Massive reduction in Threat Intelligence IP data since Monday 10th June
Hi, Anyone else see a massive reduction in Threat Intelligence IP data since Monday 10th June into Sentinel platforms? I operate two Sentinel environments and they both seen the same change. The screenshot below is the past 30 days. The past 48 hours still reports some IP information being sent but at a very reduced rate. What's changed with the feed?
Need information on generating sample events for Threat Intelligence
Hi community, I am working on exploring MS Threat Intelligence and its features. But I am not able to generate sample data for this product, nor able to view the Threat Intelligence logs using Microsoft Management API following the schema - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/office-365-management-api/office-365-management-activity-api-schema#auditlogrecordtype I tried sending some mails from external email account to my organisation's test user containing EICAR files, and also tried with some safe but malicious test URLs. But still unable to get data inside Threat Intelligence. Can someone please help me here for generating events and viewing the content using Management APIs?
Need information on generating sample events for Threat Intelligence
Hi community, I am working on exploring MS Threat Intelligence and its features. But I am not able to generate sample data for this product, nor able to view the Threat Intelligence logs using Microsoft Management API following the schema - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/office-365-management-api/office-365-management-activity-api-schema#auditlogrecordtype I tried sending some mails from external email account to my organisation's test user containing EICAR files, and also tried with some safe but malicious test URLs. But still unable to get data inside Threat Intelligence. Can someone please help me here for generating events and viewing the content using Management APIs?
Python Update Recommendation Not Desapearing from Microsoft Vulnerability Management list
Hello, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is recommending to update Python in my Azure VM Machines since version 3.9 has some critical vulnerabilities. We did the update to version 3.12 but only the Windows 2019 Datacenter machine is not appearing as Exposed Device anymore. The procedure to update Python in all machines was the same but the Windows 2016 Datacenter VM´s remains in the Exposed Device list. Because Python relies on Anaconda, it is not possible to remove the older version completely. The strange thing is why the same proceduro to update the software is seen as diferent by Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management apparently. Any advice is highly appreciated. Thanks in advance Mirella
Can the Microsoft Defender portal show the server details as per security group?
I'm using Microsoft Defender to monitor the servers. I have multiple groups of people working from various other vendors. I would like create multiple security groups and add people based on their company and configure the defender such a manner that only people from Company "A" can see their own servers and people working from Campany "B" can see their respective servers. Also, I as admin can see both "A's" and "B's" servers. Can this be achieved using Microsoft Defender? If yes, how to achieve this? Any step-by-step approach would help. Or if there are any other ways, please suggest. ThanksMicrosoft Defender Threat Intelligence and Sentinel integration deep dive
See how quick detection and response are vital to navigating today's fast-moving cyberattacks. We'll break down a cyberattack and show how Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence, combined with Microsoft's SIEM and XDR solutions, constructs a multi-stage incident giving visibility into the attack timeline and all related events. We'll then investigate the attacker and automate mitigations to contain the damage. This session is part of the Microsoft Secure Tech Accelerator. RSVP for event reminders, add it to your calendar, and post your questions and comments below! This session will also be recorded and available on demand shortly after conclusion of the live event.
New Blog | New Copilot for Security Plugin Name Reflects Broader Capabilities
By Michael Browning The Copilot for Security team is continuously enhancing threat intelligence (TI) capabilities in Copilot for Security to provide a more comprehensive and integrated TI experience for customers. We're excited to share that the Copilot for Security threat Intelligence plugin has broadened beyond just MDTI to now encapsulate data from other TI sources, including Microsoft Threat Analytics (TA) and SONAR, with even more sources becoming available soon. To reflect this evolution of the plugin, customers may notice a change in its name from "Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence (MDTI) to "Microsoft Threat Intelligence," reflecting its broader scope and enhanced capabilities. Since launch in April, Copilot for Security customers have been able to access, operate on, and integrate the raw and finished threat intelligence from MDTI developed from trillions of daily security signals and the expertise of over 10 thousand multidisciplinary analysts through simple natural language prompts. Now, with the ability for Copilot for Security's powerful generative AI to reason over more threat intelligence, customers have a more holistic, contextualized view of the threat landscape and its impact on their organization. Read the full post here: New Copilot for Security Plugin Name Reflects Broader Capabilities
Website incorrectly flagged as security threat (Safe Links false-positive)
Hi, Our SaaS-website atleta.cc is currently incorrectly flagged as security threat by Microsoft Defender / Safe Links. This is causing trouble for clients and customers of clients in Outlook, Edge etc. Where can we report this false-positive, or request removal from the block list? Thank you! Greetings, Jarno Example:
