Forum Discussion
Team site vs communication site for project collaboration
I'm looking for some advice on how to best align what I am trying to accomplish with microsoft's grand plan with SharePoint (and just about ever other application they are newly developing). Current...
>but we also cannot make a Group for each project, as we would quickly have hundreds of
>groups with very similar members (but not all the same) leading to chaos and redundancy
I appreciate that this might be scary but for sure a single Group per Project is the intent and ideal for the use of O365 Groups.
Even if two projects might have exactly the same people working on them? With significant overlap in their lifecycle? I've noticed more work going into the "My SharePoint" site that users get so if there is a good way for individuals to see all of the Sites (Projects/Groups) that they are involved in then I suppose it would not be too chaotic.
Thank you for your response.
Thank you for your response.
Remember that with Groups you get the SharePoint Site, Planner, the OneNote, the Calendar, Email, and Teams. All things a project team would want. And you probably want to keep the assets/tasks separate for each Project.
If the players don't change at all and if all they're using is the Documents in SharePoint I could see a rationale for a single SP site for projects and then a set of folders for each project.