Forum Discussion

24 Replies

  • frankzz's avatar
    frankzz
    Copper Contributor

     @Everyone Please vote this here. Hopefully it grabs the attention of Microsoft.

     

    https://feedbackportal.microsoft.com/feedback/idea/4025b758-d3da-ee11-a73d-6045bdbdc092

  • guieix's avatar
    guieix
    Copper Contributor
    at last!!!!! Enjoy!



    https://learn.microsoft.com/es-es/dynamics365/marketing/bimi-support

  • lakeofthewoods's avatar
    lakeofthewoods
    Copper Contributor

    Bump. At this point you would think MS has BIMI on the roadmap and an ETA or they don't and have no plans to support it? TonyRedmond 

    • Laurent Gébeau's avatar
      Laurent Gébeau
      Copper Contributor
      At this point it start to be very noticeable, and used by competition against Office 365, so urgent to have an official statment somewhere
      • Stephen_Enright's avatar
        Stephen_Enright
        Copper Contributor

        Laurent Gébeau 

        Just going to chime in here and say that I wish Microsoft would implement BIMI.  Our organization is rolling it out presently.  But the conversations is a bit awkward when we're trying to advocate internally for a standard when the software that we use ourselves doesn't adhere to that very standard...

  • Kevin Taber's avatar
    Kevin Taber
    Brass Contributor

    TonyRedmond Google recently touched upon BIMI again (7/12)...as did Postmark (7/13). As long as DMARC has been around, it's sad how few have implemented. Hopefully this can gain traction.

     

    https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/bringing-bimi-to-gmail-in-google-workspace

     

    https://postmarkapp.com/blog/what-the-heck-is-bimi#how-do-you-implement-bimi

     

     

    • David Westgate's avatar
      David Westgate
      Copper Contributor

      Kevin Taber I still cannot believe the slow uptake on DMARC and really confused around the lack of BIMI on Microsofts Part. Both of these are great initiatives at reducing the prevalence of security events in the email space as it relates to PHISHING and targeted attacks. Come on Microsoft, time to prioritise the easy wins and listen to the community and commentators like TonyRedmond 

  • Joshua Bines's avatar
    Joshua Bines
    Iron Contributor

    TonyRedmondincentivising the dmarc records to move from p=none i think is a great idea might get the exec's on board.  According to June 1 still no take up from MS  https://bimigroup.org/bimi-adoption-june-2020/

    • Paul Bendall's avatar
      Paul Bendall
      Iron Contributor

      Glad I found this article and as Joshua Bines points out the situation hasn't changed as of June 2020 according to BIMI working group. I would go further and suggest, like one of the commentators on TonyRedmond original page, that Microsoft are muddying the waters and confusing both implementers and recipients. 

      The "new" Microsoft approach was supposed to be more open standards orientated and they have made some good progress in this area. However, lack of DMARC reporting and BIMI support is very disappointing in overcoming phishing/SPAM as an industry wide initiative.

Resources