Forum Discussion
Is it now recommended or okay to create subsite under a Communication or a Teams site?
Hello Monir
it's ok (it's available), but it's not recommended. You can also deactivate the option: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/manage-site-creation#manage-detailed-site-and-subsite-creation-settings-in-the-classic-sharepoint-admin-center
All the new technologies (e.g. teamsite, groups, teamsite not groups connected) and site architecture features (e.g. global/hub navigation) based on site-concept, not subsite. So it is better to to the change to a new site based infrastructure.
Best regards, Dave
Hello Monir
it's ok (it's available), but it's not recommended. You can also deactivate the option: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sharepoint/manage-site-creation#manage-detailed-site-and-subsite-creation-settings-in-the-classic-sharepoint-admin-center
All the new technologies (e.g. teamsite, groups, teamsite not groups connected) and site architecture features (e.g. global/hub navigation) based on site-concept, not subsite. So it is better to to the change to a new site based infrastructure.
Best regards, Dave
Thank you Dave.
Microsoft should set the recommended options as default. People tend to use what they find by default in most cases. In the past subsite was a norm so users are used to use them in regular basis.
However, there’re benefits of using subsites. For example: you have a project/program that has multiple initiatives - in this case each initiative can have a subsite dedicated to it under a project/program site collection.
In the new site recommended structure you have to create new site collection for each initiative and managing permissions and keeping track of them could be challenging for all these site collections.