Microsoft Teams Connect aka Shared Channels Coming Later in 2021

%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2178920%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EMicrosoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2178920%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EMicrosoft%20Teams%20Connect%2C%20a%20new%20way%20of%20collaboration%20based%20on%20federated%20shared%20channels%2C%20is%20now%20in%20private%20preview%20and%20should%20be%20available%20later%20in%202021.%20The%20best%20thing%20about%20shared%20channels%20is%20that%20you%20don%E2%80%99t%20need%20to%20switch%20tenants%20to%20access%20a%20channel%20in%20another%20tenant.%20Azure%20B2B%20collaboration%20(guest%20accounts)%20is%20still%20important%2C%20but%20this%20is%20a%20brand%20new%20way%20of%20working%20that%20should%20be%20very%20popular.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fpractical365.com%2Fblog%2Fmicrosoft-teams-connect-shared-channels%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fpractical365.com%2Fblog%2Fmicrosoft-teams-connect-shared-channels%2F%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-2178920%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EMicrosoft%20Teams%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2180050%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2180050%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThanks%20for%20posting!%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2273980%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2273980%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F64%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tony%20Redmond%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EReally%20excited%20about%20these%20new%20sharing%20possibilities!%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EOne%20thing%20I%20don't%20understand%20though%2C%20is%20since%20the%20external%20users%20you%20share%20a%20channel%20with%2C%20don't%20need%20to%20be%20guests%20on%20your%20platform%2C%20how%20would%20the%20invitation%20process%20look%20and%20how%20would%20they%20access%20the%20Team%20if%20they%20don't%20use%20M365%20on%20their%20end%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2274042%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2274042%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EWe%20don't%20have%20full%20details%20yet%2C%20but%20I%20wouldn't%20be%20surprised%20if%20the%20external%20access%20mechanism%20is%20used%2C%20just%20like%20federated%20chat.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2274139%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2274139%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThis%20is%20interesting%2C%20thanks%20for%20posting.%20Do%20we%20know%20if%20this%20will%20create%20a%20separate%20SharePoint%20site%20collection%2C%20like%20private%20channels%20do%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2274552%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2274552%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EFrom%20the%20text%20of%20the%20article%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%22Like%20private%20channels%2C%20a%20shared%20channel%20gets%20a%20SharePoint%20Online%20team%20site%20to%20share%20documents%20between%20members%20of%20the%20shared%20channel.%22%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2282207%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2282207%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThe%20%22problem%22%20is%20that%20these%20private%20SHPT%20team%20sites%20are%20not%20visible%20in%20the%20SHPT%20Admin%20Center.%20Will%20this%20be%20addressed%20in%20the%20near%20future%3F%20How%20do%20we%20as%20admins%20manage%20and%20support%20these%20sites%3F%20I%20know%20via%20the%20Teams%20Admin%20Center%20you%20can%20see%20if%20there%20are%20any%20but%20accessing%20them%20in%20case%20of%20support%20can%20only%20be%20done%20if%20admins%20are%20added%20by%20the%20Teams%20owner%20to%20the%20private%20channel%20itself.%20Not%20ideal.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2282301%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2282301%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EYou%20can%20use%20PowerShell%20to%20manage%20the%20SharePoint%20Online%20sites%20created%20for%20private%20and%20shared%20channels.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2282329%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2282329%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EAlways%20interested%20in%20the%20options!%20Could%20you%20tell%20me%20more%3F%20To%20be%20honest%20I%20am%20not%20working%20with%20PowerShell%20enough%20to%20immediately%20understand%20what%20is%20possible.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2282461%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2282461%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ECare%20to%20invest%20in%20a%20book%20to%20help%3F%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgum.co%2FO365IT%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fgum.co%2FO365IT%2F%3C%2FA%3E%20Just%20saying...%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%24Sites%20%3D%20Get-SPOSite%20-Template%20%22TeamChannel%230%22%20will%20find%20all%20private%20channel%20sites.%20After%20that.%20you%20manage%20them%20like%20any%20other%20site.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2376467%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2376467%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EYes%2C%20however%2C%20not%20all%20%22Teams%20owners%22%20are%20profficient%20in%20PowerShell%2C%20nor%20should%20they%20have%20to%20be.%20I%20agree%20with%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F927235%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40DebbieHere%3C%2FA%3E%20and%20am%20concerned%20about%20the%20governance%20of%20this.%20Why%20not%20teach%20users%20to%20work%20and%20structure%20teams%20in%20Teams%20optimally%2C%20instead%20of%20running%20head%20over%20heals%20to%20solve%20something%20that%20could%20be%20easily%20solved%20with%20current%20solution%3F%20For%20example%2C%20if%20I%20am%20running%20a%20real%20estate%20department%20that%20are%20managing%20lots%20of%20properties%20and%20different%20suppliers%20managing%20these%3B%20i%20would%20create%20a%20team%20in%20Teams%20for%20my%20internal%20%22Real%20estate%20department%22%20and%20any%20internal%20work%20should%20be%20done%20there%2C%20and%20access%20only%20for%20internal%20resources.%20Then%20I%20would%20create%20a%20team%20in%20Teams%20for%20%22Real%20Estate%20Suppliers%22%20and%20create%20some%20common%20channels%20where%20e.g.%20policies%2C%20templates%2C%20routines%2C%20etc.%20could%20be%20shared%20and%20available.%20Then%20I%20would%20create%20a%20private%20channel%20for%20each%20supplier%2C%20where%20internal%20resources%20could%20have%20access%20to%20all%20private%20channels%2C%20but%20each%20supplier%20only%20their%20own%20and%20the%20common%20channels.%20This%20way%20I%20do%20not%20see%20any%20need%20for%20a%20shared%20channel%20in%20addition%20to%20this.%20If%20I%20need%20then%20to%20share%20a%20document%20from%20one%20of%20these%20channels%2C%20I%20can%20Open%20in%20SharePoint%20and%20share%20the%20specific%20document%20by%20using%20the%20%22Share%22%20function.%20Please%20let%20me%20know%20if%20I%20have%20missed%20some%20info%20here%2C%20right%20now%20I%20just%20see%20this%20is%20going%20to%20be%20a%20headache%20to%20administer%20access%20to...%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2380166%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2380166%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20think%20you%20should%20wait%20until%20you%20see%20shared%20channels%20in%20action%20before%20you%20decide%20whether%20they%20or%20private%20channels%20are%20the%20better%20approach%20for%20collaboration%20in%20different%20circumstances.%20As%20to%20using%20PowerShell%2C%20it's%20a%20tool.%20You%20decide%20what%20tools%20you%20wish%20to%20use%20for%20administration%20and%20which%20you%20want%20to%20acquire%20some%20proficiency%20in.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2380509%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2380509%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F803319%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40MeretheStave%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EThis%20isn't%20actually%20possible%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CBLOCKQUOTE%3E%3CHR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F803319%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40MeretheStave%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bwrote%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CP%3EThen%20I%20would%20create%20a%20private%20channel%20for%20each%20supplier%2C%20where%20internal%20resources%20could%20have%20access%20to%20all%20private%20channels%2C%20but%20each%20supplier%20only%20their%20own%20and%20the%20common%20channels%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CHR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FBLOCKQUOTE%3E%0A%3CP%3EAll%20private%20channel%20members%20need%20to%20be%20part%20of%20the%20parent%20team%2C%20it's%20always%20a%20subset%20of%20existing%20members.%20This%20is%20however%20what%20Shared%20Channels%20will%20provide%2C%20allowing%20you%20to%20have%20channel%20only%20members.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2386341%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2386341%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHi%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F64%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tony%20Redmond%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20yes%2C%20and%20after%20further%20investigation%20and%20thinking%20about%20it%2C%20I%20realized%20the%20benefits%3B%20as%20shared%20channels%20can%20make%20it%20easier%20for%20collaboration%20across%20different%20companies%2C%20which%20many%20times%20is%20the%20case.%20Shared%20channels%20solves%20the%20tenant%20switching%20issue%2C%20you%20can%20mount%20a%20channel%20in%20an%20existing%20team%20in%20your%20own%20tenant%2C%20no%20need%20for%20tenant%20switching.%20Perhaps%20I%20had%20a%20hint%20of%20getting%20%22old%20and%20set%22%20when%20putting%20on%20the%20hand-breaks%20on%20this%20one!%20%3B)%3C%2Fimg%3E%20Still%2C%20we%20should%20work%20on%20how%20to%20advice%20admins%20to%20keep%20track%20of%20all%20SPO-sites%2C%20from%20a%20governance%20perspective%2C%20I%20guess%20this%20will%20also%20improve%20over%20time.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2387134%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2387134%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI'm%20now%20seeing%20this%20option%20on%20Teams%20at%20my%20institution.%20I%20now%20have%20a%20third%20option%20when%20adding%20a%20channel%20to%20a%20Team%3A%20%22Shared%20-%20People%20you%20choose%20from%20your%20org%20or%20other%20orgs%20have%20access%22.%20Seems%20to%20be%20working%20well%20within%20the%20organization%2C%20but%20I'm%20unable%20to%20add%20external%20users%20using%20their%20e-mail%20(%22We%20didn't%20find%20any%20matches%22).%20Is%20this%20something%20that%20needs%20to%20be%20activated%20by%20my%20admin%20people%20or%20has%20Microsoft%20not%20rolled%20that%20aspect%20out%20yet%3F%20Note%20-%20I%20can%20add%20external%20people%20to%20a%20Team%20as%20Guests%2C%20so%20we%20have%20enabled%20that%20feature%2C%20but%20that%20gives%20them%20access%20to%20the%20full%20Team%20and%20requires%20changing%20tenants.%20Any%20word%20on%20this%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2387187%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2387187%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EAre%20you%20in%20the%20Microsoft%20TAP%20program%20for%20Teams%3F%20If%20not%2C%20it's%20probably%20a%20mistake%20that%20you%20see%20the%20option%20to%20add%20a%20shared%20channel.%20In%20any%20case%2C%20when%20the%20feature%20is%20available%2C%20you'll%20need%20to%20configure%20a%20policy%20to%20enable%20connections%20with%20other%20organizations.%20The%20policy%20is%20bi-directional%2C%20meaning%20that%20you%20can't%20connect%20to%20another%20tenant%20without%20their%20OK.%20I'll%20flag%20the%20issue%20to%20Microsoft.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2387196%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2387196%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3Ein%20addition%20to%20my%20earlier%20post%20I%20discovered%20a%20way%20to%20add%20members%20and%20owners%20to%20a%20private%20channel%20when%20in%20the%20Admin%20Center.%20This%20makes%20it%20easier%20to%20grant%20access%20when%20needed!%3CBR%20%2F%3ESo%20I%20(as%20an%20admin)%20now%20have%20a%20way%20to%20see%20if%20there%20are%20private%20channels%20and%20in%20case%20of%20need%20for%20support%20can%20also%20get%20access%20without%20the%20need%20for%20an%20user%20to%20grant%20it%20(which%20could%20have%20been%20difficult%20if%20no%20owners%20are%20left%20%3B)%3C%2Fimg%3E%20)%3CBR%20%2F%3ESeek%2C%20ask%20and%20you%20will%20find%20an%20answer%20hahaha%3CBR%20%2F%3EThanks%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F64%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tony%20Redmond%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%20for%20your%20help%20in%20easily%20discovering%20them%20via%20Powershell%20btw%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2387244%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2387244%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EYes%2C%20I%20believe%20so.%20There%20is%20a%20TAP%20symbol%20above%20my%20picture%20on%20Teams.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2387248%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2387248%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EOK.%20Then%20your%20admin%20should%20know%20what%20to%20do.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2387288%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2387288%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ENo%20worries.%20We%20have%20a%20lot%20more%20information%20about%20Teams%20in%20the%20Office%20365%20for%20IT%20Pros%20eBook.%20Keeping%20this%20book%20updated%20on%20a%20monthly%20basis%20means%20that%20we%20hunt%20down%20details%20like%20this%20all%20the%20time.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgum.co%2FO365IT%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fgum.co%2FO365IT%2F%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2406657%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2406657%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F64%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tony%20Redmond%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGiven%20the%20ability%20to%20share%20a%20channel%20to%20an%20external%20user%2C%20is%20there%20anything%20to%20prevent%20us%20from%20adding%20a%20power%20bi%20app%20into%20a%20tab%20on%20that%20channel%20and%20thus%20allowing%20external%20users%20to%20see%20the%20reports%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ECurrently%20I%20use%20the%20%22app%20owns%20data%2Fembedded%22%20setup%20with%20a%20external%20website%20(time-consuming%20but%20works%20well).%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHaving%20externals%20authenticated%20from%20their%20own%20tenancy%20and%20invited%20into%20a%20Channel%20might%20I%20think%20open%20up%20a%20huge%20time-saver.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Einterested%20if%20anyone%20knows%20if%20my%20thoughts%20are%20on%20track%20or%20not%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2407356%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2407356%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20think%20you'll%20have%20to%20wait%20and%20see.%20While%20Teams%20will%20be%20able%20to%20federate%20with%20other%20tenants%2C%20different%20applications%20will%20need%20to%20be%20able%20to%20do%20the%20same%20thing.%20There's%20no%20guarantee%20if%20and%20when%20Power%20BI%20will%20be%20able%20to%20federate%20externally.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2446523%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2446523%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EIs%20there%20a%20plan%20to%20enable%20adding%20Dynamic%20groups%20for%20shared%20teams%20channel%20permissions%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2456349%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2456349%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3Eshould%20it%20be%20possible%20to%20move%20existing%20channel%20to%20this%20state%3F%20Would%20be%20nice%20to%20keep%20context%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2475823%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2475823%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F447041%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40274188A%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BYou%20should%20already%20be%20able%20to%20share%20PBI%20reports%20with%20external%20users.%20They%20need%20to%20be%20a%20guest%20in%20your%20AAD%20tenant%20for%20it%20to%20work.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2485213%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2485213%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F64%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tony%20Redmond%3C%2FA%3Eis%20my%20understanding%20correct%2C%20that%20this%20feature%20will%20only%20work%20with%20users%20outside%20my%20own%20tenant%3F%20I%20am%20really%20looking%20forward%20for%20this%20feature%2C%20but%20I%20have%20concerns%20that%20it%20would%20not%20suit%20our%20needs.%20Our%20scenario%20is%20as%20follows%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWe%20have%20%22external%22%20colleagues%20(near-shore%20developers)%20which%20have%20their%20own%20account%20in%20our%20tenant%2C%20but%20no%20access%20to%20our%20%22Main%20Team%22.%20This%20main%20team%20has%20several%20channels%20(also%20for%20internals%20only%2C%20thats%20why%20externals%20have%20no%20access%20to%20the%20team%20at%20all).%20But%20for%20one%20single%20channel%2C%20we%20would%20like%20to%20invite%20the%20external%20colleagues%20as%20well.%20Would%20that%20be%20possible%20with%20this%20upcoming%20feature%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EBest%2C%20Florian%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2485242%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2485242%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EShared%20channels%20support%20both%20internal%20and%20external%20participants.%20The%20only%20caveat%20is%20that%20the%20domain%20the%20external%20participants%20come%20from%20must%20be%20allowed%20to%20use%20federated%20collaboration.%20We're%20getting%20close%20to%20public%20preview%20and%20details%20are%20changing%2C%20but%20I%20anticipate%20you'll%20be%20able%20to%20do%20what%20you%20want%20to.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2494731%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2494731%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F64%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tony%20Redmond%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bdo%20you%20have%20any%20visibility%20on%20the%20DLP%20capabilities%20yet.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2494750%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2494750%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ENope.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2494751%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2494751%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EAnd%20when%20we%20do%20know%2C%20we%20will%20update%20the%20Office%20365%20for%20IT%20Pros%20eBook.%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgum.co%2FO365IT%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fgum.co%2FO365IT%2F%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2548827%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2548827%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EAny%20chance%20Microsoft%20was%20INSPIREd%20to%20push%20this%20into%20public%20preview%20this%20week%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2593438%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2593438%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHi%20Tony.%20Do%20you%20know%20when%20Shared%20Channels%20will%20be%20accessible%20by%20enabling%20preview%20features%20in%20update%20policies%20within%20the%20Teams%20Admin%20Center%3F%20Thanks%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2593692%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2593692%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F10875%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Nelson%20Nomura%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BI%20don't.%20Sorry.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2816942%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2816942%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F64%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tony%20Redmond%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3Bany%20further%20news%20on%20the%20release%20date.%20I've%20just%20watched%20Jared%20Spataro's%20video%20-%20The%20Hybrid%20Workplace%20from%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fnews.microsoft.com%2Fmarch-2021-ignite%2F%22%20target%3D%22_self%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Eignite%202021%3C%2FA%3E%20and%20he%20lists%20shared%20channels%20as%20one%20of%20a%20100%20new%20features%20in%20Teams%20in%202020!%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2817167%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2817167%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EWhen%20is%20the%20Ignite%20conference%3F%20Think%20about%20it...%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2881698%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2881698%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHow%20will%20this%20affect%20naming%20policies%20of%20teams%20and%20channels%3F%20Will%20I%20be%20able%20to%20see%20which%20tenant%20a%20team%2Fchannel%20is%20part%20of%2C%20or%20should%20we%20provide%20the%20company%20name%20in%20the%20name%20of%20the%20team%20or%20channel.%20It%20needs%20to%20suit%20both%20internal%20and%20external%20needs.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2881836%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2881836%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EIt%20shouldn't%20affect%20any%20naming%20policy%20unless%20you%20want%20to%20name%20shared%20channels%20in%20a%20particular%20way.%20It's%20up%20to%20you.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2881949%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2881949%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ESorry%20for%20not%20being%20clear.%20As%20an%20external%20user%2C%20I%20would%20like%20to%20know%20how%20I%20see%20which%20tenant%20the%20team%20and%20shared%20channel%20is%20part%20of.%20If%20the%20team%20name%20for%20example%20is%20Event%20planning%20and%20the%20channel%20name%20Social%20media%20campaign%2C%20then%20it%20makes%20sense%20for%20employees%20of%20that%20company%20but%20could%20be%20confusing%20for%20external%20users%2C%20especially%20in%20the%20case%20there%20are%20several%20teams%20named%20the%20same.%20I%20am%20requesting%20a%20way%20that%20you%20can%20see%20or%20set%20the%20tenant%20name.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2882162%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2882162%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI'd%20prefer%20to%20leave%20details%20like%20this%20(for%20NDA%20reasons)%20until%20Microsoft%20announces%20shared%20channels%20as%20available.%20That%20is%20likely%20to%20happen%20at%20Ignite.%20Let's%20wait%20until%20then.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2952617%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2952617%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F64%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tony%20Redmond%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAny%20news%20on%20this%3F%20I've%20been%20hearing%20later%20in%202021%20since%20March.%20At%20this%20point%20I%20have%20users%20asking%20me%20when%20it%20will%20be%20available%2C%20some%20going%20as%20far%20as%20holding%20off%20on%20making%20new%20Teams%20because%20they%20would%20rather%20user%20a%20shared%20channel.%20At%20this%20point%20we%20only%20have%20a%20month%20and%20a%20half%20left%20in%202021%2C%20so%20is%20the%20anticipated%20release%20still%20%22later%20in%202021%22%20or%20%22Sometime%20in%202022%22%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2952670%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2952670%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F225555%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Justin%20Siegard%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BShared%20Channels%20will%20be%20available%20for%20Public%20Preview%20in%20the%201st%20quarter%20of%202022.%20See%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fmicrosoft-teams-blog%2Fmicrosoft-ignite-fall-2021-innovations-coming-to-microsoft-teams%2Fba-p%2F2824127%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fmicrosoft-teams-blog%2Fmicrosoft-ignite-fall-2021-innovations-coming-to-microsoft-teams%2Fba-p%2F2824127%3C%2FA%3E%2C%20section%20titled%20%22Shared%20Channels%20and%20Chat%20with%20Teams%22%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-2957985%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-2957985%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EAll%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EThe%20current%20status%20of%20shared%20channels%20is%20that%20they%20are%20in%20limited%20private%20preview%20with%20customers%20through%20Microsoft's%20Technology%20Adoption%20Program%20(TAP).%20Microsoft%20indicated%20at%20Ignite%20that%20they%20expect%20shared%20channels%20to%20be%20available%20in%20public%20preview%20in%20early%202022.%20Exactly%20when%20depends%20on%20the%20technology%20meeting%20thresholds%20for%20quality%20and%20functionality%20AND%20the%20availability%20of%20other%20features%20within%20Microsoft%20365%20that%20shared%20channels%20need%20to%20work.%20Yes%2C%20it's%20a%20pain%20that%20things%20are%20taking%20so%20long%2C%20but%20you'd%20prefer%20to%20get%20functionality%20that%20works%20well%20and%20doesn't%20take%20a%20huge%20amount%20of%20effort%20to%20implement%20and%20manage...%20wouldn't%20you%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3058748%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3058748%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F64%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tony%20Redmond%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIt's%20inexcusable%20this%20feature%20is%20STILL%20not%20available.%20This%20creates%20%3CSTRONG%3Ehuge%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20headaches%20for%20companies%20that%20are%20merging%20or%20partnered%20up%20(which%20my%20company%20is%20now%20trying%20to%20figure%20out).%20This%20is%20a%20basic%20function%20that%20should%20have%20been%20up%20and%20running%20when%20Teams%20was%20launched.%20It%20was%20announced%20a%20year%20ago%20and%20we%20still%20have%20nothing.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3058829%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3058829%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EYes%2C%20but%20I'd%20also%20like%20to%20be%20able%20to%20tell%20my%20end%20users%20when%20they%20can%20expect%20features%20with%20confidence.%20Saying%20%22Later%20in%202021%22%20starting%20back%20in%20December%20of%202020%20and%20then%20waiting%20until%20NOVEMBER%20of%202021%20to%20say%20it's%20being%20pushed%20back%20is%20just%20poor%20communication.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3061934%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3061934%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThis%20is%20starting%20to%20have%20some%20%22Private%20Channels%22%20vibes%20to%20it.%20%3A(%3C%2Fimg%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3061936%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3061936%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThe%20difference%20is%20that%20shared%20channels%20are%20introducing%20a%20completely%20new%20authentication%20mechanism%20to%20permit%20sharing%20with%20people%20from%20other%20Microsoft%20365%20tenants.%20Given%20the%20sensitivity%20of%20authentication%20and%20sharing%20of%20potentially%20confidential%20information%20which%20might%20be%20in%20shared%20channels%2C%20I%20think%20it%20is%20both%20right%20and%20best%20for%20Microsoft%20to%20wait%20until%20they%20have%20resolved%20bugs%20and%20bulletproofed%20the%20software%20(as%20much%20as%20this%20is%20possible).%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3061958%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3061958%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F64%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tony%20Redmond%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20don't%20have%20a%20problem%20with%20that%2C%20I%20do%20have%20a%20problem%20with%20their%20ability%20to%20execute.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EWe%20could%20talk%20all%20day%20about%20how%20much%20new%20technology%20they%20have%20to%20invent%2C%20the%20reality%20is%2C%20users%20don't%20care%20about%20that.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20see%20more%20and%20more%20companies%20slipping%20back%20to%20Slack%20and%20Zoom%20for%20external%20collaboration%20due%20to%20the%20lack%20of%20a%20quality%20Microsoft%20offering%20in%20the%20space.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EDo%20I%20want%20it%20secure%20first%20time%3F%20Absolutely.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EDo%20I%20think%20five%20years%20into%20Teams%20life%20we%20should%20still%20be%20waiting%20on%20this%3F%20Absolutely%20not.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EMy%20issue%20with%20Private%20Channels%20was%20the%20continued%20%22we%20are%20working%20on%20it%22%20messages%20coming%20out%20of%20Microsoft%20and%20it%20was%20almost%20two%20full%20years%20from%20the%20announcement%20at%20Ignite%20before%20it%20was%20released.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EI%20guess%20I%20would%20prefer%20if%20Microsoft%20didn't%20announce%20features%20until%20they%20were%20ready%20if%20they%20can't%20keep%20to%20their%20release%20dates.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%2Frant%20over%20%3Asich_vor_Lachen_auf_dem_Boden_winden%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3061967%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3061967%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20don't%20work%20for%20Microsoft%20(and%20never%20have).%20I%20have%20commented%20on%20the%20inability%20of%20the%20Teams%20developers%20to%20meet%20published%20dates%20in%20the%20past%20(like%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Foffice365itpros.com%2F2021%2F07%2F06%2Foffice365-delays-retirements-features%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Foffice365itpros.com%2F2021%2F07%2F06%2Foffice365-delays-retirements-features%2F%3C%2FA%3E).%20To%20me%2C%20it's%20a%20question%20of%20turning%20marketing%20into%20reality.%20Other%20companies%20do%20the%20same.%20It's%20all%20about%20keeping%20customer%20interest%2C%20and%20that's%20what%20a%20stream%20of%20new%20announcements%20are%20intended%20to%20do.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EOn%20the%20other%20hand%2C%20I%20am%20aware%20of%20what's%20going%20on%20with%20shared%20channels%20and%20have%20seen%20some%20of%20the%20challenges%20involved%20in%20teasing%20out%20the%20details%20of%20common%20sharing%20scenarios%20and%20the%20controls%20large%20enterprises%20(in%20particular)%20insist%20upon.%20If%20Microsoft%20ships%20the%20software%20and%20don't%20meet%20customer%20requirements%2C%20they%20fail.%20If%20they%20ship%20late%20and%20disappoint%20customers%2C%20they%20fail.%20But%20maybe%20less%20so%20because%20they%20avoid%20any%20of%20the%20problems%20associated%20with%20potential%20information%20leaks.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3061972%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3061972%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EBTW%2C%20the%20Office%20365%20for%20IT%20Pros%20eBook%20(%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fgum.co%2FO365IT%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fgum.co%2FO365IT%2F%3C%2FA%3E)%20has%20been%20tracking%20change%20inside%20Office%20365%20since%202014.%20We%20know%20that%20Teams%20is%20poor%20at%20making%20committed%20dates%20(over%2040%25%20of%20their%20features%20are%20late).%20But%20other%20workloads%20are%20almost%20as%20bad%2C%20as%20we%20have%20found%20out%20to%20our%20detriment.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3062029%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3062029%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F407341%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Ed_Kenny%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BI%20understand%20your%20frustration%20waiting%20for%20shared%20channels.%20At%20the%20same%20time%20I%20do%20not%20quite%20see%20why%20it%20is%20problematic%20related%20to%20external%20sharing.%20It%20is%20currently%20possible%20to%20share%20externally%20from%20Teams%2C%20you%20just%20need%20to%20define%20external%20sharing%20for%20the%20respective%20team%20in%20Teams.%20For%20example%2C%20If%20I%20am%20running%20a%20project%20with%20several%20vendors%20and%20partners%20involved%2C%20I%20would%20make%20a%20project%20team%20in%20Teams%20where%20everyone%20in%20the%20project%20are%20included%2C%20and%20everyone%20informed%20that%20whatever%20is%20shared%20in%20the%20proejct%20team%20in%20Teams%20is%20open%20for%20everyone%20who%20are%20members.%20This%20is%20a%20good%20idea%20as%20everyone%20in%20the%20project%20is%20delivering%20on%20the%20project%20together.%20There%20might%20be%20some%20documents%20that%20are%20not%20to%20be%20shared%20with%20everyone%20in%20the%20project%2C%20these%20can%20be%20either%20shared%20in%20private%20channels%20or%20in%20an%20internal%20project%20and%20portfolio-team%20in%20an%20internal%20Teams.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EThat%20being%20said%2C%20there%20might%20be%20a%20situation%20were%20I%20want%20external%20resources%20to%20see%20only%20things%20my%20team%20is%20sharing%20with%20them%2C%20or%20collaborating%20with%20them%20on.%20In%20this%20scenario%20I%20could%20create%20a%20vendor%20team%20(with%20external%20sharing%20on)%20in%20Teams%20with%20a%20few%20shared%20channels%2C%20for%20e.g.%20routines%2C%20templates%2C%20etc.%20and%20then%20a%20private%20channel%20for%20each.%20It%20is%20not%20shared%20channels%2C%20and%20they%20would%20need%20to%20switch%20tenant%2C%20still%2C%20it%20is%20very%20easy%20to%20do%20this%20in%20browser%20(and%20add%20as%20apps%20on%20the%20taskbar).%20This%20would%20however%2C%20resolve%20the%20need%20until%20shared%20channels%20are%20in%20place%2C%20and%20get%20people%20used%20to%20work%20and%20collaborate%20in%20a%20smart%20way%20in%20Teams%20while%20waiting.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EPlease%20share%20a%20scenario%20where%20you%20think%20either%20or%20none%20of%20these%20would%20work%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3064957%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3064957%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20don't%20care%20that%20much%20about%20shared%20channels%20in%20relation%20to%20external%20users.%20All%20I%20want%20is%20a%20very%20basic%20thing%20which%20I%20cabn't%20fathom%20why%20Teams%20didn't%20have%20from%20the%20beginning%3A%20Channels%20where%20I%20can%20invite%20ANY%20user%20from%20our%20own%20tenant.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EIt%20is%20the%20single%20most%20requested%20feature%20in%20our%20organization%20to%20be%20able%20to%20have%20different%20channels%20in%20ones%20team%20with%20different%20members.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EAnd%20no%2C%20creating%20a%20new%20team%20for%20each%20combination%20of%20users%20is%20a%20terrible%20solution.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3109539%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3109539%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F369253%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40kaaremai%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3CBR%20%2F%3ESound%20like%20you%20want%20private%20channels.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHave%20one%20parent%20team%20for%20all%20users%20and%20then%26nbsp%3B%20channels%20with%26nbsp%3Bindividually%20managed%20membership.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EHaving%20the%20ability%20to%20invite%20any%20user%20from%20the%20tenant%20to%20a%20channel%20but%20not%20to%20the%20team%20seems%20to%20be%20a%20bit%20like%20given%20them%20access%20to%20a%20subfolder%20on%20a%20fileserver%20but%20not%20giving%20them%20access%20to%20the%20parent%20folder.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3111356%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3111356%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3Eso%20wait%2C%20this%20is%20still%20not%20released%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3111398%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3111398%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHi%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F1296168%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40shakazulu89%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B-%26nbsp%3BTeams%20Connect%20(aka%20shared%20channels)%20is%20still%20in%20development.%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fmicrosoft-365%2Froadmap%3Ffilters%3D%26amp%3Bsearchterms%3D70766%22%20target%3D%22_self%22%20rel%3D%22noopener%20noreferrer%22%3ELatest%20Roadmap%20update%3C%2FA%3E%20says%20public%20preview%20in%20March%202022.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3117364%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3117364%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F1062900%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Kelly-D-Jones%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%20ouch%2C%20so%20muchfor%20november%202021%26nbsp%3B%3CIMG%20class%3D%22lia-deferred-image%20lia-image-emoji%22%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Fhtml%2F%407EBDB192371E60F0C05B7773EFC0C76E%2Fimages%2Femoticons%2Fxd_40x40.gif%22%20alt%3D%22%3Axd%3A%22%20title%3D%22%3Axd%3A%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3135799%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3135799%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20know%20people%20are%20frustrated%20that%20Microsoft%20has%20not%20delivered%20shared%20channels%20by%20now.%20Yesterday%2C%20an%20important%20prerequisite%20appeared%20in%20preview%20to%20pave%20the%20way%20for%20shared%20channels%20to%20come%20in%20preview%20next%20month.%20Azure%20AD%20cross-tenant%20collaboration%20controls%20are%20the%20foundation%20for%20shared%20channels.%20More%20at%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Foffice365itpros.com%2F2022%2F02%2F08%2Fazure-ad-cross-tenant-access%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Foffice365itpros.com%2F2022%2F02%2F08%2Fazure-ad-cross-tenant-access%2F%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3167556%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3167556%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EHey%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F64%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tony%20Redmond%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B-%20Do%20you%20know%20if%20people%20from%20the%20federated%20tenant%20will%20be%20considered%20in%20the%20%22Everyone%22%20group%20in%20SharePoint%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3167641%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3167641%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20doubt%20it.%20The%20technology%20is%20based%20on%20Azure%20AD%20accounts%20and%20not%20SharePoint.%20But%20it%20is%20easily%20tested%20when%20the%20software%20is%20available.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3177600%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3177600%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EI%20wonder%20when%20this%20will%20arrive.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3194464%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3194464%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F109017%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Simon%20Payne%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Eprivate%20channels%20are%20limited%20to%2030%20in%20a%20team.%20so%20the%20proposed%20%22solution%22%20stops%20working%20at%20about%2050%2B%20employees%20total%20i'd%20say%20not%20to%20mention%20what%20do%20you%20do%20when%20you%20have%20channels%20for%20various%20functions%2C%20especially%20cross%20functional%20groups%2C%20located%20in%20multiple%20teams.%20%22just%20create%20more%20teams!!!%22%20is%20a%20%22solution%22%20that%20very%20quickly%20leads%20leadership%20to%20think%20teams%20is%20terrible%20and%20confusing%20for%20collaboration.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Esome%20of%20the%20ways%20teams%20operates%20and%20what%20it%20can%20or%20can%20not%20do%20make%20me%20wonder%20if%20it's%20possible%20that%20tea%20teams%20devs%20and%20product%20leads%20have%20never%20been%20part%20of%20an%20organization%20before%20and%20thus%20don't%20know%20how%20%22work%22%20works%3F%20is%20everyone%20working%20on%20teams%20in%20their%20first%20year%20out%20of%20university%20at%20their%20first%20%22real%22%20job%3F%20it%20would%20be%20the%20only%20sane%20explanation%20for%20some%20of%20their%20direction%20and%20decisions%20taken%20so%20far.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3194473%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3194473%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F170237%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Damir%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3CSTRONG%3E%22just%20create%20more%20teams!!!%22%20is%20a%20%22solution%22%20that%20very%20quickly%20leads%20leadership%20to%20think%20teams%20is%20terrible%20and%20confusing%20for%20collaboration.%22%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3EThat's%20because%20that%20is%20exactly%20what%20it%20is.%20MS%20has%20zero%20mindset%20outside%20of%20SMBs%20of%20the%20past.%20But%2C%20as%20I%20constantly%20tell%20people%2C%20you%20get%20what%20you%20pay%20for.%20We%20switched%20b%2Fc%20our%20last%20CEO%20had%20no%20idea%20what%20he%20was%20doing.%202%20years%20in%20and%20every%20week%20we%20have%20a%20new%20headache%20with%20Teams.%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3E%22You%20want%20'free%2C'%20Mr.%20CEO%2FCFO%20with%20zero%20tech%20experience%2Fknowledge%3F%20Then%20stick%20with%20Teams.%20Otherwise%2C%20go%20with%20the%20other%20solution%20than%20already%20has%20everything%20you%20want%20or%20need%20with%20no%20headaches.%22%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3197513%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3197513%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F170237%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Damir%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BSounds%20like%20you%20re%20going%20to%20be%20pretty%20happy%20with%20Shared%20Channels%20when%20they%20appear%20in%20preview%20in%20late%20March.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3202917%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3202917%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20am%20curious%2C%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F634264%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Dirk_Smith%3C%2FA%3E%2C%26nbsp%3Bwhat%20solution%20did%20you%20have%20before%20Teams%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3203095%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3203095%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EHere%20you%20are...%20some%20details%20about%20what%20you'll%20get%20in%20shared%20channels%20when%20they%20reach%20public%20preview%20next%20month%3A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EDiving%20into%20the%20Details%20of%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Shared%20Channels%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3EA%20year%20after%20announcing%20Teams%20shared%20channels%2C%20Microsoft%20is%20preparing%20to%20release%20the%20code%20into%20public%20preview%20in%20March%202022.%20The%20new%20collaboration%20mechanism%20uses%20Azure%20AD%20B2B%20Direct%20Connect%20instead%20of%20guest%20accounts%2C%20meaning%20that%20external%20members%20of%20shared%20channels%20use%20credentials%20issued%20by%20their%20home%20tenant%20to%20gain%20access.%20You%E2%80%99ll%20need%20to%20configure%20a%20cross-tenant%20access%20policy%20to%20allow%20shared%20channels%20to%20work%20externally.%20Once%20that%E2%80%99s%20done%2C%20the%20collaboration%20floodgates%20open.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fpractical365.com%2Fmicrosoft-prepares-debut-teams-shared-channels%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fpractical365.com%2Fmicrosoft-prepares-debut-teams-shared-channels%2F%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3261909%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3261909%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F64%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40Tony%20Redmond%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BWe%20are%20hanging%20out%20for%20this%20feature.%20Can%20you%20give%20us%20any%20more%20detail%20about%20when%20it%20should%20arrive%20than%20later%20in%202021.%20Mid-2021%3F%20Third%20quarter%3F%20In%20time%20for%20Christmas%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3261923%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3261923%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F1338120%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40MelGKollective%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EShould%20be%20within%20next%20two%20weeks%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fmicrosoft-teams-blog%2Fmicrosoft-teams-connect-shared-channels-is-rolling-out-to-public%2Fba-p%2F3252901%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Ftechcommunity.microsoft.com%2Ft5%2Fmicrosoft-teams-blog%2Fmicrosoft-teams-connect-shared-channels-is-rolling-out-to-public%2Fba-p%2F3252901%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3294033%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3294033%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3E%3CP%3Ethis%20is%20out%20now%20correct%3F%20I%20cannot%20seem%20to%20activate%20this%20feature!%20Documentation%20is%20non-existant.%20the%20few%20steps%20i%20did%20find%20did%20not%20help%20(turned%20on%20share%20channels%20in%20policies).%20i%20do%20not%20have%20option%20to%20share%20channels.%20what%20am%20i%20missing%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3294053%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3294053%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EDoes%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fpractical365.com%2Fmicrosoft-prepares-debut-teams-shared-channels%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fpractical365.com%2Fmicrosoft-prepares-debut-teams-shared-channels%2F%3C%2FA%3E%20and%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fpractical365.com%2Fcross-tenant-access-policies%2F%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%20rel%3D%22nofollow%20noopener%20noreferrer%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fpractical365.com%2Fcross-tenant-access-policies%2F%3C%2FA%3E%20help%3F%20Shared%20channels%20should%20be%20available%20to%20100%25%20of%20tenants%20worldwide%20if%20they%20enable%20preview%20access.%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-3480099%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3ERe%3A%20Microsoft%20Teams%20Connect%20aka%20Shared%20Channels%20Coming%20Later%20in%202021%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-3480099%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%3EThe%20share%20Channel%20Feature%20are%20not%20appearing%20in%20my%20Microsoft%20Teams%20how%20is%20this%20possible%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
MVP

Microsoft Teams Connect, a new way of collaboration based on federated shared channels, is now in private preview and should be available later in 2021. The best thing about shared channels is that you don’t need to switch tenants to access a channel in another tenant. Azure B2B collaboration (guest accounts) is still important, but this is a brand new way of working that should be very popular.

 

https://practical365.com/blog/microsoft-teams-connect-shared-channels/

66 Replies

@Tony Redmond 

 

Really excited about these new sharing possibilities! 

One thing I don't understand though, is since the external users you share a channel with, don't need to be guests on your platform, how would the invitation process look and how would they access the Team if they don't use M365 on their end?

We don't have full details yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if the external access mechanism is used, just like federated chat.
This is interesting, thanks for posting. Do we know if this will create a separate SharePoint site collection, like private channels do?
From the text of the article:

"Like private channels, a shared channel gets a SharePoint Online team site to share documents between members of the shared channel."
The "problem" is that these private SHPT team sites are not visible in the SHPT Admin Center. Will this be addressed in the near future? How do we as admins manage and support these sites? I know via the Teams Admin Center you can see if there are any but accessing them in case of support can only be done if admins are added by the Teams owner to the private channel itself. Not ideal.
You can use PowerShell to manage the SharePoint Online sites created for private and shared channels.
Always interested in the options! Could you tell me more? To be honest I am not working with PowerShell enough to immediately understand what is possible.
Care to invest in a book to help? https://gum.co/O365IT/ Just saying...

$Sites = Get-SPOSite -Template "TeamChannel#0" will find all private channel sites. After that. you manage them like any other site.

Yes, however, not all "Admins" are profficient in PowerShell, nor should they have to be. I agree with @DebbieHere and am concerned about the governance of this. Why not teach users to work and structure teams in Teams optimally, instead of running head over heals to solve something that could be easily solved with current solution? For example, if I am running a real estate department that are managing lots of properties and different suppliers managing these; i would create a team in Teams for my internal "Real estate department" and any internal work should be done there, and access only for internal resources. Then I would create a team in Teams for "Real Estate Suppliers" and create some common channels where e.g. policies, templates, routines, etc. could be shared and available. Then I would create a private channel for each supplier, where internal resources could have access to all private channels, but each supplier only their own and the common channels. This way I do not see any need for a shared channel in addition to this. If I need then to share a document from one of these channels, I can Open in SharePoint and share the specific document by using the "Share" function. Please let me know if I have missed some info here, right now I just see this is going to be a headache to administer access to...

I think you should wait until you see shared channels in action before you decide whether they or private channels are the better approach for collaboration in different circumstances. As to using PowerShell, it's a tool. You decide what tools you wish to use for administration and which you want to acquire some proficiency in.
Hi @Tony Redmond, yes, and after further investigation and thinking about it, I realized the benefits; as shared channels can make it easier for collaboration across different companies, which many times is the case. Shared channels solves the tenant switching issue, you can mount a channel in an existing team in your own tenant, no need for tenant switching. Perhaps I had a hint of getting "old and set" when putting on the hand-breaks on this one! ;) Still, we should work on how to advice admins to keep track of all SPO-sites, from a governance perspective, I guess this will also improve over time.
I'm now seeing this option on Teams at my institution. I now have a third option when adding a channel to a Team: "Shared - People you choose from your org or other orgs have access". Seems to be working well within the organization, but I'm unable to add external users using their e-mail ("We didn't find any matches"). Is this something that needs to be activated by my admin people or has Microsoft not rolled that aspect out yet? Note - I can add external people to a Team as Guests, so we have enabled that feature, but that gives them access to the full Team and requires changing tenants. Any word on this?
Are you in the Microsoft TAP program for Teams? If not, it's probably a mistake that you see the option to add a shared channel. In any case, when the feature is available, you'll need to configure a policy to enable connections with other organizations. The policy is bi-directional, meaning that you can't connect to another tenant without their OK. I'll flag the issue to Microsoft.

in addition to my earlier post I discovered a way to add members and owners to a private channel when in the Admin Center. This makes it easier to grant access when needed!
So I (as an admin) now have a way to see if there are private channels and in case of need for support can also get access without the need for an user to grant it (which could have been difficult if no owners are left ;) )
Seek, ask and you will find an answer hahaha
Thanks @Tony Redmond  for your help in easily discovering them via Powershell btw

Yes, I believe so. There is a TAP symbol above my picture on Teams.
OK. Then your admin should know what to do.
No worries. We have a lot more information about Teams in the Office 365 for IT Pros eBook. Keeping this book updated on a monthly basis means that we hunt down details like this all the time.

https://gum.co/O365IT/

@Tony Redmond 

Given the ability to share a channel to an external user, is there anything to prevent us from adding a power bi app into a tab on that channel and thus allowing external users to see the reports?

 

Currently I use the "app owns data/embedded" setup with a external website (time-consuming but works well).

 

Having externals authenticated from their own tenancy and invited into a Channel might I think open up a huge time-saver.

 

interested if anyone knows if my thoughts are on track or not?

I think you'll have to wait and see. While Teams will be able to federate with other tenants, different applications will need to be able to do the same thing. There's no guarantee if and when Power BI will be able to federate externally.