SharePoint without Sync (Advice Needed)
Our biggest challenge with SharePoint is how to roll it out to End Users with no SharePoint Experience (many of these users are engineers/site based on slow(ish) internet connections. We have large (+100,000) document libraries with long paths. Sync has been a massive issue, the default behaviour has been to just use File explorer to access files, resulting in sync errors and accidental deletion of files. I am looking for advice on turning OFF sync (in the document library settings) I have concerns about doing this, as there are always times when it is easier to Sync, and this is essentially a global setting (set for all users) Has anyone had any real life use cases/experience of doing this. I cannot think of any alternatives.
Customizing Search Result Display for .eml files at Site Collection level
Hi everyone, I’ve noticed a specific behavior regarding how SharePoint handles search results for .eml files and I am looking for a way to optimize this. Observation: Following a migration of emails into a SharePoint Site Collection, the search results currently display the Filename as the primary heading. Since these filenames are GUIDs, they provide no context to the users. The Title property (which contains the actual email subject) is available but is not being used as the main display value in the search results. Goal: The objective is to change the search result display so that the Title/Subject is shown instead of the Filename, making the results meaningful for the end-users. Current Constraints: Permissions: Access is limited to Site Collection Administrator (no Tenant Admin access). Environment: Must remain Out-Of-The-Box. PnP Modern Search or other third-party web parts cannot be deployed in this environment. Scope: Changes need to be implemented at the Site Collection level, as tenant-wide search schema modifications are currently not an option. Technical Question: Is there a way to influence the result display logic or the mapping of Managed Properties specifically within the Site Search Schema to achieve this? I am looking for guidance on whether this can be solved through site-level configuration or if there are other OOTB workarounds to prioritize the Title property in the search UI. Any insights or documentation on how to approach this at the site level would be greatly appreciated.
Sharepoint online copy to/move to issues
Hello, we are fully migrated do O365, so this question is not connected with migration issues. We use the copy/move functionality between libraries, folders within libraries or between sites quite often. There are specific reason for this: - temporary externally shared folders archived in internal sites - adjusting the content structure etc. We use web interface only (Chrome on Mac). However, the functionalities are clumsy and inconsistent: - sometimes it works without any problems - sometimes copy/move operation just hangs (0% migrated) and nothing happens (for days) - sometimes copy/move operation seems to be hanged at 0%, but in the target library/folder the files are already present and accessible - we try to move one specific folder for weeks to a different site, it never finishes, original folder is still present and the only way to check what has been moved, is to manually check the structure in the target library, file by file. There is no sign if the process is still running or not. These situations are not bound to number or size of files. It does happen with 1-2 files the same way as with many of them. There is no way to check the status of these operations (or at least I am not aware of any). So we are not able to be alerted if the operation has failed, if all the files have been moved or not. We have user complaints that they cannot find the expected files where they need to. I did not expect to have such issues with copy/move operations. Similar topic is discussed here: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/SharePoint/Moving-or-Copying-Files-Painfully-Slow-Loss-of-Data/m-p/238315 ... with no clear solution. Am I missing something here? Should we use this functionality or not? If not, what is the preferred way?Open Files from SharePoint in "Protected" mode by default
Many users have complained about "auto save" as people open a file and start working on it immediately, not realising their changes are being saved. I know that you can use protection in Office, if the author sets it. This is a good option forcing people to "think" before editing My Question Is it possible to set this as the default either for all documents in a specific library and/or for specific usersList items: Enable edit, disable create item
I created a custom Permission Level in order to allow users to edit list items but disable Create New Item. It worked for my one test user, but as soon as I applied the custom permission level to a permission group of 75 users, none of them could edit. I had to just turn on the out-of-the-box permission level Contribute, which enables Create new item. If there is a limit on number of users in a permissions group, is there a setting to override it? For my custom permission, here are the pertinent 'List Permissions' settings I used: <No> Add Items <Yes> Edit Items <Yes> View Items <Yes> Open Items <Yes> View Versions <Yes> View Application PagesMy Content Type instances have duplicate Document IDs (dlcdocid).
Hi, I have a Documents library with Content Types enabled, and with the Document ID service enabled. However new documents do not have a unique ID, but all get assigned the same ID as the content type template. The setup I enabled Document ID service via the Site Collection Features: https://<domain>.sharepoint.com/sites/<sitename>/_layouts/15/ManageFeatures.aspx?Scope=Site I enabled and configured content types. I created a Word template in the SharePoint library, and used Insert > Quick Parts > Document Property to create form fields sync'd with the Library/content type columns (Description, Project, Status). I downloaded the Word template from the same library into my OneDrive sync'd location, and uploaded it to the site collection's Content Types https://<domain>.sharepoint.com/_layouts/15/online/AdminHome.aspx?modern=true#/contentTypes and sync'd to the site content types. I created documents in the library using the "New" menu. Later I ask the user or reviewer to update the document frontsheet with the dlcdocid (Insert > Quick Parts > Document ID value, or Insert > Quick Parts > Field... > DocProperty > _dlc_DocId) as well as the SharePoint Version using the policy label method (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/answers/questions/5146555/sharepoint-label-to-embed-version-in-word-doc-havi) via Insert > Quick Parts > Document Property > Label. The Problem In the Documents library, new Word files are being re-assigned the original dlcdocid of the template (say DOCUMENT-0123456789-5). Now the "unique" URL shows me a list of multiple files all with DOCUMENT-0123456789-5. This is a read-only field so I cannot edit or delete the IDs. I want to have a Content Type template, with the frontsheet/header/footer fields sync'd with the Library columns, but I also want each document to have a unique ID and version. Help requested Is there a way to fix the template to clear the template ID, and to avoid this issue on future templates? How should I replace the template? Is uploading Template copies to the Content Type bad? Should I instead point to the file URL? Does it matter where the Template file is stored? Are there any ways to reset the ID of the few existing documents with the duplicate value?
Linking a specific OneNote page to a Sharepoint List
Hello, I am trying to link a OneNote page in a Sharepoint list via the Hyperlink field. So basically users would copy the link to the OneNote (shared) page in the URL field of Sharepoint. However, I keep getting an error when I save the list with the page URL in (it works well before saving!). I can link the general notebook, but not a specific page (which is what I am interested in). I read it might be linked to a limitation in the number of characters that Sharepoint accepts as URL? Can somebody help me on this? Many thanks! Kind regards Valeria