Forum Discussion
New Library UI - non-required "Required" metadata
Hey all! Sorry we've been busy getting ready for the SharePoint Virtual Summit (join us! https://aka.ms/SharePointSummit) on May 16th.
The good news is that we TOTALLY UNDERSTAND the situation and the challenges you're describing, as well as the challenges many customers faced with the 'classic' model that prevented documents from being visible to team members if required metadata was not completed. There is work being done to address the scenario. We're not ready to announce the details, yet.
I'll add LincolnDeMaris and Chris McNulty to this and will let them reply when they have a chance.
- Vince JenningsMay 04, 2017Brass Contributor
I have an issue with the way the metadata works in Sharepoint when document check-in/check-out is being used to manage document versions.
Generally, the purpose of using check-in/check-out is to manage the version of a document for traceability and other reasons. The only time the version of the document should change is when the content of the document changes and this include changes to some types of metadata.
However, there is 2 types of metadata associated with a document:
- The metadata that is part of the document content. If this changes so does the version of the document. For example: Title, Author, Publish date.
- Metadata that is used for classification (taxonomy) of the document for storage or searching purposes. In this case the metadata can be changed without changing the content or version of the document. For example: If a (physical) book is out in a (physical) library it might be listed under several subjects.
The problem in Sharepoint is that if check-in/check-out is required there is no way (as far as I know) to change metadata associated with the document without raising the version number.
Sharepoint needs some mechanism that allows classification (taxonomy) metadata to be updated without changing the version number.
If this could be done, then the taxonomy provided by the term store would become a very powerful feature.
- Gregory FrickApr 10, 2017Iron Contributor
Thanks Chris McNulty - The emphasis is often on on the most recently released stuff so those of us that want to leverage MMS and Content Types and Site Columns and Search, are not always sure if MSFT is committed to these techologies (supporting and improving). Yes - you did write a book on the subject and I still have the copy I got at the Puget Sound SharePoint User Group years ago. :-) - Greg
- Eric_HApr 10, 2017Iron Contributor
Excellent! Thank you Chris and Dan for the update. We look forward to more information, and hopefully seeing it on the roadmap asap. Maybe we'll hear about it at the May virtual summit? *wink *wink*