Forum Discussion

linkamitmukhi's avatar
linkamitmukhi
Copper Contributor
Jan 16, 2020
Solved

Unable to make consolidate data for MIS through Pivot looking other option in excel

Hello connection 

I am looking for one help in consolidation of data in excel however desired result are not coming through pivot looking alternate unable to make, 

File is enclosed user can add columns if required for result or source data 

Appreciate for help 

 

  • Thanks for responding SergeiBaklan  

    Really appreciate on work done & providing suggestion how to make

    can you please share working file on my email: mukhi_amit@yahoo.com i will do some working on same file i am not very advance user in excel

    For reporting purpose out of 11 ID if one is discrepant than my FTR calculation will be 

    FTR% is = FTR/count of ID

    Discrepant% = Discrepant/Count of ID

    because in source data for location 1 we have two results for one ID refer S No 15 & 16, rule applied for reporting purpose is where ever there is discrepancy that ID will overall assume discrepant irrespective that ID is having one FTR row as well

    In other way if you have 10 set of pen assuming 1 set = 2 pen and out of this ( 10 set= 20 pen)  if 1 pen is broken than i will assume your 1 set is broken so rest of the pen set you have is 9 in other words 90% (Pen set ok) 10% (broken) here in table it should be 11-1-10 my % will come out automatically 

     

    BranchCount of IDDiscrepantFTRFTR %Discrepant %
    Location111111 68.8%6.3%
    Location25500.0%31.3%

     

5 Replies

  • SergeiBaklan's avatar
    SergeiBaklan
    Diamond Contributor

    linkamitmukhi 

    You may add data to data model creating the Pivot Table and after that in Power Pivot or using right click menu in Pivot Table create 5 measures:

     

    as

    Count of ID:=DISTINCTCOUNT(Table1[ID])
    Discrepant:=CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(VALUES(Table1[ID])),Table1[Overall Status]="Discrepant")
    FTR:=CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(VALUES(Table1[ID])),Table1[Overall Status]="FTR")
    Discrepant %:=[Discrepant]/CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(VALUES(Table1[ID])),ALL(Table1[Location]))
    FTR %:=[FTR]/CALCULATE(COUNTROWS(VALUES(Table1[ID])),ALL(Table1[Location]))

    Not sure how % shall be calculated, here is to distinct ID:s for all location. If not, when ALL shall be removed.

    Result is 

    Result is bit different from your manual sample, but again, not sure in logic.

    • linkamitmukhi's avatar
      linkamitmukhi
      Copper Contributor

      Thanks for responding SergeiBaklan  

      Really appreciate on work done & providing suggestion how to make

      can you please share working file on my email: mukhi_amit@yahoo.com i will do some working on same file i am not very advance user in excel

      For reporting purpose out of 11 ID if one is discrepant than my FTR calculation will be 

      FTR% is = FTR/count of ID

      Discrepant% = Discrepant/Count of ID

      because in source data for location 1 we have two results for one ID refer S No 15 & 16, rule applied for reporting purpose is where ever there is discrepancy that ID will overall assume discrepant irrespective that ID is having one FTR row as well

      In other way if you have 10 set of pen assuming 1 set = 2 pen and out of this ( 10 set= 20 pen)  if 1 pen is broken than i will assume your 1 set is broken so rest of the pen set you have is 9 in other words 90% (Pen set ok) 10% (broken) here in table it should be 11-1-10 my % will come out automatically 

       

      BranchCount of IDDiscrepantFTRFTR %Discrepant %
      Location111111 68.8%6.3%
      Location25500.0%31.3%

       

      • SergeiBaklan's avatar
        SergeiBaklan
        Diamond Contributor

        linkamitmukhi 

        I added one more measure to exclude from counting ID:s which are in both categories.

        Exclude ID:=COUNTROWS(
        	INTERSECT(
        		CALCULATETABLE(DISTINCT(Table1[ID]),Table1[Overall Status]="Discrepant"),
        		CALCULATETABLE(DISTINCT(Table1[ID]),Table1[Overall Status]="FTR")
        	)
        )

        and updated the rest accordingly. Sorry, but I still don't understand initial manual table. Why in Location 1 9 FTR, not 10 (we have totally 11 with unique ID minus 1 together with discrepant = 10), why discrepant % for location 2 is 50%, not 100%.

         

        Anyway, the latest file is attached to this post.

Resources