Forum Discussion
Turn Root Site Collection into Communication Site
- Oct 31, 2017
Not out of the box, but I found this post online that makes it look like there is a hacky way to do it (that I probably still wouldn't do): https://hangconsult.com/2017/06/29/change-sharepoint-online-root-site-collection-to-use-the-new-communication-site-template/. It seems like this would introduce some risk to your "go forward" architecture. I feel like it would be better to create a Comm Site that you use as your "home" site and then see where things shake out with concepts like enterprise news publishing. I'd hate to hack my way in to an architectural decision and then learn later on that it locks me out of future capabilities.
Dean_Gross Yes, the feature is available now to turn existing classic team site into a communication site. The release will come in May. See Message Center Posting: MC179211. A few things to be aware:
1) you need use powershell to convert the root site
2) the root site has to be a classic site, with no publishing features turned on
3) The release is still in the process of rolling out as of today, your tenant may not have the release yet.
- philmaynard_wapMay 08, 2019Iron Contributor
Kiki Shuxteau thanks for the heads up. I'm a little lost for words as we've been waiting for this for a long time, only to be thwarted by the Publishing feature limitation! I'd imagine the vast majority of organisations wanting to use this are running a root site collection with the publishing features turned on as they're using it as the primary intranet! Do you know if there's a plan to remove this limitation? Just to expand on the limitation, it's not just that the publishing features are turned on, it's if they've been enabled in the past too - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/sharepoint-online/Enable-SPOCommSite?view=sharepoint-ps#notes
- Ali SalihMay 08, 2019Iron ContributorThere is a miscommunication in that article that needs to be fixed. “In the past” isn’t what we have received from program group directly as mandatory requirements. I think lost in translation type of thing going on there.
In short make sure the feature isn’t on at any level in the hierarchy, and you are fine.