Forum Discussion

SparkingEagle's avatar
SparkingEagle
Copper Contributor
Mar 28, 2026

7 General suggestions to Windows and its Apps

        During my experience on Windows I’ve been thinking about how it could improve, especially around Fluent Design. I wrote down seven ideas that I’d love to hear opinions on. I will be sharing them here:

#1: Two branches for Windows and content updates; 
 
  Trying to please everyone with a single version of Windows is difficult, so Microsoft could maintain two official branches of the system: a “Vintage Windows” (like Windows 10), for those who prefer the classic interface and a more traditional look, with extended support indefinitely and security updates. And a “Modern Windows” (Windows 11), consistent with Fluent Design, constantly updated, and focused on introducing new features. Both would use the same kernel and APIs for developer compatibility. This approach would offer users greater freedom of choice and demonstrate that a trillion-dollar company is dedicating teams to simultaneously deliver traditional features and modernity. I’ve seen many people complain about the lack of consistency and lack of content. Additionally, I miss feature updates for Windows and hope that Microsoft brings more flexibility, apps, and Fluent 2-style fixes in future updates.
  And, yes, this would increase the efforts and costs, but it's a cost that a trillion-dollar company could take.
 
#2: Modern Flyouts and Windows' limitation with volume mixer;

  In Windows 11, the multimedia controls displayed by apps like Fluent Flyouts are very limited; they only allow you to pause or skip tracks, with no option to adjust the volume or use repeat or shuffle buttons. This makes the experience less convenient compared to Android, where users can control the app’s volume or the music’s volume separately, and the operating system allows third-party apps to do so. My suggestion is that Microsoft should be more flexible and give apps like Modern Flyout the ability to adjust the volume, so you could turn the music up or down without affecting the overall system volume. Honestly, it’s surprising that something as basic as this hasn’t been implemented yet in the most widely used operating system.

‎#3: Lack of flexibility in the Windows 11 search bar;

  Windows 11 still limits users and developers to a rigid and impractical search bar. Apps like Fluent Search, Flow Search, and Everything Toolbar are much faster and more powerful, but they’re confined to taskbar icons or floating search bars, while the native search bar takes up space without offering the same efficiency. Microsoft needs to be more flexible and release an API that allows third-party apps to appear as a search bar directly on the taskbar. This isn’t a complex feature; it’s something simple and obvious that should already exist. If the official search bar itself isn’t improved, the least they could do is give other apps the freedom to offer a superior experience. It’s frustrating to see Windows remain limited in such basic aspects, while other systems offer more modern and practical solutions. Microsoft needs to listen to users and stop holding Windows back with an outdated model.
 
#4: Windows Task Scheduler and other menus and tools need to be updated
 
  The native Windows Task Scheduler is completely outdated and inconsistent with the Fluent 2 style. Independent projects like the Fluent Task Scheduler show that it’s possible to have a modern, organized, and much more user-friendly interface. It’s frustrating that these apps have to coexist with outdated system tools, without being able to replace them or integrate with the system. Microsoft, as a trillion-dollar company, should invest in modernizing its own utilities or hire independent developers who have already proven capable of creating superior solutions, such as the Fluent Task Scheduler. The lack of visual and functional consistency in Windows is glaring and needs to be addressed

#5: Lack of flexibility in naming user folders Compared to the Android system;
 
  Windows is very inflexible and lacks practicality in many ways. For example, if my folder is C:\Users\eagl, I cannot simply correct it to eagle without creating an entirely new user profile. This lack of flexibility is a major hurdle for personalization on what could be a basic and simple fix. On Android, I was already so used to the system’s practicality that when I switched to Windows—which was supposed to be a more robust and powerful system—I was surprised to find it lacks even such a basic feature.
 
#6: Differences in user experience between home and business users, and inconsistencies in Fluent 2;
 
  Microsoft seems to be focusing more and more on businesses, consistently applying Fluent 2 to apps like Teams, Outlook, and Office, while everyday users are left with a Windows full of outdated and inconsistent menus. This contradicts the marketing that promotes Fluent 2 as the standard, yet is frequently violated by the official apps themselves. It’s frustrating to see that Microsoft can’t deliver on its promises. If it really wants to preserve old elements for the sake of businesses, then it should separate the systems, as in point #1: a legacy one for compatibility and a modern one for home users. Or, at the very least, adhere to the Fluent 2 style across all of Windows. I love Fluent 2 and really want to see significant progress in this area, but seeing that Microsoft itself hasn’t made much effort in this regard has been a disappointment. The trillion-dollar company that talks so much about innovation shouldn’t be delivering a fragmented and outdated system.
 
#7: Digital Wellness and productivity;
 
  Microsoft should make a native app with fluent style to help users watch their screen/app time. In 2026 there hasn't been an app that's free, solid and that feels native in Windows 11, because there aren't any API for that. Apps like Activity Watch for some reason don't work in my PC and apps like SolidTime are paid and not really fluent. Naturally, something like this should be made by Microsoft itself. Android has it since the beginning, why Windows doesn't have it yet?

I believe that these suggestions, even though difficult, could contribute for a more consistent user experience, improved productivity and easier accesibility.

3 Replies

  • Mustafoan's avatar
    Mustafoan
    Brass Contributor

    This approach makes a lot of sense, especially for catering to different user preferences. Maintaining a “Vintage Windows” for those who prefer stability and familiarity, alongside a “Modern Windows” that pushes innovative features, could reduce fragmentation and improve user satisfaction. It would also help enterprises and power users who prioritize long-term stability.

  • Rantana's avatar
    Rantana
    Copper Contributor

    You've shared seven thought-provoking ideas for improving Windows, with a focus on Fluent Design and the future of the operating system.

  • SparkingEagle's avatar
    SparkingEagle
    Copper Contributor

    I’d also like to address the most common counterpoint to modernizing legacy apps: backward compatiblity. If Microsoft kept these outdated menus to ensure stability across all devices, it would be understandable. However, compatibility doesn't seem to be the true priority.

    For instance, I have a modern PC with a Ryzen 5 4600G and a B450M motherboard, hardware that is more than capable, yet Windows 11 frequently flags it as not meeting minimum requirements for TPM or Secure Boot. It is a contradiction: the system holds onto 20-year-old UI elements in the name of 'compatibility,' while simultaneously creating artificial hardware barriers that prevent modern PCs from having a seamless experience. If Microsoft is willing to leave older hardware behind for the sake of 'security' and 'innovation,' they should be equally willing to leave the outdated UI behind to finally deliver a truly consistent, modern OS.