PLEASE DELETE THIS

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-74628%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EPLEASE%20DELETE%20THIS%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-74628%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EPLEASE%20DELETE%20THIS%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-87803%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20All%20Customization%20must%20be%20re-done%20in%201703%20(feedback%20to%20Microsoft)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-87803%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EAnyone%20from%20Microsoft%20reading%20this%3F%20Any%20opinions%20around%20this%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-74753%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20All%20Customization%20must%20be%20re-done%20in%201703%20(feedback%20to%20Microsoft)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-74753%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EAgreed.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-74752%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20All%20Customization%20must%20be%20re-done%20in%201703%20(feedback%20to%20Microsoft)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-74752%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CHR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F9466%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Salvatore%20Biscari%3C%2FA%3E%20wrote%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CP%3EOn%20the%20other%20hand%2C%20with%20GPOs%20you%20shouldn't%20have%20the%20problems%20you%20are%20reporting...%20Am%20I%20correct%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CHR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CP%3EI%20haven%C2%B4t%20even%20tried%20GPOs%20with%201703.%20If%20my%20powershell%20scripts%20and%20registry%20import%20works%20perfectly%20with%201607%2C%20why%20I%20should%20suffer%20with%201703....%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EMy%20point%20is%2C%20GPO%20is%20not%20the%20only%20solution%20you%20use%20in%20Enterprices....%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-74750%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20All%20Customization%20must%20be%20re-done%20in%201703%20(feedback%20to%20Microsoft)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-74750%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EOn%20the%20other%20hand%2C%20with%20GPOs%20you%20shouldn't%20have%20the%20problems%20you%20are%20reporting...%20Am%20I%20correct%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-74749%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20All%20Customization%20must%20be%20re-done%20in%201703%20(feedback%20to%20Microsoft)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-74749%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CHR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F9466%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Salvatore%20Biscari%3C%2FA%3E%20wrote%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CP%3EOut%20of%20curiosity%3A%20don't%20you%20use%20GPOs%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CHR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CP%3ENo%2C%20I%20prefer%20SCCM%2C%20because%20GPO%20makes%20things%20mandatory%20for%20end%20user.%20SCCM%20doesn%C2%B4t.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-74666%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20All%20Customization%20must%20be%20re-done%20in%201703%20(feedback%20to%20Microsoft)%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-74666%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EOut%20of%20curiosity%3A%20don't%20you%20use%20GPOs%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Contributor

PLEASE DELETE THIS

6 Replies

Out of curiosity: don't you use GPOs?


@Salvatore Biscari wrote:

Out of curiosity: don't you use GPOs?


No, I prefer SCCM, because GPO makes things mandatory for end user. SCCM doesn´t.

On the other hand, with GPOs you shouldn't have the problems you are reporting... Am I correct?


@Salvatore Biscari wrote:

On the other hand, with GPOs you shouldn't have the problems you are reporting... Am I correct?


I haven´t even tried GPOs with 1703. If my powershell scripts and registry import works perfectly with 1607, why I should suffer with 1703....

 

My point is, GPO is not the only solution you use in Enterprices....

Anyone from Microsoft reading this? Any opinions around this?