around this, or is this just a feature that will be added to the API eventually? We'd have no problem just never selecting Legal Terms and including our own checkbox that would have to be checked to submit the registration, but then users who register for the event outside of our Drupal site would not have to agree to our terms to register because the only way to see it here is to add the Legal Terms field to the configuration.Retrieve all Teams transcripts a bot has attended to using Graph API
Hi there, I've been struggling for a lot of time trying to get this done. Has anyone been able to achieve something like this ? I wanted to : 1- Get all the meetings and transcripts of the tenant 2- Filter on those where the bot was attending 3- Get the transcripts when available. 4- Add rules to restrict the bot's access Right now I am stuck with the OAuth : The application 'bot-transcript' asked for scope 'OnlineMeetings.Read.All' that doesn't exist on the resource '00000003-0000-0000-c000-000000000000'. But this permission was added, and really seems to exist. Right ? Thanks in advance for any kind of help you could give me.
Graph API 1.0 - Listing lists doesn't return all lists (todoTaskList)
Hi, first time posting here, please let me know if I should be doing something differently! I've searched throughout the internet and couldn't find a reason for this. I've got a couple of users running into a problem where the https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/api/todo-list-lists?view=graph-rest-1.0&tabs=http endpoint only returns one list (Flagged Emails), though these users have and see many other lists in the To Do desktop (macOS) app. I've confirmed in both cases it's the same user that's identified in my app/integration and in the desktop app. They can see the tasks in that list without a problem. There are no errors requesting that list, and asking via `/users/{id|userPrincipalName}/todo/lists` also returns the same response (with that one list). Is there any known situation where this could be happening? Am I missing something obvious? Is there something else I should be trying? I've got many other customers using the To Do integration without a problem. I'm aware "My Day" and a few other special lists aren't returned. Thank you so much!Retrieving the “Device inventory” of iOS devices via the Graph API
We use Microsoft Intune to manage our iOS mobile devices. To achieve the highest possible level of efficiency, we use PowerShell as a supplementary tool for administration. Since our devices may contain two SIM cards, it is important for us to be able to read this information in order to perform relevant processes (e.g., adding phone numbers to address books). In general, it would be desirable to be able to read the information from the “Device Inventory” of iOS devices. For the reasons mentioned above, we would like this information to be made available via the Graph API. Alternatively, there should be a way to provide this information for all devices in a single report.
Reporting on Device CPU and Memory
I have a requirement to produce a monthly report on all our Intune managed Windows devices and the applications they have installed. I have written a script that is able to report on UPN, Device Name, Manufacturer, Model, Serial Number, OS, Total HHD and Free space along with all the applications installed. I am however unable to output the devices CPU and Memory details. I have tried using the Get-MgBetaDeviceManagementManagedDevices with the ProcessorArchitecture and PhysicalMemoryInBytes parameters but these just report 0 or NULL. What is the best way to report on the CPU and Memory from Intune?
