Some Fabric Lakehouse tables not appearing in Microsoft Purview after scan
Hi everyone, I’m running into an issue where several tables from a Fabric Lakehouse aren’t appearing in Microsoft Purview after a workspace scan. Here’s the situation: I scanned a Fabric workspace that contains multiple Lakehouses. For most Lakehouses, the tables appear correctly in Purview after the scan. However, for one specific Lakehouse, several tables that I know exist aren’t showing up in the scanned assets — even after adding the Lakehouse as an asset to a data product in the Unified Catalog. What I’ve tried: I rescanned the workspace and the specific Lakehouses. I verified that the tables are persistent (not temporary) and appear under the Tables section in Fabric, not only as files. I confirmed permissions for the Purview connection account. Scan results and errors: After the rescan, the tables still didn’t appear. The scan logs show several ingestion errors with messages like: Failed to ingest asset with type fabric_lakehouse and qualified name [qualified name] due to invalid data payload to data map I checked the error entries to see which assets they point to, and none of them are related to the tables in the Lakehouse in question. There were four of these errors in the last run. Additional context: Some older Lakehouses that had been archived months ago in Fabric still appeared as active in Purview before the rescan, so there may be stale metadata being retained. Notes: I’m aware Fabric scanning in Purview currently has sub-item scanning limitations where item-level metadata is prioritised, and individual tables aren’t always picked up. But given that tables from other Lakehouses appear as expected, and given the ingestion errors (even though the errors do not point to the missing tables), it feels like there may be a metadata sync or processing issue rather than a simple coverage limitation. Question: Has anyone encountered this behaviour or the “invalid data payload to data map” error before? Any guidance on further troubleshooting steps would be appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Edge Read Aloud feature fails on landscape PDF documents with tables.
I've encountered an issue with the Read Aloud feature in Microsoft Edge when opening PDF documents in landscape orientation that contain tables. The Read Aloud option is available and can be activated, but it gets stuck loading indefinitely and never starts reading. No error message is shown. In contrast, the same feature works perfectly with portrait-oriented PDFs, even when those PDFs include tables. I tested this on both Windows and macOS with up-to-date Edge versions. The issue appears to be consistent and not OS-specific. My clients use tables in landscape PDFs for better readability and formatting. It’s unclear whether the problem is due to the landscape orientation alone or the combination of landscape + tables. However, tables in portrait PDFs do not cause any issues. Has anyone else experienced this behavior? Is there a known fix or workaround? Would appreciate any feedback or confirmation from the Edge team.Is there a way to hide a single page in multi-page mail merge document?
Hi! Mail-merge newbie here...I am trying to determine if it's possible to hide a single page with no mail merge data, that is contained in a multi-page mail-merge document. Within Salesforce, we are using a platform called Conga to generate a customer invoice that is to be printed and mailed, after they have completed their order. We have setup the document to contain 3 pages, each of which contains information for a different type of ticket that they can purchase (each of these pages contain static and mail merge data). They can buy any combination of the ticket types. If customer A buys ticket type 1 and 3, but not 2, is there a mail-merge field or code that can be embedded to not have the ticket type 2 page included in the final document export?Performance issue when two or more tables are included in the same sheet
Is there any known performance issues when there are two or more tables in a same sheet? Whenever I have more than 1 table in the same sheet then system takes a long time to insert rows or columns in those sheets. I try to avoid having multiple tables in one sheet. But from a user experience perspective sometimes when each of the tables are too small, it doesn't make sense to keep them in two separate sheets. If you could share some suggestions or thoughts, it would be great.
Turn Off Calculated Columns
Hello Everyone, I have a workbook with multiple sheets with a different table on each one. A lot of the columns needs consistent formulas and so calculated columns are great for this. However, some of the columns I don't want to have this enabled. It seems that any column that I would like this feature to work didn't work originally, and the columns that I don't want to use it with, it's working with. I've figured out to make an existing column work when it didn't originally, I just have to make sure all the cells in that column have the same type of formula. However, as far as I can tell, once you set it up like that, you can't break it. For example: I have a column that will automatically create a hyperlink to another part of the workbook. When I would create another row in the table, it wouldn't copy that formula. After making sure every cell in that column had the same formula structure, it works now. Elsewhere in the workbook (even in the same table), I have a column that also creates a hyperlink to somewhere else in the workbook. However, not ever cell in these columns has the same formula structures. Yet when I create a new row, it still copies down the formula. Is there a way to stop this from happening?
Filter complex table to simple table
Hi, I have very big and complex table with loads of headers and information . Sadly I don't know what steps do I need to take ? But these are requirements Basically table consist of serial numbers with failed and pass and which stage failed and what it done to pass test . what I want do to create another table to summaries only failed ones and show only test failed for each test and why failed and what they did . thanks
Excel Table Size in Macro
Hi, I download external Excel information and run a macro I created for it. It works great. However, the external info I download grows every week with new rows and when I run the macro, the new rows dont get included in the table. This is part of my macro to turn it into a formatted table: ActiveSheet.ListObjects.Add(xlSrcRange, Range("$A$1:$X$125"), , xlYes).Name ="Table1" So, it creates a table and formats it with 125 rows. But next week, there may be 130 rows, not 125 rows. Since the Macro only goes to row 125, the table stops at row 125 and misses the last 5 rows. Question: Other than setting the table size in the macro from "$A$1:$X$125" to something like "$A$1:$X$1200", how can you select all the rows (including the new 5 rows) automatically without making the table so large by using ("$A$1:$X$1200")? Thanks, Wayne.Taking values from certain rows based on data input
So I'm trying to get a value into the column "Cat A Tied" (C column). This value depends on the number in the "# People Tied With" column (D Column). In this case, cell D2 has the number 3 in it. I want the sum of the first three rows of the B column (not including column headers) and then divide that by 3. However, I want the cell to be dynamic so if I change the number to 5 it will then automatically take the sum of the first 5 rows and divide by 5. Additionally, if I put this value into D3, the second row of my table, I'd want the first number (3 or 5, or any number put in) of rows from that same row onwards instead of from the first row of the data set. Any help would be greatly appreciated 🙂
Pivot tables connected
Hello, I created two pivot tables in different worksheets of a same workbook, but I am facing some problems when I try to group or ungroup only one of them. Because both tables have time as lines, whenever I try to group the days into months in one pivot table, the other one gets automatically grouped, which is a problem for the graphing results I am showing. How can I have the freedom of grouping and ungrouping one pivot table without altering the other one? Thank you
