PHS staged rollout works for existing users but not new synced users
We are troubleshooting an Entra ID PHS staged rollout issue with a federated domain using a third-party WS-Fed IdP. The intended behavior is that normal federated users redirect to the IdP, while users in the PHS staged rollout group receive the Microsoft/Entra password prompt instead. Existing users in the staged rollout group continue to work correctly. They enter their UPN and receive the Microsoft password prompt. One known-good test user is not provisioned in the third-party IdP and still signs in successfully through the Entra password prompt, so the working path does not require the user to exist in the IdP. The issue is only with newly created AD-synced users. Newly synced users in the same staged rollout group are still being routed to the federated IdP at HRD instead of receiving the Entra password prompt. We’ve verified the staged rollout policy and group membership from Graph, confirmed the affected users are properly AD-synced with clean immutableID/sourceAnchor, and confirmed PHS is working. Federation metadata and HRD policies also look clean. Seamless SSO/AZUREADSSOACC was checked and remediated, but the behavior did not change. For failed attempts, there is no Entra sign-in log entry, including tenant-wide interactive and non-interactive logs. However, the federated IdP logs show a WS-Fed inbound request from login.microsoftonline.com for the affected user. That makes it look like Entra HRD is routing the user to federation before sign-in logging or token issuance. The issue started around an Entra Connect AD connector/DC-path change. We have since reverted the connector to the previous known-good configuration. After reverting, we created a clean-room test user with the correct UPN set before first sync, confirmed sync/PHS/sourceAnchor, added the user directly to the staged rollout group, and waited 60+ minutes. The clean-room user still redirected to the federated IdP instead of getting the Entra password prompt. So the current behavior is that established staged-rollout users still get the Entra password prompt, but newly created synced staged-rollout users are sent to the federated IdP by HRD. Has anyone seen staged rollout get into this state, where existing users work but new synced users remain on the federated HRD path despite valid rollout policy, group membership, synced password hash, and clean immutableID/sourceAnchor? Is there any known backend cache/state reset or escalation path for HRD/staged rollout routing?
mail@mydomain is causing a cert mismatch error in all browsers for Outlook.com
Hello, I have created a CNAME for our users in my domain so that they can access webmail. For example, it's called mail.mycustomdomain.com, and it is directed to Outlook.com But when I try to visit mail.mycustomdomain.com, it shows a security warning and recommends going back. I can understand because the SAN name in the certificate presented by Outlook doesn't include my CNAME. Is there anything I can do as a workaround so our users can enter the CNAME without encountering a Certificate Mismatch Error? It is causing repeated calls to the helpdesk, and we would like them to use something simple they can remember. ThanksHybrid Join Lifecycle Model
Microsoft Entra hybrid join is still a common reality in enterprise environments. For many organizations, it remains necessary because legacy applications still rely on Active Directory machine authentication, Group Policy is still in use, and on-premises operational dependencies have not fully been retired. At the same time, the long-term direction for endpoint identity is increasingly cloud-native. That creates an important architectural question: Should hybrid join be treated as a permanent device state, or as a lifecycle stage in a broader modernization journey? In practice, hybrid join is often discussed as a binary condition: the device is either hybrid joined or it is not. But from an operational perspective, that view is too limited. In real enterprise environments, hybrid join behaves much more like a lifecycle. A device moves through provisioning, registration, trust establishment, management attachment, steady-state operation, recovery, retirement, and eventually transition. That distinction matters because most hybrid join issues do not fail loudly. They usually appear as stale objects, pending registrations, broken trust, inconsistent management ownership, and environments that remain temporarily hybrid far longer than intended. Why a lifecycle model is useful Treating hybrid join as a lifecycle helps explain why so many organizations struggle with it even when the initial implementation appears technically correct. The challenge is usually not the first successful join. The challenge is everything that happens around it: Provisioning quality Trust validation Management ownership Drift detection Stale object cleanup Exit criteria for transition to Entra join Without that lifecycle view, hybrid join often becomes a static design decision with no clear operational model behind it. The eight phases 1. Provisioning The lifecycle starts when the device is built, imaged, or provisioned. This stage is more important than it looks. If the device is provisioned from a contaminated image, or if cloning and snapshot practices are not handled carefully, later identity issues are often inherited rather than newly created. Provisioning should be treated as an identity-controlled event, not just an OS deployment task. 2. Registration The device becomes known to Microsoft Entra. This is where many environments confuse visibility with readiness. A device object may exist in the cloud, but that does not automatically mean the hybrid identity state is healthy or operationally usable. 3. Trust Establishment This is the point where hybrid join becomes real. A device should not be considered fully onboarded until both sides of trust are present and healthy. In operational terms, this means the device is not only registered, but also capable of supporting the expected sign-in and identity flows. 4. Management Attachment Once trust exists, governance becomes the next question. Many organizations still balance Group Policy, Configuration Manager, Intune, and legacy application dependencies at the same time. That is exactly why hybrid join often persists. But if management ownership is not clearly defined, organizations end up with overlapping policy planes, inconsistent control, and unclear accountability. 5. Operational Steady State Hybrid join does not stop at successful registration. The device must remain healthy over time, and that means monitoring trust health, registration state, token health, line-of-sight to required infrastructure, and management consistency. A device that was healthy once is not necessarily healthy now. 6. Recovery Every real environment eventually encounters drift. Pending states, broken trust, orphaned records, reimaged devices, and inconsistent registration scenarios should not be treated as unusual edge cases. They should be expected and handled with formal recovery playbooks. Recovery is not an exception to the lifecycle. It is part of the lifecycle. 7. Retirement Retirement is one of the weakest areas in many hybrid environments. Devices are replaced or decommissioned, but their identity records often remain behind. That leads to stale objects, inventory noise, and administrative confusion. A proper lifecycle model should include a controlled retirement sequence rather than ad hoc cleanup. 8. Transition This is the most important strategic phase. The key question is no longer whether a device can remain hybrid joined, but whether there is still a justified reason to keep it there. Hybrid join may still be necessary in many environments today, but in many cases it should be treated as transitional architecture rather than the target end state. Practical takeaway Looking at hybrid join as a lifecycle creates a more useful framework for architecture decisions, operational ownership, troubleshooting, directory hygiene, governance, and transition planning toward Microsoft Entra join. That is the real value of this model. It does not replace technical implementation guidance, but it helps organizations think more clearly about why hybrid join exists, how it should be operated, and when it should eventually be retired. Final thought Hybrid join is still relevant in many enterprise environments, but it should not automatically be treated as a default destination. In many cases, it works best when it is managed as a lifecycle-driven operating model with defined phases, controls, and exit criteria. That makes it easier to stabilize operations today, while also creating a clearer path toward a more cloud-native endpoint identity model tomorrow. Full article: https://www.modernendpoint.tech/hybrid-join-lifecycle-modelDisplay On-prem Password Policy on SSPR Page
Hi All We are beginning to rollout SSPR with on-prem writeback. So far so good. Is there a way we can display our on-prem password policy requirements on the SSPR screen? I have seen the MS docs, but can't really make any sense of them so any help would be greatly appreciated. SK
Azure AD Health Failing
I am on the latest version of Azure AD Connect (2.5.79.0)... There are no network/DNS/connectivity issues at our site, it seems to me that Azure AD Health Service is having trouble because the endpoint is experiencing a service issue.. Is anyone else having the same problem with failure alerts/etc? I checked by running "Test-MicrosoftEntraConnectHealthConnectivity -Role SYNC" command, the stack trace throws an undocumented error number and complains of rate limiting issues... smells like the server is being overwhelmed or there are other issues slowing down the endpoint/service with the consequence that connections are piling up causing this error: Connectivity Test Step 1 of 2: Testing dependent service endpoints begins ... AAD CDN connectivity is skipped. Connecting to endpoint https://login.microsoftonline.com Endpoint validation for https://login.microsoftonline.com is Successful. Connecting to endpoint https://s1.adhybridhealth.azure.com/providers/Microsoft.ADHybridHealthService/diagnostics/version Endpoint validation for https://s1.adhybridhealth.azure.com/providers/Microsoft.ADHybridHealthService/diagnostics/version is Successful. Connectivity Test Step 1 of 2 - Testing dependent service endpoints completed successfully. Connectivity Test Step 2 of 2 - EventHub data upload procedure begins ... Tenant Id is successfully collected during agent registration. Server rejected Eventhub data upload, here is the exception: Microsoft.ServiceBus.Messaging.ServerBusyException: The request was terminated because the entity is being throttled. Error code : 50002. Sub error : 101. Please wait 4 seconds and try again. To know more visit https://aka.ms/sbResourceMgrExceptions and https://aka.ms/ServiceBusThrottlingS:N:ADHSPRODWUSEHSYNCIA:EVENTHUB:ADHSPRODWUSEHSYNCIA~22527,CL:30,CC:32,ACC:356250,LUR:WinEnd,LUT:2025-10-08T03:03:12.2035867Z,RC:1 TrackingId:<<< anonymized tracking ID>>> 0, SystemTracker:adhsprodwusehsyncia:eventhub:adhsprodwusehsyncia~22527, Timestamp:2025-10-08T03:03:13 at Microsoft.ServiceBus.Common.ExceptionExtensions.ThrowException(Exception exception) at Microsoft.ServiceBus.Common.AsyncResult.End[TAsyncResult](IAsyncResult result) at Microsoft.ServiceBus.Messaging.EventHubSender.Send(EventData data) at Microsoft.Identity.Health.AgentV1.ConfigurationPowerShell.TestAzureADConnectHealthConnectivity.TestInsightServiceDataUploadProcedure() Azure AD Connect Health agent could not communicate to the Health Service using port 5671. As a result, agent communication will fall back to use port 443, but use of port 5671 is recommended. Please allow outbound communication using port 5671. Tenant Id is successfully collected during agent registration. Server rejected Eventhub data upload, here is the exception: Microsoft.ServiceBus.Messaging.ServerBusyException: The request was terminated because the entity is being throttled. Error code : 50002. Sub error : 101. Please wait 4 seconds and try again. To know more visit https://aka.ms/sbResourceMgrExceptions and https://aka.ms/ServiceBusThrottlingS:N:ADHSPRODWUSEHSYNCIA:EVENTHUB:ADHSPRODWUSEHSYNCIA~22527,CL:30,CC:32,ACC:356837,LUR:IncomingUsage_ADHSPRODWUSEHSYNCIA-5,LUT:2025-10-08T03:03:54.9448143Z,RC:1 TrackingId:<<< anonymized tracking ID>>>, SystemTracker:adhsprodwusehsyncia:eventhub:adhsprodwusehsyncia~22527, Timestamp:2025-10-08T03:04:00 at Microsoft.ServiceBus.Common.ExceptionExtensions.ThrowException(Exception exception) at Microsoft.ServiceBus.Common.AsyncResult.End[TAsyncResult](IAsyncResult result) at Microsoft.ServiceBus.Messaging.EventHubSender.Send(EventData data) at Microsoft.Identity.Health.AgentV1.ConfigurationPowerShell.TestAzureADConnectHealthConnectivity.TestInsightServiceDataUploadProcedure() Azure AD Connect Health agent could not communicate to the Health Service using port 5671. As a result, agent communication will fall back to use port 443, but use of port 5671 is recommended. Please allow outbound communication using port 5671.Join Merill Fernando and other guests for our Identity and Network Practitioner Webinar Series!
This October, we’re hosting a three-part webinar series led by expert Merill Fernando for Identity and Network Access practitioners. Join us as we journey from high-level strategy to hands-on implementation, unifying identity and network access every step of the way. Each session builds on the last, helping you move from understanding why a unified approach matters to what are the foundations to get started, and finally to how to configure in practice. The goal is to equip you with actionable skills, expert insights, and resources to secure your organization in a unified, Zero Trust way. Register below: Identity and Network Security Practitioner Webinar Series | Microsoft Community Hub
Microsoft Entra Connect sync stopped, request upgrade and library not found
Hello, I have the latest (for our company, present on Entra blade) version of Microsoft Entra Connect Sync: 4 days ago I noticed on Synchronization Service Manager that there is no sync of data; I have started the Microsoft Entra Connect Sync and found a big button with "Upgrade" word; I tried to execute the upgrade but when the it arrives to the Connect to Microsoft Entra ID step, I fill with my global administrator account but found a stop error: An error occured while retrieving the Active Directory schema. The error was: Could not load file or assembly 'file:///C:\Program Files\Microsoft Azure AD Sync\Bin\Microsoft.IdentityModel.Clients.ActiveDirectory.dll' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified. and when I click again on Next I have the same request of global administrator user and password and the same error. Now, the library is not present but I verified, in a test tenant where I have a working Entra Connect Sync system, that the files is not present even there (and also when I start Microsoft Connect Entra Sync I haven't the upgrade button there); I also tried to repair the installation, but obviously the file is no there. What can I do? Are there other people with the same issue? Any idea is appreciated.
My Azure login is stuck at MFA and cannot proceed
In August, I was still able to log in to Azure, and by logging in through GitHub I could bypass 2FA. But now, no matter how I try, logging in via GitHub always requires 2FA. I can’t access my Azure account anymore—nothing works. The system prompts me to use Microsoft Authenticator to confirm a two-digit code in real time. My Microsoft Authenticator on my iPhone is logged into the same Microsoft account, but I’m not receiving any verification requests for Azure login. No matter how much I refresh, nothing shows up. I’ve already updated the Microsoft Authenticator app to the latest version from the App Store. However, my personal Microsoft account works fine and can log in without any issues.
