Secure containers from code to runtime | Microsoft Defender
Correlate cross-cloud attacks into a single incident, catch runtime threats that image scanning misses, and block vulnerable images before they reach production. Investigate container hijacking, isolate compromised pods with Security Copilot-guided remediation, and close the loop from SOC to dev by pushing CVE fixes to GitHub and syncing resolution back to Defender. Matt McSpirit, Microsoft Azure expert, shares how to detect, investigate, and remediate container threats in one connected workflow. Expose container hijacking at runtime. Binary drift detection flags the moment a container runs anything outside its original image. Try it now. Detection to containment in one flow. Security Copilot in Defender generates your incident report, classifies the attack, and surfaces pod isolation as a guided remediation step. Check it out. Close the loop from SOC to dev. Create GitHub issues for vulnerable container dependencies, trigger Copilot’s fix as a Pull Request, and bring “resolved” status back to Defender the moment it merges. See how it works. QUICK LINKS: 00:00 — Secure containers in Microsoft Defender 01:02 — Cross-cloud incident 03:07- Runtime detection 04:10 — Investigate and build context 04:49 — Security Copilot incident report & containment 06:03 — Prevention 07:34 — Recommendations and take action 09:04 — Wrap up Link References Get started at https://aka.ms/DefenderCloudSecurity Unfamiliar with Microsoft Mechanics? As Microsoft’s official video series for IT, you can watch and share valuable content and demos of current and upcoming tech from the people who build it at Microsoft. Subscribe to our YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/MicrosoftMechanicsSeries Talk with other IT Pros, join us on the Microsoft Tech Community: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-mechanics-blog/bg-p/MicrosoftMechanicsBlog Watch or listen from anywhere, subscribe to our podcast: https://microsoftmechanics.libsyn.com/podcast Keep getting this insider knowledge, join us on social: Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/MSFTMechanics Share knowledge on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/microsoft-mechanics/ Enjoy us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/msftmechanics/ Loosen up with us on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@msftmechanics Video Transcript: -Containers are the foundation for how modern business critical apps are built, running across Kubernetes environments and multiple clouds. These are high value targets for attackers, who are now using AI to accelerate ways to find and exploit vulnerabilities faster than humanly possible, from code to runtime. And it’s hard to respond effectively when security signals and responsibilities are fragmented across different teams and tools. The challenge isn’t just finding security issues, it’s understanding how they connect across the lifecycle from development to production. -So, rather than treating supply chain and runtime as separate problems, Microsoft Defender for Cloud brings them together into a single, unified model to catch issues early in code by identifying vulnerabilities and misconfigurations, prioritizing risk across clusters, workloads, and configurations, and detecting and responding to threats in your running containers in near real time, all while tracing them back to the source to put the right mitigations in place. So let me walk you through a multi-stage attack across a containerized environment to show this in action from the perspective of a SOC analyst. I’m in Microsoft Defender in the incidents view, filtered to container related incidents, and I can see four related to containers. -Let’s start with this one: a multi-stage incident involving multiple users. And notice this is already correlated into a single incident, not multiple alerts. You can see it’s flagged as high impact, with a critical asset label, and the crown icon in the incident graph showing asset criticality. On the left, is the attack story with alerts listed in chronological order, color-coded by severity. If we go back to the incident graph, container resources are in black, and related identities and services are in white. This is runtime threat detection correlated across layers. -In this case, Defender has detected 19 alerts for this incident in near-real time and stitched them into a single timeline. So, let’s walk through the attack. Here we can see the initial access signal was from a Kubernetes API request from a proxy IP address. Identity compromise and escalation then occurred with credentials accessed from a service principal. And finally, Defender for Cloud’s cross-cloud correlation surfaces lateral movement spanning environments, revealing a brute-force attack originating from an exposed Azure Kubernetes cluster targeting an AWS Relational Database service resource. -Back in the graph, you’ll notice a blue icon, this indicates there are related attack paths. And if we ungroup similar nodes, we see a user indicated by the blue icon, and we can pivot directly into the attack path view. Here’s where it gets interesting. This is where we connect runtime activity back to security posture and exposure. It’s concluded that the container is internet-exposed with high-severity vulnerabilities, and it’s using a managed identity to access a protected storage account. We’ll come back to this in a moment to see if we can fix the root cause. So, we can see this wasn’t just an isolated runtime event; there was a clear path from exposure to exploitation. -So let’s move on to the second incident in our queue. This is another multi-stage attack. This time focused on initial access and discovery across multiple endpoints. In the Incident Graph, we can see a number of containers were accessed. Then in the attack story, we can see they were hijacked to be used as Cryptocoin miners. Now, containers should be immutable, only running what was in the original image. But this alert shows the initial binary drift. This signals to Defender that the container is executing something it was never built to run. And if we review the activities for this alert, we can see a suspicious parent process, and a shim file being used to execute it. And if we move to the right in evidence, we can see all the details for the process, file, pod and cluster. This is where runtime detection becomes critical, because this activity isn’t visible through image scanning or posture alone. -From here, we can investigate and build full context around the attack. For that, let’s drill into our Kubernetes cluster and start hunting to take a look at the processes run, across both control plane and data plane signals. There are tables that log these events for querying, CloudProcessEvents for runtime activity and CloudAuditEvents for control plane actions. Let’s run a query in the audit events table to search for the creation of a cluster-admin role binding. This would grant full administrative access to the cluster. Here, we can see the role binding and associated subject. It confirms our assumption that the privilege escalation did happen. Next, we can leverage Security Copilot to transition from investigation to response using guided recommendations informed by the attack insights uncovered. Here, Copilot has already generated an incident report. -At the top, we have a summary of the attack from correlated signals. If we expand it, under Credential Access, we see compromised identity activity. Under Discovery, there are network scanning tools. Under Execution, we see confirmation that the container was modified to run crypto mining processes. And below that, the Triage section then lets you classify the incident as true positive, informational, or false positive with corresponding subcategories. I’ll choose a True Positive Multi-stage attack. And Copilot also suggests two remediation actions: terminate the pod to stop activity or isolate the pod to contain the threat. So let’s follow that guidance and isolate the pod. So I’ll close Copilot and return to our Incident graph, then ungroup similar nodes again. Now selecting the Pod, under Actions, I can isolate the Pod. I’ll add a reason. And then I just need to confirm. And just like that, we’ve moved from detection to investigation and containment in a single flow. -So far, we’ve focused on detecting, responding to active threats. But security doesn’t start at runtime. And this is where Defender for Cloud helps your DevOps teams harden your environment to prevent issues from reaching production in the first place. Using policies, you can put rules in place to prevent containers with issues from being deployed. So for that, in the Azure portal in Defender for Cloud, under Environment Settings, we’ll head over to our Security Rules. -Here, we’ve already created a handful of rules to deny or audit activities. For example, if I take a look at this one to block vulnerable deployments of AI applications, this rule is configured to automatically deny deployment of any image violating the policy. It’s scoped specifically to the namespace of our AI applications. In the Configurations tab, we can see that this rule is set to trigger when a container image contains a high or critical severity vulnerability, with any count higher than zero. With our policy in place, let’s test it out by attempting to deploy a container image that contains a few high-severity vulnerabilities. This is exactly what happens with supply chain attacks. For that, from Cloud Shell, I’ll run an AKS command first to get my credentials. -Now I can execute my command. I’ll paste in this Kube Control command to run an image, including its location and namespace details. And immediately, we can see that the run was denied, stating that the image contains 415 CVEs, and we allowed zero in our policy. So it’s blocked. What’s more, Defender for Cloud continuously scans what’s in your registries and running environments in near real time, surfacing the risks that matter and turning them into clear, actionable fixes. Next over in Recommendations, we can see findings identified by Defender for Cloud with several critical risks highlighted, related to the same incident that we saw earlier in the Defender portal. And these are its recommendations. -Let’s look at this one to update busybox. Looks like this version has 13 known vulnerabilities. And digging into the Remediation Insights tab, we can see more details across the development phases. The Take Action button tells us to assign an owner and to create a GitHub issue. I can create the GitHub issue from here. And if I head over to what our dev team would see in GitHub, you can see the details for the ticket, with deployment info, matching CVEs for this version, and below there, there are the remediation guidelines to mitigate the issue. From there, we can assign the issue to GitHub Copilot, and the GitHub Copilot Coding Agent will generate a draft Pull request fixing the CVEs for review. Once the pull request is actioned and complete and the version is updated, we can see that the CVEs were resolved. And finally as a developer, we can merge the pull request to get our app back into a healthy state. I’m going to return back to Microsoft Defender and our app recommendation, clicking on the GitHub issues shows that everything was resolved, and it sent the updated status back to Defender where your SOC lives. -So, that’s a hands-on look at how Microsoft Defender helps secure your container environments end to end. It doesn’t just detect security issues, it helps you to respond faster by connecting security signals across the entire lifecycle, from development through production. To learn more or get started, visit aka.ms/DefenderCloudSecurity. Be sure to subscribe to Microsoft Mechanics for the latest tech updates. And thanks for watching.
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) — Custom Role Design for Troubleshooting Mode–Only Access
1) Introduction In customer environments, Security Operations (SOC) teams and Windows infrastructure teams frequently need to investigate endpoint issues in the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint portal—often under time pressure—while still preserving strong governance over who can change security controls. Because Troubleshooting Mode can enable temporary modification of Defender Antivirus settings even when devices are governed by organizational policies (for example, when policy protections are in place using Tamper protection settings), granting this capability broadly can introduce configuration drift, increase operational risk, and blur accountability. To address this, customers typically require a least‑privilege, scoped access model that enforces Segregation of Duties (SoD): Investigators (Security Reader) retain visibility and investigation capability but cannot create or modify MDE security policies. Only an explicitly authorized group is granted the minimum permissions required to enable Troubleshooting Mode, and that access is restricted to a defined device scope using device groups—supporting both risk reduction and clear governance. This approach ensures teams can perform required investigations and controlled troubleshooting while maintaining least privilege, SoD, and predictable operational impact across the customer’s environment. This document describes an approach to providing controlled access to Troubleshooting Mode on a scoped set of devices. - An Entra ID user group to collect eligible users - A custom Defender XDR role with only the minimum required permissions - Microsoft Defender for Endpoint device groups to scope where those permissions apply The goal is to enable safe troubleshooting while maintaining least privilege and preventing unintended policy changes. 2) Prerequisite & Coverage - An Entra ID user group to collect eligible users - A custom Defender XDR role with only the minimum required permissions - Microsoft Defender for Endpoint device groups to scope where those permissions apply The goal is to enable safe troubleshooting while maintaining least privilege and preventing unintended policy changes. This setup is necessary to: - Enforce least privilege (only the permissions needed for Troubleshooting Mode and limited operational actions) - Scope powerful actions to a defined device group instead of all devices - Support a split model where one Security Reader group gets Troubleshooting Mode access and another Security Reader group remains view/operate without TS Mode - Preserve governance: users can investigate and perform limited actions but cannot create or modify MDE policies - Improve auditability by ensuring key actions are observable via device telemetry and the Action Center (while acknowledging that some telemetry may not include the initiating username). 3) Implementation Steps for Troubleshooting Mode (TO BE PERFORMED IN MICROSOFT DEFENDER PORTAL / ENTRA ID) 3.1 Prepare Entra ID User Group Identify an existing Entra ID user group that contains users (IT Infra Team) with the Security Reader role or create a new dedicated Entra ID user group for this purpose. - This group will be used consistently for: - Assigning the custom Defender XDR role - Scoping access to Defender for Endpoint device groups 3.2 Create and Assign Custom Defender XDR Role Create a custom Defender XDR role with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) Security Settings Management permissions. - While creating the custom role, select only the minimum required permissions to maintain a least-privilege model. - Assign this custom Defender XDR role to the Entra ID user group identified in Step 1. Reference: See screenshots below for role creation, permission selection, and Entra ID group assignment. 3.3: Assign Entra ID User Group to Device Group Assign the same Entra ID user group (used in Steps 1 and 2) to a Microsoft Defender for Endpoint device group. - Devices in the device group should be dynamically grouped using supported criteria such as: - Device tags - Device name patterns - Other supported device attributes - This scoping ensures that the custom role permissions apply only to the intended set of devices. Reference: See screenshot under below showing device group creation and Entra ID group-to-device group assignment. 3.4 Resulting User Experience and Permissions After completing Steps 3.1 through 3.3, users who sign in with: - Security Reader role, and - Custom Defender XDR role will observe the following behavior in the Microsoft Defender portal: - Troubleshooting Mode is available on the scoped devices - Users cannot create or modify MDE policies - Users have access only to a controlled set of operational and investigative actions, including: - Exclude - Go hunt - Download force release from isolation script - Ask Defender Experts This configuration enables safe troubleshooting while preventing configuration drift or unauthorized security policy changes. Reference: See screenshot under below illustrating the available actions and the absence of policy creation/modification options. Reference: See screenshot below where creation of AV policy failed as User will not have access to Intune to create policy. 4. In an alternate scenario, two separate Security Reader groups are maintained: one group requires access to Troubleshooting Mode, while the other should have no Troubleshooting Mode access. Users in the latter group (no TS Mode requirement) can continue to use standard Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) operational capabilities such as managing tags, setting device criticality, running antivirus scans, collecting an investigation package, reporting device inaccuracy, initiating advanced hunting (Go hunt), triggering policy sync, and running automated investigations. Users in the Troubleshooting Mode-enabled Security Reader group must also be assigned to the appropriate MDE device group to ensure their device-level access and workflows continue to function as expected. Reference: See the screenshot below, which illustrates the additional MDE capabilities available to users who also have access to the device group 5: Auditing and Event Visibility - Events related to Tamper Protection changes and Troubleshooting Mode enablement are captured in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint telemetry. - These events are logged and visible for audit and investigation purposes. - The username is not recorded in these specific event entries, which is expected behavior in the current Defender auditing model. However, the activation of Troubleshooting Mode is still logged and visible in the device Action Center, which allows confirmation that the mode was enabled on the device and the username. Reference: See screenshot under Step 6 showing the relevant audit and event records in Timeline of Device Page. Similarly ,correlate using KQL across two Event Tables (DeviceEvents & EntraIdSignInEvents). Below is the KQL query let TimeWindow = 10m; let Lookback = 7d; // Portal sign-ins (Security & Compliance Center) let DefenderPortalSignins = materialize( EntraIdSignInEvents | where Timestamp >= ago(Lookback) | where Application == "Microsoft 365 Security and Compliance Center" | project SignInTime = Timestamp, PortalUserUpn = AccountUpn, PortalUserObjectId = AccountObjectId, SignInIP = IPAddress, CorrelationId | extend TimeBucket = bin(SignInTime, TimeWindow) ); // Tamper-protection related events (broaden as needed) let TamperEvents = materialize( DeviceEvents | where Timestamp >= ago(Lookback) | where ActionType has "Tamper" or ActionType == "TamperingAttempt" | project TamperTime = Timestamp, DeviceId, DeviceName, ActionType, AdditionalFields | extend TimeBucket = bin(TamperTime, TimeWindow) ); // Output rows: (UPN, TamperTime) within +/- window TamperEvents | join kind=inner (DefenderPortalSignins) on TimeBucket | where abs(datetime_diff("minute", TamperTime, SignInTime)) <= toint(TimeWindow / 1m) | project PortalUserUpn, TamperTime, SignInTime, DeviceName, DeviceId, ActionType, SignInIP, CorrelationId, AdditionalFields | order by TamperTime desc This query correlates by time proximity. It indicates “user signed into the portal around the time a tamper event happened.” It does not prove that the portal user caused the tamper event (that requires audit telemetry for the action). If you later want attribution (“who enabled troubleshooting mode / changed settings”), we should pivot to Defender Action Center message and then confirm the user. The query can be used for generating alert using custom detection rule and take this alert to Security Operations center using API integration. Below is reference to the sample output of the query. 6) Summary Option 3 enables a controlled Troubleshooting Mode experience by combining Entra ID group-based user assignment, a custom Defender XDR role with minimal permissions, and device group scoping in MDE. With this approach, eligible users can troubleshoot only the intended devices and perform a limited, operationally safe set of actions, while policy creation/modification remains restricted. Audit and investigation are supported through MDE telemetry and device Action Center visibility, with the known limitation that certain telemetry entries may not include the initiating username.
Windows Defender Cannot Be Activated After Uninstalling Comodo Anti Virus– Help Needed (Windows 10)
Hello Community, I’m experiencing a problem with my Windows 10 laptop and hope to get some guidance. Official support is no longer available for my system, so I’m turning to the community for help. Problem Comodo Anti Virus /Internet Security / Internet Security Essentials had been installed on my laptop for a long time. While Comodo was active, I could not load certain websites properly, and games like League of Legends would not run. For this reason, I recently uninstalled Comodo. After the uninstallation, the previously blocked websites and games work again. Current issue: My Windows Defender Antivirus cannot be activated. In Windows Security, it shows: “Virus & threat protection: Action required” “The threat service has stopped. Start it now” Clicking “Start now” only shows a loading indicator and then an “An unexpected error has occurred” message. I have administrator rights, but Defender still cannot be activated. Steps I’ve Tried 1. Registry checks Path: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows Defender Checked entries like DisableAntiSpyware and DisableRealtimeMonitoring Modifications often failed → access denied 2. PowerShell commands Set-MpPreference -DisableRealtimeMonitoring $false → errors: “Parameter not found” or “Access denied” Other commands like Set-ItemProperty or Set-Content → errors: “UnauthorizedAccessException” or “InvalidArgument” 3. CMD / SC commands sc config WinDefend start=auto Error: “SC Open Service Error 5 – Access denied” 4. Service check Get-Service WinDefend | Select-Object Status, StartType → Status: Running, StartType: Automatic Despite the service running, Defender cannot be enabled in Windows Security 5. System restore point created (For Comodo Revomal Tool) Drive C: protection enabled Backup created as a precaution Insights / Analysis (Speculations) After uninstalling Comodo, websites and games work again → this suggests that Comodo previously installed network filters or drivers that blocked them. It is possible that remnants of Comodo (drivers, services, registry entries) are preventing Windows Defender from starting. Firewall, App & Browser protection, and Exploit protection are active → partial protection, but Defender is not functional. I am not certain if there are other causes, but based on my experience, it seems strongly related to leftover Comodo components. Has anyone experienced similar issues where Defender remains blocked after uninstalling Comodo? Are there safe methods to fully reactivate Defender without risking system stability? Should I use the official Comodo Removal Tool to remove all remnants? Are there alternative steps to try before using a removal tool? I would greatly appreciate any guidance, tips, or steps I can try to get Windows Defender working again. Thank you in advance!Using the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Files API to Validate Malware Hashes
Introduction Security advisories frequently include file hashes (SHA-1 or SHA-256) as indicators of compromise (IoCs). Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) exposes a Files API that lets SecOps quickly look up Microsoft’s verdict and metadata for a given hash. This enables rapid assessment—whether a file is classified as Malicious, Suspicious, Clean, or Unknown—and helps analysts decide the next response action without needing to download or execute the sample. What is the Files API in MDE and why is it used in Security Operations? The Files API is part of the Defender for Endpoint REST APIs that returns a file profile by hash identifier. Analysts use it to: • Validate whether Microsoft has a global verdict for a hash named in an advisory. • Retrieve telemetry such as global prevalence and first/last observed times to gauge risk and spread. • Pivot to related alerts and devices when needed. This lookup shortens triage time and avoids unnecessary handling of potentially dangerous samples. Prerequisites To call the Files API using application (client credentials) context, you need: A Microsoft Entra ID App Registration (Web app / service). API permissions on the WindowsDefenderATP resource (Microsoft Defender for Endpoint). Minimum: File.Read.All (Application). Admin consent granted for the permissions. Network access to the MDE API endpoint (region-based base URL) and the Microsoft identity platform (OAuth 2.0). Tip: For interactive testing, you can also use the API Explorer in the Microsoft Defender portal under Partners & APIs, which runs requests under your user context and RBAC scope. How to use the Files API via PowerShell 1) Acquire an OAuth token from the Microsoft identity platform using your app’s client ID and secret with the .default scope for the Defender API. 2) Send an HTTP GET request to the Files endpoint with the hash (SHA-1 or SHA-256) as the identifier. 3) Inspect the JSON response field "fileClassification" and other metadata (globalPrevalence, first/last observed). 4) Use the verdict to decide next actions (e.g., create an Indicator to block, hunt in Advanced Hunting, or open related alerts). Actual Script ===== STEP 1: Get OAuth Token (MDE v1) ===== $tenantId = "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" $appId = "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" $appSecret = "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" # update with your tenant and app values $tokenUri = "https://login.microsoftonline.com/$tenantId/oauth2/v2.0/token" $body = @{ client_id = $appId scope = "https://api.securitycenter.microsoft.com/.default" client_secret = $appSecret grant_type = "client_credentials" } $tokenResponse = Invoke-RestMethod -Uri $tokenUri -Method Post -Body $body -ContentType "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" $token = $tokenResponse.access_token # ===== STEP 2: Call MDE v1 Files API ===== $hash = "97bf5e1a903a978b2281496e0a897688e9d8e6f981238cf91e39bae20390defe" # Replace with your actual hash values. $uri = "https://api.securitycenter.microsoft.com/api/v1.0/files/$hash" try { $response = Invoke-RestMethod -Uri $uri -Headers @{ Authorization = "Bearer $token" Accept = "application/json" } -Method Get } catch { Write-Error "API call failed: $($_.Exception.Message)" if ($_.ErrorDetails.Message) { Write-Host $_.ErrorDetails.Message } return } switch ($response.fileClassification) { "Malicious" { Write-Host "MDE recognises this hash as MALICIOUS. Threat Name: $($response.threatName)" -ForegroundColor Red } "Suspicious" { Write-Host "MDE recognises this hash as SUSPICIOUS." -ForegroundColor Yellow } "Clean" { Write-Host "MDE recognises this hash as CLEAN." -ForegroundColor Green } default { Write-Host "MDE does NOT have a signature for this hash (Unknown)." -ForegroundColor Gray } } $response | ConvertTo-Json -Depth 5 Script Explanation Token acquisition: Uses OAuth 2.0 client credentials flow to obtain an access token; scope targets Defender for Endpoint API. Endpoint call: Builds a GET request to the Files endpoint with the hash identifier. Error handling: Catches HTTP errors and prints server-provided details if available. Verdict mapping: Reads the fileClassification field and prints a color-coded verdict (Malicious, Suspicious, Clean, Unknown). Response output: Prints the full JSON for deeper analysis and logging. Recommended Inputs The Files endpoint accepts SHA-1 or SHA-256 identifiers; ensure you pass the correct hash type. Consider using certificate credentials or managed identity instead of client secrets for production automation. Sample Output API Explorer - Other Option to query File API The Microsoft Defender for Endpoint API Explorer is a tool that helps you explore various Defender for Endpoint APIs interactively. The API Explorer makes it easy to construct and do API queries, test, and send requests for any available Defender for Endpoint API endpoint. Use the API Explorer to take actions or find data that might not yet be available through the user interface. The tool is useful during app development. It allows you to perform API queries that respect your user access settings, reducing the need to generate access tokens. You can also use the tool to explore the gallery of sample queries, copy result code samples, and generate debug information. With the API Explorer, you can: Run requests for any method and see responses in real-time. Quickly browse through the API samples and learn what parameters they support. Make API calls with ease; no need to authenticate beyond the management portal signin. Access API Explorer From the left navigation menu, select Partners & APIs > API Explorer. Supported APIs API Explorer supports all the APIs offered by Defender for Endpoint. The list of supported APIs is available in the APIs documentation. Get started with the API Explorer In the left pane, there's a list of sample requests that you can use. Follow the links and click Run query. Some of the samples may require specifying a parameter in the URL, for example, {File Hash}. Permissions Required You need to log in with an account that has appropriate RBAC roles in Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. API Explorer enforces the same role-based access control (RBAC) as the portal: Security Administrator or Global Administrator for high-privilege actions (e.g., offboarding a device, submitting indicators). Lower roles (e.g., Security Reader) can only run read-only queries like Get file information or Get alerts. No additional API permissions or app registration are needed because requests run under your user context. Conclusion The MDE Files API gives SecOps an immediate way to validate hashes from advisories and threat feeds, reducing time-to-triage and enabling consistent response. When a hash is classified as Malicious or Suspicious, teams can move directly to containment (e.g., creating an Indicator to block). When it is Clean or Unknown, analysts can pivot to hunting, sandboxing, or further intelligence before acting. Integrating this lookup into runbooks helps security operations quickly and safely respond to emerging threats. References Get file information API: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/api/get-file-information Supported MDE APIs (Endpoint URI & versioning): https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/api/exposed-apis-list Access the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint APIs (intro & app context): https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/api/apis-intro Create an app to access MDE without a user (app registration & permissions): https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/api/exposed-apis-create-app-webapp API Explorer: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/api/api-explorerMDE for Non‑Persistent VDI — Implementation Guide & Best Practices.
1. Overview: Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (MDE) for Non‑Persistent VDI Non‑persistent VDI instances are reset or reprovisioned frequently. To ensure immediate protection and clean device inventory, MDE provides a dedicated onboarding path that calculates a persistent device ID and onboard early in the boot process. Key considerations: Use the VDI onboarding package and choose the single‑entry method (recommended) to avoid duplicate devices when hosts are recreated with the same name. Place the onboarding script in the golden image but ensure it executes only on child VMs (first boot) after the final hostname is assigned and the last reboot completes. Never fully onboard or boot the golden/template/replica image into production; if it happens, offboard and clean registry artifacts before resealing. Consider enabling the portal feature “Hide potential duplicate device records” to reduce inventory noise during transition periods. 2. Stage the scripts in the Golden Image (do NOT onboard the image) Goal: Ensure early, reliable onboarding of pooled VDI instances without tattooing the master image. Download the Windows onboarding package (Deployment method: VDI onboarding scripts for non‑persistent endpoints). Extract and copy the files to: C\Windows\System32\GroupPolicy\Machine\Scripts\Startup Configure Local/Domain GPO to run the PowerShell script at startup (SYSTEM, highest privileges). For single‑entry, add Onboard-NonPersistentMachine.ps1 on the PowerShell Scripts tab. Ensure the script runs only after final hostname and the last reboot in your provisioning flow to prevent duplicate objects. Example (Domain GPO scheduled task at startup as SYSTEM): Program/Script: C\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell.exe Arguments: -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -File \srvshare\onboard\Onboard-NonPersistentMachine.ps1 3. Never Onboard the Golden/Template/Replica VM If the golden image was accidentally onboarded (Sense service started), you must offboard and clean before resealing: sc query sense del "C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection\Cyber\*.*" /f /s /q reg delete "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows Advanced Threat Protection" /v senseGuid /f Run the official offboarding script for your tenant before cleanup, when available. 4. (Optional) Tag Devices Automatically from the Image Tags simplify scoping of device groups and policies. Add a DeviceTagging registry value during image build: reg add "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows Advanced Threat Protection\DeviceTagging" /v Group /t REG_SZ /d "VDI-NonPersistent" /f Tag appears after device info refresh; a reboot accelerates reporting. 5. Performance & AV Configuration for VDI (Important) 5.1 Shared Security Intelligence & Cache Maintenance Purpose: Reduce CPU and disk spikes at sign‑in by offloading unpackaging of definitions to a shared source and by pre‑running cache maintenance on the master image. Step‑by‑step GPO configuration: Create a secure UNC share for definition packages (e.g., \srvshare\WDAV-Update) and grant read to VDI computer accounts. GPO → Computer Configuration → Administrative Templates → Windows Components → Microsoft Defender Antivirus → Security Intelligence Updates → Enable “Define security intelligence location for VDI clients” and set \srvshare\WDAV-Update. In the same node, set update cadence (daily time) and enable randomization to avoid I/O storms. PowerShell examples: Set-MpPreference -SignatureUpdateInterval 4 Set-MpPreference -SignatureFallbackOrder "InternalDefinitionUpdateServer|MicrosoftUpdateServer" Run Windows Defender Cache Maintenance on the golden image before sealing: schtasks /Run /TN "\Microsoft\Windows\Windows Defender\Windows Defender Cache Maintenance" 5.2 FSLogix Exclusions Why exclusions matter: FSLogix mounts user profiles as VHD/VHDX files. Scanning these at attach/detach causes logon delays, black screens, and app launch slowness. Paths and extensions to exclude: %TEMP%\*.VHD %TEMP%\*.VHDX %Windir%\TEMP\*.VHD %Windir%\TEMP\*.VHDX \\<storage>\<share>\*.VHD \\<storage>\<share>\*.VHDX \\<storage>\<share>\*.VHD.lock \\<storage>\<share>\*.VHD.meta \\<storage>\<share>\*.VHD.metadata \\<storage>\<share>\*.VHDX.lock \\<storage>\<share>\*.VHDX.meta \\<storage>\<share>\*.VHDX.metadata GPO: Computer Configuration → Administrative Templates → Windows Components → Microsoft Defender Antivirus → Exclusions (File/Folder and Extension). PowerShell examples: Add-MpPreference -ExclusionExtension VHD,VHDX Add-MpPreference -ExclusionPath "C:\ProgramData\FSLogix","\\storage\fslogix-share\*.VHD*" 5.3 General Scan Posture Real‑time & cloud‑delivered protection (GPO): Enable Real‑time protection, Cloud‑delivered protection, Join MAPS, and “Block at first sight.” Scheduled scans (GPO): Daily Quick Scan (e.g., 02:00) with randomization window. Weekly Full Scan (e.g., Sunday 03:00). Consider “Start the scheduled scan only when computer is on but not in use” to reduce user impact. CPU throttling settings: Set-MpPreference -ScanAvgCPULoadFactor 30 # 5..100 (0 = no throttling) Additional scheduling/throttling options (Intune/Policy CSP as applicable): ScanOnlyIfIdleEnabled = True DisableCpuThrottleOnIdleScans = True ThrottleForScheduledScanOnly = True EnableLowCPUPriority = True Validation commands: Get-MpPreference | fl ScanAvgCPULoadFactor,ScanScheduleQuickScanTime,SignatureUpdateInterval Get-MpComputerStatus | fl AMServiceEnabled,AntivirusSignatureVersion,RealTimeProtectionEnabled 6. Validate Onboarding After first boot of a pooled VM, verify device appears in Defender portal (Assets → Devices). For single‑entry method, reboot/redeploy a few instances with the same hostname and confirm one device object is reused. Optionally enable “Hide potential duplicate device records” (Settings → Endpoints → Advanced features). This is like only filtering the view of Devices list does actual remove the records from the MDE portal. Run a detection test if needed (per Microsoft guidance) to verify sensor connectivity. 7. Quick Checklist — Build Step Download VDI onboarding package from Defender portal. Copy scripts to Startup folder in golden image; configure GPO/Task to run PS1 at boot as SYSTEM. Do NOT onboard/boot the golden image into production; if it happens, offboard + clean senseGuid & Cyber cache. (Optional) Set DeviceTagging registry value for scoping (e.g., VDI-NonPersistent). Configure Shared Security Intelligence path; schedule updates; run Cache Maintenance on master image. Apply FSLogix AV exclusions (paths + extensions). Set scan posture (RTP + cloud, schedules, CPU throttling). Validate onboarding behavior and inventory cleanliness. 8. Summary & Best Practices Checklist for golden image: Script staged, not executed on master; executes only on child VMs at final boot stage. Shared Security Intelligence path configured; cache maintenance pre-run. FSLogix exclusions present prior to first user logon. RTP and cloud protection enabled; scans scheduled with randomization; CPU load factor tuned. Common pitfalls & fixes: Golden image onboarded → Offboard + clean registry/cache; reseal. Script runs before final hostname → Duplicate device records. Delay script until last reboot/final rename. No exclusions for FSLogix → Long logons/black screens. Add VHD/VHDX exclusions and share paths. Simultaneous scans across hosts → Enable randomization; schedule during off‑hours. References Onboard non‑persistent VDI devices: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/configure-endpoints-vdi Onboard Windows devices in Azure Virtual Desktop: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/onboard-windows-multi-session-device Configure Microsoft Defender Antivirus on RDS/VDI: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/deployment-vdi-microsoft-defender-antivirus FSLogix prerequisites (AV exclusions): https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/fslogix/overview-prerequisites Configure AV exclusions (file/extension/folder): https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/configure-extension-file-exclusions-microsoft-defender-antivirus Create and manage device tags: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/machine-tags Advanced features (hide duplicate records): https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/advanced-features Schedule antivirus scans using Group Policy: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/schedule-antivirus-scans-group-policy Troubleshoot MDAV scan issues (CPU throttling, idle scans): https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-endpoint/troubleshoot-mdav-scan-issuesUpdate Coverage Workbook in Microsoft Defender for Cloud to Include Defender for AI Plan status
Option 1: Update the Existing Coverage Workbook Enhance the current workbook by adding a query that checks Defender for AI plan enablement across subscriptions. Steps Open the Coverage Workbook in Defender for Cloud. Edit the workbook and update the query section to include the line below. AIServices = defenderPlans.AI Display the results in a table or chart alongside other Defender plans. Save and publish the updated workbook for organization-wide visibility. Pros Single pane of glass for all Defender coverage. Easy for SOC teams already using the workbook. Cons Requires manual customization and maintenance. Updates may be overwritten during workbook template refresh. Option 2: Use Azure Resource Graph Explorer Run a Resource Graph query to check Defender for AI enablement status across multiple subscriptions without modifying the workbook. Steps Go to Azure Resource Graph Explorer in the Azure portal. Run the following query: __________________________________________________________________________________ securityresources | where type =~ "microsoft.security/pricings" | extend pricingTier = properties.pricingTier, subPlan = properties.subPlan | extend planSet = pack(name, level = case(isnotempty(subPlan),subPlan,pricingTier)) | summarize defenderPlans = make_bag(planSet) by subscriptionId | project subscriptionId, CloudPosture = defenderPlans.CloudPosture, VirtualMachines = defenderPlans.VirtualMachines, AppServices = defenderPlans.AppServices, AIServices = defenderPlans.AI, SqlServers = defenderPlans.SqlServers, SqlServerVirtualMachines = defenderPlans.SqlServerVirtualMachines, OpenSourceRelationalDatabases = defenderPlans.OpenSourceRelationalDatabases, CosmosDB = defenderPlans.CosmosDbs, StorageAccounts = defenderPlans.StorageAccounts, Containers = defenderPlans.Containers, KeyVaults = defenderPlans.KeyVaults, Arm = defenderPlans.Arm, DNS = defenderPlans.Dns, KubernetesService = defenderPlans.KubernetesService, ContainerRegistry = defenderPlans.ContainerRegistry The output appears as shown below. Export results to CSV or Power BI for reporting. Optionally, schedule the query using Azure Automation or Logic Apps for periodic checks. Pros No dependency on workbook customization. Flexible for ad hoc queries and automation. Cons Separate reporting interface from the Coverage Workbook. Requires manual execution or automation setup. Recommendation If your organization prefers a centralized dashboard, choose Option 1 and update the Coverage Workbook. For quick checks or automation, Option 2 using Resource Graph Explorer is simpler and more scalable.End of Windows 10 Support: What Defender Customers Need to Know
As of today, October 14, 2025, Microsoft is officially ending support for Windows 10. This means that Windows 10 devices will no longer receive security or feature updates, nor technical support from Microsoft. While these devices will continue to operate, the lack of regular security updates increases vulnerability to cyber threats, including malware and viruses. Applications running on Windows 10 may also lose support as the platform stops receiving updates. Will Defender continue to protect Windows 10 devices? Defender supports a range of legacy systems, including Windows 10. (See here for a full list of supported operating systems.) Microsoft Defender will continue to provide detection and protection capabilities to the extent possible on Windows 10 and other legacy systems. Keep in mind that security solutions on legacy systems are inherently less secure and may not be able to receive all new features, so please review the next section for important actions you can take. For Windows 10 customers without Defender, Microsoft will continue to provide security intelligence updates for the built-in Microsoft Defender Antivirus protection through October 2028. Of course, Defender Antivirus alone isn't a comprehensive risk mitigation posture without Microsoft Defender detection and response deployed across your digital estate. What should customers do to protect their Windows 10 devices? Upgrade to Windows 11: Moving to Windows 11 is strongly recommended for PCs eligible to upgrade. Windows 11 delivers the latest security features, improved performance, and ongoing support at no additional cost. This is the best way to ensure your endpoints remain protected and compliant. Devices running Windows 10 will be more vulnerable, even with ongoing security intelligence updates (SIUs). Extended security update (ESU) program: If upgrading isn’t immediately possible, Microsoft offers an ESU program for Windows 10. The ESU program provides critical and important security updates but does not include new Windows features or technical support. Enterprise customers can purchase ESU for up to three years or receive it at no additional cost with a Windows 365 subscription. Cloud and virtual environments: Windows 10 devices accessing Windows 11 Cloud PCs via Windows 365 or Virtual Machines are entitled to ESU at no extra cost, with automatic updates. Consumer customers have options to enroll for one year of ESU, including free enrollment methods in certain regions. For further guidance, check out the posts below or connect with your Microsoft account team. End of support for Windows 10, Windows 8.1, and Windows 7 | Microsoft Windows How to prepare for Windows 10 end of support by moving to Windows 11 today | Windows Experience Blog Extended Security Updates (ESU) program for Windows 10 | Microsoft Learn To learn more about Microsoft Security solutions, visit our website. Bookmark the Security blog to keep up with our expert coverage on security matters. Also, follow us on LinkedIn (Microsoft Security) and X (@MSFTSecurity) for the latest news and updates on cybersecurity.Multi-tenant endpoint security policies distribution is now in Public Preview
We’re excited to announce a key milestone in Defender’s multi-tenant management journey—Microsoft Defender for Endpoint security policies can now be distributed across multiple tenants from the Defender multi-tenant portal. This capability empowers security teams to manage policies at scale, ensuring consistency and saving valuable time. What is content distribution? Content distribution is a powerful Defender feature that enables scalable management of content across tenants. With this capability, you can create content distribution profiles in the multi-tenant portal that allow you to seamlessly replicate existing content—such as custom detection rules and now, endpoint security policies—from a source tenant to designated target tenants. Once distributed, the content runs on the target tenant, enabling centralized control with localized execution. How it works Security policies are now a selectable content type when creating a distribution profile. Simply choose existing policies from your home tenant and add them to the distribution profile. You can also decide which Microsoft Entra group(s) will be applied as scope. Policy targeting will be based on the Entra device groups that exist in every tenant, and you select the relevant groups for each tenant. Upon completion, policies are automatically distributed to the selected tenants and are applied on the targeted machines. Distributed policies also appear in a hierarchical view, with the original policy serving as the parent. You can find the policies that were distributed from the tenant under the original policy. This appears on the endpoint security policies page within multi-tenant management. The last distribution status for the original policy reflects the overall status of its distributed copies, and the tenants and tenant groups sections indicate the recipients of the policy. At any time, you can update the policies, tenants, scope or any other settings, and sync to apply these changes. This new capability enables consistency (maintaining uniform security posture across tenants), efficiency (eliminating manual duplication and reducing operational overhead), and scalability (easily expanding coverage as the tenant landscape grows). FAQ What pre-requisites are required? Access to more than one tenant with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, with delegated access via Azure B2B or GDAP (CSP Partners only), using the multi-tenant management capability. A subscription to Microsoft 365 E5 or Office E5. What permissions are needed to distribute MDE security policies? To access endpoint security policies, users require the security administrator role in each relevant tenant. To distribute content using multi-tenant management content distribution, the Security settings (manage) or Security Data Basic (read) permission is required. Both roles are assigned to the Security Administrator and Security Reader Microsoft Entra built-in roles by default. Can I update or expand distribution profiles later? Yes. You can add more content, include additional tenants, or modify scopes as needed. Learn more For more information, see Content distribution in multitenant management. To get started, navigate to the Content distribution page. To learn more about Microsoft Defender's endpoint protection, check out our website and video. To learn more about Microsoft Security solutions, visit our website. Bookmark the Security blog to keep up with our expert coverage on security matters. Follow us on LinkedIn (Microsoft Security) and X (@MSFTSecurity) for the latest news and updates on cybersecurity.
